Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Jews have a historic and a moral right to the land
I find even this argument a bit problematic. Civilizations who played the game of thrones and lost and moved away from where they originated from have no moral right to their home land. Else we will be having problems all around the world.
 
o just so people know why Israel has more land after 1967; because it pushed back an attack from 3 points and it survived. And the losers, are now complain, " common...seriously...no joke..can we have the land back? Promise we not try to kill you no more!"
You mean the 6 day war when Israel invaded Egypt and took the entire Sinai peninsula and the Gaza strip because Nassr threatened to cut off Israeli shipping just like they did in 1956 as well?

I agree that the Arab world was far more united against Israel then than it is now, but a bit shelling from Syria, a half hearted push into the West Bank that killed less than 20 people by Jordan, while Israel stormed Egypt is hardly a major attack from 3 points.
 
I understand people condemning Israel's counterattack in general. But it's happening either way at this point. So I think it's ironic that some people direct their outrage at the fact that they are sharing their battle plan with the enemy to give at least some people the chance to get away from the fighting and not at Hamad, who are reportedly telling people to stay put.

The outrage is with Israel's attack.

The Hamas attack was outrageous. Israel have sunk even lower and are about to create one of the biggest humanitarian crisis's of all time.

They have no regard for the hostages that Hamas have taken. They will be seen as collateral damage in Israels quest to destroy the Palestinian people.

Quite honestly, it is so unbelievable that Hamas planned and carried out this attached without Mossad knowing about it. The Biden administration just came out and said they received credible intel that there was an increased risk of attack.

My theory - Israel allowed the attack on their own people, just so they had the cover to wipe out Gaza and it's people.
 
There are ways around it if the will is there from all sides. New borders can be drawn around most of the major blocks that sit astride the 67 lines, and other land transferred to the Palestinians in exchange (the 67 lines aren't sacrosanct but a basis for negotiations). Some of the settlers could be allowed to remain in the new state, as residents of the state if they so choose. And yes there would need to be expulsions, with compensation and incentives provided by the Israeli government. Without a genuine enthusiasm for the two-state solution from both sides, none of these things can happen. But what was thought possible in the late 90s vis-a-vis the settlements hasn't necessarily become impossible in the last 20-25 in practical terms.

Jerusalem and the refugees are in my opinion a bigger stumbling block to a negotiated settlement. in the event both sides reach a point where they agree to return to the table.

Id say that’s about right for now, especially Jerusalem, but I do wonder how things might have changed by the time Israel are ready to return to the table. They’ll only get more dominant, and more oppressive in response to violence.

To be clear, I'm not optimistic at all. I wrote that for any of these arrangements to have a chance of working, there needs to be a genuine enthusiasm for the plan. But for me a problem greater than the practicalities with settlement building and expansion is that it completely saps the enthusiasm and trust that Palestinians could potentially place in such a plan.

This speaks to my above point; the more dominant Israel are, the more powerful they are in negotiations. But from a Palestinian point of view, this reality doesn’t exist.How can you square both trust and enthusiasm for a plan on both sides with reality? just doesn’t work. Assuming we get through the next 6 months with any trust left, how do you convince the Palestinians to realise how weak they are at the negotiating table and accept that, and how do you get the Israelis to accept that a state for the Palestinians is a safe security option? Even the rhetoric here revolves around how “unfair“ it is, which isnt the basis for honest negotiating

feeling is this is too far gone for several decades at least. By which time the Palestinians will be so marginalised, there may not be enough left.
 
“There were numerous indicators of a change in posture generally by Hamas and then pivoting both in public rhetoric and posture more towards violence and attacks generally,” said one source familiar with US intelligence.

 
Right, I guess where I'm coming from is I tend to assume that settlements and settler power in Israeli politics/demographics have now gotten to a place where a 2 state solution is impossible, though I remember the right saying that removing the settlements from Gaza would lead to hundreds or thousands of jew on jew violence deaths and that not happening when Sharon disengaged and bought off the settlers with 200K or whatever it was.

Sorry I see you asked for a link - this is a recent quote from an article by a former Israeli diplomat and advisor to Shimon Peres:

"It is important to dwell on the issue of the land swaps, because it has the potential to disprove the “too late” claim that there is no possibility of evacuating the approximately 650,000 Israelis who live beyond the Green Line. The principle of the exchange of territories allows about 80% of the settlers to remain in their homes and be included within the boundaries of the State of Israel within an agreed border. In this way, it will be possible to significantly reduce the number of settlers who will be forced to move to the territory of the State of Israel through evacuation and compensation (or who will remain within the territory of the Palestinian state, if so agreed) to orders of magnitude that will not constitute an impossible task for the State of Israel."

https://www.pij.org/articles/2201/w...ospects-of-the-twostate-solution-is-justified
 
Israelis just bombed a press crew on the Lebanese border.
A friend of a friend has been torn into 2, even though all of them are journalists and were wearing "press". He was a cameraman for Reuters. I got the video an hour ago but only just got the news its actually him in the video.

Another example of Israeli barbarianism, but I guess this side of the border we aren't human right? So we don't have any rights or anything :)
 
Israel just bombed people evacuating. Genocidal maniacs. May Palestine be free one day
 
Sorry I see you asked for a link - this is a recent quote from an article by a former Israeli diplomat and advisor to Shimon Peres:

"It is important to dwell on the issue of the land swaps, because it has the potential to disprove the “too late” claim that there is no possibility of evacuating the approximately 650,000 Israelis who live beyond the Green Line. The principle of the exchange of territories allows about 80% of the settlers to remain in their homes and be included within the boundaries of the State of Israel within an agreed border. In this way, it will be possible to significantly reduce the number of settlers who will be forced to move to the territory of the State of Israel through evacuation and compensation (or who will remain within the territory of the Palestinian state, if so agreed) to orders of magnitude that will not constitute an impossible task for the State of Israel."

https://www.pij.org/articles/2201/w...ospects-of-the-twostate-solution-is-justified

Thanks a lot for sharing this. Wouldn't it be possible to place Jerusalem under international control and make it an open city?
 
Has it been proven that some of the images that have been released were made using AI? That's a very scary thought for both this and future conflicts.
 
The outrage is with Israel's attack.

The Hamas attack was outrageous. Israel have sunk even lower and are about to create one of the biggest humanitarian crisis's of all time.

They have no regard for the hostages that Hamas have taken. They will be seen as collateral damage in Israels quest to destroy the Palestinian people.

Quite honestly, it is so unbelievable that Hamas planned and carried out this attached without Mossad knowing about it. The Biden administration just came out and said they received credible intel that there was an increased risk of attack.

My theory - Israel allowed the attack on their own people, just so they had the cover to wipe out Gaza and it's people.
Yeah, just like 9/11 was an inside job.
 
Can you explain how it's ironic that people are more outraged at the people planning to bomb and displace a million people, than the people who aren't? There are three types of irony: verbal, dramatic, and situational, though I never remember what they mean. This is a new one, though.
Which side isn't planning to bomb loads of people in this conflict though?
 
Israelis just bombed a press crew on the Lebanese border.
A friend of a friend has been torn into 2, even though all of them are journalists and were wearing "press". He was a cameraman for Reuters. I got the video an hour ago but only just got the news its actually him in the video.

Another example of Israeli barbarianism, but I guess this side of the border we aren't human right? So we don't have any rights or anything :)

Must've been some Hamas operative within a radius of 100km, because that's the range of their collateral damage
 
Thanks a lot for sharing this. Wouldn't it be possible to place Jerusalem under international control and make it an open city?

Israel will never allow that. It’s under their control. I’m not really saying this as a criticism of Israel specifically- if the Palestinians had that same level of control they’d be hanging on too.
 
My theory - Israel allowed the attack on their own people, just so they had the cover to wipe out Gaza and it's people.
There it is again. Even the massacre on their own civilians is Israel's fault.

Also, they're not going to wipe out Gaza's people, stop being ridiculous.
 
The outrage is with Israel's attack.

The Hamas attack was outrageous. Israel have sunk even lower and are about to create one of the biggest humanitarian crisis's of all time.

They have no regard for the hostages that Hamas have taken. They will be seen as collateral damage in Israels quest to destroy the Palestinian people.

Quite honestly, it is so unbelievable that Hamas planned and carried out this attached without Mossad knowing about it. The Biden administration just came out and said they received credible intel that there was an increased risk of attack.

My theory - Israel allowed the attack on their own people, just so they had the cover to wipe out Gaza and it's people.

Ridiculous. There’s also nothing Israel can do other than go in and try to clear Hamas out. What’s the other option?
 
Thanks a lot for sharing this. Wouldn't it be possible to place Jerusalem under international control and make it an open city?

That was the idea in the 1947 partition plan. And very much my preferred option in the unlikely event a two-state solution ever appears on the agenda again. In today's climate it seems an impossibility to me, with too much of the mythology and nationalist sentiment underlying the rival narratives invested in the city to compromise.
 
You mean the 6 day war when Israel invaded Egypt and took the entire Sinai peninsula and the Gaza strip because Nassr threatened to cut off Israeli shipping just like they did in 1956 as well?

I agree that the Arab world was far more united against Israel then than it is now, but a bit shelling from Syria, a half hearted push into the West Bank that killed less than 20 people by Jordan, while Israel stormed Egypt is hardly a major attack from 3 points.

Yep this is what I was trying to say. The only genuine 3 sided attack was 1973, but that was very much not attacking over the 1967 borders.
 


Reuters and Al Jazeera journalists directly targeted by airstrikes, BBC team "assaulted and held at gunpoint" by Israeli police, in a few hours the Internet in Gaza will be taken down. The targeting of press and information seems to be a part of the strategy, not an accident.
 
The targeting of press and information seems to be a part of the strategy, not an accident.

They know what's coming, the more press and phones with internet, the more the world will witness their crimes.
 
Less good PR and more the absolute minimum they likely have to do to abide by humanitarian law. At least, you'd hope now, there is a possibility many people are in a safer area or at least be en route there and the invasion is localizing to one area which, whilst being far from ideal, is a lot more 'fair' for the average Joe caught in a war they didn't want. Looking at Liveuamap it does seem to be concentrating.
Maybe I guess but Israel is hardly a country to care about humanitarian law. Also cheers for the map link.
I was just surprised to see people attack one of the few good will gestures (even if it turns out to be entire cynical and hollow) between the two sides.
I could be wrong but I’ve mostly seen people attack it because it’s appear so hollow and cynical. Also I guess watching the last few days of bombing from Israel and seeing this apparent gesture isn’t going to go down well.
 
Israelis just bombed a press crew on the Lebanese border.
A friend of a friend has been torn into 2, even though all of them are journalists and were wearing "press". He was a cameraman for Reuters. I got the video an hour ago but only just got the news its actually him in the video.

Another example of Israeli barbarianism, but I guess this side of the border we aren't human right? So we don't have any rights or anything :)

I'm really sorry to hear about your loss buddy. Hope you and your family remain safe.
 
Attacking from 3 directions and still taking such an L that you actually lose territory must be...omg...the humiliation must be unbearable. Try to make it like..no...we did not have hundreds of thousands of soldiers ready to invade...no... :lol: Imagine trying to invade a nation and ending up actually losing territory.

In a thread that despite the heightened tensions has been relatively well natured and debated, certainly in comparison to most of the bile elsewhere on the internet (or indeed even on the Man Utd forum.....) your posts have to be amongst the most childish on here?
 



"..But there is very little confidence in western capitals that Israel will listen to calls for restraint. “They think they are facing a second potential Holocaust and fighting for the survival of the state,” says the EU official. “They’re not going to listen to us...”

"....European diplomats have also been struck by how little interest the Israeli government has shown in prioritising the lives of the hostages held in Gaza — some of whom come from European countries..."

"...And they share widespread concerns that once Israel has forced the Palestinians out of Gaza, it will never let them back..."
 
Last edited:
In a thread that despite the heightened tensions has been relatively well natured and debated, certainly in comparison to most of the bile elsewhere on the internet (or indeed even on the Man Utd forum.....) your posts have to be amongst the most childish on here?
The use of so many green smiles is quite annoying.
 
In a thread that despite the heightened tensions has been relatively well natured and debated, certainly in comparison to most of the bile elsewhere on the internet (or indeed even on the Man Utd forum.....) your posts have to be amongst the most childish on here?

Its the ‘us v them’ nature of it that so unnecessary. I think he genuinely sees this as a personal win for his team.
 
So what do we make



"..But there is very little confidence in western capitals that Israel will listen to calls for restraint. “They think they are facing a second potential Holocaust and fighting for the survival of the state,” says the EU official. “They’re not going to listen to us...”

"....European diplomats have also been struck by how little interest the Israeli government has shown in prioritising the lives of the hostages held in Gaza — some of whom come from European countries..."

"...And they share widespread concerns that once Israel has forced the Palestinians out of Gaza, it will never let them back..."

EU politicians trying to save their backsides because they know what is coming and they know that they unabled it for decades.
 
So what do we make



"..But there is very little confidence in western capitals that Israel will listen to calls for restraint. “They think they are facing a second potential Holocaust and fighting for the survival of the state,” says the EU official. “They’re not going to listen to us...”

"....European diplomats have also been struck by how little interest the Israeli government has shown in prioritising the lives of the hostages held in Gaza — some of whom come from European countries..."

"...And they share widespread concerns that once Israel has forced the Palestinians out of Gaza, it will never let them back..."
Wow.
 
So what do we make



"..But there is very little confidence in western capitals that Israel will listen to calls for restraint. “They think they are facing a second potential Holocaust and fighting for the survival of the state,” says the EU official. “They’re not going to listen to us...”

"....European diplomats have also been struck by how little interest the Israeli government has shown in prioritising the lives of the hostages held in Gaza — some of whom come from European countries..."

"...And they share widespread concerns that once Israel has forced the Palestinians out of Gaza, it will never let them back..."

Shoulder shrug. Platitudes about human rights after the event. They dropped leaflets. Most moral army in the world. What could they have done? Dresden. Ukraine. Many people in the West (and on this thread) likely secretly believing they deserve it. Do nothing. etc etc.