Jose Gimenez

That didint happened actually. Again can you point out players as good as Rio or Vidic who are available now ?

I can only think of 1 direct replacement for Rio ie Bonucci. However, we can't dally on the past either. While Im quite open in us, bringing in an experienced CB (please do read my previous post) our main aim is to find 2 top quality young CBs who would sort this issue for the next 10 years. Rio-Vidic had left the club 3 years ago and we can't keep on dilly-dally around this issue anymore.

Bailly has enough potential to slot in one of those roles. Now we need another.
 
Last edited:
Other than Bonucci they are all gambles. Van Dijk has PL experience going for him but it seems to me you are significantly underrating Giménez. He has 30 caps, one World Cup, two Copas and an U20 WC runner up under his belt.

They are gamble but less gamble than Gimenez who can't even play ahead of Savic this season. And you actually think someone who can't play ahead of Savic can solve our centre back problems?? Is that not a bigger gamble?
 
So let’s say we replace Jones with an experienced defender. There aren’t many top experienced CBs in the UK, so we have to sign it from another league. Currently, the Ferrari of experienced defenders is Bonucci, he’s 29 and he’s got issues with Allegri which makes him available for bid from us. Let’s say, we spend 30m-40m to get him here.

Mourinho has other players in mind so that signing will pretty much suck up all the budget allotted for CD. With Bonucci, Rojo, Bailly and Smalling in the team, we would still have to loan our youths out. Therefore Bonucci’s experience will be ‘wasted’ around players of his same age. In 4-5 years time we would need a total revamp in defence. Bonucci, Rojo, Smalling and Valencia would be too old to do the job.

If we take that route then we might as well sell Smalling and Rojo and bring someone younger for example Gimenez. Bonucci’s experience would be invested on top quality defenders who have the potential to one day lead Manchester United’s defense. TFM, Williams and Tuanzebe would remain at United and fight for the 4th defender role.

I confess that I like that route, although I do acknowledge the risks of it.

a- We would be changing a lot of staff in a critical role which might have an impact on the team. Both Bonucci and Gimenez will need time to settle down in the EPL which would leave us a bit light in CB.

b- Young defenders need plenty of game time to develop. I lost count of how many times I actually swore at a young Gary Neville before he learnt not to dive in tackles inside the box. Shadowing isn't always great and I wonder how Smalling-Jones would have developed if they invested their early part of career playing week in week out instead of shadowing Rio-Vidic. Keane is a classic example of what regular first team football can do to young defenders.

c- while I am not a big fan of Smalling and Rojo myself, I do acknowledge that United has no DM, which leaves the defence vulnerable.

Taking that in consideration, then maybe the wisest strategy would be to make changes on a slower tempo. We bring in Gimenez, a top quality young RB to shadow Valencia and a top quality DM (I am a big fan of Kessie) and see the effect these players would have in defence. Who knows, maybe Gimenez’s signing would be the wake-up call needed for Smalling to step up. Currently he has little competition for his first team spot (Rojo is average, Jones is always injured) but that would surely change, with Gimenez in the squad.

The year after we can re-assess the defence and see what we need. Had Smalling/Rojo stepped up? Is Gimenez and Bailly good enough to lead the defence? How did Tuanzebe and go faired on loan? Gimenez and Bailly would be nearly 24 at that stage, which means there’s some possibility that we won’t need an experienced head around.

My top option will be van Dijk due to his experience in PL compared to Bonnuci but surely it doesn't make any sense that a very young centre back like Gimenez is a better solution for our centre back's problem. He can't even play ahead of Savic this season and what makes you think he will solve our centre back problems for next season??

Buy proven or top centre back with enough experience and then get the youngster later. Young players tend to make mistakes and need a proper support and guide, no point to sign Gimenez if neither of Smalling and Rojo haven't prove themselves to be able to step up their game.

I would rather do what Juve did, sign Pirlo and solve the midfield problem or find someone who can step up in midfield and next season get young player like Pogba.
 
My top option will be van Dijk due to his experience in PL compared to Bonnuci but surely it doesn't make any sense that a very young centre back like Gimenez is a better solution for our centre back's problem. He can't even play ahead of Savic this season and what makes you think he will solve our centre back problems for next season??

Buy proven or top centre back with enough experience and then get the youngster later. Young players tend to make mistakes and need a proper support and guide, no point to sign Gimenez if neither of Smalling and Rojo haven't prove themselves to be able to step up their game.

I would rather do what Juve did, sign Pirlo and solve the midfield problem or find someone who can step up in midfield and next season get young player like Pogba.

Well, there's a big gap between playing for a high mid tier team like Southampton and playing for United. We know that very well with the likes of Schneiderlin, Young and Fellaini who were excellent players at their former club only to fizzle away with us.

We know very little why Gimenez was dropped. He did suffered from some injuries lately so its only fair if Simeone had dropped him to allow him time to recover. Also with 18 months left in his contract, he might be refusing to sign a new contract, which may have lead Simeone to punish him for it.

Irrespective of that, Gimenez has the characteristics Mourinho like in a defender. He's a warrior on the pitch whose gifted with great pace, positioning and power. With just 18 months left in his contract he might come at a decent price, which would allow Mourinho to spend the dosh in other areas.
 
This seems to be a no-brainer, really. A massive defensive talent who's only going to get better under a defensive guru like José (after hitting a bit of a cul-de-sac under Simeone), especially when there's a chance to get him for a fee lower than his buyout clause by putting contractual pressure on Atlético.
3 very young centre backs like Gimenez, Bailly, and Tuanzebe in 2018/2019?
@devilish has a point - getting a Godín or Bonucci would be ideal, but that's not exactly realistic at this point in time, so the alternative should be replacing middling players with someone who can become a world class defender in the near future with regular playing time (Giménez and Rugani are arguably the standout young centerbacks in Europe from a defensive standpoint) - to provide an element squad renewal and improvement on a year-to-year basis. And Giménez/Bailly will hardly be very young at 23 and 24 years of age by 2018, respectively, when you consider that someone like Terry became Mourinho's go-to leader and club captain at age 23. The primary emphasis of this particular transfer would be to bring a potential generation defining defensive player to the club - and build a sustainable central defensive structure for atleast the medium term. The only major snag is his fit with Bailly because ideally you'd want one of the centerbacks to be an excellent distributor from the back, but then Mourinho did play Lúcio (who was more of a dribbler in space to bring the ball out) + Samuel at Internazionale.
 
Well, there's a big gap between playing for a high mid tier team like Southampton and playing for United. We know that very well with the likes of Schneiderlin, Young and Fellaini who were excellent players at their former club only to fizzle away with us.

We know very little why Gimenez was dropped. He did suffered from some injuries lately so its only fair if Simeone had dropped him to allow him time to recover. Also with 18 months left in his contract, he might be refusing to sign a new contract, which may have lead Simeone to punish him for it.

Irrespective of that, Gimenez has the characteristics Mourinho like in a defender. He's a warrior on the pitch whose gifted with great pace, positioning and power. With just 18 months left in his contract he might come at a decent price, which would allow Mourinho to spend the dosh in other areas.

Well, there is also a big gap between playing with top defender like Godin who also has leadership mentality to organise the defense and playing with another young inexperienced defender like Bailly or defenders who are prone mistakes and haven't step up their level like Smalling and Rojo.

And we also know that there are players who are good enough and step up their level and mentality into top tier such as Mane and Alderweiereld. van Dijk is pretty much one of the best centre back in PL at the moment.


We both know what we are lacking in our defense and it makes more sense to say that van Dijk is a less risky signing than Gimenez. And it makes more sense why we want more proven PL and more experienced centre back like him than Gimenez.
 
This seems to be a no-brainer, really. A massive defensive talent who's only going to get better under a defensive guru like José (after hitting a bit of a cul-de-sac under Simeone), especially when there's a chance to get him for a fee lower than his buyout clause by putting contractual pressure on Atlético.

@devilish has a point - getting a Godín or Bonucci would be ideal, but that's not exactly realistic at this point in time, so the alternative should be replacing middling players with someone who can become a world class defender in the near future with regular playing time (Giménez and Rugani are arguably the standout young centerbacks in Europe from a defensive standpoint) - to provide an element squad renewal and improvement on a year-to-year basis. And Giménez/Bailly will hardly be very young at 23 and 24 years of age by 2018, respectively, when you consider that someone like Terry became Mourinho's go-to leader and club captain at age 23. The primary emphasis of this particular transfer would be to bring a potential generation defining defensive player to the club - and build a sustainable central defensive structure for atleast the medium term. The only major snag is his fit with Bailly because ideally you'd want one of the centerbacks to be an excellent distributor from the back, but then Mourinho did play Lúcio (who was more of a dribbler in space to bring the ball out) + Samuel at Internazionale.

The worse our season, the worse the situation it will become. If we can't win the league or CL, more players will leave the club. We all know what happened to Arsenal when they lost the invisible squad. They rely on young players who have potential and talent and they couldn't win PL for 13 years, players like Nasri, Fabregas, RVP, Song decided to leave the club.

Contrast to Sir Alex, he always built his young players around with top players, experienced players with leadership and winning mentality. That's how he won us many trophies.

Some players are different. Terry already had that leadership mentality since he was young. Roy Keane as well. That's why i have mentioned this before, it's not about age!! But about if they actually have prove themselves that they can do it or have it.

Signing both Bonucci and Gimenez are obviously the ideal but we know it's impossible that's why I have said this before the best solution is getting the proven or top centre back who has the leadership mentality to organise and be the leader in our defense.
 
Well, there is also a big gap between playing with top defender like Godin who also has leadership mentality to organise the defense and playing with another young inexperienced defender like Bailly or defenders who are prone mistakes and haven't step up their level like Smalling and Rojo.

And we also know that there are players who are good enough and step up their level and mentality into top tier such as Mane and Alderweiereld. van Dijk is pretty much one of the best centre back in PL at the moment.


We both know what we are lacking in our defense and it makes more sense to say that van Dijk is a less risky signing than Gimenez. And it makes more sense why we want more proven PL and more experienced centre back like him than Gimenez.

Which would lead us to square one. If Smalling and Rojo (who are both 27) can provide us with such leadership then WTF they are doing here? From a purely age POV Smalling (27), Rojo (27), Gimenez (22) and Bailly (22) give us the right balance.

If you ask me, Gimenez signing is too good to turn down. He's one of the most promising CBs in the world, whose got 18 months left in his contract and whose got the right tenacity to do well in the EPL. Assuming we'll sign him for 30m then his price will go up by at least another 10m as soon as the ink dry on his contract.
 
Bonucci is 29, has never left Italy, does not speak English and plays for Juve who are undoubtedly in a better position than us.

I'm not sure how anyone sees this as a deal that makes sense for him or us. We'd have to spend a great deal of money for a 29yo who might not adapt well or fail to provide the leadership people will expect from him due to the language barrier. He'd be taking a massive career gamble for little potential reward, besides a higher salary, and we'd be taking a massive gamble on our side.

I don't ever see him leaving Italy. He'll likely move to Inter or AC when his time comes to seek a new challenge.
 
Bonucci is 29, has never left Italy, does not speak English and plays for Juve who are undoubtedly in a better position than us.

I'm not sure how anyone sees this as a deal that makes sense for him or us. We'd have to spend a great deal of money for a 29yo who might not adapt well or fail to provide the leadership people will expect from him due to the language barrier. He'd be taking a massive career gamble for little potential reward, besides a higher salary, and we'd be taking a massive gamble on our side.

I don't ever see him leaving Italy. He'll likely move to Inter or AC when his time comes to seek a new challenge.

If he leaves Juventus then he'll leave Italy. The Italian clubs can easily be outbidded by the EPL ones. I wouldn't worry about the language too much either. He's been learning English throughout last year.

The argument here is why should we keep defenders of 27 years of age, who provide no leadership whatsoever
 
They are gamble but less gamble than Gimenez who can't even play ahead of Savic this season. And you actually think someone who can't play ahead of Savic can solve our centre back problems?? Is that not a bigger gamble?
Strange post. Savic is a very good defender who keeps getting better every season. And having just turned 26, with 5 years experience and 100+ games in Italy and Spain, he probably hasn't even reached his prime.
 
He's one of the few alternatives I'd like for us to aim for in CB this summer, if he's available.
 
The worse our season, the worse the situation it will become. If we can't win the league or CL, more players will leave the club. We all know what happened to Arsenal when they lost the invisible squad. They rely on young players who have potential and talent and they couldn't win PL for 13 years, players like Nasri, Fabregas, RVP, Song decided to leave the club.

Contrast to Sir Alex, he always built his young players around with top players, experienced players with leadership and winning mentality. That's how he won us many trophies.
That's an entirely hypothetical situation. Plus, Arsenal's biggest players leaving for greener pastures toward the end of the last decade and the start of the current one was different from where United is now - especially in terms of financial clout and their contract situations (which often forced Arsenal's hand), so I don't believe our best players will abandon ship like theirs did. As for Sir Alex's template - it took a while to implement (which isn't always possible in the current climate), and the circumstances of that period of football are different from the current one - plus, there's no hard and fast rule for building a team. Fergie built a team in the way he wanted to, and the current manager can build it in the way he wants to - be it signing younger players, or older ones - either one can be successful, it's just that older ones have a greater sample size - which is reassuring, and ideal terms - yes, the composition should be staggered between young players, and older leaders.
Some players are different. Terry already had that leadership mentality since he was young. Roy Keane as well. That's why i have mentioned this before, it's not about age!! But about if they actually have prove themselves that they can do it or have it.

Signing both Bonucci and Gimenez are obviously the ideal but we know it's impossible that's why I have said this before the best solution is getting the proven or top centre back who has the leadership mentality to organise and be the leader in our defense.
Giménez has leadership mentality, too - he was the defensive leader for Uruguay in 2013 when they reached the U-20 World Cup final and conceded just 3 goals despite being the youngest player in the unit. At Atlético, he doesn't get to display his leadership traits because of the presence of Godín (arguably the best centerback in the world), Juanfran (top 3 rightback in Europe), Luís (top 3 leftback in the world), Gabi, Koke, Griezmann and the likes. He's not going to stand out as a leader, especially in that defensive unit with contemporary defensive behemoths flanking him and exerting their influence on the team. Expecting him to be a leader in that backline would be like expecting young Terry to be a leader in a hypothetical backline consisting of Blanc, Thuram and Lizarazu - it's not going to happen, and is all about relatives.

Regarding the proven and top centerback bit, that would be ideal. But just to reiterate what was said before, outside of the likes of Godín, Bonucci, Thiago, Boateng and the likes, there aren't a lot of proven and top centerbacks in the current market. Apart from them, you have the likes of Alderweireld (likely unattainable), Manolas, Van Djik, etc. - who aren't much better than Giménez, and some of them haven't evidenced the ability to lead the defense for a team of United's stature, so we have to adapt to the market. Leading a club like Southampton is very different from leading a club of the dimension of United - which is partly why someone like Schneiderlin was their midfield leader, but that didn't amount to much at United.

I think the perfect player for United would be Sokratis Papastathopoulos - who has played a big part in maintaining Dortmund's defensive structure - he could come in and be exactly what we need because he has played for a big European team for 4 years with ~30 European appearances, and has become their leader after the departure of Hummels. But they are not likely to sell them because he's a key defensive presence.
 
I don't think we can be making buys with 10 year plans personally, modern football just doesn't lend itself to such a lengthy trajectory, you're pushing it with a 5 year plan these days. As for Gimenez, I can see the arguments for and against, my biggest concern is that 3 of our 4 CB's are already nutters, adding another doesn't seem the best course to take, we really need a calming influence back there IMO.
 
I can only think of 1 direct replacement for Rio ie Bonucci. However, we can't dally on the past either. While Im quite open in us, bringing in an experienced CB (please do read my previous post) our main aim is to find 2 top quality young CBs who would sort this issue for the next 10 years. Rio-Vidic had left the club 3 years ago and we can't keep on dilly-dally around this issue anymore.

Bailly has enough potential to slot in one of those roles. Now we need another.

We have that in our reserves . Heard of Tuanzbe and Williams ? Both of them have what it takes to be a manchester united player.

If we keep on buying young CB's the cycle just wont stop. If we can bring Bonucci or Chielleini I have no issues . Otherwise dont spend money on defense this summer because our issue is on the other side. We have a good defensive record still and that too without playing with a proper CDM , so get a proper CDM and sort out the attack issue .That should be our priority.
 
We have that in our reserves . Heard of Tuanzbe and Williams ? Both of them have what it takes to be a manchester united player.

If we keep on buying young CB's the cycle just wont stop. If we can bring Bonucci or Chielleini I have no issues . Otherwise dont spend money on defense this summer because our issue is on the other side. We have a good defensive record still and that too without playing with a proper CDM , so get a proper CDM and sort out the attack issue .That should be our priority.

The cycle will only stop when we've got a solid defensive pair who can play well week in week out ie people like Pally-Bruce, Stam-Johnsen, Rio-Vidic.

Its tuanzebe. I'd suggest that you learn how to write his surname, before rating him at par with one of the most promising defenders there is.
 
They are gamble but less gamble than Gimenez who can't even play ahead of Savic this season. And you actually think someone who can't play ahead of Savic can solve our centre back problems?? Is that not a bigger gamble?
Are you thick or you missed the part on him having issues with Simeone and getting injured once he got back in the team?

He isn't starting ahead of Coates for Uruguay either as he isn't fit. Neither is Shaw starting ahead of Darmian or Ashley Young btw.
 
I don't think we can be making buys with 10 year plans personally, modern football just doesn't lend itself to such a lengthy trajectory, you're pushing it with a 5 year plan these days. As for Gimenez, I can see the arguments for and against, my biggest concern is that 3 of our 4 CB's are already nutters, adding another doesn't seem the best course to take, we really need a calming influence back there IMO.
Yeah, that was my point earlier, he shouldn't be a standalone signing.
 
Strange post. Savic is a very good defender who keeps getting better every season. And having just turned 26, with 5 years experience and 100+ games in Italy and Spain, he probably hasn't even reached his prime.
He's really not doing well this season. Consistently the weak link in their defence. Gimenez also regressed in the last year though
 
Slightly off topic as this about signing Gimenez who I think is a wonderful talent and has great potential but doesn't Alderweireld have a buyout clause in his contract ? I've seen in loads of places in the past couple of months that Spurs wanted to give him a new contract to eliminate that clause.

If such a clause exists then Alderweireld is about as perfect as there gets as he's a leader, proven in our league and arguably the best in our league, Champions League experience, great age and is good with the ball at his feet so that's who I'd go for even if the clause didn't exist.

I know it means dealing with Levy but the fact is that when the money is right he's proven he will sell to us as he's a business man so I'd much rather we sign players from our league instead of young players who'll need to adapt or progress or supposed "Galactico's" that are only coming for the money.
 
He's really not doing well this season. Consistently the weak link in their defence. Gimenez also regressed in the last year though
Can't agree with that. He's had a few loose games but so has Ramos and Madrid fans are very happy with him. Overall Atleti as a defensive unit have not been as good as we expected them to. By January they had already conceded as much goals as they did in the entire previous season. But they seems to have tightened things up in the back in the last couple of games.
 
Slightly off topic as this about signing Gimenez who I think is a wonderful talent and has great potential but doesn't Alderweireld have a buyout clause in his contract ? I've seen in loads of places in the past couple of months that Spurs wanted to give him a new contract to eliminate that clause.

If such a clause exists then Alderweireld is about as perfect as there gets as he's a leader, proven in our league and arguably the best in our league, Champions League experience, great age and is good with the ball at his feet so that's who I'd go for even if the clause didn't exist.

I know it means dealing with Levy but the fact is that when the money is right he's proven he will sell to us as he's a business man so I'd much rather we sign players from our league instead of young players who'll need to adapt or progress or supposed "Galactico's" that are only coming for the money.
I think it also depends on the way Jose wants to play. Gimenez is more closer to the old fashion centrebacks. Alderweireld is much more refined, he can even play as a defensive midfielder because he has a very good passing range. Alderweireld gives away very few fouls, Gimenez is more physically imposing and also more prone to giving away fouls. I see them as very different players. Personally i like Gimenez a lot as i have never seen such a young centreback play so consistently well at a high level, i was too young to watch young Maldini. The way he took his opportunity as a 19 year old playing like a season veteran since his first game was very impressive. But as someone mentioned above, we cannot rule out the influence of Godin, and Atleti's setup probably also suited him just as much as it didn't suit Alderweireld. The way Spurs play suits him very well.
 
Are you thick or you missed the part on him having issues with Simeone and getting injured once he got back in the team?

He isn't starting ahead of Coates for Uruguay either as he isn't fit. Neither is Shaw starting ahead of Darmian or Ashley Young btw.

And you just sums up two of my points which I have been making there

1st Point: Being non fit is also a big problem in here. Would you rather have another player who can't stay fit in our back four??
I would rather have a proper left back who can stay fit like Bertrand than a young left back with great talent but can't stay fit like Shaw.

2nd Point: The fact that he's unfit this season means he hasn't prove himself that he's capable to lead defense in a top club. Previous seasons, Godin was the man who lead Atl Madrid defense even now.
Even Smalling looks like very good in 2010/2011 when he played alongside Vidic.

This is why, given the situation of our centre back problems it makes sense that signing van Dijk is less risky than signing Gimenez.
 
Strange post. Savic is a very good defender who keeps getting better every season. And having just turned 26, with 5 years experience and 100+ games in Italy and Spain, he probably hasn't even reached his prime.

I don't think I say something bad about Savic.

So do you think a player who can't start in Atl Madrid will be the best solution and less risky to solve our centre back's problem?
 
Which would lead us to square one. If Smalling and Rojo (who are both 27) can provide us with such leadership then WTF they are doing here? From a purely age POV Smalling (27), Rojo (27), Gimenez (22) and Bailly (22) give us the right balance.

If you ask me, Gimenez signing is too good to turn down. He's one of the most promising CBs in the world, whose got 18 months left in his contract and whose got the right tenacity to do well in the EPL. Assuming we'll sign him for 30m then his price will go up by at least another 10m as soon as the ink dry on his contract.

Just like what you said it leads us to square one due to your "BRILLIANT IDEA".

How many times do I need to say this, age isn't the issue here. Player like Terry and Roy Keane were already have that great leadership mentality since they were young. Being 27 years old or older doesn't make you have "great leadership" mentality. Their leadership mentality might only up to mid table level, not all players who are above 26 years age can carry the expectation of top club like Manchester United and both Smalling and Rojo are likely to be in the same category since they have yet to step up after playing for more than three seasons in here. But it seems your sense are giving them another season which what we have been doing previous seasons and as a result we have the same problem every seasons since we lost Rio and Vidic.

This is why I already said this, it so much more sense to sign van Dijk than Gimenez if we want to solve the problems of our centre back.
 
That's an entirely hypothetical situation. Plus, Arsenal's biggest players leaving for greener pastures toward the end of the last decade and the start of the current one was different from where United is now - especially in terms of financial clout and their contract situations (which often forced Arsenal's hand), so I don't believe our best players will abandon ship like theirs did. As for Sir Alex's template - it took a while to implement (which isn't always possible in the current climate), and the circumstances of that period of football are different from the current one - plus, there's no hard and fast rule for building a team. Fergie built a team in the way he wanted to, and the current manager can build it in the way he wants to - be it signing younger players, or older ones - either one can be successful, it's just that older ones have a greater sample size - which is reassuring, and ideal terms - yes, the composition should be staggered between young players, and older leaders.

You just don't get it what went wrong to Arsenal and how Sir Alex was able to win something with kids. Giggs and Neviles even admit they they won't be able to win something and be like what they are right now without the help of players like Keane (even though he was very young), Bruce, Pallister, Cantona, Schmeichel who have a lot of experiences, leadership mentality and winning mentality. And right now our squad are lacking that winning and leadership mentality. Even Jose admitted it.

Giménez has leadership mentality, too - he was the defensive leader for Uruguay in 2013 when they reached the U-20 World Cup final and conceded just 3 goals despite being the youngest player in the unit. At Atlético, he doesn't get to display his leadership traits because of the presence of Godín (arguably the best centerback in the world), Juanfran (top 3 rightback in Europe), Luís (top 3 leftback in the world), Gabi, Koke, Griezmann and the likes. He's not going to stand out as a leader, especially in that defensive unit with contemporary defensive behemoths flanking him and exerting their influence on the team. Expecting him to be a leader in that backline would be like expecting young Terry to be a leader in a hypothetical backline consisting of Blanc, Thuram and Lizarazu - it's not going to happen, and is all about relatives.

Regarding the proven and top centerback bit, that would be ideal. But just to reiterate what was said before, outside of the likes of Godín, Bonucci, Thiago, Boateng and the likes, there aren't a lot of proven and top centerbacks in the current market. Apart from them, you have the likes of Alderweireld (likely unattainable), Manolas, Van Djik, etc. - who aren't much better than Giménez, and some of them haven't evidenced the ability to lead the defense for a team of United's stature, so we have to adapt to the market. Leading a club like Southampton is very different from leading a club of the dimension of United - which is partly why someone like Schneiderlin was their midfield leader, but that didn't amount to much at United.

I think the perfect player for United would be Sokratis Papastathopoulos - who has played a big part in maintaining Dortmund's defensive structure - he could come in and be exactly what we need because he has played for a big European team for 4 years with ~30 European appearances, and has become their leader after the departure of Hummels. But they are not likely to sell them because he's a key defensive presence.

leadership mentality in Uruguay U20 is different level with leadership mentality in Manchester United. Big gaps!!

Not only Gimenez has low experience in football despite of his age, he also has no experience in PL and just like what you have said he hasn't prove himself to be able to lead a top level defense like Manchester United because so far he's been in the shadow of Godin, Juanfran, Gabi, Koke and Griezmann.

That's why I said signing van Dijk is more sense and less risky than Gimenez.
 
Would sell Jones and Smalling and buy Keane and Gimenez instead. The cost would be the same as Smalling and Jones would be in demand, and I just think that Jose has previously shown that he can do wonders for young central defenders(Varane, Zouma). No reason why he couldn't do the same with these two. I still like Jones but Smalling is just hopeless.

The dream scenario would be Tuanzebe to step up and claim his position in the squad now that both Jones and Smalling are injured, but that's unlikely to happen considering the competition in PL.
 
And you just sums up two of my points which I have been making there

1st Point: Being non fit is also a big problem in here. Would you rather have another player who can't stay fit in our back four??
I would rather have a proper left back who can stay fit like Bertrand than a young left back with great talent but can't stay fit like Shaw.

2nd Point: The fact that he's unfit this season means he hasn't prove himself that he's capable to lead defense in a top club. Previous seasons, Godin was the man who lead Atl Madrid defense even now.
Even Smalling looks like very good in 2010/2011 when he played alongside Vidic.

This is why, given the situation of our centre back problems it makes sense that signing van Dijk is less risky than signing Gimenez.
Players do get injured, it doesn't mean they are broken like Jones.

Never mind anyway, whatever anyone says you will turn into an argument for van Dijk. For all I know he could work, or not, 50-50 really.
 
leadership mentality in Uruguay U20 is different level with leadership mentality in Manchester United. Big gaps!!

Not only Gimenez has low experience in football despite of his age, he also has no experience in PL and just like what you have said he hasn't prove himself to be able to lead a top level defense like Manchester United because so far he's been in the shadow of Godin, Juanfran, Gabi, Koke and Griezmann.

That's why I said signing van Dijk is more sense and less risky than Gimenez.
That makes no sense whatsoever. You clearly know feck all about him.

30 caps, 1 World Cup, 2 Copas, great CL runs and league challenges with Atlético. Miranda got sold because he was too good for the bench, same for Alderweireld.

Van Dijk has 7 caps and plays for a midtable side.
 
You just don't get it what went wrong to Arsenal and how Sir Alex was able to win something with kids. Giggs and Neviles even admit they they won't be able to win something and be like what they are right now without the help of players like Keane (even though he was very young), Bruce, Pallister, Cantona, Schmeichel who have a lot of experiences, leadership mentality and winning mentality. And right now our squad are lacking that winning and leadership mentality. Even Jose admitted it.
Why are you so antagonistic? What don't I get, do elaborate, please? If you re-read the post, you'll realize that what I said was - yes, Fergie did well with a certain template of having an experienced core to then launch the younger players, but that's not always a realistic option (especially in the current market where the best experienced players have gravitated towards clubs that won't let them go, and aren't as readily available from Premier League clubs because of the TV revenues). It's like saying we should sign the equivalents of Drogba (Onze d'Or winner) and Carvalho (UEFA Defender of the Year and Ballon D'Or 9th) to herald the Mourinho era at United without taking the current football climate into context - where players of that caliber aren't readily available at selling clubs like Marseille and Porto. So you might have to decide between building an experienced core by signing experienced players (which can take time, and isn't always realistic because you have to consider the quality, too) or going for players who aren't world class yet, but have the potential to be world class in the near future to become your experienced core - and are quite experienced for their age. Being a middle aged played and 'having experience' isn't some magic recipe if you aren't that good or proven as a potential elite club level player (which is where a lot of people doubt Van Djik and Manolas and the likes as centerback solutions for United - because they don't play for clubs of a similar stature).
leadership mentality in Uruguay U20 is different level with leadership mentality in Manchester United. Big gaps!!

Not only Gimenez has low experience in football despite of his age, he also has no experience in PL and just like what you have said he hasn't prove himself to be able to lead a top level defense like Manchester United because so far he's been in the shadow of Godin, Juanfran, Gabi, Koke and Griezmann.

That's why I said signing van Dijk is more sense and less risky than Gimenez.
Cheers for spelling out that U20 experience is different from United experience. I'd never have figured that out in a million years without your snarky response!

As for the rest of it, I don't believe you're familiar with Giménez because you're making some weird claims regarding him and Van Djik. The former has played 3½ season for a Top 5 club in Europe (which reached the final of the Champions League twice), he has played in the World Cup - becoming their youngest ever player in a World Cup tournament - while retiring Lugano and eliminating England + Italy:

300px-URU-ENG_2014-06-19.svg.png


300px-ITA-URU_2014-06-24.svg.png

He has played in 2 Copa América tournaments and has 30 caps for a country that's 9th on the FIFA rankings, vs. Van Djik who had 12 for a country that's 21st: https://www.fifa.com/fifa-world-ranking/ranking-table/men/

The points you make regarding Savić (without considering Giménez's injury and differences of opinion with Simeone) can be twisted to - Van Djik couldn't play ahead of defensive juggernauts like De Vrij, Joël Veltman and Martins Indi. As for the PL experience caveat, that has no bearing because most issues for players coming from other leagues revolve around their unsuitability to the combativeness and tempo of English clubs - and Giménez has the perfect athletic skillset + fiery temper to counter that. The Premier League isn't a fantasy land where players from other leagues get lost without exception. Wrt. Van Djik being less risky, he's currently recuperating from a major injury, and while Giménez was in the final of the European Cup after beating Bayern Munich, he was part of a defense that got hammered 6-1 by Liverpool - so I dunno about the risks involved narrative. Especially when Giménez has played for a big European club - which is something Van Djik hasn't done (and Schneiderlin didn't do before moving to United - he was deemed to be a risk-free transfer, too).
 
That makes no sense whatsoever. You clearly know feck all about him.

30 caps, 1 World Cup, 2 Copas, great CL runs and league challenges with Atlético. Miranda got sold because he was too good for the bench, same for Alderweireld.

Van Dijk has 7 caps and plays for a midtable side.

Yeah 30 caps for country playing with world class centre back like Godin. Was it enough though? It's just doesn't make any sense that you are keep using world cup U20 level achievement and compared it with EPL level.

Evans played more than 50 games with Rio and Vidic, and when they both left he couldn't step up to be the leader of our defense because our expectation and level are too high for him.

Van Dijk had played more games than Gimenez did in their whole career and he had more experiences in PL. Two big plus why I said he's less risky than Gimenez. Looking forward at our current problems, it makes more sense why we want someone who has more experience in their career, proven in PL and not prone mistakes which what a lot of youngsters tend to do.
 
Just like what you said it leads us to square one due to your "BRILLIANT IDEA".

How many times do I need to say this, age isn't the issue here. Player like Terry and Roy Keane were already have that great leadership mentality since they were young. Being 27 years old or older doesn't make you have "great leadership" mentality. Their leadership mentality might only up to mid table level, not all players who are above 26 years age can carry the expectation of top club like Manchester United and both Smalling and Rojo are likely to be in the same category since they have yet to step up after playing for more than three seasons in here. But it seems your sense are giving them another season which what we have been doing previous seasons and as a result we have the same problem every seasons since we lost Rio and Vidic.

This is why I already said this, it so much more sense to sign van Dijk than Gimenez if we want to solve the problems of our centre back.

If Smalling/Rojo cant lead the defense then we might replace them with someone who will. At 27-28 this is our last chance of making decent money out of the two and soon enough they will be on the decline.

The last thing we need is 3 three CBs at the wrong end of their 20s who will probably retire together in 3-4 years time. If Jones leave, then we replace him with a young player. If we need experience and leadership then we need to get rid of the older dudes
 
Last edited:
Yeah 30 caps for country playing with world class centre back like Godin. Was it enough though? It's just doesn't make any sense that you are keep using world cup U20 level achievement and compared it with EPL level.

Evans played more than 50 games with Rio and Vidic, and when they both left he couldn't step up to be the leader of our defense because our expectation and level are too high for him.

Van Dijk had played more games than Gimenez did in their whole career and he had more experiences in PL. Two big plus why I said he's less risky than Gimenez. Looking forward at our current problems, it makes more sense why we want someone who has more experience in their career, proven in PL and not prone mistakes which what a lot of youngsters tend to do.

Bailly had zero EPL experience and he quickly became a regular first teamer with us. We are well stocked with EPL proven players ie Jones, Smalling, Shaw, Young, Fellaini. Are we winning leagues because of them? No. Lets focus on talent first can we?

I think we're interested in Gimenez because of alot of factors including his young age, his attitude (he's a bit of a Roy Keane), his talent and his price (ie he's got around a year of contract left). Van Dijk would cost us a bomb (Bambi on ice cost Shitty 50m) and we have alot of positions that need to be strengthened.
 
Last edited:
Players do get injured, it doesn't mean they are broken like Jones.

Never mind anyway, whatever anyone says you will turn into an argument for van Dijk. For all I know he could work, or not, 50-50 really.

You still don't get my point though. He hasn't prove himself that he can lead the defense.

Yeah but I'm not saying van Dijk is safe or guarantee us problems solved. van Dijk has more plus that you can think of such as play more games in his career, PL experience, less prone error, physical advantages. He's less risky than Gimenez.
 
Bailly had zero EPL experience and he quickly became a regular first teamer with us. We are well stocked with EPL proven players ie Jones, Smalling, Shaw, Young, Fellaini. Are we winning leagues because of them? No.

Lets focus on talent first can we?

And did Bailly solve the problem? Same story no leadership in defense. No one is able to step up.
I have mentioned this before in our first conversation that signing Gimenez will be the same as signing Bailly.

And again, is EPL proven only enough though?. We lack that leadership in defense, and how is Gimenez can solve that problem when he's both non proven PL experience and non proven to be able to lead his defense in top level competition.
 
Gimenez has played with a lot more pressure and at a higher level expectation than van Dijk who will likely cost £20M more at least, I'm not convicned that either are exactly what we need but Gimenez is equally viable and no greater or lesser risk.
 
He's a bit of a firebrand from what I see and that concerns me because we need more of a calming influence at the back. We need a Rio more than a Vidic imo.

Bailly and Rojo are both quite temperamental and with Jones nearly always injured (and being quite rash himself) it's only Smalling that seems to have some calmness to his play. And by that I mean avoiding rash challenges, elbows/stamps, unnecessary and dangerous forays up the pitch etc. I don't mean that he stays calm if you pass him the ball with an opponent within 10 yards :lol:
 
You still don't get my point though. He hasn't prove himself that he can lead the defense.

Yeah but I'm not saying van Dijk is safe or guarantee us problems solved. van Dijk has more plus that you can think of such as play more games in his career, PL experience, less prone error, physical advantages. He's less risky than Gimenez.

These days, most EPL managers are foreigners. There is little difference between playing with Manchester United or playing with Real Madrid or Internazionale because we all had the same manager.

I believe that the biggest challenge for a player is whether he can step up from a smaller team to a bigger one. Tactics and expectations change, individual mistakes are magnified and the pressure increase. There are plenty examples of players who did very well with smaller sides only to fizzle out when they played with top sides (Young, Fellaini, Darmian, Smalling, Jones, Schneiderlin, Taibi etc). There’s also examples of players who struggled at big clubs only to became instrumental in smaller teams (Phil Neville, Howard etc), some of whom were decent players (ex Roberto Baggio or Antonio Cassano).

Gimenez has shown that he can handle pressure at a top club. Sure he played alongside Godin, but he's not a boy scout/yes man like Smalling, Evans and co.
 
If Smalling/Rojo cant lead the defense then we might replace them with someone who will. At 27-28 this is our last chance of making decent money out of the two and soon enough they will be on the decline.

And exactly that's why i have been mentioning name likes Bonucci, van Dijk and etc.

The last thing we need is 3 three CBs at the wrong end of their 20s who will probably retire together in 3-4 years time. If Jones leave, then we replace him with a young player. If we need experience and leadership then we need to get rid of the older dudes

We have enough young defenders like Bailly and Tuanzebe. Or even that Williams guy and Mensah can play in that position. But what we are lacking are that leadership.

We can always sign young defender in any next summer windows once we solve that "leadership" problem first.

Just think about it, what happened to Juventus when they decided to sign a more experienced midfielder like Pirlo first, solve the problem first and build their midfield around him and then next season sign the young one for future like Pogba? Double and went to final CL in one season.
 
These days, most EPL managers are foreigners. There is little difference between playing with Manchester United or playing with Real Madrid or Internazionale because we all had the same manager.

I believe that the biggest challenge for a player is whether he can step up from a smaller team to a bigger one. Tactics and expectations change, individual mistakes are magnified and the pressure increase. There are plenty examples of players who did very well with smaller sides only to fizzle out when they played with top sides (Young, Fellaini, Darmian, Smalling, Jones, Schneiderlin, Taibi etc). There’s also examples of players who struggled at big clubs only to became instrumental in smaller teams (Phil Neville, Howard etc), some of whom were decent players (ex Roberto Baggio or Antonio Cassano).

Gimenez has shown that he can handle pressure at a top club. Sure he played alongside Godin, but he's not a boy scout/yes man like Smalling, Evans and co.

Pretty much you just said what I was about to post. He played alongside Godin. Gimenez hasn't shown that he can be the leader at a top club because he is supported by Godin. Most of the pressured were handled by Godin in their centre back partnership.

I have said this before, Giggs and Neville brothers have said that without Bruce, Cantona, Keane, Pallister and Schmeichel they won't be able to handle most of the pressure alone. Young players need those kind of players.