Iker Quesadillas
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
- Messages
- 4,951
- Supports
- Real Madrid
US got info that the Grim Reaper from the film series 'Final Destination' is up to no good in Gaza.
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) said on Monday that one of its facilities had received at least 28 dead people following the strike, including woman and children.
In a statement, the organisation said it had treated another 180 wounded Palestinians, with most suffering from serious shrapnel wounds, fractures, traumatic injuries and burns.
MSF rejected Israeli claims that the strike was precise, saying the "attack on a populated camp in a so-called ‘safe zone’ in Rafah shows the complete disregard for the lives of civilians in Gaza".
In a statement on Monday evening, the US called the images "heartbreaking", but insisted that Israel had a right to defend itself.
"Israel has a right to go after Hamas, and we understand this strike killed two senior Hamas terrorists who are responsible for attacks against Israeli civilians," a White House national security spokesperson said.
There is no way that only 35k people have died so far.
Oliver did a few times in his show. Absolute silence from Colbert and the restI have an irrational need to ask the following: have the likes of Stephen Colbert, John Oliver, Meyers etc shared their views on what's happening in Gaza?
Not that I expect comedians to solve world crises but more in the context of highlighting the Biden administration's absurdity on this subject. Or do only Republicans get made fun of?
Trump told donors he will crush pro-Palestinian protests, deport demonstrators
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/27/trump-israel-gaza-policy-donors/
Oliver has done segments in the past. Meyers interviewed Biden recently and didn’t mention Gaza. This is Colbert currentlyI have an irrational need to ask the following: have the likes of Stephen Colbert, John Oliver, Meyers etc shared their views on what's happening in Gaza?
When the 1st hospital attack happened, it led to weeks of discourse: "Palestinians can't shoot straight", death toll is actually much lower, accidentally hit fuel storage, etc. When they first raided a hospital, there was a lot of discourse: MRI machine armoury, tunnels underneath, etc. When they first mowed down people surrounding an aid truck, there was tons of dicsourse: Hamas did it, these were terrorists, etc.
Since then they have attacked almost every hospital using both air and ground forces, have massacred people lining up for aid multiple times, and there has been no discourse and no need for a cover story since it becomes an accepted part of this war.
I quite often think the same but I think it's time to rethink it. Calling the terrorist army incompetent feels like letting them off. There is no incompetence here, it's all calculated, deliberate terrorism."The most sophisticated and moral army in the world" are also grossly incompetent.
Been posted?
Thats your business. To me they are both utter evil. I despise them as much as I despise the right wing government in power in Israel right now. All they both want is as many deaths of civilian Palestinians as possible. Justifying it with flimsy excuses every time it occurs.I don't care really. I would rather have a neighbor who wouldn't give a shit if I dropped dead than a neighbor who is actively trying to murder me.
That's the thing here, as bad as hamas are (and they are) right now they are irrelevant, it's israel who is murdering innocents by the dozens on a daily basis.
Nope. That is you rather taking extravagant leaps to attach extra meanings beyond the scope of what I said. If I had desired to Include the West Bank & Syria or Lebannon for that matter in my post I would have. I ibstead talked of Hamas and their specific behavior.That's the issue you didn't bring up October 7th in your post. If you did and your point started from that moment then it would make some sense but you didn't and that's why it's absolutely senseless because for some reason you didn't spot that you are argumentation describes israelis and their actions against civilians in Gaza, the West Bank but also Syria and they happen to kill far more on a yearly basis.
Ok. So Hamas has an interest in inflating the death toll, but has no track record of doing so in multiple past bombardments, and you believe they have this time. All I need to know
How so many people can be confused on this is beyond me. Hamas targets civilians of Israel. They want to kill civilians. Woman and children. That is their goal. They use their own population, women and children, as human shields. They want their own population to get killed, so it reflects badly on Israel. This is their strategy. The numbers Hamas have provided may be correct or even too low, but UN recently revised it's estimate of women and children killed by about half, based on Hamas not being a reliable source. It is impossible to know what is the correct numbers. People taking Hamas' word regarding this as fact, is ludicrous. One shows oneself to be willing to belive just about anything, on very little evidence.
This is a completely ignorant post.How so many people can be confused on this is beyond me. Hamas targets civilians of Israel. They want to kill civilians. Woman and children. That is their goal. They use their own population, women and children, as human shields. They want their own population to get killed, so it reflects badly on Israel. This is their strategy. The numbers Hamas have provided may be correct or even too low, but UN recently revised it's estimate of women and children killed by about half, based on Hamas not being a reliable source. It is impossible to know what is the correct numbers. People taking Hamas' word regarding this as fact, is ludicrous. One shows oneself to be willing to belive just about anything, on very little evidence.
You don't know what you are talking about. This is complete nonsense.The numbers Hamas have provided may be correct or even too low, but UN recently revised it's estimate of women and children killed by about half, based on Hamas not being a reliable source.
The overall number of reported deaths in Gaza - which currently stands at more than 35,000 - has not changed, but the UN now says incomplete information has led to the revision.
The UN has denied that the estimated death toll of women and children in the war in Gaza has been revised downward, pointing towards a confusion between the total numbers of dead bodies recorded, and the number of those who have so far been fully identified.
Now for anyone who is genuinely interested in the different orgs methods, potential discrepancies and the reasons for these discrepancies, here are two useful articles.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-69014893
https://www.theguardian.com/world/a...revises-figures-for-women-and-children-killed
Of course it's not.This is a completely ignorant post.
What about it is nonsense?You don't know what you are talking about. This is complete nonsense.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...r-35000-not-all-bodies-identified-2024-05-13/"Unfortunately we have the sad experience of coordinating with the Ministry of Health on casualty figures every few years for large mass casualty incidents in Gaza, and in past times their figures have proven to be generally accurate," Haq said.
The World Health Organization "has a long-standing cooperation with the MoH in Gaza and we can attest that MoH has good capacity in data collection/analysis and its previous reporting has been considered credible," said WHO spokesperson Margaret Harris.
You have absolutely no idea what you 're talking about. Your display of ignorance about this topic is astonishing.Of course it's not.
What about it is nonsense?
All my points still stand.. The guy above have only confirmed what I first stated. Hamas is the only source, so of course everyone relies on itYou have absolutely no idea what you 're talking about. Your display of ignorance about this topic is astonishing.
This seems to have been directed against a former ICC prosecutor, not Khan.
Of course it's not.
What about it is nonsense?
frankly, anyone who still believes that Palestinians casualties are caused by "human shields" is either ignorant or just comfortable with genocide. Either way the guy sounds like a trollEverything you wrote here was nonsense that was not backed by evidence. Starting with the Mosul death ratio (I have followed the Iraqi liberation war from ISIS every minute for every day for 3 years).
Ending it with "numbers revised" . If you had the good faith you could have easily read the UN report that simply contradict what you claim.
Not in the sense you think he did.All my points still stand.. The guy above have only confirmed what I first stated. Hamas is the only source, so of course everyone relies on it
I mean, if you say so!Everything you wrote here was nonsense that was not backed by evidence. Starting with the Mosul death ratio (I have followed the Iraqi liberation war from ISIS every minute for every day for 3 years).
Maybe I missed that part. As far as I can see it confirms my pointEnding it with "numbers revised" . If you had the good faith you could have easily read the UN report that simply contradict what you claim.
I do..Not in the sense you think he did.
The confidence with which you hammer your absolute lack of knowledge and understanding is a sight to behold.
I thought that you were trolling at first, but it seems that you truly believe what you're writing.
Only outcome possible now is ethnic cleansing eventually succeeding. Some Arab/Palestinian population will remain in what he called as "Greater Israel" as citizens with lesser rights against the Jewish ones, somewhat similar to how it is in Malaysia for minoring Indian and Chinese population.Thanks for this, I think it's quite good. I'm not 100% on board, but I do like the framing and the virtually irrefutable claims that this has massively diminished the prospect of peace for Israel in the future. That's the bit that is so obvious and I assume must just not be getting through to the Israelis in Israel. Netanyahu and these far right morons are jeapordising the future of the entire Israeli project, for their own selfish reasons.
I think the single most glaring issue at the moment is simply that no one is coming up with answers anymore, anywhere. There is no longer a solution on the horizon. It's easy to criticise the US, but the same people doing so are also expecting a future (Trump!?) administration to oversee whatever comes next. We need to arrive at a post-Netanyahu point, and somehow find leadership that is willing to move towards a two-state solution, at a time when it has been all but abandoned.
There just isn't another option. As much as the last (almost year!) has poisoned the views of many on Israel, it is not going anywhere. Even once all settlements have been removed, the 67 borders adhered to, I don't see that being 'good enough' for Hamas or whomever inherits that mantle.
Just have no idea anymore.