55/60% for Spain to me. I honestly don't think the favouritism is very different to that
And advantage for Spain is that I think that we played a wider range of teams, but England hasn't played against any high pressure/high energy team. Im curious how they will cop it. Long balls? more short passes? will England be able to easily break that pressure?
No, I don't want to discuss that, as I don't want to discuss flat Earth. So this will be my last post regarding that topic.
You are just ultra biased. Bellingham is bad, because Spain, of course... haha. And I don't know... Kane, why he dives? maybe his summers in Ibiza? that must be it. What else could be? You just have your story in your head and that's it. You just watch a game with a Spanish player and if he is fouled and not injured for 5 months.... "ohh he is diving, he is play acting!!!". You simply are not as interested if the fouled is not Spanish. My god, you were even protesting for the Germany game where a Spanish player was injured for months (Pedri) in the 3rth minute and Kroos wasn't even booked!
Then you start listing a random list of Spanish players. Albiol... why not? let's add him there! I can help you if you need to add some other random players to the list, I know many!
I actually googled real quick (biggest divers of the world and similar searches) and your list is far, far, very far away from what I see. So... what?
"Diving" is generally a (bigger) problem from:
- Teams who keep the ball (more passes, more time with the ball = more tackles = more fouls = more diving/play acting/you just fall to the ground because.... they fouled you?)
- Teams who are usually winning/closer to their objective (if you need a goal you will try to get playing faster... if you are winning 1 minute in a game you just have one chance to dive, ring a bell?)
- Technically gifted players (on the ball, dribbling...): harder for the opposition to recover the ball and they are just fouled more often. Sometimes you just have butchers that only thing they can do is a horrible tackle.
And it is used as an excuse for losers, usually teams that weren't winning, with worse players, teams that cannot hold the ball... frustration. If you win it is easier to forget robberies/dives from the less technical/worse team that lost to you, because you spend time celebrating, not crying and making up excuses. That is why dominant/good teams are generally talked as favored by refs, luck, etc., it might be true or not, but the echo chamber plays a huge role in downsizing success of these teams and giving credit to losers using these types of excuses.
VAR has a few things to improve but diving is much better, and of course, in general crystal clear penalties and off sides.
If there is any difference in diving/play acting between countries / teams, is not the massive difference you see and it is actually very similar, so using that to insult countries is just meh...
PD: I want a clock like in basketball. 30 minutes each half. Clock stopped when not playing. You might think about "play acting", and you are right, but continuous fouling (the only way some team can try to stop better teams) is also a complete waste of time.
That makes total sense.
What a pity we cannot renew the subscription for that hate this Sunday... forever is not enough
i would like a forever forever hate!!!!
I think playing Bundesliga for Bayern was putting on the brink already... haha