mattunited1978
doommonger
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,000
Utter shite, giant fecking clown
Copyright issues maybe? Like Vom Mistelroum and Farzel Haar if you know what I'm talking about.I have seen that several times, what is happening?
Agreed I've never seen a defender that does rash things constantly. If he used his head he would have allowed McTominay to try to win the ball back and wait to either to intercept the ball and or be a body that wont allow them to be in a 1v1 situation with DDG.Worst thing is, the poster is clearly wrong. Maguire creates a massive gap but going for a random ball and taking himself and McTomminay out of the game. He does this time after time. It’s just brainless.
Read my post again. First off, Verane doesn't even look at Verane. He completely ignores him. It's almost like he doesn't even know he's there, because he's ball watching. But the moment where the screw up happens is because of McTominay. He tries to tackle from behind when Maguire is stepping up on his man. Mc Tominay then gets in Maguire's way. McTominay should be ignoring the player and getting goal side and backing Maguire up.
Yes it does....The obvoius mistake is that McTominay goes in for a tackle that he shouldn't and Verane doesn't mark his man. McTominay takes Maguire out of the play trying to tackle Maguire's man. When Maguire steps up, McTominay should get goal side of Maguire, not also try and tackle. And Verane should be marking Rodriguez, not ball watching. But everyone wants to blame Maguire for everyting so they look for excuses to blame him...
I don't have anything against Maguire, this is just a redundant statement that is meaningless without evidence and shuts down the debate.
there is no reason to step up to make a tackle in that situation, Weghorst had very little space to work with and all the passing lanes were cut-off. He isn't a striker that is going to burst past you with pace, he's a 2m tall lump of a target man, who looks to lay off wide and get in the box.
so Maguire makes the decision to step in when all he has to do is jockey the player, and in your own words once he makes that decision he needs another player, already behind the play, to get back goal-side. By stepping in he exposes himself and the team to what happened, he over-commits, got beat easily and all the play opened up. It was a daft decision, and it cost us a goal.
Let's look at the same incident with Lindelof instead of Maguire.If you don't think Maguire was right to step up to Weghorst than there's no point in carrying this conversation because you obviously have no idea what you're talking about
As for his "over commitment", this is where McTominay needs to do better. If Maguire is coming in from one area McTominay should cover the other. Not try and also make a tackle. McTominay should be going to Maguire's left and covering. Then he easily intercepts. And Verane should be marking Rodriguez but he doesn't even look at him. And guess who scored the goal? Verane's man...
Let me check what Goldbridge had said on the matter... People have already responded to your post in relative detail — you are a poster with the clearest agenda on the matter.
If you don't think Maguire was right to step up to Weghorst than there's no point in carrying this conversation because you obviously have no idea what you're talking about
As for his "over commitment", this is where McTominay needs to do better. If Maguire is coming in from one area McTominay should cover the other. Not try and also make a tackle. McTominay should be going to Maguire's left and covering. Then he easily intercepts. And Verane should be marking Rodriguez but he doesn't even look at him. And guess who scored the goal? Verane's man...
He benches Ronaldo, he can sure as shit drop Maguire.Does anyone truly believe Ralf has the authority to drop Maguire this weekend IF he so chooses to of course?
I don't for a second. If Maguire is match fit he will play. The board won't allow him to be benched given he's the captain and his price tag.
Would Ralf pick him as captain if he had total control and came in during pre season? I doubt it very much.
I hope Ralf goes rogue and starts going against what I suspect are club orders.
If you don't think Maguire was right to step up to Weghorst than there's no point in carrying this conversation because you obviously have no idea what you're talking about
There’s McTominay, he’s your protection, all he’s got to do, Maguire, is keep pushing him away, he hasn’t got to overcommit
And they sit deep and protect the CB's at all costs.
His need to make split-second, game deciding decisions is reduced considerably for England.
Rio has no idea what he’s talking about, some random poster whom can’t spell Varane does though.this is what Rio said about it
Let me check what Goldbridge had said on the matter... People have already responded to your post in relative detail — you are a poster with the clearest agenda on the matter.
It was a joke, I don’t watch him but @SadlerMUFC did say that all who criticize Maguire can’t think for themselves and simply repeat Goldbridge’s arguments.Did you find out what he said about that? I just remember Mark losing his shit and clowning Arry to no end. Even called him the most cowardly captain in the history of our club when he retweeted his post match comments. I must say I concur..
@SadlerMUFC
It’s not even that; it’s interesting that some only focus on the goal-conceding error and not the plethora of daft things he did in a half where a less tolerant referee would have sent him off. In fact, he’s being shielded from wider criticism for his performance by that one incident, ironically enough.It's like Phil Jones support all over again where you're try to convince people a costly error a game isn't normal for a CB.
tl;ds version?
(too long, don’t subscribe)
Fascinating in-depth analysis that is perfectly summed up by the authortl;ds version?
(too long, don’t subscribe)
This isn’t to say he hasn’t had his own patches of poor individual form but, if he played in a system that did not hinder him, that could be improved. The more possession United control as a team, the less he’ll have to dive into duels as opposed to guarding space. A better United makes for a better Maguire.
Due to team deficiencies (big gaps between midfield & defence etc) Maguire (and other defensive partners) are in situations where they have to take quick decisions in exposed defensive positions. Due to the nature of his defensive partners (more passive) this is usually Maguire. His lack of agility and pace leaves him exposed if he doesn't get this right (see Tuesday evening). He's one of the best defenders in the PL at progressing the ball up the pitch and is crucial to our attacking which is very reliant on the left hand side.
It is isn’t to say he hasn’t had his own patches of poor individual form but, if he played in a system that did not hinder him, that could be improved. The more possession United control as a team, the less he’ll have to dive into duels as opposed to guarding space. A better United makes for a better Maguire.
Maguire as an example forces us football fans to ask a broader question about how we evaluate players: how much does the system around a player change what we see on our television screens? Maguire is a good defender — and he’s proved that he is even more than a defender, too.
I looked at the xGA when Lindelof and Varane played together for two games. It was 13% of our xGA in 5% of the games - over 2 xGA per game. It's a small sample but made me wonder if it was an expression of two more passive defenders playing together under the same team deficiencies. They didn't make headline mistakes but the opposition had too many big chances.
Copyright issues maybe? Like Vom Mistelroum and Farzel Haar if you know what I'm talking about.
Yeah howson mentioned yesterday that whilst he’s in top percentile in ball carries, he’s also among the worst in key defensive metrics. I mean his first job here is to defend and seemingly - he’s shit at it.The issue is that he glances over his mistakes, acknowledging them but not analyzing them (and allowing himself such vague statements like “he’s had his own patches of poor individual form” which is a bit of an understatement). It’s a good article that highlights Maguire’s other contributions, most notably on the ball, but it’s something that I’d imagine to read of a fan forum and not at The Athetic due to how one-sided the argument that he’s making is (regardless of whenever it’s a pro- or anti-Maguire sentiment).
The issue is that he glances over his mistakes, acknowledging them but not analyzing them (and allowing himself such vague statements like “he’s had his own patches of poor individual form” which is a bit of an understatement). It’s a good article that highlights Maguire’s other contributions, most notably on the ball, but it’s something that I’d imagine to read of a fan forum and not at The Athetic due to how one-sided the argument that he’s making is (regardless of whenever it’s a pro- or anti-Maguire sentiment).
Surely part of being a good defender is knowing your own skillset? If you lack the agility and pace to come out of the defensive line and lunge into a challenge then, you know, stop doing it?
It is a part of his skillset, he is front foot and makes a lot of interceptions but if he's forced by the poor team structure in regular desperate actions then mistakes will become more common.
But that’s my point. He’s not forced to do anything. He needs to make split second decisions about when to engage and when to back off. If he’s regularly getting those decisions wrong that’s all on him. Getting those decisions right consistently is literally the art of defending.
I think a lot of people decided he was too slow back when we signed him in 2019. And they've been looking for reasons to confirm that bias since day 1.
But if you actually look at his errors, it's not his pace that's the real issue. Stretching back to the beginning of the season, his main problem is actually his front-foot aggressive pressing. He mistimes his tackles in midfield far too often. It was even happening during the Liverpool game when Ole was still in charge.
The narrative around him is focussing on the wrong part of his game, imo. Whether he can fix that or not, is another matter. Assuming Rangnick-ball (or some variation of it) is here to stay, he'll need to.
Ah but dont forget the poster "knows more than most" presumably including the best CB of his generation so Rio must be wrong.this is what Rio said about it
team deficiencies (big gaps between midfield & defence etc) Maguire (and other defensive partners) are in situations where they have to take quick decisions in exposed defensive positions.
Not really. He glanced through them, giving a few points on the team’s structure that leads to Maguire trying to do what he can’t do but he doesn’t go into depth & generally dismisses them as a rarely occurrence.He does analyse the mistakes, it's the point of the article is it not? They're accentuated because of the poor team structure that forces the defence into drastic actions in exposed positions more often.