Abizzz
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2014
- Messages
- 8,323
Obviously the likelihood of getting a fair judgement must have weighed in. I don't understand how you, or single journalists, can categorically rule out CAS involvement when CAS has been relied upon to settle disputes in the past. I understand that the teams have signed a waiver to settle things infront if ICA instead, however I don't see why that waiver itself couldn't be challenged infront of CAS. What else would the point of CAS be?Nah I'm just saying this is obviously a massive exercise in face-saving all round, from FIA and Mercedes.
"We had an unbeatable case but Hamilton didn't want us to" is better than "we were going to lose at the FIA court and weren't even allowed by the regs to take it any further than that."
If they had an unbeatable case according to their own lawyer and were able to take it to a higher court they would have.
If anything this waiver has made F1, FIA and their race director even more shady to me. Why would you ask your business partners to waive the possibility to challenge your judgements if you weren't planning on using them with impunity?
F1 as a sport is dying. Maybe Max is the first winner of a new era. Net flix.