paulscholes18
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 20,717
Would have been more supportive of it had more European clubs been involved, because as things stands half our games will be other premier league teams.
Yep. There have been a lot of comparisons with American sports but they have salary caps which are manageable so everyone basically spends up to them while the shit teams get high draft picks to become competitive eventually, in this the dregs will likely just stay the dregs unless their owners have a complete character transformation.As well as Spurs and Arsenal.
I mean if you want to see the actual best teams slugging it out then a system where 15 are guaranteed a place independent of merit is hardly ideal.
No doubt whatsoever-
Think FFP has already been scrapped completely.If FFP is removed or rendered even just more pointless than it already is, then no doubt more Oil states will be getting on the act. And European football will be nothing more than middle eastern pissing contest.
Someone has to finish bottom?As well as Spurs and Arsenal.
I mean if you want to see the actual best teams slugging it out then a system where 15 are guaranteed a place independent of merit is hardly ideal.
The clubs in this super league wouldn't want to stay in their domestic competitions anyway, they just can't come out and announce that straight away. They will want to play at weekends for the TV audience, will want to play around the world and will decide playing each other even more will be more worthwhile than playing the likes of Burnley.
The revenue United and the other teams bring the PL is worth too much to be banning teams. That's the reason their upset anyway, they're worried a super league will stop the PL from being as popular as it currently isThey've already said that they will ban them teams from the league, any team can be expelled from the league if the governing body decides.
But most sponsors and random 'fans' want Real x Juve or Arsenal x Barca every week instead of Chelsea x Malmo or Lokomotiv x Pool.Not with the upcoming changes.
This faux outrage is comical.
1 CL appearance total?Tottenham and arsenal have no business in a European super league. Ffs.
If City are then it must only be going off the lsst 10 years - if that's the case Leicester deserve it too.
Well you will presumably get more prize money from getting further in the competition or winning it. Same as any other competition.So let’s say it happens as appears to have been pitched.
United now solely play in the 12 team European Super League where you cannot be relegated from or promoted to.
Where is the desire to improve your squad? Why would any of these owners spend millions of pounds improving the team when there is no financial benefit to winning the league, or even winning games?
How can 2nd in the league be bottom feeders ?
CL football is dead, pretI am struggling to understand how any fans can be for this? I genuinely don't see anything positive or redeeming about it at all.
Yeah right - and there are courts who can block such thing happening.They've already said that they will ban them teams from the league, any team can be expelled from the league if the governing body decides.
The Champions league hasn't been that for years. Since they started letting shite teams from all of Europe in because they won their leagueA collection of brilliant teams slugging it out...isn’t that what the champions league is?
It has one million percent accelerated. How could juventus, real madrid or Barcelona catch city and psg from here. Milan clubs? Don't even think about it. Plenty of people have been saying for years that what city and psg are doing isn't just 'the same' as every other big club. Years into each project that has been laid bare
Completely agreed. The non oil clubs have been cornered and they're using their brand to run with with idea.Just look at the acceleration of City's dominance, from zero PL titles to 5 of the last 10, including soon 3 of the last 4. We are all getting swallowed up by the U.A.E because no football club can compete with a state.
Infuriating seeing so many posters here blaming the clubs, when UEFA and FA are clearly the feckwits that have caused it all.
They have to say that. It’s the only thing potentially stopping it.
The revenue United and the other teams bring the PL is worth too much to be banning teams. That's the reason their upset anyway, they're worried a super league will stop the PL from being as popular as it currently is
Think FFP has already been scrapped completely.
The revenue United and the other teams bring the PL is worth too much to be banning teams. That's the reason their upset anyway, they're worried a super league will stop the PL from being as popular as it currently is
People probably made a massive outrage over that too.I get that 100% no one would really watch the Prem, if it were to go ahead (and to be honest I think it will, there'll be some sort of money negotiation going on) then the excitement would be watching who gets into the ESL each year as there is still promotion and relegation to that league. Though the Big 6 would be permanent members of the league. Maybe they're trying to scare the big teams off?
Let's all remember this one very fact the Premier League itself was/is a breakaway league from the old league system! This is kinda like history repeating itself.
I mean with the increase of 36 teams, it is somewhat diluted and would just get worse. This whole swiss model has sounded iffy to me, with UEFA killing the concept of what made the CL great.A collection of brilliant teams slugging it out...isn’t that what the champions league is?
The revenue United and the other teams bring the PL is worth too much to be banning teams. That's the reason their upset anyway, they're worried a super league will stop the PL from being as popular as it currently is
Is this not the best move for the club?
How would you feel if United refused to enter the super league but 5 other PL teams went instead? How far would a moral victory actually get us by the time the super league kicked off? You think we'd sign Haaland? Maybe Sancho? What about a Grealish? Forget it, we'd be shopping in the Championship for players.
I'm sure clubs like Leicester can apply for membership to this new league.Tottenham and arsenal have no business in a European super league. Ffs.
If City are then it must only be going off the lsst 10 years - if that's the case Leicester deserve it too.
That doesn't matter when Arsenal has more fans than Everton+Leicester+Wolves combined. People who like to watch a game here and there want the biggest brands playing each other every week. It's like with movies. A lot of people 'love' movies but when they have to choose they always choose popular brands, famous actors even when they could watch a better low-budget movie made by unknowns.But Spurs and Arsenal aren't even among the best teams in England right now. Atlanta could finish above Juventus in Italy.
Come out of it mate. It's not going to happen. UEFA can't ban players representing the countries for non-sporting reasons.Do you think Haaland or Sancho would be happy about not being able to represent their national teams?
They haven't said that. I seriously don't understand the outcry from fans and domestic leagues. Nothing changes from the existing format and the small clubs would still get their fair share of money like they are getting now. So what exactly is the issue here if 14 clubs decides to play in an additional tournament?
That's it right there, the acceleration of that domination is there for all to see, and it should be blindingly obvious to everyone that no single football can compete with an oil rich state, it's fecking preposterous. So many heads buried in the sand regarding City's (and later PSG's) takeovers and where that was ultimately leading us.
Do you think Haaland or Sancho would be happy about not being able to represent their national teams?
There’s no talk of leaving the domestic leagues right?
Completely agreed. The non oil clubs have been cornered and they're using their brand to run with with idea.