Deery
Dreary
- Joined
- May 21, 2019
- Messages
- 18,590
Was it Moyes out?Do a bit of research before peddling nonsense mate.
Was it Moyes out?Do a bit of research before peddling nonsense mate.
But that's the annoying thing with Nev (and the rest of the pundit circle) He really doesn't tell us anything we don't know or already suspected. Of course he has all the faux shock and outrage the same as Goldbridge does but has an entirely different platform to peddle it on. A good ten minutes to get to the conclusion that water is wet. He's the master of stating the glaringly obvious.Everything he says about us is true. Can't dispute a single word.
Lifelong United fan that also made over 600 appearances for the club doesn't want to see us succeed. Ok then.Publicly suggesting our best hope of a managerial candidate avoid us, what an absolute pillock. Why would he go that far? Honestly think he doesn't want us to succeed.
Do a bit of research before peddling nonsense mate.
I did actually and there was no protest planned for the Norwich game before we lost to Everton. There was no thread about it in here until Saturday evening and no mention of it anywhere else, strange that, probably just a coincidence.
I presume you have evidence that the protest was planned before the Everton game? We wouldn't anyone accusing you of talking out of your arse now would we.
Is 'at this moment in time' some kind of GNev catchphrase?
It doesn't stand. ETH isn't going to let the opinion of one, young, unhappy footballer inform his decision making. Especially when it's such a massive opportunity for him.
Which is why it looks very much like he's on his way here.
A player who, let it not be forgotten, was got rid of by ETH’s club, with absolutely no indication that they did so against the manager’s will.Of course it’s drivel, why on Earth would you take the opinion of a disgruntled player who is failing elsewhere at the lower end of the table?
What insight does that give him? What insight could DvB, Manchester United sub have into the inner workings at the upper levels of the club? It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
Ragnick, absolutely, as Ragnick is now well aware from a manager’s perspective as to how the club is run, if they keep their promises etc etc, and he has an idea as to how the club will be run in future. However, considering Ragnick was given the trust to come onboard and will remain employed by the club, it’d be very very odd for him to warn ETH off.
Surely it's a better situation for Donny if ETH takes the job. Why would he be warning him off?
It doesn't stand. ETH isn't going to let the opinion of one, young, unhappy footballer inform his decision making. Especially when it's such a massive opportunity for him.
Which is why it looks very much like he's on his way here.
Its a bit like Ole being made Chelsea manager and the press speculating that the first things he’ll do is make Lukaku captain and sign Fellaini.
He has a point. Why would ETH want a job at United if his demands are not met. There is substantial precedent that we're a club where players and managers go to get their career completely obliterated.
Klopp decided United was not for him when Woodward pitched the club as an adult DisneylandWhich, I suggest, is the exact reason Klopp took on Liverpool instead of United.
How this in itself is not a fireable offense was baffling. What kind of feckin pitch was that. Would any of you here accept an important position in a company that called themselves adult disneyland. What a fecking joke.Someone at the club must be leaking information to Neville. Not that it comes as a surprise! After the 1-1 draw against Leicester he spoke about how the build up of negative energy among the supporters could lead to an announcement about the next manager during the week. That opened up the flurry of unconfirmed reports about the club deciding on Ten Hag. The club hasn't made an official statement but if you're to believe the rumors talks have hit a 'snag' over Hag's apparent demands. Add the timing of the reported interest from Leipzig in credible outlets like the Express and the Times in the midst of Nevilles current speculations you'd have to think he may know something we don't.
Klopp decided United was not for him when Woodward pitched the club as an adult Disneyland
That as wellIt’s a bit like asking the guy who’s job it is to clean up the elefant shit at the zoo, if you should take up the zoo managers position.
Klopp decided United was not for him when Woodward pitched the club as an adult Disneyland
How this in itself is not a fireable offense was baffling. What kind of feckin pitch was that. Would any of you here accept an important position in a company that called themselves adult disneyland. What a fecking joke.
Which is clearly such a bollocks myth, Klopp has still never broken contract ever, and has stated many times he never will. When his Dortmund contract ran out, United had hired LvG just a year earlier so the job wasn’t available.
He “chose” Liverpool because the timing was fortunately perfect for them, when they sacked Rodgers and Klopp had been jobless for almost half a year.
Klopp aint dumb though, revealing United wanted him as first choice before LVG when he was under contract, and selling it as the Disneyland thing putting him off has been incredibly popular with Liverpool fans, he knows exactly what he’s doing.
Raphael Honigstein described the meeting in what has become the definitive biography on Klopp. Bring the noise from 2017. The author was given access to Klopps closest colleagues, friends and family members. Klopp has never denied or confirmed the claims. For from myth in my opinion but if you don't care about it there's no need to get worked up, or appear as such
Klopp decided United was not for him when Woodward pitched the club as an adult Disneyland
The Wolf of Wall Street himself described his company as an adult Disneyland, and feck yeah I’d have taken a job from him or at Manchester United. LVG likely got the same pitch and took the job, and was ridiculously excited about it even whilst still Holland manager.
The “stupidity” of that comment has been vastly overplayed, he’s selling a fecking managerial position at a club that calls it’s stadium “The Theatre of Dreams” for heaven’s sake.
He wants Poch so badly he’s creating alternate timelines where it leads to Mauricio in charge.
Yeah the stuff about Utd being a graveyard for Dutch managers says everything about how gutted he is Pochettino won't get the job
How this in itself is not a fireable offense was baffling. What kind of feckin pitch was that. Would any of you here accept an important position in a company that called themselves adult disneyland. What a fecking joke.
It's been years and people still misquote this one. He allegedly described Old Trafford as a Disneyland for adult, in the context of suggesting that the entertainment factor was extremely important.
This is Manchester United football club, this is the theatre of dreams.
A place Bobby Charlton himself described as…
It was fine Bobby saying something as cheesy as that about Old Trafford, so much so that our own fans have completely embraced the name, but Woodward describing it similarly cheesily is apparently “sack worthy” and something to be completely outraged about it.
As I say, that Summer he also spoke to LVG who was managing Holland and has managed Barca and Bayern, and likely gave him a similar pitch. LVG was like a kid on Christmas Eve when he waiting to take over.
People like to fake outrage due to the myth that that comment put Klopp off, when in reality Klopp was under contract with Dortmund and had no intention of breaking it, even if Liverpool came in for him then, or Barca/Real for that matter.
Which is clearly such a bollocks myth, Klopp has still never broken contract ever, and has stated many times he never will. When his Dortmund contract ran out, United had hired LvG just a year earlier so the job wasn’t available.
He “chose” Liverpool because the timing was fortunately perfect for them, when they sacked Rodgers and Klopp had been jobless for almost half a year.
Klopp aint dumb though, revealing United wanted him as first choice before LVG when he was under contract, and selling it as the Disneyland thing putting him off has been incredibly popular with Liverpool fans, he knows exactly what he’s doing.
If you think about all the bad things he says in public. Imagine what he says behind closed doors.
The part that bothers me the most is that he joined Liverpool who are one of the corniest and most commercial oriented club in the world.
If he jizzes over City, Liverpool and Chelsea on live TV, just imagine how much of a wrong'un he is when the cameras aren't rolling.I really want to know if he is genuine or if he is acting for Sky.
That quote isn't commercial though is it cheesy ? Yes but its emotional and sentimental not geared towards selling you more shirts.A place Bobby Charlton himself described as…
It was fine Bobby saying something as cheesy as that about Old Trafford, so much so that our own fans have completely embraced the name, but Woodward describing it similarly cheesily is apparently “sack worthy” and something to be completely outraged about it.
As I say, that Summer he also spoke to LVG who was managing Holland and has managed Barca and Bayern, and likely gave him a similar pitch. LVG was like a kid on Christmas Eve when he waiting to take over.
People like to fake outrage due to the myth that that comment put Klopp off, when in reality Klopp was under contract with Dortmund and had no intention of breaking it, even if Liverpool came in for him then, or as alleged Real Madrid for that matter.
That an unemployed Klopp was wooed by Liverpool I have no doubt about, but it was mid season and it was the only vacancy at a big club. It’s much easier to fall in love with something when you’re open to it.
You can say that a lot of people around this club are moaners and negative etc. but if we're being honest we've never actually came close to looking like a top team or building anything substantial or special in all that time and that's part of the reason the discontent is so high. Finishing second twice while being miles behind City never really felt all that significant, especially as both of those seasons ended with hugely disappointing periods of form and losing cup finals.I honestly don’t get how all sense of perspective and relativity just goes to the wall with United. Any time we don’t win it’s a moral outrage and everything and everyone at the club is broken. We’ve finished 2nd twice in the last 4 years. We’ve been to umpteen semi-finals and a final in that time. We’ve finished ahead of high spending Chelsea 3 of the last 4 years. Was anyone bleating in the media about why would Tuchel want the Chelsea job when he took them over in 8th? Leaks everywhere about how they disliked Lampard and his methods - was there a meltdown every day on every media platform telling them all to get out of the club? The fans even had a little protest in support of Lampard. What about klopp at Liverpool? Had achieved feck all for decades. They were 9th I think, 6th the previous season and had lost to stoke 6-1 on the final game. Total disarray. Was the media actively telling anyone linked not to join? It’s been a bad season. Other clubs have bad seasons. I saw Gullit say it’s a shit job and the big problem ETH will have is that the former players like Neville, Ferdinand and Scholes are constantly on TV saying how shit everything is and you’ll get zero time before the pressure builds - and he’s right. I’m sick of listening to it all. You get more time and more money than any other club outside of City and the project of restoring a huge club to former glory. And if it goes wrong nobody blames you. It’s a dream job.
That quote isn't commercial though is it cheesy ? Yes but its emotional and sentimental not geared towards selling you more shirts.
Though the whole adult Disneyland pitch has probably been blown out of proportion.
I agree though in all fairness it's kinda of a wacky presentation to give someone who doesn't have the best grasp of English and wants to manage outsideof his country for the first time .I don’t think he was trying to sell Klopp shirts in fairness, he probably loved his own job (back then) and loved being around OT which lead him to say to both Klopp and LVG that summer that being around Old Trafford is like Disneyland for adults. Meaning it’s a shit load of fun, and an incredible warm and happy place that’s amazing to be around.
It’s incredible how much what likely was a throwaway comment praising the club has been turned into some apparent horror show for the worst sales pitch ever, which it clearly fecking wasn’t because the club and Woodward had no problem getting both LVG and Mourinho to beam from ear to ear about joining.
I agree though in all fairness it's kinda of a wacky presentation to give someone who doesn't have the best grasp of English and wants to manage outsideof his country for the first time .
Also I wonder if klop just outright made that shit up himself to endear himself to Liverpool fans, did Woodward confirm it as well?
I don’t think he was trying to sell Klopp shirts in fairness, he probably loved his own job (back then) and loved being around OT which lead him to say to both Klopp and LVG that summer that being around Old Trafford is like Disneyland for adults. Meaning it’s a shit load of fun, and an incredible warm and happy place that’s amazing to be around.
It’s incredible how much what likely was a throwaway comment praising the club has been turned into some apparent horror show for the worst sales pitch ever, which it clearly fecking wasn’t because the club and Woodward had no problem getting both LVG and Mourinho to beam from ear to ear about joining.
I mean, as for Klopp, people would do well to remember that “if” the Disneyland comment turned him off so much as the myth makes out, he joined the fecking club and owners that backed this shitshow ….
Whats wrong for a football club to be entertaining? Its a form of entertainment after all so fans can reasonably expect to enjoy the show don't they?It's worse than that, it's about the idea that fans expect to be entertained, that it's part of the club identity. In other word he was talking about Sir Matt Busby idea that United has a duty to entertain the fans.
Whats wrong for a football club to be entertaining? Its a form of entertainment after all so fans can reasonably expect to enjoy the show don't they?
Also we have a long history of explosive exciting football so its in our DNA.