Yes, I thought so. Stay safe mate. I value your input here.Kicking them to the curb was a major condition of the opposition. So you can assume not.
Yes, I thought so. Stay safe mate. I value your input here.Kicking them to the curb was a major condition of the opposition. So you can assume not.
youre defending apartheid. whats wrong with you?It's a descriptive not a legal definition. You can describe it as apartheid, without it being analogous.
You can have a system of apartheid (and Israel do) without being in the same situation as South Africa. You have many systems of apartheid around the world.
Apartheid definitions are borne from South Africa and don't define the hostility and lethality of the group you're dominating though. They don't look to the consequence of lifting that regime, because it was created with the MK in mind. Trying to paint the situations as the same is foolish.
Security considerations would likely play heavily into caselaw of a crime that has never actually been tried, as would offers of statehood, and any other myriad number of factors. And current circumstances (I dont think) would be counted, as it's a war.
It all boils down to the same thing - not every Palestinian is in Hamas nor a supporter. Not every Irish person was in the IRA nor a supporter.It's rather a different situation. This is more a Grozny, Aleppo, or Bakhmut, where the only way to take the city without being slaughtered is fires.
Interesting as someone in Germany you would write this given in '45 the country ceased to exist, was split up between the Allies, and was only reunited in 1990. There was literally a wall dividing Berlin that you couldn't cross as the Soviets ravaged the East while America brain drained the West. Losers in war always get completely fecked over, who knows how modern Germany would look if the Soviet Union had not collapsed.
The staff at the hospitals and UN schools that israel have bomb are at fault right?The UN are at fault here, they should have pulled out their staffers as soon as news of the Hamas attacks broke. Anybody leaving staff in Gaza has exposed them to a city under siege, and it's why only the most fearless of journalists and never the UN have ever covered places like Mariupol and Grozny when under siege.
As we reported earlier, the Hamas-run Health Ministry in Gaza says 1,055 people have been killed in the Gaza Strip and 5,184 injured since Israel began its air strikes.
Yesterday, it said 260 children and 230 women were among those killed. It also said six medical personnel had been killed and another 15 injured, and that eight journalists had also died.
The UN's Palestinian refugee agency says nine of its staff have been killed in Gaza since Saturday.
The Committee for the Protection of Journalists is collating reports of journalists that have been killed, injured or reported missing in both Israel and Gaza - it lists seven reported dead in Gaza.
Are the Far right Ministers still part of the Israeli government?
Kicking them to the curb was a major condition of the opposition. So you can assume not.
It all boils down to the same thing - not every Palestinian is in Hamas nor a supporter. Not every Irish person was in the IRA nor a supporter.
one fact is true, what Israel might feel is the right thing for them today will come back to haunt them in the following decades. History of conflicts have taught us this
The UN are at fault here, they should have pulled out their staffers as soon as news of the Hamas attacks broke. Anybody leaving staff in Gaza has exposed them to a city under siege, and it's why only the most fearless of journalists and never the UN have ever covered places like Mariupol and Grozny when under siege.
I was actually going to write something about our apartheid (South Africa), Mandela being branded a terrorist etc. and what you can eventually expect when you oppress & dehumanize people long enough...in here yesterday, but thought against it. Because i realise i'd have accusations of whataboutism thrown my way, or even worse "trying to justify" what hamas did. And in the end, it won't matter a thing to anyone anyway.Only after decades of branding the ANC as terrorists (Mandela was taken off the list in 2008) and recognizing the right of the Afrikaner regime to defend themselves , until the end of the Cold War
Don't worry, the Israeli electorate will vote those right wingers back in at the next election.
Precisely.And if recent events cause you to say, "yeah feck all the history and context", then either your mind was already made up from the beginning, or your moral compass needs recalibration
Said everyone in reference to Bibi about 15 years ago.Nope. Their careers are all but over.
In Israel, there are de facto only central or right-leaning parties. the left side of the map has become insignificant.
a more sane and "moderate" centric-right government will likely be elected, and for the Palestinians, nothing is going to change.
Nobody gives a shit about their fate so long as they keep quiet over there in the WB or Gaza and leave Israel alone.
a treaty with the Saudis can't ever be signed after what Gaza will turn into.
so no one is going to force the Israeli government's hand into even pretending it seeks to promote a 2-states solution.
Syria. Lebanon/Hezbollah. They remain significant threats. And Iran of course although they're neither Arab nor neighbouring, they are the biggest existential threat to Israel.All of Israel's Arab neighbours today either hold friendly diplomatic relations with them or are in the process of formalising peace talks.
You refuted a poster who was saying when does an aggressor ever not take advantage if they are the stronger force and made a sarcastic comment about how:That has absolutely nothing to do with anything I said.
Yea I mean that's why I'm currently under a blockade in Germany where I'm not allowed to travel to any other country because France and UK is controlling our borders.
Yes, I thought so. Stay safe mate. I value your input here.
youre defending apartheid. whats wrong with you?
The UN are at fault here, they should have pulled out their staffers as soon as news of the Hamas attacks broke. Anybody leaving staff in Gaza has exposed them to a city under siege, and it's why only the most fearless of journalists and never the UN have ever covered places like Mariupol and Grozny when under siege.
The issue is protests usually amount to nothing (remember the Iraq war million man march?), and the media has also largely decided to run with a certain narrative at the behest of their editors. Ultimately its the Western governments who hold the cards, and they've opted to favour an unequivocal commitment to indulging the Israelis, even at the expense of Palestinian suffering, going as far as to veto anything, including something as innocuous as a UNSC resolution condemning illegal settlements. So its no wonder Israel believes it can carry out acting with impunity as their actions bear no diplomatic or economic consequences.Except there is/was very large condemnation of Israel worldwide and support for the Palestinian people, we see it in the streets of Manchester/London, not too long ago there was someone on the caf asking about unfurling a Palestinian flag at a game somewhere. Just not enough support to influence Governments though I agree, and all governments worldwide know they would act in the same way.
Still, yes it shouldn't be excused, pressure should be put on Israel to do what no country has done before and show restraint.
Becoming a thing...
Said everyone in reference to Bibi about 15 years ago.
The electorate can't get enough of these right-wing fanatics.
So did I with my original comment. They'll all be voted back in the second they're running for office again.I meant Smotrich and Ben Gvir.
Bibi, he's like a wizard, a cult leader. he can convince his followers that the earth is in the shape of a triangled zebra.
I hope he dies somehow, assassination, heart failure, don't care.
He is more of a danger to me and my friends than Ichyie Sinwar as far as I'm concerned.
Yes, it was. There's been a million articles about this; most are in agreement that mainly peaceful means not insurgent ones brought an end to apartheid. Happy to point you to a few.
Syria can barely keep their country together and have been devastated by a decade long civil war. Hezbollah are a militia. Iran have historically never invaded a nation since the days of the Persian Empire, and for all their evils they aren't as stupid to not realise that directly attacking nuclear Israel would lead to their own existential demise. Israel as a nuclear power with the US as its main ally are pretty much bulletproof.Syria. Lebanon/Hezbollah. They remain significant threats. And Iran of course although they're neither Arab nor neighbouring, they are the biggest existential threat to Israel.
I was actually going to write something about our apartheid (South Africa), Mandela being branded a terrorist etc. and what you can eventually expect when you oppress & dehumanize people long enough...in here yesterday, but thought against it. Because i realise i'd have accusations of whataboutism thrown my way, or even worse "trying to justify" what hamas did. And in the end, it won't matter a thing to anyone anyway.
Thoughts on this historical summary?
Yeah, I don't even think you need to be any sort of expert - just a high level of understanding and it will make sense.I've been in the museum in Joburg too many times mate. And I'm not an expert but still
So did I with my original comment. They'll all be voted back in the second they're running for office again.
Nope. Their careers are all but over.
In Israel, there are de facto only central or right-leaning parties. the left side of the map has become insignificant.
a more sane and "moderate" centric-right government will likely be elected, and for the Palestinians, nothing is going to change.
Nobody gives a shit about their fate so long as they keep quiet over there in the WB or Gaza and leave Israel alone.
a treaty with the Saudis can't ever be signed after what Gaza will turn into.
so no one is going to force the Israeli government's hand into even pretending it seeks to promote a 2-states solution.
Let's not get carried away here. The people in Gaza and those there on humanitarian grounds are not at fault for anything.
You refuted a poster who was saying when does an aggressor ever not take advantage if they are the stronger force and made a sarcastic comment about how:
When in fact the Allies did more than control Germany's borders, they erased it as a country, split it into four and pillaged it.
Thanks for this post, it's a really fascinating point highlighting the depths of complexity within Middle East relations. I'd seen recent videos of the Persepolis football match where fans actively reject the Palestinian flag, and then further videos of Iranian flags flying alongside Israeli ones in Paris gatherings. Both make much more sense now. Hopefully the IR regime crumbles. What it has both destroyed and simultaneously played a key role in establishing in the region is nothing short of heart-braking. Everyone would be better off with its demise.
North Korea and South Korea co-exist with a guardened border between them. Could this serve as a template for a future 2-state solution?
(Yes I know people are saying the 2 state solution is dead but I'm not convinced)
Pardo said that as Mossad chief, he repeatedly warned Netanyahu that he needed to decide what Israel’s borders were, or risk the destruction of a state for the Jews.
In the past year, Pardo has become an outspoken critic against Netanyahu and his government’s push to reshape the judicial system, slamming his old boss for steps he said would lead Israel to become a dictatorship. His candid evaluation Wednesday of Israel’s military occupation is rare among leaders of the grassroots protest movement against the judicial overhaul, which has largely avoided talk of the occupation out of concern that it might scare away more nationalist supporters.
Pardo’s remarks, and the overhaul, come as Israel’s far-right government, which is made up of ultranationalist parties who support annexing the West Bank, is working to entrench Israel’s hold on the territory. Some ministers have pledged to double the number of settlers currently living in the West Bank, which stands at a half-million.
You’re moving purposefully away from what you said and this is a weak response. Attempting to say I compared Palestine to West Germany is poor form, clearly dispelled by simply looking at the post exchange. The ending to your post is somewhat ironic.West Germany was a fully democratic country that had control over themselves and their movement after 1955. If you honestly cannot see the difference between Germany post 1955 and Palestine now, and still want to equate them as the same or even similar in any way, I have to doubt your intentions or intelligence.
Increasingly looking like the beheaded babies story may have been correct. Just beyond horrific.