Mockney
Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Columbine also had armed security of their own.
Maybe they weren't good enough guys?
Columbine also had armed security of their own.
Brilliant comedy on this page.
Maybe they weren't good enough guys?
Maybe they weren't good enough guys?
Damn white people with all those guns killing the world!
You know what would solve this honky genocide? More guns! feck yeah.
Psschh, you can prove anything with facts.
I don't know Mocks. Quite a few of the security guards in the United States have probably had previous military experience.
Yup, as far as we are concerned, Mugabe is the best person in the world... Damn, if only every leader was like Mugabe...
My post was tongue in cheek and not to be taken literally. It just highlights the prejudice in this thread, where genocide is not just a "White Christian", thing.
if you have to resort to comments like that you can be certain your argument is moronic.
if you have to resort to comments like that you can be certain your argument is moronic.
Psschh, you can prove anything with facts.
if you have to resort to comments like that you can be certain your argument is moronic.
Your post isn't what I was mocking mate
if you have to resort to comments like that you can be certain your argument is moronic.
If the guard is inside the office he will know a guy is coming with a gun and the fact a mass murder wannabe knows that school as a police office I bet you he will look for another school.
Are you mental?
If I know first-hand an armed security officer is in the school and I'm still hell-bent on shooting up the police, I'll find that fecker first and put a bullet in his head/chest. The art of surprise - he would have no idea I have a concealed weapon as I walk past him then turn and take him out. Now I have another weapon as I take his.
It's a ludicrous argument/thought to have armed guards in schools.
The NRA would like to have an army of George Zimmermans patrolling the schools. MJS likes this.
The gun laws of California[3][4] are some of the strictest in the United States. A Handgun Safety Certificate, obtained by passing a written test, is required for handgun purchases, although there are exemptions to this requirement[5]. Handguns sold by dealers must be "California legal" by being listed on the state's roster of handguns certified for sale. Private sales of firearms must be done through a licensed dealer. All firearm sales are recorded by the state, and have a ten-day waiting period. Unlike most other states, California has no provision in its state constitution that explicitly guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms.[1] The California Supreme Court has maintained that most of California's restrictive gun laws are constitutional based on the fact that the state's constitution does not explicitly guarantee private citizens the right to purchase, possess, or carry firearms. However recent US Supreme Court decisions of Heller (2008) and McDonald (2010) established that the 2nd Amendment applied to all states within the Union, and many of California's gun laws are now being challenged in the federal courts.
Semi-automatic firearms that the state has classified as assault weapons, .50 BMG caliber rifles, and magazines that can hold more than ten rounds of ammunition may not be sold in California. Possession of automatic firearms, and of short-barreled shotguns and rifles, is generally prohibited.
California is a "may-issue" state for permits to carry concealed guns. The willingness of issuing authorities in California ranges from No-Issue in most urban areas to Shall-Issue in rural counties. However, concealed carry permits are valid statewide, regardless of where they were issued. California does not recognize concealed carry permits issued by other states, and non-residents are generally forbidden from obtaining a California concealed carry permit.
California has state preemption for many, but not all, firearms laws. Actual enforcement of California's firearms laws also varies widely across the state. Urban areas, such as the San Francisco and Los Angeles metropolitan areas strictly enforce firearms laws, and some communities within these areas have passed local ordinances that make legally owning a firearm difficult. Meanwhile, some rural jurisdictions are narrowly enforcing the same firearms laws by targeting only those who demonstrate malicious intent, or not enforcing portions of the state's firearms laws at all.
This is from Wiki:
The California approach is an improvement on the free-for-all of some other states. Perhaps it could be a starting point for the next phase of the gun debate. And Feinstein is a California senator.
Columbine had an armed guard
Not sure if he had a chainsaw strapped to his head or not.
in fairness, the tosser he's interviewing basically doesn't give a flying feck about the 20 children that died because he and his group refuse to allow the restriction of assault weapons. He then turns it on it's head and claims it's the fact these weapons aren't allowed in schools that is the problem. I imagine he was making up his own figures as he was going along too.
How do you rationally debate with someone so detached from reality? Most people would be rattled by that level of scuminess
he also ably demonstrated the other part of the problem, the kid who took his mothers guns was not mentally ill, but evil.
Although I agree with largely agree with Piers Morgan it looks like he has found his home in America, his conduct is highly unprofessional, becoming emotionally charged and calling his guest an idiot, it seems to be the way with many of the news presenters over there.