Man Utd set to appoint Director of Football (when hell freezes over)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reading this thread you'd get the impression there are only two parties involved in signing a player from another club: Ed Woodward and Jose Mourinho.
 
I have mentioned before about these global partners. I would rather we had some big deals but not as many. World famous names. Surely less of them it makes them easier to remember and more likely you would use them. Most of them I have never heard of in the first place and certainly cannot remember who sponsors what? At times it is overkill. I suppose that is not how it works though.
Maybe the big dogs wouldn't be fooled by our claim of having 659 million fans
 
Darmian played only 17 matches last season, including only 8 in the league, from which he started 5. He's not going to get missed because he wasn't playing anyway.
Blind played also quite a few games and someone needs to get those games too. Considering that our full backs are two 33 yo players, 1 newbie with 8 career games, 1 fat crock and Darmian, I am not sure how wise is to sell him without a replacement.

On the other hand, if we had signed a reliable LB, then we should have sold both Darmian and Shaw.
 
The problem is that we cannot get any half decent RB for 15m. With Valencia being 33 and Dalot having played 8 times on his senior career, it is a bit risky to do so.

Maybe not 15m but what would somebody like Cedric Soares cost? I imagine the cost wouldn't be exorbitant and despite not being anything special he would, IMO, be an improvement on the Valencia we saw last season who looked physically diminished and at a point in his career where serious decline had set in.
 
We have no idea about it considering that last year he wasn't good enough even for Porto. Of course, players at his age can progress rapidly but it is still very risky

What Darmian brings to the table is very little. Only reason he his being played and praised by JM is to get buyers for him. If Dalot is not ready then TFM can be backup. And Lindelof after him.

The size of our sqaud is already big. Ideally you should have 2 players per position:
CB: Smalling, Lindelof, Rojo, Jones, Bailly. Unless we are planning to play 3 CBs we should sell one of them, 2 if we are bringing in Alderweireld.
FB: Young, Valencia, Dalot, TFM, Shaw, Darmian. 6 players for two positions. Darmian will hopefully leave. TFM loaned out to Bundesliga.
 
Blind played also quite a few games and someone needs to get those games too. Considering that our full backs are two 33 yo players, 1 newbie with 8 career games, 1 fat crock and Darmian, I am not sure how wise is to sell him without a replacement.

On the other hand, if we had signed a reliable LB, then we should have sold both Darmian and Shaw.

That's the point. I was complaining last season about giving minutes in league cup and useless CL games to useless players like Darmian and Blind while they should given to youngsters. Giving these minutes to Dalot and TFM will be much better, and they can walk their up in the selection behind Valencia. There's no point in giving minutes to Darmian as he's not going to do anything with it and not going to develop or improve, it's just a waste of time.

Surely the whole scenario was buying Sandro and selling both Darmian and Shaw, with having Valencia and Dalot on the right, and Sandro and Young on the left. That's not far from the point, but here we're, stuck with Darmian and didn't buy and decent LB.
 
Read ravelstone Post about our financial situation. Let's be fair, over the years here, he has been the only poster who has had a clear view of our financial situation rather than we are rich so we can spend xxx amount of money.

According to him, after the interest payments and debt we had circa 150m pounds to spend, but then we had to pay a lot of money to other clubs from previous years deals. So after that money and the current years transfers, we have another 15m (probably a bit more) to spend, unless we make transfers in that way as to pay for them in the future (which also means that we can spend less in the future).

No one cares about FFP, in case of United isn't worth mentioning it cause all the money we spent is money generated from the club. The question is can we continue spending large sums of money every summer (which let's be fair, no club, not even City or PSG does it) while our massive wage increases cause we just stockpile players? And can we do that after Mourinho didn't manage to improve much our team even with the money he has spent already?
Think we need to start asking the true state of the club's finances instead of the layfan position that we're the richest and can spend the equivalent of our gross earnings every window. There's clearly more to our finances than the exaggerations Woodward throws around at investor meetings. Unfortunately the info isn't readily available to any fan with an Internet connection but it's quite clear we aren't spending because of certain limitations rather than the glazers abruptly deciding they want more money to fuel their jets
 
Our recruitment strategy clearly has no flexibility.

Go for the big names initially, sure, but when that goes south - at least in our case - do a Tottenham and bring in frikkin *somebody* who is at least an upgrade.
 
We're the richest club in the world, and yet missed out on 3 of 5 target positions identified by the manager.

It's been a poor pre-season by Woodward so far. If nothing changes before Friday, he'll have had a shocker.
 
We're the richest club in the world, and yet missed out on 3 of 5 target positions identified by the manager.

It's been a poor pre-season by Woodward so far. If nothing changes before Friday, he'll have had a shocker.

Not in the owners' eyes. If he sells Darmian and Rojo for the fees floated then the club will have zero net spend. He has already more than covered the Grant and Dalot transfers by selling Johnstone and Blind. The Glazers will be delighted.
 
People are saying Jose wouldn't like it, well all he did was give Ed a list, give your list to someone who might actually do a better job of getting the players you want.
Maybe the players on the list didn't fancy playing for Jose.
 
Not really impressed with Ed's work in the last 5 years. United has literally become like Disneyland under his leadership.

Bring in Daniel Levy.
 
Maybe the players on the list didn't fancy playing for Jose.
That's a different matter. I can imagine some not wanting to play his style of football. You would presume Ed would inform him if that happened, then it will then show if Jose is just a stubborn so-and-so or if he can make us a more attractive proposition for players.
 
That's a different matter. I can imagine some not wanting to play his style of football. You would presume Ed would inform him if that happened, then it will then show if Jose is just a stubborn so-and-so or if he can make us a more attractive proposition for players.

I don't think there is any chance that if players are literally untransferable or do not want to join that Jose wouldn't find other targets. Pretty sure he's desperate for quality players, without whom he won't win anything of note.
 
We're the richest club in the world, and yet missed out on 3 of 5 target positions identified by the manager.

It's been a poor pre-season by Woodward so far. If nothing changes before Friday, he'll have had a shocker.
Maybe it’s not Woodward’s fault. Maybe it’s that the players do not actually want to play for our club.
 
Think the pattern is clear. We will not spend heavily unless there is a need . We have the CL now for 2 years running and owners think we can live through the squad one more year before fixing the full backs and winger next year .
 
Woodward has been called out before for not being able to get deals done, in fact the press even said he was humiliated by his inability to get deals done as far back as the 2013/14 season. He has not had the clout or nous for a very long time. And as for the players he has done deals for the vast majority aren't even here any more 3 seasons later (Di Maria, Depay, Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Blind). Even LvG has called out Woodward for not signing high quality players: https://metro.co.uk/2018/05/30/loui...y-manchester-united-transfer-targets-7589702/

Those players were his choices. The players he failed with were Neymar and Muller. Look at the kind of money that was needed to price Neymar away from from Barcelona. Bayern rarely sell a good player last time it happened was Kroos.
 
If the excuse for the board is that they want Jose to do well the available resources when the manager wants more addition then it's a stupid excuse. If you dont trust your manager then sack him. What's the point of continuing this. Jose will continue to moan, moan and moan. Either back the manager fully or just dont back him and just get a new manager.

I will be honest, I dont trust our board. Even after Jose leaves there is no guarantee our board will make right decisions.
 
If the excuse for the board is that they want Jose to do well the available resources when the manager wants more addition then it's a stupid excuse. If you dont trust your manager then sack him. What's the point of continuing this. Jose will continue to moan, moan and moan. Either back the manager fully or just dont back him and just get a new manager.

I will be honest, I dont trust our board. Even after Jose leaves there is no guarantee our board will make right decisions.
Big Sam. A former England manager.
 
That's a different matter. I can imagine some not wanting to play his style of football. You would presume Ed would inform him if that happened, then it will then show if Jose is just a stubborn so-and-so or if he can make us a more attractive proposition for players.
I would suggest that the players would just give a polite no thanks and I doubt if ED would tell Jose even if they did.
 
Maybe it’s not Woodward’s fault. Maybe it’s that the players do not actually want to play for our club.
He's a negotiator and a business man. That's his job.

You can make that excuse every now and then, but it doesn't wash if we're facing abject failure in the market. Also, bear in mind that Mourinho's list of targets will have been informed by agents, so it's not like they'd all be impossible purchases.

If you were a salesman and tried the same line at the end of your most important sales period after being given a bunch of warm leads, you'd get the sack. Appealing to 'the randomness of life' is not good enough.
 
I would suggest that the players would just give a polite no thanks and I doubt if ED would tell Jose even if they did.

Ed would be absolutely right to tell him if that happens. If only to spare himself from Jose's next presser.
 
According to Wikipedia page:

In 2005, Woodward advised Malcolm Glazer and the Glazer family during its successful takeover of Manchester United. The Glazer family then recruited Woodward to join the club in a "financial planning" role.

He's a true Glazer man. I feel that the Glazer's are so indebted to him that his job is almost bulletproof. I mean, he was on an extended holiday until last week (during a key time in the transfer window).

If Mourinho flops and gets sacked, he should also be cautioned. The next managerial appointment should be his last chance. After this, he's got to go.

In terms of selling sponsorships, this skill is far less niche than a proper football man who can deal with the football side of the business. Therefore, he's more replaceable than a DoF.
 
We're the richest club in the world, and yet missed out on 3 of 5 target positions identified by the manager.

It's been a poor pre-season by Woodward so far. If nothing changes before Friday, he'll have had a shocker.

Who were the targets, did they want to come, were their clubs willing to let them go and how much money was asked for them?

It's not black and white.
 
Come on Edd..The whole world is laughing at us now.. especially with this Barca crap going on bidding for pogba. Pull your finger out mate and make a signing!!
 
I love that he has largely kept quiet while Mourinho blabs.

I think he will start speaking to another manager long before Mourinho is fired. That happened with Moyes and Van Gaal.
Seems so.

I don't see how it is a good idea to openly criticise his boss, especially considering how bad he has been performing and his now-tarnished reputation. He is hardly the star he has been in 2004-2010, if he gets sacked now, he'll struggle to get a top job in his remaining career.
 
According to Wikipedia page:



He's a true Glazer man. I feel that the Glazer's are so indebted to him that his job is almost bulletproof. I mean, he was on an extended holiday until last week (during a key time in the transfer window).

If Mourinho flops and gets sacked, he should also be cautioned. The next managerial appointment should be his last chance. After this, he's got to go.

In terms of selling sponsorships, this skill is far less niche than a proper football man who can deal with the football side of the business. Therefore, he's more replaceable than a DoF.

No fecking way, surely! Source?
 
It's going to be a crazy 4 days for this man. If he can capitalise on Barcelona's interest in Pogba it could make him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.