[AndyMUFC]

Every time he starts a game where we're expected to be on the front foot it's a struggle. He'll look decent when we're doing backs to the walls defending but on the flip side he's one of the reason we're doing so much defending in the first place.

He's just not good enough. One year extension maximum if we want to focus on other positions, but he should be gone this summer or next.

 

[Based Adnan]

The accuracy of his heading is bizarre, can go anywhere

 

[Andycoleno9]

Classic Maguire and reminder why we should not give him new contract. In a game where we must push high he becomes fouling maschine.
He is solid solution for teams with deep defence and that is it. Just not good enough for any bigger side.

 

[Andycoleno9]

People wanting to extend 32-year-old Maguire after watching him for the last 6 years is too funny.

United fans live by phrase; "You are good as you were in your last game".
It is our theme for a decade now. Hojlund, Pogba, Maguire, Lingard, Rashford McTominay......prime examples.

 

[CannibalSpectre]

Poor start but the best of the 3.

Thought he was comfortably the worst

 

[Pogue Mahone]

The accuracy of his heading is bizarre, can go anywhere

Hence the head shaped like a fifty p piece meme.

 

[userman]

People wanting to extend 32-year-old Maguire after watching him for the last 6 years is too funny.

Well since we’re already (most likely) letting go of both Lindelof and Evans, it makes sense to trigger Maguires option for another year even if it’s just as a squad option. Buying 2-3 new CBs on top of our other needs is a close to impossible task, so it would be poor squad planning to release him (in my opinion).

 

[NZT-One]

Well since we’re already (most likely) letting go of both Lindelof and Evans, it makes sense to trigger Maguires option for another year even if it’s just as a squad option. Buying 2-3 new CBs on top of our other needs is a close to impossible task, so it would be poor squad planning to release him (in my opinion).

Again - that would indicate that there are no other options for our 4th or 5th choice CB available and that we really need him since we plan to compete at all fronts. Both I think are fair to say are quite debatable at this point. We might as well bring in another veteran or promote somebody from the youth team. If it works out, fantastic, if not flip him a year later for a little profit maybe. Minutes for Maguire are somewhat waisted opportunities.

 

[userman]

Again - that would indicate that there are no other options for our 4th or 5th choice CB available and that we really need him since we plan to compete at all fronts. Both I think are fair to say are quite debatable at this point. We might as well bring in another veteran or promote somebody from the youth team. If it works out, fantastic, if not flip him a year later for a little profit maybe. Minutes for Maguire are somewhat waisted opportunities.

I’m pretty sure the club’s ambition and plan is to compete on as many fronts as possible at any given time, and that means it would be necessary with at least 5-6 senior CB’s if we’re playing with a 3 at the back. Based on the injury record of our defenders most will argue that 5 CBs in the squad is a very optimistic/naive approach.
I’m not his biggest fan, never really been either, but he has his strengths and claiming that it would be an easy task replacing him with another veteran or someone from the youth setup is undervaluing him.

IMO focus should be elsewhere when we’re recruiting than on the 4/5/6th choice CB.

 

[NZT-One]

I’m pretty sure the club’s ambition and plan is to compete on as many fronts as possible at any given time, and that means it would be necessary with at least 5-6 senior CB’s if we’re playing with a 3 at the back. Based on the injury record of our defenders most will argue that 5 CBs in the squad is a very optimistic/naive approach.
I’m not his biggest fan, never really been either, but he has his strengths and claiming that it would be an easy task replacing him with another veteran or someone from the youth setup is undervaluing him.

IMO focus should be elsewhere when we’re recruiting than on the 4/5/6th choice CB.

All this would make sense if we really would compete in multiple comps but we aren't. Therefor, the little bit of financial sense goes mostly out of the window. That isn't undervalueing him, I know he can be of use, but we have to look into the future and that means a strong and competitive first eleven has to be first priority at all costs. So as soon as he wants to be paid more than we are ready to pay our 4/5/6th choice CB, he should be gone.

We have to accept where we are. We have to accept that some of the things that made sense with SAF and when we were fighting for CL and PL don't make sense anymore. At least not for the time being. We are admitting that playing thursday and sunday every week is surely a factor for Amorim not being able to really imprint his ideas to the players as everything is about regeneration. Yet some fans are clamouring to be in as many comps as possible. Maybe it is exactly what we need - a season where we can play like a Leicester or an Aston Villa, having a full week of regeneration and training to finally achieve something. What we are doing since years is fixing the bike while riding it in a race at the same time. And we end up achieving nothing, neither fixing it, nor winning the race.

So much complaining about the recruitment but as soon as somebody is supposed to leave, it only needs a few decent games or (as with McTominay) a few good scenes and fans are losing memory. We have to break that pattern.

 

[A-man]

Has his strengths but overall quite limited player. One thing I don’t understand is how someone that is so dominant in the air can have such a poor direction of his headers. Even when he’s completely unchallenged, he clears the ball randomly.

 

[tentan]

How is he still at this club?

 

[Hammondo]

Not good enough on the ball, crumbles against the press.

 

[erikcred]

How is he still at this club?

He's probably among the last few players I'd get rid of. So many in the get-out queue before him.

 

[spiriticon]

Every time people keep saying he's on great form and playing extremely well, I look at our scores and we are conceding goals from everywhere.

I just don't get it.

 

[Foolsgold21]

By march he'll be 32 which means that the contract would take him to 34-35. Are we planning to learn from the casemiro mess?

Reduced terms ie £100k a week - I’d say that’s learning..?

 

[devilish]

Reduced terms ie £100k a week - I’d say that’s learning..?

Maguire is 32 on March. He's on 190k a week, his contract ends this year and we can trigger a one year extension. That leaves a 6 months (Jan till June) or 18 months ie around 15m in salary if we go to the max. A 2+1 will give him 5m till June then 5m per year for 2 years and an option for 5m taking it to the total of 20m. Considering that he'll be 35 then I doubt that we'll ever trigger that extension which puts him back to 15m. Some argue that Evans is better then Maguire and he's on 3.66m per year.

So ask yourself why on earth should Maguire would lose a potential huge signing on fee so he get approximately the same amount of money he'll get if United should trigger the contract extension? Why should United keep Maguire till age 34- 35 when he struggled with us even in his prime?

 

[Bebe]

He's too immobile to play that central role when we see a lot of the ball. Can play the long ball to the left, but he can't pass to his right for shit and can't move fast enough to create passing angles.

 

[CannibalSpectre]

How is he still at this club?

Incompetence of the highest level. We should've never bought him in the first place

 

[SuperiorXI]

Magure is playing decent but it'd be so typical of us to give him a new contract

 

[pratyush_utd]

We should move on when his contract expire next season.

Credit where is due though. Despite being trolled and mocked, he has put in decent performance and remained professional throughout his tenure at United.

Going to Italy should help his game.

 

[ArbeitervonWien]

Do you guys think we can get a better back up for deLigt for the money we may get out of Maguire?

We have a lot of problems in our squad, I don't think Maguire is one of them. I'd much rather sell Lindelof and get rid of Shaw, which would leave us with only 5 players for 3 positions if Evans leaves as well. Even if keep Shaw we'd generally still only have 5 player.

 

[Bebe]

Do you guys think we can get a better back up for deLigt for the money we may get out of Maguire?

We have a lot of problems in our squad, I don't think Maguire is one of them. I'd much rather sell Lindelof and get rid of Shaw, which would leave us with only 5 players for 3 positions if Evans leaves as well. Even if keep Shaw we'd generally still only have 5 player.

I'd really like to replace him with someone ten years younger. If the goal is to compete for the league in 2/3 years, which it should be, there's just no point in keeping Maguire around imo. That's not to discredit the point you make about cost effectiveness, but I don't think it actually is cost effective in the long run.