The breaking of the wage structure has been and is a critical element in the club's struggles. If there was one thing an incoming manager could do to fix us, I'd argue that in a pick-your-poison situation, fixing the wage structure would be first on the block.
Also, his 'financial wizardry/done well on the commercial side' boils down to taking money from people throwing it at him in a rabid desire to be associated with 'the brand'.
Not to diminish it per se - as there is nothing easy about anything in life - and we'd be in a much worse situation without it, but the 'excellent' job he's done there is not going to be exactly hard for someone good with numbers. TBF, the real question is whether he's capable of that same in the longer term, AKA during a true rebuilding phase.
Best case scenario, he's:
a) smart enough to realize the chance for a seamless transition - while ambitious and a good target - is passed and the club needs to take a deep breath and accept that running headfirst into a brick wall is damaging the image and better to join the pack and look longer term. The rise back to the top can absolutely be immediate, but to continually try and force it creates an air of desperation which is very negative and permeates through the organization.
b) actually good enough at the financial side of things to keep this level of sponsorship going regardless of circumstance.
Worst case scenario he really was only good at parlaying the chance of continued success into these speculative windfalls and once those expire he's incapable of that level of acumen.
Realistically, however, the signs are overwhelmingly not encouraging.
What he actually looks like, from 'watch this space' to the Fabregas bids etc, is an inferiority-complex driven loser granted the opportunity to 'win' through circumstance - in this case, being good with numbers - and desperate to overcompensate (or in the club's case, overpay) to 'become' a winner.
Which is a bit technical but it's what everyone is sensing in a roundabout fashion with all the posts about him.
The club would benefit immensely for someone in his position to have the capacity to do some soul-searching and to adjust accordingly.
It's not easy for someone in that position to cede power to a DOF; what if that appointee fails? What if A, what if B, what if C and so on? If the appointee succeeds, it highlights his own failure. If the appointee succeeds, he then must be able to graciously deflect any praise onto that person and continue to move forward.
It's a murky situation for him, footballing-wise. Ultimately it comes down to his ego, and the choice he makes can and will filter on down through the organization. Can his ego handle losing ground to the investors while gaining ground with the playing/coaching staff? Is he capable of grasping such tradeoffs and how they function?
I'm going to answer your post point by point because i think its fundamentally incorrect, and you seem to be able to have a rational debate unlike 90% of people in this thread.
To start with, I really hope that you are not slating Woodward for having a high wage bill because the hypocrisy would be baffling. We have 5 first team CBs, and when he says hes its not financially prudent to buy another, no doubt would on inflated wages, he gets slated?
I dont accept his financial acumen is just down to people chucking money at him either. We actively upped the marketing efforts since he was incharge with the additional staff based in the newly set up Mayfair office. If its not that hard, then other clubs would have done it. You then ask can he do it long term whilst in a rebuilding phase, well we have been in transition for the last five years and he has held up the financial side.
I agree that more is being leaked to the press then should be such as the Fabregas bids (do we even know who leaked it?) but i have no issue with the actual bid itself. In terms of the watch this space comment, remember he is obliged to do a investor call each quarter targeted to 'money men', so yes 'football people' will see these comments from a different perspective.
I think the fans want it both way and arent willing to apply any logic to there thoughts. Overpaying, he gets slated, refuses to pay, he gets slated. Talking about his ego when we have the most narcissistic manager in footballing history.
With everything wrong at the club at this moment, if you look at it then 99% of them come from the footballing side, and things that the manger is in charge of. Lets break it down.
Moyes - Was fergies appointment. He was given a chance and sacked when failed
LVG - was know to play attacking football with youthful players. ticks the boxes on paper for what we needed. didnt live up to his reputation and was sacked at a reasonable time
Mourinho - Two attempts at building dynasties, so we went to as sure as a guarantee as you can get. It hasnt worked, and he closed to being sacked, as he should.
Two Woodward appointments which were logical and at the time could be justified. Yes they haven't worked, but 2 failed appointees isn't enough of a sample size for the blame to be Woodwards. The next is huge, and if he doesnt choose someone with a attacking philosophy then yes i will start to doubt him, but until then from all the evidence i see, the blame lays squarely with the manager. We're not doing well so were quick to take the easy option and blame the board and the owners, but can you provide a specific reason why?
On a final note, this thread became a lot more active since the defeat to west ham. We started with 3 at the back, one being a midfield youth payer, while an actual cb was sat on the bench. Then when he decides to change to 4 at the back, instead of taking of the midfielder, he takes off one the actual CBs. Leaves lukaku on and takes martial off. Doesnt even have sanchez/lingard on the bench. How anything other then the mourinho out thread is being bumped is beyond me.