Andy_Cole
Full Member
Best thing about this is reforms low number.
I actually think Sunak’s message about not giving Labour a supermajority could would against them as people might opt for Lim Dems in close races and bump them into the opposition party.At that scale of a landslide it would be slightly disappointing for the Tories to still be the official opposition, but at least it would be a strong message
One day I hope the person who came up with the first line of this gets to meet whoever did the second.I guess you were probably too busy wanking off to sweet squares twitter sprees every time kemi and her friend were being transphobic then.
In case it still flies over your head, I'm accusing you of using trans issues to score political points. Your post history says it all.
Now on to the block list you go, cause I have enough of your idioticy for today.
https://www.voice-online.co.uk/news...bandon-clacton-campaign-against-nigel-farage/
EXCLUSIVE: Labour candidate ‘in tears’ after being ordered to abandon Clacton campaign against Nigel Farage
Anger grows at the party’s treatment of Jovan Owusu-Nepaul and the news that it accepted a donation of thousands of pounds for his campaign the day after Labour HQ told him “never come back” to the constituency
Tracey Lewis, former Clacton Labour party member
“I am deeply disappointed with the Labour Party accepting funds for a campaign they knew they had destroyed. It’s money that as a family we could have used for nursery fees and ever-increasing household bills. I thought it worthwhile to invest in Jovan’s campaign for my children’s future, for a more tolerant country.
“I don’t understand how Labour HQ could be so short-sighted when there is a real chance to defeat Farage. Their flattening Jovan’s campaign is terrible. Keir Starmer should hold his party to higher standards.
The author continued: “I was encouraged by a report by Best for Britain saying that with support and tactical voting, Jovan could win in Clacton.
“I donated £7,500 to Clacton Labour, and £2,500 to Best for Britain.’ But more than the donation, I was upset at the fact of his being told to halt a successful campaign in such a key constituency.”
“I don’t understand how Labour HQ could be so short-sighted when there is a real chance to defeat Farage.
I guess you were probably too busy wanking off to sweet squares twitter sprees every time kemi and her friend were being transphobic then.
In case it still flies over your head, I'm accusing you of using trans issues to score political points. Your post history says it all.
Now on to the block list you go, cause I have enough of your idioticy for today.
Jess Bradley says "Hi!"Tbh it’s only really a “complicated issue” for people who think Trans people are inherently a risk to women.
WTF 23% reform?!
WTF 23% reform?!
Poll seems to be a strange oneI hear they're doing a big social media push.
It does kinda make you wonder if letting 16 year olds vote is such a good idea. I'm sure if they knew what reform really stood for there would be far less support.
Poll seems to be a strange one
Makes sense as these people will be dealing with realities of climate change more than older people.I met a 14/15 year old lad the other day who reckoned that 2/3 or more of his class would vote Green if they were allowed to, reckoned they were all very worried about climate change. Anecdotal as it comes of course!
Same here. I like their manifesto, but the local candidate has done absolutely nothing. Not even a leaflet through the door or a presence online.I might have been tempted by Lib Dems if they had a better local candidate. I generally prefer the Lib Dems manifesto to Labour though.
Same here. I like their manifesto, but the local candidate has done absolutely nothing. Not even a leaflet through the door or a presence online.
Of all the elections not to take it seriously.
I doubt most will get much inheritance as it will be used up by the boomers on their retirement and care costs.The interesting one will be seeing who some richer millennials vote for. Will they stay left leaning when the inheritance starts to kick in.
Anyone who isn't simply interested in using it as a tactic for short term gain knows it isn't a good idea. If anything, it should be raised to 25.It does kinda make you wonder if letting 16 year olds vote is such a good idea.
Anyone who isn't simply interested in using it as a tactic for short term gain knows it isn't a good idea. If anything, it should be raised to 25.
Some very good points there, but I think it could also just be kept at 18, which seems like a quite universally agreed upon compromise which most parts of the political spectrum can live with without feeling cheated.Why stop there? Let's go all the way back to the active/passive citizen distinction and only let those who own property vote. Or even further back, and allow only those who have served in the military. Or just ditch democracy all-together, let a Tyrant rule.
Anyone who isn't simply interested in using it as a tactic for short term gain knows it isn't a good idea. If anything, it should be raised to 25.
I'm not against lowering the age really. But I'd also add some kind of civics/political education to the HS corriculum.
Considering how plastic and malleable brains of 16 year olds are, that is only a good idea as long as you are confident that the prevailing civics/political education suits your purpose. What happens if a new political order decides to change that education in a way that is anathema to you? I really don't understand this idea - boys at 16 can't be relied upon to change their socks or underwear every other day, but are still expected to vote on issues far beyond their underdeveloped brains. Again, I don't see how this is a sensible idea anywhere at anytime, unless it's for short term political gain.I'm not against lowering the age really. But I'd also add some kind of civics/political education to the HS corriculum.
Considering how plastic and malleable brains of 16 year olds are, that is only a good idea as long as you are confident that the prevailing civics/political education suits your purpose. What happens if a new political order decides to change that education in a way that is anathema to you?
Teach them and then let it sink it for a few years. Don't make it possible for a government to teach kids how to vote in real time.Eh? Surely by this logic we shouldn't be teaching the kids anything? The reality is that not teaching your kids critical thinking skills from an early age is how you get adults without critical thinking skills - and thus uninformed voters.
Teach them and then let it sink it for a few years. Don't make it possible for a government to teach kids how to vote in real time.
I see schools are doing well to educate our young, fecking reform? feck me.
He seems to be a bigot is what he seems. He's on board with Tory policies about gender idendity not being taught in school.Ok, then. So no “separate trans wards” but fair cop on Starmer talking shite. He doesn’t seem to understand the policy being proposed.
Oh, perhaps. It's currently Angela Rayner's seat, and traditionally a safe seat for Labour.Didn't the lib dems say not too long ago that they weren't going to fund unwinnable seats? Whats the breakdown of you seat looking like? Safe tory or labour?
What makes you think there are general social sciences classes?That's not a thing already? Surely it must be. If nothing else as part of a general social sciences class.
I see schools are doing well to educate our young, fecking reform? feck me.
BREAKING: The final MRP projection by
@Survation
LAB: 484 CON: 64 LD: 61 SNP: 10 RFM: 7 PC: 3 GRN: 3 34,558 interviews conducted online and on the telephone
6:57 PM · Jul 2, 2024
·
945.3K
Views
That is a very big sample, very close to the election. It can't be true can it?