Red Dreams
Full Member
30 million? he does not push the envelope in the creative midfielder dept.
he is.....Villa quality.
he is.....Villa quality.
We did go for Robben and he chose the Renties
He has so much potential.
After all this time, you would think people would just blindly trust Fergie.
It definitely seems we're interested. The story has that 'feel'
Milner is very highly rated amongst managers, pundits and scouts.
We did. We just thought we had better options on our wings. Besides, we are looking at him for an entirely different role to that he played at Leeds.if we're gonna spend 30 million quid on the yorkshire bastard, why didn't we get him for peanuts when he was at leeds? did we not rate him then?
Well the pundits don't know their arse from their elbow and he's clearly not rated all that by top managers or else they'd have bought him.Milner is very highly rated amongst managers, pundits and scouts.
if we're gonna spend 30 million quid on the yorkshire bastard, why didn't we get him for peanuts when he was at leeds? did we not rate him then?
Well the pundits don't know their arse from their elbow and he's clearly not rated all that by top managers or else they'd have bought him.
Tribal bolox has said we're in the race with Mancity.
Milner would add some goals from central midfield, but will most likely prove our "value for money" talk to be rubbish. Still, when top clubs go out and spend big they tend to be successful. So as long as Milner isnt the only midfielder coming in, over the odds or no, then I'm on board because he is a good player. Just not the playmaker I think should be our priority. As without one its asking a lot from Scholes next season...
according to wiki he's got 24 goals in around 245 games...10 at villa in 70 games..so i'm not sure we can say he'll offer many more goals but he's shown he's a good player. A grafter too. He's completely overpriced but he's English and that's the reason.
We still have cleverly to come back who's very promising so it will be interesting to see what we do
You do have to bare in mind that he's only been playing central midfield this season. And he's got 7 in the league from that position. You also have to take into account that several of them are penalties... Still, he has proven he can finish better than most of our central midfielders. I dont think its out of the question that he could get 8-10 goals as 1 of our 3 central midfielders next season, from open play as he probably wont be taking pens. Its not exactly Scholes in his prime but its a few more than our other midfielders tend to get.
The grafting will always be useful, but its surely a lower priority when you consider we have Fletcher and if Anderson is going to step up to the next level he'd provide something similar. We could really use someone to help us hold on to the ball and dominate midfield with our passing. Scholes can do it in part but he doesnt manage it every game and he cant play every game. And if we had another similar player in our 3 we could make it a 2 man job and make it easier on him as well as grooming his eventual replacement. For example Scholes playing his deep lying playmaker role he's been playing this season and then someone like Modric playing in front of him, next to Fletcher, Anderson or Milner or whoever. And then when Scholes is suspended, injured or needs a rest Modric could take on the role himself and fill in for him. Thats the kind of player I feel should take priority over "grafters" and players to add a few more goals from midfield. But if we got both then fair enough.
I think that when Villa players begin discussing the transfer then we know there's something to it. Petrov says, "If we try to match his ambition, and the club shows they are doing things the right way, i don't think he'll go somewhere else." Well if a player's ambition dictates that he wants to play at the very top, then Villa will never be able to match that; much like Barry before him, if a big club comes knocking then there will be a deal to be struck. I can't see City being interested in Milner, but he'd fit right into our United team. I don't agree with those writing him off as not being 'United quality', or those claiming that he wouldn't improve the squad; he's already proved that he can score, and that he can create, he's been doing it all season right here in the Premier League. He's won the PFA:YPY for a reason, and that's because he's lead that Villa team to a position in which, two games from the end of the season, they're in the running for a Champions League spot, and anyone still disputing his talent must know very little about Premier League football. Anyone complaining about his price must by now realise that nobody comes cheap; £20m is no longer a large sum of money for an establised Prem player; we can complain about expensive English players and muppet around after foreign alternatives all we like, but i believe that with James Milner we'd be getting what we pay for. We'd not be getting a young foreign potential with no English league experience and a craving for sunny weather, we'd be getting the top man from one of England's top clubs, trained to English standards by one of the country's top managers. I for one would be delighted to see him signed.
Well the pundits don't know their arse from their elbow and he's clearly not rated all that by top managers or else they'd have bought him.
Tribal bolox has said we're in the race with Mancity.
We'll be in a race with Man City for every player we attempt to buy. I wouldn't be surprised if they don't actually employ any scouts.
Would much prefer Modric or Gourcuff to Milner. We need a playmaker, and we're supposedly looking to compete with the best in Europe.
O'Neill recently compared him to a young Roy Keane or a Bryan Robson
High Praise
O'Neill recently compared him to a young Roy Keane or a Bryan Robson
High Praise
Chamez Milnero from Astoni Villareal, he'd the better option
Sounds like a shit unknown player to be fair..... Would rather Milner
Milner has been on my 3 signing shortlist for this summer, along with a creative midfielder (like Gourcuff) and a more defensive minded midfielder, not sure who that should be though.
For me, Milner would be a great addition to the squad, providing competition though the centre and on the wings. He can also fill in at full back. He is an intelligent player on the ball, decent passer and a decent goal scoring threat too.
I would like him at United, but I would hope that he is not the key signing this summer, as I don't think he is quite good enough to be what we need for next season. He would be a step up in quality, attacking wise, from Park imo.
I'm just comparing that if Carrick was worth 16m... I'd certainly pay 20m for Milner. His form in the CM this season has been superb and certainly gets recognition. Still.... if we can cough up a few more and get..... GOURCUFF who I think should be our United Zidane, then byebye Milner.
Im not Carrick's biggest fan but he's a different animal to Milner. Far classier, superior passing ability and is capable of dictating play and controlling a game. Milner isnt.