MDFC Manager
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 25,832
Macronne said no to the super league, wrong project
Might have said differently if PSG were involved
Macronne said no to the super league, wrong project
it wouldnt affect english football. its just like the CL except some teams automatically qualify every year based on an agreement made setting up the league, so they can be guaranteed more money even if the football team isn't goodI'm confused. Would there still be promotions in the football league if this was to happen?
Hope the announcement is of them backtracking. But even if they do, The damage is done.
If it is one big bluff the Premier League should absolutely feck over the 5 teams involved in someway in case they want to repeat it down the line.
What damage?Hope the announcement is of them backtracking. But even if they do, The damage is done.
I think they were asked and they refusedMight have said differently if PSG were involved
Boris spoke in support of FA. I know the game is fecked but if we let this go to just friendly matches between Milan and united whom has been irrelevant then were absolute mugs like.Yes of course, but they’re all crooks as far as I’m concerned, including the current ruling authorities who are so angrily speaking out against this. Game was lost to money long ago.
Just wish it was straight knockout, of course that would affect TV. The league stages can be boring.Why do they have to ruin what is good.
I feel CL is good as it is. Maybe improve it to 64 teams if they want and remove EL.
Although I like having two tournaments to be honest.
Who wants to watch a world cup without any of the best players? It's an empty threat.
They wouldn't get nearly the same amount of participation fee that the likes of United or real are likely to get. The big guys will also no doubt have some other rules to suit themWhy are City and PSG have been asked to join in this then ? Wouldn't their non ending funding still impact the ESL ?
Hope the announcement is of them backtracking. But even if they do, The damage is done.
It's too simple. Who's to say how much a company (owned by the club owner) thinks a club is worth in terms of sponsorship deals? Especially if the more sponsorship money goes into the club, the more successful and visible it becomes, therefore making the sponsorship more valuable.The whole problem with City and Chelsea buying the league could have been avoided if the PL imposed a rule stating that clubs could only spend a maximum of 80% of their yearly revenue on players. Academies can only send out a certain number of players on loan. An owner isn't allowed to own more than one club in European football.
Boom, no more artificial clubs.
"But clubs could just cook the books".
My response to that is, it's illegal to do so. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together would see it's dodgy if a club went from making 40M one season to making 300M in commercial revenue the next.
Is that idea too simple to have worked? Basically, owners can't invest money into the club in terms of buying players, but can invest it into infrastructure instead.
Again, that how I understand. No one has said anything about leaving CL. The issue here is , UEFA isn't getting their share and that's it. It has nothing to do integrity. UEFA doesn't want FIFA to eat all the money with the clubs from Europe.
You think this has been decided behind the Glazers back? they are all yes men, one of the Glazers is the vice chairman of the proposed league!Sir Alex wouldnt know. He isnt even on the board of directors. There has to be an ability to fire those responsible. The owners wont make this decision unilaterally. It will be considered by senior execs who make the decisions. Who can be fired.
Oh no you didn't!So there’s a statement coming at half 9 from the big English clubs and Spurs and Arsenal?
Further damage to the trust between clubs and fans. They couldn't give a shit about us; we are merely customers.What damage?
You kind of are by insinuating that their long standing money grab has anything to do with it. The monster has always existed the only thing that prevented it was that the UEFA caved every single time, the difference is that this time what the UEFA offered seemingly isn't enough. I find it problematic that you even start your point with it because it deflects from the historic shadiness of big clubs, we need to stop making excuses or making mitigating factos for the clubs that we love.
I also want to make the off topic point that these same clubs routinely shaft players, knowingly exploit young players when they don't have strong representation and that agents like Mendes and Raiola may be upsetting from the POV of a fan but they are snakes dealing with snakes, football clubs aren't angels and have never been.
The organization chart
President: florentino perez (real madrid)
Vice President: joel glazer (man united)
Vice President: john henry (liverpool)
Vice President: stan kroenke (arsenal)
Vice President: andrea agnelli (juventus)
Clubs
Real madrid
Barcelona
Atletico madrid
Manchester Utd
Manchester city
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Tottenham
Inter
Milan
Juventus
DS Steve Arnott likes this.The organization chart
President: florentino perez (real madrid)
Vice President: joel glazer (man united)
Vice President: john henry (liverpool)
Vice President: stan kroenke (arsenal)
Vice President: andrea agnelli (juventus)
Clubs
Real madrid
Barcelona
Atletico madrid
Manchester Utd
Manchester city
Liverpool
Chelsea
Arsenal
Tottenham
Inter
Milan
Juventus
Bayern not going alongDoesn't smell right. Where's Bayern?
The damage was already done a long time ago
The list of clubs doesn’t even excite me from just a purely entertainment standpoint.
which clubs would then?
They're happy to continue whipping their respective one team domestic leaguesDoesn't smell right. Where's Bayern? (edit: and PSG)