MDFC Manager
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 25,901
Extended Mourinho's contract. Unforgivable stuff.What is he supposed to have done wrong?
Extended Mourinho's contract. Unforgivable stuff.What is he supposed to have done wrong?
Specialist in failure after the news that we have matched the Cowboys in commercial value. Which was his job. A real failure. In which he is a specialist, apparently.
Because Jose has been making shit judgments on players lately. It's common sense. You don't need to be an expert to see that.
All those corporate deals should be commemorated in the trophy room as placards in lit up glass sealed frames. Right..
Sorry, but thats not Eds job, every transfer is a risk, at least jose realiesd he fecked up signing lindelof and wanted a replacement, then a bean counter thinks he knows better, he doesn’t and its been proven so far since he undermined Jose.
Jose isnt clear of blame by any means but Ed shouldn’t be making these decisions.
Is our defence not good enough to beat Brighton? That wasn't a bad day at the office. That was utter domination by a relegation contender. Is our defence worse than them. Is our defence the reason we can't string more than few moves a game. Is our defence the reason all our attackers play like strangers.
This year we have lost to Sevilla, Newcastle, West Bromwich while barely posing a threat to those teams. Is our defence worse than them.
If Jose thinks CB is the biggest issue, he could have made it a priority in the two years he has been here?
No it’s not. It’s part of his job and what the owners doubtlessly care about. Doesn’t change the fact that Woodward is deciding who is signed and taking great delight in telling anyone who’d listed that he knows football players better than the football manager he hired.That success is his exact job. He is not a director of football.
$400mil transfer kitty and he's the specialist in failure?
No it’s not. It’s part of his job and what the owners doubtlessly care about. Doesn’t change the fact that Woodward is deciding who is signed and taking great delight in telling anyone who’d listed that he knows football players better than the football manager he hired.
Know feck all about football yet has final say in football matters: 1. have hand in appointing wrong managers if fans insist on their hatre of the managers. 2. Shite negotiatition skill starting with stupid talk about warchest. This leading to overpay in many cases, even failure to acquire some targets. 3. Name fetish. Both transfer and manager appointment testifies for this = having no vision. Just go after names instead of seeing sense in team building, managers' styles compatibility. 4. Briefing against managers to push more pressure on the team as if there is not enough = Manchester not United (not backing managers, not an United organization). 5. Contract renewal. Seems like Woodward has influence in renewal of players managers contract. He is always has say in sacking a managers, letting players go. We have plenty of problem due to giving luxurious contracts for players that turn out very quickly deadwood. Why giving Mourinho renewal just months before turning on him. Failure to shift deadwood (sack manager swiftly) is on Woodward too.What is he supposed to have done wrong? Not backed the manager with funds?
Gofundme plane?If you want to fly a banner over the stadium, at least fly it during the game where you’ll have more tv coverage. Idiots.
No he isn't. He is a fecking manager . Astronomical difference.Head coach
He is doing fantastic commercial job for us. So banner is really ridiculous thing to do. Only thing which he must change is to put himself out of football business. Buying players, selling, deciding is player good or not for united is just not job for which he is capable. Give that job to another person(dof), set budget to him as CEO and that is that. I would not change woodward for somebody else to be honest. As i said, this year he fecked it up but i can't say nothing against CEO who spent 400mil on players and brought 2 world class managers in this club.
I agree that's not a measure of club's success , however that's the exact measure of Woodward's success.All those corporate deals should be commemorated in the trophy room as placards in lit up glass sealed frames. Right..
No he isn't. He is a fecking manager . Astronomical difference.
No he isnt.
Ultimately the manager/scouting pick the players, Woody then tries to get them.
It's not exactly his fault when he doesn't get a player, I'd rather have that sort of CEO than one who just pays whatever price is chucked at him.
Surely deciding if a player is good or not for United isn't his job, but the managers/scouts?
Not.I agree that's not a measure of club's success , however that's the exact measure of Woodward's success.
Except this is not a video game , and the club is not backed by an oil state, thus not having limitless bank accounts. He may want to sign Mbappe and Messi , but he needs to take the actual reality into account.You’d think he’d be able to sign the players he wants, then.
Except this is not a video game , and the club is not backed by an oil state, thus not having limitless bank accounts. He may want to sign Mbappe and Messi , but he needs to take the actual reality into account.
The irony is strong. Woodward is known to be one pushing for names. Can't remember the briefing: Varane 100mil?Except this is not a video game , and the club is not backed by an oil state, thus not having limitless bank accounts. He may want to sign Mbappe and Messi , but he needs to take the actual reality into account.
He didn’t, he asked for Alderweireld - hardly the moon.
There were 4 names as alternative. Doesn't sound like doing well negotiate with any, yet briefed that would be more than happy to pay 100mil for Varane. The point is Wood ward has precedence in mind boggling contract renewal, paying ridiculous price, missing acquireable targets, talking about spending prowess on unacquireable targets (what is the point?) pre Mourinho.Who had a ridiculous price tag.
Yes, and hardly worth what was asked for an injury prone back . As I said , we can't sign blank cheques.He didn’t, he asked for Alderweireld - hardly the moon.
Well somebody needs to tell Ed Woodward because he is of the impression he is deciding who is better for the team.No he isnt.
Ultimately the manager/scouting pick the players, Woody then tries to get them.
It's not exactly his fault when he doesn't get a player, I'd rather have that sort of CEO than one who just pays whatever price is chucked at him.
Apparently the results are all on him.....We’re 2 nil up, well done to Woodie, hopefully we’ll continue like this and go on to have a good season and if so, I’m sure the fans will thank him for his contribution.
Is that 100% fact? People here always say Daniel Levy is hard to negotiate with maybe Ed thought asking price was too much for a player with a year left.Which is exactly what people said against Woodward here. He decided that Alderweilerd isnt good enough for United. Isnt that irony in your point?
Yeah because Spurs and Leicester have no say in whether we sign their players or not.You’d think he’d be able to sign the players he wants, then.
Apparently the results are all on him.....
Or is that only when we lose?
Good job Tottenham were actively trying to sell Alderweireld all summer then. But of course ultimately we have to respect Woodward's briefings that he's no better than we have currently.Yeah because Spurs and Leicester have no say in whether we sign their players or not.
If you are actively trying to sell a player you don't price him out of the market. How many of the players that Spurs were actively trying to sell did they actually manage to sell?Good job Tottenham were actively trying to sell Alderweireld all summer then. But of course ultimately we have to respect Woodward's briefings that he's no better than we have currently.
Is that 100% fact? People here always say Daniel Levy is hard to negotiate with maybe Ed thought asking price was too much for a player with a year left.
Interesting take, I tend to agree with youAgreed. Hope it doesn't happen. I tend to agree with the banner sentiment but have a few issues with it.
1) it's a bit knee jerk after 2 bad results.
2) it's fecking embarrassing
3) no mention of the Glazers
4) what outcome do they hope for at this stage in the season?
5) I suspect (with absolutely no evidence) a bunch of journalists have plugged together to do this!