F1 2021 Season

Thanks for the explanation… I’ll probably never fully understand how badly Hamilton got screwed compared to those that follow F1 but even to me it does sound bad.

Put it this way. If the race director had followed the regulations, in whatever scenario, Hamilton is the likeliest winner. They either un-lap all the cars, which would take too long and the race would end under the safety car or they un-lap none of them, and Max would have 5 other cars between him and Hamilton with just 1 lap to go. In the first scenario Hamilton is the guaranteed winner, in the second scenario Hamilton is by far the likely winner.

They made the inexplicable decision to only un-lap the cars between Max and Hamilton, in the name of entertainment, to have 1 lap of racing. Hamilton was pretty much a sitting duck, considering Max had just pitted to change to soft tyres, which are much faster than the old hard tyres over a short distance that Hamilton had used for, I forgot now, something like 30 or 40 laps.

So not only did they manufacture a last second shot at the title for Max out of nowhere, they left Hamilton pretty defenceless against him.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the explanation… I’ll probably never fully understand how badly Hamilton got screwed compared to those that follow F1 but even to me it does sound bad.
Put it this way. If the race director had followed the regulations, in whatever scenario, Hamilton the likeliest winner. They un-lap all the cars, which would take too long and the race would end under the safety car or they un-lap none of them, and Max would have 5 other cars between him and Hamilton with just 1 lap to go. In both scenarios Hamilton is the likely winner.

They made a decision, to only un-lap the cars between Max and Hamilton, in the name of entertainment, to have 1 lap of racing. Hamilton was pretty much a sitting duck, considering Max had just pitted to change to soft tyres, which are much faster than the old hard tyres over a short distance that Hamilton had used for, I forgot now, something like 30 or 40 laps.

So not only did they manufacture a last second shot at the title for Max out of nowhere, they left Hamilton pretty defenceless against him.

Just to add to this - it was only Verstappen that got this preferential treatment - the rest of the cars in the race still had lapped cars between them and the cars in front.

Sainz for example was in 3rd, and should have been immediately behind Max, but the race director didn't think it was important to move lapped cars out of his way, only Verstappen's.
 
Brundles thoughts.

I've said for years that lapped drivers should fall back behind the runners on the lead lap so as not to prolong the safety car procedure. Also the Race Director now needs a trusted and experienced wing man, especially in next year's 23-race marathon including a new venue in Miami, and teams should be very limited on the number of times they can challenge race control mid-race throughout a season so they are used more strategically when there's a fair and relevant point to be made. We simply can't have the referee bullied like that.
 
Put it this way. If the race director had followed the regulations, in whatever scenario, Hamilton is the likeliest winner. They either un-lap all the cars, which would take too long and the race would end under the safety car or they un-lap none of them, and Max would have 5 other cars between him and Hamilton with just 1 lap to go. In the first scenario Hamilton is the guaranteed winner, in the second scenario Hamilton is by far the likely winner.

They made the inexplicable decision to only un-lap the cars between Max and Hamilton, in the name of entertainment, to have 1 lap of racing. Hamilton was pretty much a sitting duck, considering Max had just pitted to change to soft tyres, which are much faster than the old hard tyres over a short distance that Hamilton had used for, I forgot now, something like 30 or 40 laps.

So not only did they manufacture a last second shot at the title for Max out of nowhere, they left Hamilton pretty defenceless against him.
Thanks.. that’s very bad, don’t know what Hamilton will or can do.


@TheMagicFoolBus
gave a random 90th min penalty while the keeper was getting treatment :lol:
 
If they can do that, with the lapped cars falling back behind the lead cars, they should have been doing that since forever. I thought there was something about running shorter distances and fuel loads stopping it, but if there's no reason then it's idiotic to waste laps waiting for the lapped cars to go around and catch up with the back of the train.
I don't see how this can happen. Imagine being 12th, having lapped the 13th, then the 13 gets to sit behind you on the same lap after a safety car but has the extra fuel to burn for the rest of the race. Not only has your established advantage been erased, you're actually put at a disadvantage.
 
Verstappen said: "Michael is a nice guy and he tries his very best and it's very unfair to now start hating on him because it is a very tough job."

Horner added: "Michael has been under massive pressure from all sides." "And I think that it's a little unfair that, you know, he's [Masi] up there on his own. He doesn't have any form of support."


Seeing Verstappen and Horner use that particular word is giving me PTSD.
 
Rich coming from those two, if they were on the receiving end I have little doubt Max would revert to type and Karen Horner is the biggest snake in motorsport.
 
Mercedes are set to ABANDON their appeal against Max Verstappen's contentious F1 world title victory after Sir Lewis Hamilton told them he doesn't want his eighth championship to be won in court
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...ax-Verstappens-Formula-1-world-title-win.html

Sportsmail understands that Hamilton has been key to Mercedes' revised position and, though bitterly sore at being deprived of the triumph he wanted most, thinks it in the best interests of the sport not to proceed down the legal route. That is despite Mercedes' lawyer, Paul Harris QC, believing he has an overwhelming case to present.

For feck's sake. Masi 4eva.
 
Mercedes are set to ABANDON their appeal against Max Verstappen's contentious F1 world title victory after Sir Lewis Hamilton told them he doesn't want his eighth championship to be won in court
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...ax-Verstappens-Formula-1-world-title-win.html

Sportsmail understands that Hamilton has been key to Mercedes' revised position and, though bitterly sore at being deprived of the triumph he wanted most, thinks it in the best interests of the sport not to proceed down the legal route. That is despite Mercedes' lawyer, Paul Harris QC, believing he has an overwhelming case to present.

For feck's sake. Masi 4eva.

Very noble of Hamilton, if true but I didn't think overturning the result and handing Hamilton the title was even on the table. I thought best case scenario was FIA admitting their faults and acknowledging a grave error and an unjust decision was made at which point everyone moves on with 2021 having a massive asterisk next to it.
 
Put it this way. If the race director had followed the regulations, in whatever scenario, Hamilton is the likeliest winner. They either un-lap all the cars, which would take too long and the race would end under the safety car or they un-lap none of them, and Max would have 5 other cars between him and Hamilton with just 1 lap to go. In the first scenario Hamilton is the guaranteed winner, in the second scenario Hamilton is by far the likely winner.

They made the inexplicable decision to only un-lap the cars between Max and Hamilton, in the name of entertainment, to have 1 lap of racing. Hamilton was pretty much a sitting duck, considering Max had just pitted to change to soft tyres, which are much faster than the old hard tyres over a short distance that Hamilton had used for, I forgot now, something like 30 or 40 laps.

So not only did they manufacture a last second shot at the title for Max out of nowhere, they left Hamilton pretty defenceless against him.

This ought to be used as the definitive summary of what went on.
 
Mercedes are set to ABANDON their appeal against Max Verstappen's contentious F1 world title victory after Sir Lewis Hamilton told them he doesn't want his eighth championship to be won in court
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...ax-Verstappens-Formula-1-world-title-win.html

Sportsmail understands that Hamilton has been key to Mercedes' revised position and, though bitterly sore at being deprived of the triumph he wanted most, thinks it in the best interests of the sport not to proceed down the legal route. That is despite Mercedes' lawyer, Paul Harris QC, believing he has an overwhelming case to present.

For feck's sake. Masi 4eva.

Fighting words on Lewis' part. I suspect it means that he will want to come back now and fight the system.
 
Hamilton has been shat on by Masi and F1A but he's going about this in exactly the right way. Going through courts of arbitration will just be exhausting and both sides will fight tooth and nail.

Even if Mercedes won, Lewis would never be satisfied with that title if Max had won the race, and neither would the fans. It's a dead loss.

He can only go back to the grid and win it back.
 
Wolff congratulates Verstappen after dramatic championship triumph

fAFmkzobACRBlq7jEKzeMDHyCFgzZFPlj6v5zJPf-fHzKMpZtRdJPlPUjyG0Ou23QQZJ_gnxMybEUQ=s1080-nd-v1


Verstappen has, however, revealed a message from Wolff in the aftermath of the finale, commenting: "Toto sent me a text - congratulations on the season and that I deserved to win, that was very nice."

Referring to Hamilton's graciousness in the eyes of defeat, the Dutchman added: "Of course it helps if you have already seven titles. That comforts him a bit.

"I think if it was the other way around, it would have been more painful for me because I didn't have one.

"Lewis came up to me and congratulated me. It must have been very tough in that last lap. It also shows the respect we have for each other.

"Of course we had our tough times through the season but we respect what we're doing and we were pushing each other to the limit and it has been very enjoyable racing against him."
 
Whether they abandon it or not, this isn't the reason.

He can't win it in court because they're not allowed to take it to court. Unless by court they mean the FIA court.
Are you the legal adviser of the daily mail or something?
 
I wold expect nothing else, Horner would have done the same if Lewis had won.
The picture is classic Toto, but he was not going to be smiling was he.
:lol:That is a great picture choice. He looks like he's been on a week-long bender.
 
That’s not the argument that was being presented, it’s amazing how many people on here can’t even read.

The argument was whether the decision was popular with the fans, not if it was “just”.
As many people have told you, but you have failed to read, there’s a certain subset of people who will have even watched the YouTube highlights.
 
Everyone saw what happened. Red Bull and Verstappen have their title, and they'll get to keep it, but it will remain a tainted title for the rest of your days Marko.
like Liverpool?

Title wins

  • Max Verstappen - 1 (*)

Marko on Mercedes… “What I don’t understand: they had also the ability also to go to the pits”. They didn’t. So it was their mistake.”

Nice to see he’s gracious and takes all the facts into account. Perfect fit with Red Bull
 
like Liverpool?

Title wins

  • Max Verstappen - 1 (*)

Marko on Mercedes… “What I don’t understand: they had also the ability also to go to the pits”. They didn’t. So it was their mistake.”

Nice to see he’s gracious and takes all the facts into account. Perfect fit with Red Bull
Titles are remembered with stories. Everyone remembers the story behind Schumi's first. Hamilton's first. Alonso's double.

This will be Max's.
 
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/f1-agrees-to-ditch-mgu-h-as-part-of-new-engine-rules/6885625/

F1 agrees to ditch MGU-H as part of new engine rules
By:Jonathan Noble
Dec 15, 2021, 8:10 PM
Formula 1 chiefs have confirmed that the MGU-H will be dropped from power units from 2026 as part of a new rules shake-up.

The complicated technology, which generates electrical power from exhaust heat, has proven to be expensive and complex since it formed part of the new turbo hybrid rules that were introduced in 2014.

With F1 eager to attract new manufacturers from 2026, the presence of the MGU-H was viewed as a key part of the discussions.

For the Volkswagen Group, which is poised to enter F1 with either its Audi or Porsche brands, was reluctant to enter if the MGU-H remained.

It felt that the expense of developing the technology, which has limited road car application, plus the head start that current manufacturers had in understanding it, was not worth it and its continued presence could prompt it to elect to steer clear of joining.

Earlier in the summer, Mercedes F1 team boss Toto Wolff said the German manufacturer was willing to drop the MGU-H if other elements of the rules were agreed.

"I think it's a compromise that, I can't speak for anybody else, but at Mercedes, we are prepared to enter in order to facilitate the entry of the Volkswagen Group,” he said. “But there are several other topics where compromise needs to be found.”

During subsequent discussions between the current car makers and VW, it was agreed that the MGU-H could be dropped if other elements were put forward – such as a cost cap that ensured that new entrants would not trigger a fresh spending war.

That has now resulted in the FIA’s World Motor Sport Council confirming that there will be four central elements to the new powerunits that are coming for 2026.

They are that the current 1.6-litre V6 engine will be retained, electrical power will increase to 350kW, the MGU-H will be ditched and there will be a cost cap for engine development.

The FIA has also approved the outline concept of F1 running on 100 percent sustainable fuel alongside the increased electrical power boost.
One key element is also to ensure that the power units are attractive to fans.

The FIA said that it wanted a: “powerful and high-revving power unit, car performance, sound, drivers’ ability to race, avoiding excessive differentiation.”
 
Yes boys come on! I bet Lewis pressured Mercedes not to appeal. He's been a class act since straight after the race. Max didn't deserve the WDC to be taken from him. Lewis deserved better as well during the race so big respect to him. His fans could learn from him.
 
Might as well shut the book there and close the thread.

As expected from Mercedes. Roll on 2022
 


I wanted it to go through the CAS courts just so we could at least have on record what we all know, that the FIA acted unjustly and manufactured the ending they wanted. I can understand why Hamilton and Mercedes wouldn't want to go through that process and for it to be a distraction heading into the new season (doesn't it usually take months to get a ruling with CAS?).
 
I wold expect nothing else, Horner would have done the same if Lewis had won.
The picture is classic Toto, but he was not going to be smiling was he.

We don't know when that photo was taken. Probably a stock photo.
I do think that this is the most sensible outcome i e. making the best out of a bad job.
Most serious people understand what has happened and it is now time to put all of that behind us and move on to 2022.
My main hope is that Masi gets a very severe bollicking from the FIA and the rules are tightened up to prevent any further manipulating of a race outcome.
 
Well I don't think it was ever going to CAS, but going to appeal in the FIA courts would mean they would be forced to explain the dirty laundry in public. You have to have an appeal result and a detailed explanation.

With the statement from the FIA last night, it looks they admit the situation was not perfect and are going to explain themselves anyway. So I guess in hindsight, Mercedes no longer need to appeal. Still it would have been nice to see the FIA take a side on this in legal black and white, about whether they support race fixing for TV or not.

Whatever.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I'm really disappointed with Mercedes about this - I know Lewis was pushing not to drag this out, but frankly the fans deserve a lot better, and need assurance that it's worth tuning in to the races, rather than just catching the last lap of the last race to see who Masi has decided is gonna win.
 
Yes boys come on! I bet Lewis pressured Mercedes not to appeal. He's been a class act since straight after the race. Max didn't deserve the WDC to be taken from him. Lewis deserved better as well during the race so big respect to him. His fans could learn from him.
Are you an infant?
 
Yes boys come on! I bet Lewis pressured Mercedes not to appeal. He's been a class act since straight after the race. Max didn't deserve the WDC to be taken from him. Lewis deserved better as well during the race so big respect to him. His fans could learn from him.

:lol: If Lewis didn’t come out and act classy all hell would have broke loose. Being classy is literally the only thing he could have done to not look like a sore loser (which he wouldn’t have been if he did object).