Henrik Larsson
Still logged in at RAWK (help!)
Reading this thread you'd get the impression there are only two parties involved in signing a player from another club: Ed Woodward and Jose Mourinho.
Maybe the big dogs wouldn't be fooled by our claim of having 659 million fansI have mentioned before about these global partners. I would rather we had some big deals but not as many. World famous names. Surely less of them it makes them easier to remember and more likely you would use them. Most of them I have never heard of in the first place and certainly cannot remember who sponsors what? At times it is overkill. I suppose that is not how it works though.
Blind played also quite a few games and someone needs to get those games too. Considering that our full backs are two 33 yo players, 1 newbie with 8 career games, 1 fat crock and Darmian, I am not sure how wise is to sell him without a replacement.Darmian played only 17 matches last season, including only 8 in the league, from which he started 5. He's not going to get missed because he wasn't playing anyway.
Think Ed talks with forked tongue?Maybe the big dogs wouldn't be fooled by our claim of having 659 million fans
The problem is that we cannot get any half decent RB for 15m. With Valencia being 33 and Dalot having played 8 times on his senior career, it is a bit risky to do so.
We have no idea about it considering that last year he wasn't good enough even for Porto. Of course, players at his age can progress rapidly but it is still very risky
Think Ed talks with forked tongue?
Blind played also quite a few games and someone needs to get those games too. Considering that our full backs are two 33 yo players, 1 newbie with 8 career games, 1 fat crock and Darmian, I am not sure how wise is to sell him without a replacement.
On the other hand, if we had signed a reliable LB, then we should have sold both Darmian and Shaw.
PossiblyThink Ed talks with forked tongue?
Think we need to start asking the true state of the club's finances instead of the layfan position that we're the richest and can spend the equivalent of our gross earnings every window. There's clearly more to our finances than the exaggerations Woodward throws around at investor meetings. Unfortunately the info isn't readily available to any fan with an Internet connection but it's quite clear we aren't spending because of certain limitations rather than the glazers abruptly deciding they want more money to fuel their jetsRead ravelstone Post about our financial situation. Let's be fair, over the years here, he has been the only poster who has had a clear view of our financial situation rather than we are rich so we can spend xxx amount of money.
According to him, after the interest payments and debt we had circa 150m pounds to spend, but then we had to pay a lot of money to other clubs from previous years deals. So after that money and the current years transfers, we have another 15m (probably a bit more) to spend, unless we make transfers in that way as to pay for them in the future (which also means that we can spend less in the future).
No one cares about FFP, in case of United isn't worth mentioning it cause all the money we spent is money generated from the club. The question is can we continue spending large sums of money every summer (which let's be fair, no club, not even City or PSG does it) while our massive wage increases cause we just stockpile players? And can we do that after Mourinho didn't manage to improve much our team even with the money he has spent already?
Then that should be his job, get someone with a track record as a DOF to deal with transfers.
People are saying Jose wouldn't like it, well all he did was give Ed a list, give your list to someone who might actually do a better job of getting the players you want.Re-arrange this quote, 'The Nail You Head On Hit The'
Possibly
He helped the Glazers take over Utd. I wouldn't really trust him.
We're the richest club in the world, and yet missed out on 3 of 5 target positions identified by the manager.
It's been a poor pre-season by Woodward so far. If nothing changes before Friday, he'll have had a shocker.
Maybe the players on the list didn't fancy playing for Jose.People are saying Jose wouldn't like it, well all he did was give Ed a list, give your list to someone who might actually do a better job of getting the players you want.
That's a different matter. I can imagine some not wanting to play his style of football. You would presume Ed would inform him if that happened, then it will then show if Jose is just a stubborn so-and-so or if he can make us a more attractive proposition for players.Maybe the players on the list didn't fancy playing for Jose.
That's a different matter. I can imagine some not wanting to play his style of football. You would presume Ed would inform him if that happened, then it will then show if Jose is just a stubborn so-and-so or if he can make us a more attractive proposition for players.
Maybe it’s not Woodward’s fault. Maybe it’s that the players do not actually want to play for our club.We're the richest club in the world, and yet missed out on 3 of 5 target positions identified by the manager.
It's been a poor pre-season by Woodward so far. If nothing changes before Friday, he'll have had a shocker.
Woodward has been called out before for not being able to get deals done, in fact the press even said he was humiliated by his inability to get deals done as far back as the 2013/14 season. He has not had the clout or nous for a very long time. And as for the players he has done deals for the vast majority aren't even here any more 3 seasons later (Di Maria, Depay, Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Blind). Even LvG has called out Woodward for not signing high quality players: https://metro.co.uk/2018/05/30/loui...y-manchester-united-transfer-targets-7589702/
Big Sam. A former England manager.If the excuse for the board is that they want Jose to do well the available resources when the manager wants more addition then it's a stupid excuse. If you dont trust your manager then sack him. What's the point of continuing this. Jose will continue to moan, moan and moan. Either back the manager fully or just dont back him and just get a new manager.
I will be honest, I dont trust our board. Even after Jose leaves there is no guarantee our board will make right decisions.
I would suggest that the players would just give a polite no thanks and I doubt if ED would tell Jose even if they did.That's a different matter. I can imagine some not wanting to play his style of football. You would presume Ed would inform him if that happened, then it will then show if Jose is just a stubborn so-and-so or if he can make us a more attractive proposition for players.
He would last longer with England!Big Sam. A former England manager.
He's a negotiator and a business man. That's his job.Maybe it’s not Woodward’s fault. Maybe it’s that the players do not actually want to play for our club.
I would suggest that the players would just give a polite no thanks and I doubt if ED would tell Jose even if they did.
He has a manager right on the edge, he will be sugar coating the excuses.Ed would be absolutely right to tell him if that happens. If only to spare himself from Jose's next presser.
In 2005, Woodward advised Malcolm Glazer and the Glazer family during its successful takeover of Manchester United. The Glazer family then recruited Woodward to join the club in a "financial planning" role.
We're the richest club in the world, and yet missed out on 3 of 5 target positions identified by the manager.
It's been a poor pre-season by Woodward so far. If nothing changes before Friday, he'll have had a shocker.
Results matter.Who were the targets, did they want to come, were their clubs willing to let them go and how much money was asked for them?
It's not black and white.
Seems so.I love that he has largely kept quiet while Mourinho blabs.
I think he will start speaking to another manager long before Mourinho is fired. That happened with Moyes and Van Gaal.
He worked for J.P. Morgan before jumping over to the Glazers. The insane leveraged debt takeover was his device.I didn't know that - that explains a lot.
According to Wikipedia page:
He's a true Glazer man. I feel that the Glazer's are so indebted to him that his job is almost bulletproof. I mean, he was on an extended holiday until last week (during a key time in the transfer window).
If Mourinho flops and gets sacked, he should also be cautioned. The next managerial appointment should be his last chance. After this, he's got to go.
In terms of selling sponsorships, this skill is far less niche than a proper football man who can deal with the football side of the business. Therefore, he's more replaceable than a DoF.
Come on Edd..The whole world is laughing at us now.. especially with this Barca crap going on bidding for pogba. Pull your finger out mate and make a signing!!