Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Kicking them to the curb was a major condition of the opposition. So you can assume not.
Yes, I thought so. Stay safe mate. I value your input here.
 
It's a descriptive not a legal definition. You can describe it as apartheid, without it being analogous.

You can have a system of apartheid (and Israel do) without being in the same situation as South Africa. You have many systems of apartheid around the world.

Apartheid definitions are borne from South Africa and don't define the hostility and lethality of the group you're dominating though. They don't look to the consequence of lifting that regime, because it was created with the MK in mind. Trying to paint the situations as the same is foolish.

Security considerations would likely play heavily into caselaw of a crime that has never actually been tried, as would offers of statehood, and any other myriad number of factors. And current circumstances (I dont think) would be counted, as it's a war.
youre defending apartheid. whats wrong with you?
 
It's rather a different situation. This is more a Grozny, Aleppo, or Bakhmut, where the only way to take the city without being slaughtered is fires.
It all boils down to the same thing - not every Palestinian is in Hamas nor a supporter. Not every Irish person was in the IRA nor a supporter.
one fact is true, what Israel might feel is the right thing for them today will come back to haunt them in the following decades. History of conflicts have taught us this
 
Interesting as someone in Germany you would write this given in '45 the country ceased to exist, was split up between the Allies, and was only reunited in 1990. There was literally a wall dividing Berlin that you couldn't cross as the Soviets ravaged the East while America brain drained the West. Losers in war always get completely fecked over, who knows how modern Germany would look if the Soviet Union had not collapsed.

That has absolutely nothing to do with anything I said.
 
The UN are at fault here, they should have pulled out their staffers as soon as news of the Hamas attacks broke. Anybody leaving staff in Gaza has exposed them to a city under siege, and it's why only the most fearless of journalists and never the UN have ever covered places like Mariupol and Grozny when under siege.
The staff at the hospitals and UN schools that israel have bomb are at fault right?

whats wrong with you?
 
As we reported earlier, the Hamas-run Health Ministry in Gaza says 1,055 people have been killed in the Gaza Strip and 5,184 injured since Israel began its air strikes.

Yesterday, it said 260 children and 230 women were among those killed. It also said six medical personnel had been killed and another 15 injured, and that eight journalists had also died.

The UN's Palestinian refugee agency says nine of its staff have been killed in Gaza since Saturday.

The Committee for the Protection of Journalists is collating reports of journalists that have been killed, injured or reported missing in both Israel and Gaza - it lists seven reported dead in Gaza.
 
Are the Far right Ministers still part of the Israeli government?


Kicking them to the curb was a major condition of the opposition. So you can assume not.

Feck me, this is mildly exciting news in times like this.
I wish I shared this assumption.

my guess is that they will have likely expanded the government,
and possibly made Ben Gvir and Smotrich feck off from the Security Cabinet....


But you'd assume it'll be all over the news if they were to be kicked out of the government entirely.

who can hope.
 
It all boils down to the same thing - not every Palestinian is in Hamas nor a supporter. Not every Irish person was in the IRA nor a supporter.
one fact is true, what Israel might feel is the right thing for them today will come back to haunt them in the following decades. History of conflicts have taught us this

I get the analogy you're trying to make, but the calculus was simply different. Had all of the IRA been stuck in Belfast unable to escape and they'd just rolled into London and killed 1200+, you could viably have seen a siege of the city. It wouldn't have looked the same as there were far less of them and they didn't have heavy weaponry, but it would have been brutal. Look at Afghanistan and Iraq. Places far away, but still.
 
The UN are at fault here, they should have pulled out their staffers as soon as news of the Hamas attacks broke. Anybody leaving staff in Gaza has exposed them to a city under siege, and it's why only the most fearless of journalists and never the UN have ever covered places like Mariupol and Grozny when under siege.

Let's not get carried away here. The people in Gaza and those there on humanitarian grounds are not at fault for anything.
 
Only after decades of branding the ANC as terrorists (Mandela was taken off the list in 2008) and recognizing the right of the Afrikaner regime to defend themselves :), until the end of the Cold War
I was actually going to write something about our apartheid (South Africa), Mandela being branded a terrorist etc. and what you can eventually expect when you oppress & dehumanize people long enough...in here yesterday, but thought against it. Because i realise i'd have accusations of whataboutism thrown my way, or even worse "trying to justify" what hamas did. And in the end, it won't matter a thing to anyone anyway.
 
Don't worry, the Israeli electorate will vote those right wingers back in at the next election.

Nope. Their careers are all but over.

In Israel, there are de facto only central or right-leaning parties. the left side of the map has become insignificant.

a more sane and "moderate" centric-right government will likely be elected, and for the Palestinians, nothing is going to change.
Nobody gives a shit about their fate so long as they keep quiet over there in the WB or Gaza and leave Israel alone.

a treaty with the Saudis can't ever be signed after what Gaza will turn into.
so no one is going to force the Israeli government's hand into even pretending it seeks to promote a 2-states solution.
 
Nope. Their careers are all but over.

In Israel, there are de facto only central or right-leaning parties. the left side of the map has become insignificant.

a more sane and "moderate" centric-right government will likely be elected, and for the Palestinians, nothing is going to change.
Nobody gives a shit about their fate so long as they keep quiet over there in the WB or Gaza and leave Israel alone.

a treaty with the Saudis can't ever be signed after what Gaza will turn into.
so no one is going to force the Israeli government's hand into even pretending it seeks to promote a 2-states solution.
Said everyone in reference to Bibi about 15 years ago.

The electorate can't get enough of these right-wing fanatics.
 
All of Israel's Arab neighbours today either hold friendly diplomatic relations with them or are in the process of formalising peace talks.
Syria. Lebanon/Hezbollah. They remain significant threats. And Iran of course although they're neither Arab nor neighbouring, they are the biggest existential threat to Israel.
 
That has absolutely nothing to do with anything I said.
You refuted a poster who was saying when does an aggressor ever not take advantage if they are the stronger force and made a sarcastic comment about how:

Yea I mean that's why I'm currently under a blockade in Germany where I'm not allowed to travel to any other country because France and UK is controlling our borders.

When in fact the Allies did more than control Germany's borders, they erased it as a country, split it into four and pillaged it.
 
The UN are at fault here, they should have pulled out their staffers as soon as news of the Hamas attacks broke. Anybody leaving staff in Gaza has exposed them to a city under siege, and it's why only the most fearless of journalists and never the UN have ever covered places like Mariupol and Grozny when under siege.

The UN is at fault for their staffers getting killed in indiscriminate bombings by Israel. Got it.
 
Except there is/was very large condemnation of Israel worldwide and support for the Palestinian people, we see it in the streets of Manchester/London, not too long ago there was someone on the caf asking about unfurling a Palestinian flag at a game somewhere. Just not enough support to influence Governments though I agree, and all governments worldwide know they would act in the same way.

Still, yes it shouldn't be excused, pressure should be put on Israel to do what no country has done before and show restraint.
The issue is protests usually amount to nothing (remember the Iraq war million man march?), and the media has also largely decided to run with a certain narrative at the behest of their editors. Ultimately its the Western governments who hold the cards, and they've opted to favour an unequivocal commitment to indulging the Israelis, even at the expense of Palestinian suffering, going as far as to veto anything, including something as innocuous as a UNSC resolution condemning illegal settlements. So its no wonder Israel believes it can carry out acting with impunity as their actions bear no diplomatic or economic consequences.
 
Said everyone in reference to Bibi about 15 years ago.

The electorate can't get enough of these right-wing fanatics.

I meant Smotrich and Ben Gvir.

Bibi, he's like a wizard, a cult leader. he can convince his followers that the earth is in the shape of a triangled zebra.

I hope he dies somehow, assassination, heart failure, don't care.
He is more of a danger to me and my friends than Ichyie Sinwar as far as I'm concerned.
 
I meant Smotrich and Ben Gvir.

Bibi, he's like a wizard, a cult leader. he can convince his followers that the earth is in the shape of a triangled zebra.

I hope he dies somehow, assassination, heart failure, don't care.
He is more of a danger to me and my friends than Ichyie Sinwar as far as I'm concerned.
So did I with my original comment. They'll all be voted back in the second they're running for office again.
 
Yes, it was. There's been a million articles about this; most are in agreement that mainly peaceful means not insurgent ones brought an end to apartheid. Happy to point you to a few.

I don't know where you are getting your articles from. They are wrong.

Here's a rough timeline of Apartheid in South Africa:

The movement starts peaceful
The Afrikaner regime clamps down hard on peaceful dissent with imprisonment and extrajudicial killings
A decision is made by the ANC to introduce armed struggle, initially focused on economic sabotage
Mandela and others go abroad for military training
Mandela and others are caught, sham trialed and sentenced to life imprisonment on Robben Island. Others move abroad to forward bases in Zambia/Mozambique/Zimbabwe once their minority/colonial governments fell, for planning and incursions against Apartheid troops
Meanwhile the majority black population in South Africa gradually make the interior ungovernable with violent resistance
Extrajudicial killings and imprisonment is heightened by the government, and ultimately an indefinite state of emergency is proclaimed, drafting many Afrikaners into military and intelligence to fight at home and abroad
Faced with the mounting costs of fighting at home and abroad, coupled with a loss of support from the West due to the end of the Cold War, De Klerk releases Mandela
De Klerk asks Mandela to renounce violence from his end as a precondition to negotiations. Mandela refuses, saying that the state needs to ramp off Apartheid first
The state looks to instigate "black on black" violence and destabilize free elections by infiltrating the ANC and IFP and trying to turn them against each other which works with limited success. Chris Hani is killed by an apartheid extremist.
Elections take place on 1994, and Mandela is ushered in as president.

The movement started peaceful in the 1940s/1950s. And the government responded with violence. And from that moment, until the eve of free elections, the resistance against Apartheid was violent.

Again, change your reading. Especially if your source is an Israeli website.
 
Syria. Lebanon/Hezbollah. They remain significant threats. And Iran of course although they're neither Arab nor neighbouring, they are the biggest existential threat to Israel.
Syria can barely keep their country together and have been devastated by a decade long civil war. Hezbollah are a militia. Iran have historically never invaded a nation since the days of the Persian Empire, and for all their evils they aren't as stupid to not realise that directly attacking nuclear Israel would lead to their own existential demise. Israel as a nuclear power with the US as its main ally are pretty much bulletproof.

But all of this is immaterial since it still doesn't explain why Israel hasn't declared its borders or ceased expanding settlements.
 
I was actually going to write something about our apartheid (South Africa), Mandela being branded a terrorist etc. and what you can eventually expect when you oppress & dehumanize people long enough...in here yesterday, but thought against it. Because i realise i'd have accusations of whataboutism thrown my way, or even worse "trying to justify" what hamas did. And in the end, it won't matter a thing to anyone anyway.

I've been in the museum in Joburg too many times mate. And I'm not an expert but still ;)
 
North Korea and South Korea co-exist with a guardened border between them. Could this serve as a template for a future 2-state solution?

(Yes I know people are saying the 2 state solution is dead but I'm not convinced)
 
Nope. Their careers are all but over.

In Israel, there are de facto only central or right-leaning parties. the left side of the map has become insignificant.

a more sane and "moderate" centric-right government will likely be elected, and for the Palestinians, nothing is going to change.
Nobody gives a shit about their fate so long as they keep quiet over there in the WB or Gaza and leave Israel alone.

a treaty with the Saudis can't ever be signed after what Gaza will turn into.
so no one is going to force the Israeli government's hand into even pretending it seeks to promote a 2-states solution.

Feck me that's bleak. Accurate, but bleak.
 
Let's not get carried away here. The people in Gaza and those there on humanitarian grounds are not at fault for anything.

They aren't at fault for sure. They are doing good work. But their managers and administrators are. I can't imagine why you'd leave your staff vulnerable in a city under siege, in the same way they were withdrawn from Mariupol and Bakhmut. It was clearly about to become a high intensity war zone.
 
You refuted a poster who was saying when does an aggressor ever not take advantage if they are the stronger force and made a sarcastic comment about how:



When in fact the Allies did more than control Germany's borders, they erased it as a country, split it into four and pillaged it.

West Germany was a fully democratic country that had control over themselves and their movement after 1955. If you honestly cannot see the difference between Germany post 1955 and Palestine now, and still want to equate them as the same or even similar in any way, I have to doubt your intentions or intelligence.
 
Thanks for this post, it's a really fascinating point highlighting the depths of complexity within Middle East relations. I'd seen recent videos of the Persepolis football match where fans actively reject the Palestinian flag, and then further videos of Iranian flags flying alongside Israeli ones in Paris gatherings. Both make much more sense now. Hopefully the IR regime crumbles. What it has both destroyed and simultaneously played a key role in establishing in the region is nothing short of heart-braking. Everyone would be better off with its demise.

Thanks mate. Yes, and also there is this famous video from 2020 Tehran right after Trump sent Suleimani to hell to burn eternally....The public refused to walk on Israeli/US flags and the few regime supporters who did it were massively booed and told at: Here is the video: (btw, how do we attach now that Twitter is X?)

https://x.com/emilyshar1/status/1710881841211638203?s=20

Also these were some of the photos of Iranians at Israel-support rally in Toronto (I'd hazard there were 200-300 Iranians there at least)

hVbxecR.png


1zdi8MY.png
 
North Korea and South Korea co-exist with a guardened border between them. Could this serve as a template for a future 2-state solution?

(Yes I know people are saying the 2 state solution is dead but I'm not convinced)

No, unless Israel behave like a country that has borders. And also no because no one will enforce any misconduct from Israel. I shared the article yesterday but these paragraphs point the finger at a fundamental issue and an issue that is still swept under the carpet.

Pardo said that as Mossad chief, he repeatedly warned Netanyahu that he needed to decide what Israel’s borders were, or risk the destruction of a state for the Jews.

In the past year, Pardo has become an outspoken critic against Netanyahu and his government’s push to reshape the judicial system, slamming his old boss for steps he said would lead Israel to become a dictatorship. His candid evaluation Wednesday of Israel’s military occupation is rare among leaders of the grassroots protest movement against the judicial overhaul, which has largely avoided talk of the occupation out of concern that it might scare away more nationalist supporters.

Pardo’s remarks, and the overhaul, come as Israel’s far-right government, which is made up of ultranationalist parties who support annexing the West Bank, is working to entrench Israel’s hold on the territory. Some ministers have pledged to double the number of settlers currently living in the West Bank, which stands at a half-million.
 
Increasingly looking like the beheaded babies story may have been correct. Just beyond horrific.

 
West Germany was a fully democratic country that had control over themselves and their movement after 1955. If you honestly cannot see the difference between Germany post 1955 and Palestine now, and still want to equate them as the same or even similar in any way, I have to doubt your intentions or intelligence.
You’re moving purposefully away from what you said and this is a weak response. Attempting to say I compared Palestine to West Germany is poor form, clearly dispelled by simply looking at the post exchange. The ending to your post is somewhat ironic.
 
Increasingly looking like the beheaded babies story may have been correct. Just beyond horrific.


Would prefer to see a direct quote confirming a contentious story and obviously hoping it's not true.

All of the UK media sites who led on it seem to have pulled it, except the DM of course, and only US and Israeli sites still running it from a cursory search.

EDIT: There's no number of victims mentioned either.