nickm
Full Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2001
- Messages
- 9,772
Unfortunately, Reform is going to get a lot more airtime as a result of this. Sigh.
He really is a nasty waste of afterbirth.Farage just attacked Starmer for reading his speech
Nahh, nobody is as bad as trump. Both parties are to the right of Biden but to the left of Trump.
He really is a nasty waste of afterbirth.
Yes, writing a thorough speech that goes beyond the usual one-issue bigoted soundbites aimed at an audience of mouth-frothing simpletons does require you to occasionally check over your notes.
Unfortunately, Reform is going to get a lot more airtime as a result of this. Sigh.
Reform are the Trump-like faction. They secured something like 14% of the vote but only got 4 seats thankfully. The Tories are traditionally akin to what the GOP are in the US, whereas Labour are supposed to be ideological bedfellows of the Dems. Though its far more nuanced than that because of overton shifts. Starmer (the Labour leader and new Prime Minister) is more of a Biden than he is a Sanders, whereas Sunak (The Tory leader and outgoing Prime Minister) is akin to someone like DeSantis. They're clumsy parallels which no doubt many will disagree with here but I'm trying to paint a very simplified picture for context.Tories are the equivalent of trump?
Yikes. People just get tired but you can't see a difference if you're not willing to help make a difference.
Nahh, still not nearly as bad as Trump. That guy is a full on fascist. Farage is to the left of fecking Trump.Rwanda, government contract fraud, Boris Johnson, Jacob Reece Mog etc... flying pretty close to Trump to be honest
God knows what the Greens are. Are they NIMBY moderate tory conservationists? Hard core zero growth redistributionists? Hippy agitators? Disaffected socialists? Good luck making a coherent party out of that lot.I don't think we can condense it down as simply as that. Are the Greens and this current Labour party for instance compatible bedfellows? I'd say Starmer's Labour has more in common with moderate elements of the Tory party than he does with the Greens.
I am over the moon to see the Tories gone they're awful, self serving pricks but, we've just watched a perfectly peaceful election and handover of power, no comparison to Trump at all.Rwanda, government contract fraud, Boris Johnson, Jacob Reece Mog etc... flying pretty close to Trump to be honest
From my interactions with them, they're mostly strident NIMBYs above all else.God knows what the Greens are. Are they NIMBY moderate tory conservationists? Hard core zero growth redistributionists? Hippy agitators? Disaffected socialists? Good luck making a coherent party out of that lot.
Reform got more votes than LibDem....will they still push PR as hard?
To be fair Starmer will do anything that gives him power. He has no ideology.I don't think we can condense it down as simply as that. Are the Greens and this current Labour party for instance compatible bedfellows? I'd say Starmer's Labour has more in common with moderate elements of the Tory party than he does with the Greens.
Unfortunately, Reform is going to get a lot more airtime as a result of this. Sigh.
I am over the moon to see the Tories gone they're awful, self serving pricks but, we've just watched a perfectly peaceful election and handover of power, no comparison to Trump at all.
Reform got more votes than LibDem....will they still push PR as hard?
That's being very kind to Starmer. He's a neo lib nutter who, like his ideological allies, has no problem lying and seeking out cultural battles to deflect away from the ongoing robbery of the working class.To be fair Starmer will do anything that gives him power. He has no ideology.
The Tories won’t be in his sights anymore ….Farage will aim solely at LabourProbably and unfortunately correct. I suppose the only positive of that might be that we can expect it to throw the the Conservatives (the little of them that remains) into another existential crisis, the result of which will probably see them shifting way over to the right and electing a nutter like Braverman (or even Farage) as leader, ceding all the centre ground to Labour and likely guaranteeing them another defeat in 2029.
Edit, sorry, I see you've just made this exact same point above re UKIP (who got about the same number of votes in 2015 (3.88m) as reform did yesterday).
I suppose one way to get net zero is to switch off all the electrics in the country, rather than build loads of zero emission capacity but I wish they'd be honest about it.From my interactions with them, they're mostly strident NIMBYs above all else.
The Tories won’t be in his sights anymore ….Farage will aim for Labour
So, when do we think Farage begins the push for the Tory leadership...
Limiting the influence of extremists like Farage is the exact strength of FPTP. I say we leave it well alone. if you are going to feck with the constitution at least do it holistically and carefully and not piecemeal, or we end up with more stuff like 51% non binding referenda forcing stupid results on ignorant people.Almost certainly Farage's next big campaign.
Limiting the influence of extremists like Farage is the exact strength of FPTP.
The issue wouldn't be quite as bad if people actually felt like their opinions were being heard.Limiting the influence of extremists like Farage is the exact strength of FPTP. I say we leave it well alone.
I agree but I think that issue is bigger than the specifics of how we vote for parties every 5 or so years. The issue of representation is bigger than that, I think.The issue wouldn't be quite as bad if people actually felt like their opinions were being heard.
This gem popped up on my feed.
The Liberal Democrats have tangible policies with a greater focus on the climate and nature crises, a desire to re-join the EU in some fashion, and support electoral reform.LibDems and Labour are more closely aligned now similar to when the SDP first broke away. Surely that's the way forward for both parties.
What exactly are the biggest differences between them?