Spurs west ham would join in a heartbeatNoone stops the bankrupt clubs to create the Super League. Just do 3 man Super League, Premiere League and Bundesliga Team won't join
Spurs west ham would join in a heartbeatNoone stops the bankrupt clubs to create the Super League. Just do 3 man Super League, Premiere League and Bundesliga Team won't join
If you want to be a devil's advocate there is some validity to the ESL proposal. Let the clubs decide their own fate rather than some corrupt unaccountable organisations like FIFA or UEFA decide and control.
The current CL and Europa formats have been expanded pure for financial reasons -- no different to what RM, Barca or Juve want, just that they have a different approach. If you were to start this league yourself, you would initially limit the competition (leaving the domestic competitions untouched.) But later as they gain traction, expand or invite more clubs to the ESL.
How is this any different to what UEFA has been doing the past few decades when it used to be Champion of the respective leagues invited only? And now we have that politically astute formation of the Europa Conference League, some 20+ years later. UEFA is just spinning a larger web to appease the smaller nations/clubs (not unlike FIFA throwing millions to the likes of Granada or St Kitts to get their votes.)
The fact that RM, Barca is desperate for another payday is another issue. But there is some validity to the individual clubs wanting to 'take back control' from some centralised superstructures.
The issue with the ESL was always the permanent membership. If the proposal was like the PL where every participating club gets a vote and historically participating members get some solidarity payments if they don't qualify once in a while, it wouldn't gotten anywhere near the backlash it did.
That would be a tactical issue. Imagine you were to start up an elite league say like the Champion's League when it first started decades ago -- when only and literally only league champions were invited? You would need to build the prestige of any competition by making it exclusive at the start. That would just whet the appetite for tier 2 clubs to enter -- not to say that Spurs or Arsenal were ever Tier 1 European clubs.
The ESP founders all know that to make even more money, they need to expand the competition. But you don't start by having 32 teams at the start, not that they could sign up that many clubs at the initial stage as many would take a 'wait & see' approach -- just like United was the European league pathfinder for British clubs.
The choice here will be, do we want the European competitions controlled or managed by faceless UEFA officials or the chairman of the clubs.
I agree but the whole European competitions have been a shambles for decades. This ESL was just another attempt to take back some semble of control by the clubs or cynically, to extract more money from UEFA --- or better still some accountability and openness with the opaque UEFA organisation that makes/spends billions a year without being answerable to anyone.Instead of choosing specific clubs they should have went with a qualifying criteria like "only league champions" or "top 4 from PL, top 3 from la liga, top 2 from Serie A, etc" then. By naming clubs in invite especially the likes of Arsenal and Tottenham they made a mockery of the competition.
I agree but the whole European competitions have been a shambles for decades. This ESL was just another attempt to take back some semble of control by the clubs or cynically, to extract more money from UEFA --- or better still some accountability and openness with the opaque UEFA organisation that makes/spends billions a year without being answerable to anyone.
Then they should have had the balls to actually create a decent alternative. When the European cup started, nobody claimed it was going to be a closed competition. The closed competition aspect was in the very foundation of the ESL - one of the claimed "selling point" of the league. It was always planned to be an NFL style league where yes, they could invite more teams in the future - but they'd decide it, based on if they brought enough monetary value and fanbase to the league, not based on sporting merit.
So perhaps a challenge to UEFA is still required, and maybe it does come in the form of ESL but it would have to be very differently run and would have to be a direct alternate to UEFA's competition that would allow the best teams in Europe from the last year to compete - not a set number of established big clubs.
I think with what city is doing right now, taking the piss on every English football team, UEFA, etc, the super league is inevitable. I voted No in the poll, but I understand the non oil clubs why would they go ahead with it in the future if a better plan was to be presented (a better plan than the idiotic one that was presented few months ago). If the big football clubs cant stop City, PSG and Chelsea cooking the books, they have no other option but to start an own competition where they by themselves regulate the rules and ensure it is followed.La Liga president Javier Tebas gave Barcelona a choice: extend Leo Messi's contract and give up on the Super League, or lose Messi and carry on with the Super League. (Source: @marcelobechler)
It's seems like Barcelona and Madrid still won't give up and want this League to start next year at all cost
I think with what city is doing right now, taking the piss on every English football team, UEFA, etc, the super league is inevitable. I voted No in the poll, but I understand the non oil clubs why would they go ahead with it in the future if a better plan was to be presented (a better plan than the idiotic one that was presented few months ago). If the big football clubs cant stop City, PSG and Chelsea cooking the books, they have no other option but to start an own competition where they by themselves regulate the rules and ensure it is followed.
Well United have spent equally to City and more then PSG in the last 10 years.
Well United have spent equally to City and more then PSG in the last 10 years.
Premiere League won't allow another Super League fiasco again, unless they want their Stadium burned
Do you think spending is only transfers? That would be naive. In the last 14 yeras Man city owners pumped about 2 billion from their own money directly or through masked false deals while united owners cost united in the last 14 years about 1 billion in dividends and debt amortization. The gap between united and Man city is 3 billion pounds in reality. United could not afford to renovate in the infrastructure like city does under the radar. United couldnt invest in the academy like city. It is not only transfers you know!Well United have spent equally to City and more then PSG in the last 10 years.
Premiere League won't allow another Super League fiasco again, unless they want their Stadium burned
City have spent £1.3bn in the last 10 years, United have spent £991m
How is a 34% difference spending “equally”?
Florentino Pérez, Real Madrid President, has just arrived in Barcelona.
Juventus CEO Andrea Agnelli has also arrived in the city. [cadena ser]
Finalizing the Super League for the next year. A big offer for the Premier League will be made
Only way for many clubs to compete long term is
Salary/transfer cap
Punitive taxes on excessive spending
Credits for youth players integrated into first team squads
Limiting squad sizes
Eliminate/severely restrict the loan system
Kick non-champions out of CL
Strict penalties for financial misrepresentation
Won't happen though. Long live our Emirate overlords then.
Florentino Pérez, Real Madrid President, has just arrived in Barcelona.
Juventus CEO Andrea Agnelli has also arrived in the city. [cadena ser]
Finalizing the Super League for the next year. A big offer for the Premier League will be made
@FCBarcelonaThe hypocrisy of both clubs is astounding. Back in late 90s-early00s when you had clubs like Deportivo and Valencia who were both still competitive in La Liga and Europe, the big 2 negotiated the new La Liga TV deal which would make them earn over 100m €(50% of the pie) each season while the rest of the clubs would get scraps. Meaning from 2001/02 till 2015-16 each of the clubs pocketed in over 1.5billion€
Karma is a bitch
They genuinely don't understand football culture here. We have no interest. If they push again people will destroy stadiums
Is it in England, though?Unless the alternative is a worse option.
Just imagining an hypothetical scenario where it would be preferable for English clubs to be in the Superleague rather than being out of it.Is it in England, though?
Unless the alternative is a worse option.
There is no worse option for English sides. This league will become the super league in all but name within 3 years IMO.Unless the alternative is a worse option.
I see your point, but wouldn't it have been better for English teams already from an economic point of view?Just imagining an hypothetical scenario where it would be preferable for English clubs to be in the Superleague rather than being out of it.
English clubs chose the best option for their interests.I see your point, but wouldn't it have been better for English teams already from an economic point of view?
English clubs chose the best option for their interests.
The scenario I talk about is one where it is so obvious being out of the Superleague is so detrimental to the clubs that even fans and politicians would acknowledge so very quickly.
Which is why the ESL was so attractive to many like Barca and Real. UEFA and the FA's have had 2 decades to rein in the oil peeps, and either give zero fecks or barely even try. They believed the ESL gave them opportunity to actual bring in some of the rules you mentioned to make the playing field more even.
Kicking non Champions out of CL sounds like a fecking terrible idea, which would just push the demand for the ESL.
They can do whatever the feck they like.Florentino Pérez, Real Madrid President, has just arrived in Barcelona.
Juventus CEO Andrea Agnelli has also arrived in the city. [cadena ser]
Finalizing the Super League for the next year. A big offer for the Premier League will be made
The hypocrisy of both clubs is astounding. Back in late 90s-early00s when you had clubs like Deportivo and Valencia who were both still competitive in La Liga and Europe, the big 2 negotiated the new La Liga TV deal which would make them earn over 100m €(50% of the pie) each season while the rest of the clubs would get scraps. Meaning from 2001/02 till 2015-16 each of the clubs pocketed in over 1.5billion€
Karma is a bitch