Jeremy Corbyn - Not Not Labour Party(?), not a Communist (BBC)



:lol: I love the idea of people joining the Lib Dems because Corbyn has made Labour unelectable


I'm voting for lib dem too. I'm not cool voting for commies or capitalists/xenophobic people
 
I'm voting for lib dem too. I'm not cool voting for commies or capitalists/xenophobic people

Might as well just vote Conservative then given the Lib Dems have shown themselves willing to prop up a Conservative government
 
There are tweets saying Labour had 15,000 new members sign up in the hours after Corbyn's victory yesterday. It's only twitter though.
 
Lib Dem for me too, at the moment. Corbyn's lot have made it quite clear how much they despise the rest of Labour, although I would like the choice of a new centre-left party as well.
In a strange way that might suit lefties anyway. Given that they seem to have no interest in retaining so-called 'red tory/tory light' votes, never mind attracting the current centre or right voters needed to actually win a general election, their only chance of even a share of power might be some sort of coalition in a hung parliament.
 
Last edited:
So lets say you're a labour voter, would you seriously consider voting tory perhaps cos you don't like corbyn?

That's like being a united fan but getting a season ticket for city cos they're better and you don't like mourinho.
I'll probably vote lib as they are the main challengers in my constituency... Is there many where labour and conservatives share the top two positions?
I doubt that there is many where it is such a stark choice between the two
 
Might as well just vote Conservative then given the Lib Dems have shown themselves willing to prop up a Conservative government

As said I can't vote for neither commies nor xenophobic aholes
 
But his point is that you vote for the people happy to side with them.

Ultimately there's not much to choose either. Hopefully the new lib dem would be less of a doormat to the rule Brittania then cleggs one was
 
I might vote for Corbyn depending on UKIP's chance of getting an MP elected in my constituency, though that seems unlikely at the moment.

I will consider the Lib Dems, however.
 
But his point is that you vote for the people happy to side with them.

That's how any parliament works when there's no absolute majority though, isn't it?

What would a Corbyn party do if the next parliament were hung, just proudly stand aside, and settle for another five years in opposition?
 
I'll probably vote lib as they are the main challengers in my constituency... Is there many where labour and conservatives share the top two positions?
I doubt that there is many where it is such a stark choice between the two
I am a labour voter so why would i vote anyone else.?

Like Marching, hes a tory voter and voted for them despite the fact cameron led them out the eu, you have to admire that commitment?
 
I'm reserving judgement on Labour for a while. Left and centre need to get their acts together.
 
Scottish Labour now fallen to 16% in the latest poll.
 
Labour MPs branded 'traitors' at conference and told they face deselection if they oppose Corbyn

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...raitors-at-conference-and-told-they-face-des/



So lets say you're a labour voter, would you seriously consider voting tory perhaps cos you don't like corbyn?

That's like being a united fan but getting a season ticket for city cos they're better and you don't like mourinho.

That would depend on why someone disliked Corbyn, and what motivated your earlier support for either of the main parties. If there isn't a local grievance, the divide between centre-left and centre-right can be a bridgeable one. Is it so very implausible that floating voter might trust May and Hammond with the economy over Corbyn and McDonnell?


Might as well just vote Conservative then given the Lib Dems have shown themselves willing to prop up a Conservative government

Should they have propped up Labour instead? Coalition government was something which the Lib Dems believed in strongly prior to the election, and the Tories were the only real option. Had they decided against an alliance with Cameron, the chances are that we'd have ended up a Conservative overall majority a few years sooner.
 
That would depend on why someone disliked Corbyn, and what motivated your earlier support for either of the main parties. If there isn't a local grievance, the divide between centre-left and centre-right can be a bridgeable one. Is it so very implausible that floating voter might trust May and Hammond with the economy over Corbyn and McDonnell?[/QUOTE]

Well that'd be going from left to right and its single policy voting, not for me and I don't get why anyone would do that. Also a bad example as the economy has been crap for years under the tories.
 
Then maybe they should have been voting in the Green or TUSC leadership elections instead of joining another party and voting in their's?
A bit harsh.

It's fathomable these folk were not members of any parties prior Corbyn being made leader, and felt the Labour Party was not consistent with their values. Let's be honest, the Greens before 2015 were more aligned with Corbyn's platform than Labour was at the time.
 
A bit harsh.

It's fathomable these folk were not members of any parties prior Corbyn being made leader, and felt the Labour Party was not consistent with their values. Let's be honest, the Greens before 2015 were more aligned with Corbyn's platform than Labour was at the time.

I see that, but if they felt the Greens were more consistent with their values then why not join them and vote for their leader?
 
Well that'd be going from left to right and its single policy voting, not for me and I don't get why anyone would do that. Also a bad example as the economy has been crap for years under the tories.

The economy is a rather big single issue, one that has dominated the past two general elections. Labour must also overcome two hurdles if it is to regain the confidence of the public: first, the residual hangover of their incumbency during the global crash; second and more importantly, the present leadership's lack of properly costed policies.
 
I see that, but if they felt the Greens were more consistent with their values then why not join them and vote for their leader?

It is a bit difficult to evaluate the data without knowing how many people fall into each category. The "did not vote for labour in 2015" demographic could be quite small.
 
It is a bit difficult to evaluate the data without knowing how many people fall into each category. The "did not vote for labour in 2015" demographic could be quite small.
It's about 20% of the vote, according to YouGov. Mainly Greens.

Also don't read too much in to the 18-24 voter breakdown, it's based on a subsample of about 50 people and the August YouGov which predicted the result exactly had that age group at 61-39 in Corbyn's favour.
 
There hasn't been anything unpredictable. Any strategist will have foreseen this. Let's see what the letter scheduled for release at 7:45 this morning has to say.

Edit: Move along. Nothing (much) to see here.

 
Last edited:
I'm more puzzled by the +57 who did not vote Labour in 2015.
Who did they vote for?
If no one, should they really be choosing Labour's leader for us now?

You can vote for us but feck off out of our party til then?

I do agree in some sense though, personally don't think you should have to have a clear record of voting Labour but you should have to be engaged locally and/or been a member for a given period.

Anyway, i see New Labour folk are out supporter their leader..oh wait no they're slagging off the members again and undermining the leader. Suprise suprise
 
There hasn't been anything unpredictable. Any strategist will have foreseen this. Let's see what the letter scheduled for release at 7:45 this morning has to say.

Edit: Move along. Nothing (much) to see here
What do you mean nothing much to see here? Corbyn is finished. The political titan that is John Ferrett has resigned as Portsmouth City Council leader.

Don't get this 'moderate' man confused with someone, with a similar name, calling for a new party, labelling Corbyn's backers his "political enemies" and saying he'd rather vote Tory than for them; this guy is...oh no it's the same one.
 
Looks like a compromise has been made on nuclear. Tone so far is very much stick with existing policy but actually put effort into multilateral disarmament.

Impressed with what ive heard so far.
 
Looks like a compromise has been made on nuclear. Tone so far is very much stick with existing policy but actually put effort into multilateral disarmament.

Impressed with what ive heard so far.

And immediately the Mirror gets a brief: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/labours-defence-chief-forced-drop-8916801

Sigh. I really hope this compromise was signed off by all. Labour really doesn't need to be focusing on nuclear weapons. It really isn't going to win an election.
 
unnamed-440x247.png


The scale of the issue.

http://labourlist.org/2016/09/exclusive-labour-on-course-for-worst-defeat-since-1935/
 
And immediately the Mirror gets a brief: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/labours-defence-chief-forced-drop-8916801

Sigh. I really hope this compromise was signed off by all. Labour really doesn't need to be focusing on nuclear weapons. It really isn't going to win an election.

Yeah Guardian presented that on the live feed. I dont think thats much tbh, speeches get changed and i think that line was prob removed as it could make it look like a dig at Corbyn.

Id be shocked if Labour change party policy on trident. Even if i do disagree with it.