Not true though, right? Let’s just say we trigger his one-year extension option before next summer, he’s still going to be 33 by the time he’s “free” to look for a new club. What club would realistically give someone that age a long and big contract anymore? If anything, he should expect a big drop off in pay and prestige for his next (aka last) comtract.
I think his best bet is to using the rest of this season to prove he fits Amorim’s system in every way he can, so that he can get some sort of extension beyond his current contract with us, likely at somewhat lower wage (who knows how it works). If he performs well, I think this is a good option for us in the short term, too, as we may need to reinforce elsewhere in the squad.
All that said, I think the most likely scenario here is for him to stay on the current contract until end of 2025/2026 season and leave for free then.
Maguire would be 32 before end of the season no club would offer him a long contract and if we have any sense we wouldn't either .
And I don't think we are getting any fee for him either as he is out of contract in summer and if we take the year extension then chances are he stays and leave as free agent in 2026-27 .
I get those who want to cash in now. Not for me, though.
He's good on the ball, is an asset in terms of the physicality of the league, is fine with being a squad option, and his mentality is incredible.
As a squad option, we can't ask for more. There are soooooo many players who need to leave before him as he can still positively contribute here.
I’d give him a 2.5 year contract on reduced terms - otherwise yeah, see you later HaroldHe's not as shit as many of us thought he was but it’s time for him to go. He's on silly salary and he won't be there by the time the next rebuild starts bearing its first fruit.
People wanting to extend 32-year-old Maguire after watching him for the last 6 years is too funny.Redemption
People wanting to extend 32-year-old Maguire after watching him for the last 6 years is too funny.
Maintains his value innit. In case Fulham want to try and steal him rather than pay 50mPeople wanting to extend 32-year-old Maguire after watching him for the last 6 years is too funny.
So many on here. This place is genuinely overly positivePeople wanting to extend 32-year-old Maguire after watching him for the last 6 years is too funny.
He was terrible today. Late to most challenges and in general just not commanding at all.
Still better than De Ligt though.. or so we've been told.
Maguire has a better long cross pass towards the left wing and might be slighty better at getting his head in front of the ball (but not better at aiming where the ball goes after hitting his head) than de Ligt. Other aspects, de Ligt is the superior player. De Ligt is also much younger and was much cheaper, i really dont understand why some would prefer Maguire over de Ligt. The only thing i can think off is English bias and the fact that de Ligt is an ETH purchase.
This, unfortunately. He isn’t a calamity but he’s also a midtable player. If we want to rise beyond midtable, we need better players than him. Sell while the redemption arc is still a thing.Today showed why you can’t extend his contract on the current terms. He’s not the awful player he was made out to be at times but he’s also seen his reputation grow by not playing as much. He’s a pretty ordinary and limited defender, same as he has always been.
By march he'll be 32 which means that the contract would take him to 34-35. Are we planning to learn from the casemiro mess?I’d give him a 2.5 year contract on reduced terms - otherwise yeah, see you later Harold
I’d give him a 2.5 year contract on reduced terms - otherwise yeah, see you later Harold