This guy is a leech on Fergies success. He's produced Europe's second largest wage bill for what? Him constantly overpaying for players has given them all the power. He fecked around in the summer, making an utterly stupid decision to not back a manager but keep him.
At the end of the day it didn't matter to any of these cnuts, they all get paid no matter what. We are the ones that pay out hard earned money to endure this shambles, whilst they make an absolute mockery of the club.
The breaking of the wage structure has been and is a critical element in the club's struggles. If there was one thing an incoming manager could do to fix us, I'd argue that in a pick-your-poison situation, fixing the wage structure would be first on the block.
Also, his 'financial wizardry/done well on the commercial side' boils down to taking money from people throwing it at him in a rabid desire to be associated with 'the brand'.
Not to diminish it per se - as there is nothing easy about anything in life - and we'd be in a much worse situation without it, but the 'excellent' job he's done there is not going to be exactly hard for someone good with numbers. TBF, the real question is whether he's capable of that same in the longer term, AKA during a true rebuilding phase.
Best case scenario, he's:
a) smart enough to realize the chance for a seamless transition - while ambitious and a good target - is passed and the club needs to take a deep breath and accept that running headfirst into a brick wall is damaging the image and better to join the pack and look longer term. The rise back to the top can absolutely be immediate, but to continually try and force it creates an air of desperation which is very negative and permeates through the organization.
b) actually good enough at the financial side of things to keep this level of sponsorship going regardless of circumstance.
Worst case scenario he really was only good at parlaying the chance of continued success into these speculative windfalls and once those expire he's incapable of that level of acumen.
Realistically, however, the signs are overwhelmingly not encouraging.
What he actually looks like, from 'watch this space' to the Fabregas bids etc, is an inferiority-complex driven loser granted the opportunity to 'win' through circumstance - in this case, being good with numbers - and desperate to overcompensate (or in the club's case, overpay) to 'become' a winner.
Which is a bit technical but it's what everyone is sensing in a roundabout fashion with all the posts about him.
The club would benefit immensely for someone in his position to have the capacity to do some soul-searching and to adjust accordingly.
It's not easy for someone in that position to cede power to a DOF; what if that appointee fails? What if A, what if B, what if C and so on? If the appointee succeeds, it highlights his own failure. If the appointee succeeds, he then must be able to graciously deflect any praise onto that person and continue to move forward.
It's a murky situation for him, footballing-wise. Ultimately it comes down to his ego, and the choice he makes can and will filter on down through the organization. Can his ego handle losing ground to the investors while gaining ground with the playing/coaching staff? Is he capable of grasping such tradeoffs and how they function?