Fluctuation0161
Full Member
Agreed.Carry on. Because what happened was fundamentally wrong even if some choose to try and shut you down.
To say the race was manipulated by the FIA is not saying Max did anything wrong in that race.
Agreed.Carry on. Because what happened was fundamentally wrong even if some choose to try and shut you down.
They might get more exposure for 12-24 months for leaving following the lack of integrity in the sport. So from a media/ marketing perspective leaving could work.Cost for participation is negligible for such a corporation. They get the coolness factor, especially with the likes of Russel now on board, just like it was initially with Lewis. Prestige is extremely important for luxury car maker . Also, something that I place big value on is R&D work and developments orignally inspired by the fierce sports competition that eventually reach the "ordinary" cars.
Apparently Charles said 'you woz robbed' after bestowing the honour.
Apparently Charles said 'you woz robbed' after bestowing the honour.
Apparently Charles said 'you woz robbed' after bestowing the honour.
Cost for participation is negligible for such a corporation. They get the coolness factor, especially with the likes of Russel now on board, just like it was initially with Lewis. Prestige is extremely important for luxury car maker . Also, something that I place big value on is R&D work and developments orignally inspired by the fierce sports competition that eventually reach the "ordinary" cars.
Mercedes have been involved and supplied engines for many more years than that.They've been in F1 for a total of 14 of the last 72 years. They would be fine without it, and none of their rivals have any presence in the sport. Arguably there is greater crossover to the road car business from sportscar racing and prototypes, which is why Mercedes, Audi and BMW have all spent more time in those categories than they have F1 over the years.
F1 has always needed Ferrari, and now Mercedes, more than they need F1.
Fine with you having this view overall but you can hardly say “certainly”.I am sorry did someone claim mercedes will go bankrupt if they leave f1? Of course they will be fine. However they are certainly finer being in, than out.
Toto owns around 35% of the team, can’t see him pulling the plug, it would take a vast chunk of his 500 million net worth with it, also about car sales mercs had the best ever year in terms of car sale in 2016, people always like a winner.F1 obviously needs Mercedes more than they need F1. How many teams would be left without Mercedes engines? And it’s nice advertising of course and they do make money through sponsorship and what not but at the same time there is growing focus on the fact that it’s not environmentally friendly, and no doubt as a stand alone business line is loss making. The engineering and research can be done anyway, so not a factor. Also, how many people genuinely buy a car brand because they see it on a motor sport? And at this point what proportion of people have not heard of Mercedes who would be in a position to consider buying one?
If Mercedes don’t take it to CAS, then the only reason for that is because they have the FIA and Liberty by the scrote and have managed to get something pretty substantial be it financial or otherwise.
I know the team isn’t owned outright but Mercedes but still.
Are you sure that the FIA or F1 orgainzation care why you watch though? Cause if they don't, and are fine with getting more viewers for the spectacle, then this...I mean, I will still watch it as a spectacle and enjoy spectacular crashes and Masi screwjobs, but then let's not start giving out plaudits, knighthoods and accolades for the champion. Let's stop arguing who is the GOAT sportsman out of Lewis, Schumacher or Senna. It's like arguing whether Hulk Hogan or the Rock is the better sports competitor because who won more WWE titles how, when and where. We can argue about who is the best performer or most entertaining for sure. It is definitely Max as he is the likeliest to cause an accident and give us a spectacular show with flying tyres everywhere. Lewis is a bit too old and safe now. On that basis, defo Max deserves to be champion.
...is wrong, and evereyone criticizing Masi is simply misunderstanding what he's being paid to do.Masi forgot what his job is, safety. He thought he was responsible for entertainment and I'm 99% sure he will lose his job for it. Teams don't trust him, drivers don't trust him.
Overall, I don't think it would help their brand if they quit F1 - and I certainly don't think a decision to quit would reverberate for quite that long.They might get more exposure for 12-24 months for leaving following the lack of integrity in the sport. So from a media/ marketing perspective leaving could work.
Which is why I think calling Verstappen a cheater is not deserved. (Which you did do.) Even if you think he's done unfair things in previous races, it's not like he has been trying to hide it; whatever was allowed and should not have been is all on Masi and the stewards.To say the race was manipulated by the FIA is not saying Max did anything wrong in that race.
And how have other manufacturer car sakes fared? You can’t look at that in isolation. Not only that, car sakes have so many other variables than being in F1.Toto owns around 35% of the team, can’t see him pulling the plug, it would take a vast chunk of his 500 million net worth with it, also about car sales mercs had the best ever year in terms of car sale in 2016, people always like a winner.
Are you sure that the FIA or F1 orgainzation care why you watch though? Cause if they don't, and are fine with getting more viewers for the spectacle, then this...
Mercedes have been involved and supplied engines for many more years than that.
The point is, losing a big engine manufacturer who has been in the sport for decades would be a blow for F1. It would be second only to losing Ferrari imo.The financial commitment required to supply engines is nothing compared to running a team as they do now.
Exactly.I'd love it too. Sunglasses on all year round, "feck the FIA" t-shirt on, no interviews, just looking to drive Max off the track every opportunity.
I would defo tune in to watch that
Imagine one team is winning 3-0, then in stoppage time the ref decides that whoever scores the next goal wins the match, then awards a penalty to the team losing.
That's more or less what happened to Mercedes.
Was never going to happenI fear for this thread when certain people realise the idea of a CAS appeal was always a non starter.
So they're admitting they got it wrong.
They’ve got to be confident that Mercedes have zero intention of going to CAS making a statement like that.
So they're admitting they got it wrong.
Looks like they just blamed everyone but themselves.
The “lets see what we can learn for 2022” overarching comment seems to be a clear heads up to Mercedes..
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/f...-f1-abu-dhabi-safety-car-controversy/6885615/
Its very much, "all you lot are confused, so we'll have to explain".Misunderstanding by everyone else. Nothing else farce.
FIA said:The FIA’s primary responsibility at any event is to ensure the safety of everyone involved and the integrity of the sport."
“Look dimwits. You don’t understand F1 rules, we’ll issue a warning and let’s all move on to 2022 OK!!”Lot's of words that basically says nothing from the FIA.
well played.Full statement available here: https://www.fia.com/news/statement-fia-world-motor-sport-council
I'm particularly taken with this bit:
It's a bit confusing. By "any" do they mean "all" or merely "those events chosen at the whim of the Race Director?"
Full statement available here: https://www.fia.com/news/statement-fia-world-motor-sport-council
I'm particularly taken with this bit:
It's a bit confusing. By "any" do they mean "all" or merely "those events chosen at the whim of the Race Director?"