Amir
Full Member
Results matter.
The process also matters. Our results early on last year were good, the football wasn't good enough. Eventually it reflected in City pulling away.
Results matter.
The results of his negotiating.The process also matters. Our results early on last year were good, the football wasn't good enough. Eventually it reflected in City pulling away.
People are laughing at barca.
Darmian, Rojo and £40m for Kroos. I know it doesn't personally affect me but it's genuinely a bit insulting that they thought they could get away with that. We're richer than them for feck sake and they offered us the left overs from Pound Stretcher.Just imagine the meltdown on here if we went in for a huge talent offering two barely functioning squad players and a smattering of cash. This doesn't reflect well on Barcelona at all.
It's going to be a crazy 4 days for this man. If he can capitalise on Barcelona's interest in Pogba it could make him.
Genuine question but how dp you see him realistically capitalising on Barcelonas interest in pogba?
Genuine question but how dp you see him realistically capitalising on Barcelonas interest in pogba?
The results of his negotiating.
I know that's what you meant. I mean that looking only at the results of one's work without trying to understand what's behind them is only looking at part of the picture.
He's a negotiator and a business man. That's his job.
You can make that excuse every now and then, but it doesn't wash if we're facing abject failure in the market. Also, bear in mind that Mourinho's list of targets will have been informed by agents, so it's not like they'd all be impossible purchases.
If you were a salesman and tried the same line at the end of your most important sales period after being given a bunch of warm leads, you'd get the sack. Appealing to 'the randomness of life' is not good enough.
Woodward has done some massive deals over the last few years (Di Maria, Falcao, Pogba, Ibrahimovic (wages not fee) , Lukaku , Sanchez and Mkhitaryan) - so on one hand he has the ability to pull massive names out of the bag but on the other there does not seem to be a plan to it all - and 3/4 of them signings were all with 2 agents pushing their own agenda to line their pockets (you could probably say the same for Sanchez aswell).
What has to happen before fans start proper protests about the way our club is run?
What has to happen before fans start proper protests about the way our club is run?
@Reapersoul20
By the same logic you cannot criticise Jose. You don't know how he's leading the team in training, what he says to the players privately, how professional the players are in and around training etc etc. If we are to adopt some Wittgensteinian principle here we can just close down the forum.
Remember some semblance of mutiny starting around the fag end of LvG's second season, when his dismissal was painfully stretched to breaking point. Fan banner saying "Ed, LvG and Glazers ruining the club" was removed by security.
Supporters have a lot of patience. It will take some time before something concrete happens. By then we will probably sign a crocked 32 year old Bale for 300K a week and present him in a glitzy video to once again distract the fans.
Woodward has to go and the Glazers MUST be more closely examined by the authorities if they don't invest in the coming days. Manchester United has been badly managed and under-funded compared to their wealth for more than a decade now.
Not even remotely similar. Mourinho is possibly one of the world similes you could make. We can see how the players train. We can see how they play. We can see the staff recruited. We can listen to interviews. We can measure results in a very obvious and clear way. We see the players play on the pitch ffs!
These things cannot be done for Woodward(or can only be done in an extremely limited, skewed capacity).
Anyone with a strong feeling re Woodward is a moron. Unless you have a job within the Manchester United board, you do not know enough to pass any judgement on him - there are too many variables.
LOL.Woodward has to go and the Glazers MUST be more closely examined by the authorities if they don't invest in the coming days. Manchester United has been badly managed and under-funded compared to their wealth for more than a decade now.
God these threads are the most retarded on the 'caf. Every single year. Someone tries to critique the mistakes of Ed Woodward.
Every single year, nobody has a fecking clue (a) what he does (b) what direction he has been given by the owners (c) what direction the manager has given him (d) ANYTHING.
Anyone seriously attacking Ed Woodward, without any insider knowledge of the situation (i.e everyone here), is a moron. It really is as simple as that.
Nothing I hate more in life than people who claim to know everything - that's all people can possibly be doing here.
Agree with pretty much everything you said and even the bit above, how much were those signings down to Ed? Like you say, one could argue most of those signings happened because of Jorge Mendes and Raiola.
I think the bloke is a clown when it comes to football. He's a banker who knows feck all about the game. He can't seal deals quickly, he can't even sell the deadwood. Chances are we're going into Friday's game with Darmian at right back. WTF? I'm no fan of Jose's style but you have to feel for him. He's got to use players who he's already told can leave the club a year ago.
When Pep wanted players gone, they went. Bony, Nolito, Fernando, Nasri, Kolarov, Clichy, Zabaleta, Hart on loan, Mangala...
If Pep had the Glazers at City he'd still be stuck with Zabaleta at right back.
The club is a shambles at the top.
And you're basing that on what actually ? And don't say it's his ability to close deals because that's a nonsense.
He's just too easy a target for some.
MUTV did a programme on him not long after the Fellaini saga and his knowledge of Manchester United's history, who is who and European football in general blew me away(and i'd guess anybody else that saw it that had similar doubts about him at the time would've felt the same after watching it), don't know maybe you did see it.....
And you're basing that on what actually ? And don't say it's his ability to close deals because that's a nonsense.
He's just too easy a target for some.
MUTV did a programme on him not long after the Fellaini saga and his knowledge of Manchester United's history, who is who and European football in general blew me away(and i'd guess anybody else that saw it that had similar doubts about him at the time would've felt the same after watching it), don't know maybe you did see it.....
Can't be letting facts getting in the way of a narrative now.
Soz i'm a bit thick so don't know if you're agreeing with me, or strongly disagreeing
I'm agreeing mate Woodward is the target but it's our managers who have put us in this mess, and I include SAF in that as well.
Yes judging by his ability to get in the players Jose wants and ability to sell off the deadwood.
He's been given a list of players and so far he's only landed Fred. Dalot is one for the future. How is that good enough?
Mourinho wanted a LB, Alex Sandro, a CB, Toby and a RW, Perisic, amoung others. Positions we all know we need strengthening in if we're to catch City.
If Woodward and the board don't intend to support Mourinho then why the hell is he manager and why the hell give him a contract extension? Which is it, are they supporting him but just incapable of sealing the players requested or do they no longer believe in the manager? Either way it's piss poor.
He also boasted in an interview once that we can do things in the transfer market that other clubs can only dream off. His first transfer window was a shambles, and with 48 hours to go he's on course to match it this summer.
You're having a laugh surely?
The guy just can't win, we've had fans for years saying it's embarrassing that we sell most of our players for peanuts, but pay over the odds for new recruits, well it's nearly always been like that, and the selling part i've no problem with and i'm proud the club do it, or did it, the club is offered a package for a player, and the less we take/took as a fee, the more the player gets, no harm in that, if a player wants away we try and help him, but now we are moving away from that, we'd rather keep a player until our valuation is met....
We don't know who the targets are, there is probably only a handful of people on the planet that do, so we can't really have a go at Ed for missing targets because we might not have been interested in them in the first place.
God knows why he gave Mourinho a new contract, least said soonest mended.
Thought at the time his comments about transfers was strange, but he was just reassuring fans that money was available, and would be spent when and if after a decade or more of penny-pinching, the fact we signed Pogba, Lukaku and Alexis on £500,000 a week suggest he is a man of his word, quite refreshing after years of David Gill and Martin Edwards.
Yeah, because Fergie knew his health would deteriorate in the Summer and his wife's sister would die. He just decided one day "let someone else rebuild this side."SAF didn’t leave a squad that was capable, it was his genius and RVP that gave us that title, it wasn’t the squad.
I'm agreeing mate Woodward is the target but it's our managers who have put us in this mess, and I include SAF in that as well.