But the US are just as bad as Hamas! All western nations are to blame for October 7th! Israel is just a US puppet! And so forth.
Some of the views in this thread are genuinely remarkable. There's at least a couple posters spending their time digging through Twitter black holes to find the worst incident an IDF or settler has done to show, I assume, Hamas' actions are no different. They also believe Hamas is just a natural progression of the sitauaton. Israel is the only actual actor here. Sorry, Israel and the colonialist West. The indifference or outright hostility of the Muslim world towards the Gazans means nothing. Iran hating them, Egypt (who also owned Gaza for a stretch) abandoning them.
Ignoring the failures of leadership on both sides to actually settle on a two state solution. Ignoring the fact Israel has been attacked relentlessly for its entire history. Literally since day 1.
Personally I believe that the two state solution has to be the path forward, but that Hamas has done more to damage that future with their actions then anyone, possibly in the history of the turbulent region. Hamas has empowered the disgusting actions of Netanyahu. Without the October 7th attack, just about everyone in Gaza would be better off today, and better off in the medium term.
What these posters actually want is for Israel to not exist where it does. That's fine, but at least be honest about it.
There are also those that seem to want to ignore that what Israel is doing is not morally wrong. It is morally wrong. And we should all be praying/hoping that some sense comes to those with the ability to reign in Netanyahu, who I hope will now be remembered as both a corrupt criminal and a war criminal.
I've got just a couple of points about this.
Firstly, I think those posters actually are honest about it and have explicitly said so. One on this page or the previous page in fact. I've also been upfront about the fact that if I was a Palestinian in the 30s or 40s (or Arab if people prefer to say they don't exist), I most likely would have fought (and owlo has said likewise) and imagine most people would have, at the migration of a people who's ideology was to set up a state on the land you call your own and who's UN legitimacy came via heavy 'leaning' (to put it lightly) from the USA and the Zionists at the time. The oft used a land without a people for a people without a land was a misnomer.
This included Liberia, Nicaragua and France, who said aid withdrawal was in play if they voted against, Philippines, who mysteriously changed their vote from no, with a comment on how repugnant the resolution was, to a yes following a phone call from Washington after the initial vote had been delayed by zionist filibustering, Haiti who suddenly received a payment of 5 million dollars, death threats against the Indian rulers for their stance etc. I imagine there were more. I have my own thoughts on part of the reason for the acceptability being that the modern world has been shaped by Europeans flowing abroad and finding three 'new' worlds, at the expense of the people who happened to be living there at the time. There is also no doubt in my mind that even if the UN had voted no (as the initial vote seemed likely to do), the Zionists at the time would not have listened, having been trying to create facts on the ground for decades before this and with strong American support. But ah well, such is life and it is often not fair.
Still, it happened, there is no going back now and the Jews are not going to leave (nor should they). So a solution has to be found within those parameters, whatever they may be. Personally, I think the scales have tipped in terms of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians being the most likely outcome now sadly and so the situation will have gone full circle in a way.
The other point is that I feel intensely uncomfortable whenever I see someone make the bolded statement. To me, it is the same as when people ask 'why did the Jews suffer so much discrimination', the underlying message being that that they somehow brought it upon themselves. Not denying that the Palestinians have missed opportunities. But its also not accurate. You're talking about Governments, as opposed to the people, who are still heavily Pro Palestinian. The Governments have their reasons for their stances, mostly being to come under the Western economic and military umbrella, as well as to avoid any prospect of conflict with the Israeli military, which Egypt, Syria and Jordan in particular have learnt over and over again conflict will end in humiliation of their forces, land loss and, if its going another way, overwhelming American military support and the threat of nuclear weapon use. Syria for instance has been hit repeatedly by Israeli air strikes in the past year/decade, seemingly with almost no ability to protect their skies against such an attack.
That's not to say there's support for Hamas, who are seen with utter disdain by almost every single Arab/Muslim person I know or have heard of.
Edit: I agree generally with the point that there's not much point going through the depths of twitter to find the most depraved shit on both sides but disagree that one has to do so with the settlers/ IDF. Almost 100 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank since October 7th 2023, which was already the most lethal year for West Bank Palestinians even beforehand for a long time. Settler violence is a pretty regular occurance there, not some random thing that almost never pops up. Its also slightly beyond the point of calling them a fringe extreme, when 1 in every 16 Israelis are currently living in settlements.