JustAFan
The Adebayo Akinfenwa of football photoshoppers
Bah they put up that sign after the massacre, then altered your memories.What the feck is King Eric on?
The town is right off I-84. I can't count the number of times I've seen this sign
Bah they put up that sign after the massacre, then altered your memories.What the feck is King Eric on?
The town is right off I-84. I can't count the number of times I've seen this sign
Bah they put up that sign after the massacre, then altered your memories.
What the feck is King Eric on?
The town is right off I-84. I can't count the number of times I've seen this sign
From that: "Down the rabbit hole of Sandy Hook conspiracy theories, some “truthers” consider Mills to be a possible government agent intended to discredit them and their movement."http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/vic...ell-try-to-prove-slain-teacher-never-existed/
A nut case going on trial for harassment of the family of one of the victims. He also is surprised at being made out to be a bad guy when all he did was ask questions.
This guy has a pregnant wife who is sick of his actions. But she is probably a government operative out to get him.
Another shing example of King Eric's peers.
From that: "Down the rabbit hole of Sandy Hook conspiracy theories, some “truthers” consider Mills to be a possible government agent intended to discredit them and their movement."
False flag within a false flag. Nice.
Again a reaction that should give anyone who puts any thought into this a good reason to question the so-called truthers. They will basically twist and spin anything to support their beliefs rather than actually be after the truth.From that: "Down the rabbit hole of Sandy Hook conspiracy theories, some “truthers” consider Mills to be a possible government agent intended to discredit them and their movement."
False flag within a false flag. Nice.
Nevermind that those 10k also have friends, families, relatives, confidantes. You are talking about 100k or more of people potentially knowing about the plot and yet keep schtum... For what, remind me again?Newtown where Sandy Hook is located has a population of over 27k. With the village of Sandy Hook accounting for 10k or so of that population. That's s lot of people to who would have to be in on it.
I think killing him individually would arouse too much suspicion. We'd have to bury his death in a larger massacre, which we'd stage, obviously, because we don't want to actually kill anyone. Well, apart form him... I say we hire a gunman to take just him out, then arrange for some paramedics to wheel some crash test dummies around and release some pics off google images to make it look like others were involved. But lets make sure we don't release the same pics as last time, 'cos people are starting to cotton on to that.
Also, and this is important, we should definitely make sure the actors we hire to portray his loved ones can't actually act, and are seen laughing and smiling and generally not looking sad enough every time they're interviewed.
On that note actually, have a look at the following:
Start at about 5:15. I find that to be pretty uncomfortable viewing, to be honest.
One day if a parent kisses his/hers child they are going to be arrested for child abuse, actually is almost like that.Am I missing something here? Are you not allowed to hold your kids close whilst being interviewed on tv?
Is this Queen Elizardbeth's doing again. Dastardly!
Most of the shootouts in US are gang related.That's a gangland shooting. Didn't you always argue that the criminals would always get guns no matter what?
None of us disagree with that. Gangs will find ways of getting guns. This isn't the same as a trouble kid going into a school and shooting people at random. This isn't the same as a child accidentally shooting his mother in a supermarket because she was allowed to openly carry her gun. This isn't the same as any Tom, Dick or Harry being able to buy a gun legally without ever being questioned as to why he wants a semi-automatic weapon.
Weak argument here Barros.
Baltimore, Washington DC and Chicago are on top of the list and all of them have one thing in common.Ireland has about 15 firearm murders a year, the UK has around 50. Baltimore last year had 300.
Baltimore, Washington DC and Chicago are on top of the list and all of them have one thing in common.
Unemployment, poverty and no family values.... Oops 3 things in commonGo on...
Unemployment, poverty and no family values kills people! Not guns!!!Unemployment, poverty and no family values.... Oops 3 things in common
Unemployment, poverty and no family values.... Oops 3 things in common
Unemployment, poverty and no family values.... Oops 3 things in common
Unemployment, poverty and no family values.... Oops 3 things in common
Just building on this. Gangs will not always find a way to obtain guns. The harder you make it the fewer will. Here in the USA its likely as easy as buying bread. In the UK etc, not so much.That's a gangland shooting. Didn't you always argue that the criminals would always get guns no matter what?
None of us disagree with that. Gangs will find ways of getting guns. This isn't the same as a trouble kid going into a school and shooting people at random. This isn't the same as a child accidentally shooting his mother in a supermarket because she was allowed to openly carry her gun. This isn't the same as any Tom, Dick or Harry being able to buy a gun legally without ever being questioned as to why he wants a semi-automatic weapon.
Weak argument here Barros.
Most of all big cities have the same problem, some more and some less.Washington and Chicago's murder rates aren't even that bad by American standards. Atlanta, Memphis and Indianapolis have very similar murder rates to those cities.
Ah alright, no reason to fix it if it's a widespread thing.Most of all big cities have the same problem, some more and some less.
They used machine guns not semi-automatic assault rifle looking guns, if they can get those in UK why you think even if we had gun control the gangs wouldn't get them? They live in an island and we have 2 huge borders.Just building on this. Gangs will not always find a way to obtain guns. The harder you make it the fewer will. Here in the USA its likely as easy as buying bread. In the UK etc, not so much.
Even Europe can't fix that same problem and is getting worseAh alright, no reason to fix it if it's a widespread thing.
Reread what I said.They used machine guns not semi-automatic assault rifle looking guns, if they can get those in UK why you think even if we had gun control the gangs wouldn't get them? They live in an island and we have 2 huge borders.
Which problem?Even Europe can't fix that same problem and is getting worse
Most of the big cities have problems with minorities like London and Brussels for example, only because the media and your politicians don't mention this problem that doesn't mean is not a problem.Which problem?
I didn't realize that was the "problem" in baltimore and dc but nevertheless... Even with this problem far far fewer people are dying by guns. I wonder why?Most of the big cities have problems with minorities like London and Brussels for example, only because the media and your politicians don't mention this problem that doesn't mean is not a problem.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/yes-there-are-no-go-zones-in-europe/
Most of the big cities have problems with minorities like London and Brussels for example, only because the media and your politicians don't mention this problem that doesn't mean is not a problem.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/yes-there-are-no-go-zones-in-europe/
What? Where in London is there a problem with minorities? Or are you just making shit up again?Most of the big cities have problems with minorities like London and Brussels for example, only because the media and your politicians don't mention this problem that doesn't mean is not a problem.
http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/yes-there-are-no-go-zones-in-europe/