Rightnr
Wants players fined for winning away.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2015
- Messages
- 14,768
Yes, finally. Well done, Rashford and his PR team.
Possibly.Wasn't that Martin Edwards?
They won’t. They don’t refuse to play for racism I doubt they’d do it to protect Sky and the PL’s pockets.
If it happens PSG will join.
Starting to look a lot like we'll be the last ones standing from England in this, and while kicking 6 teams out of the PL might not be on the table kicking 1 out may well be
I’ll vote for Bozza too in that case.There you go, @Pexbo. Turns out it wasn’t actually identity politics that was the final piece of the jigsaw in the Tory master plan....
If it happens PSG will join.
The Premier League, alongside The FA, met with clubs today to discuss the immediate implications of the Super League proposal.
The 14 clubs at the meeting unanimously and vigorously rejected the plans for the competition.
The Premier League is considering all actions available to prevent it from progressing, as well as holding those Shareholders involved to account under its rules.
The League will continue to work with key stakeholders including fan groups, Government, UEFA, The FA, EFL, PFA and LMA to protect the best interests of the game and call on those clubs involved in the proposed competition to cease their involvement immediately.
The Premier League would like to thank fans and all stakeholders for the support they have shown this week on this significant issue.
The reaction proves just how much our open pyramid and football community means to people.
The difference there would be that there is then additional prize money for qualifying for CL/EL wouldn't there. Or a huge drop in prize money if relegated to the Championship etc
Yes it shouldn't be a closed off group with no outline as to entry requirements or consequences for failure, that much I couldn't agree with more.
I don't really care about UEFA alignment - they've proven themselves to be corrupt to feck too.
Probably still exploring what they can do legally.Bit of a nothing statement there to be honest.
Asked if it was right he was the first person from the club to answer questions about the Super League, the Manchester City boss said: "It is an honour. I am a good spokesperson.
“Ole [Gunnar Solskjaer], Jurgen [Klopp], Mikel [Arteta], Thomas [Tuchel] – we are all in the same position. We speak six times a week about everything, from COVID-19 to the NHS.
"I would love the president from this committee to go around the world and tell us why Ajax are not in there or whether they will be."
This is a legal minefield.Bit of a nothing statement there to be honest.
Hope they make a audacious statement, I wouldn't be against threatening to relegate the top 6 to the lower leagues to make a strong point.
By UEFA alignment I mean some kind of structure along side Cl qualification or similar if it remained, can’t just have 6 teams stinking up a league with it having no meaning to them
Ok, settle down sweetheart.
Did the nasty man not agree with you?
Juventus was in serie b less than 15 years ago.But there'd probably be more prize money for the results in the knock-out stages and I'm sorry but if any of the teams that will take part in this competition get relegated by normal means from their national leagues (not banned) in the next twenty years I will buy everyone a drink on this forum.
To be fair it’s still early. They’re probably exploring all potential legal actions they can take. There’s not going to be a solution overnight. This could drag on for months.Bit of a nothing statement there to be honest.
They are literally in hiding.The fact the ESL has been so transparent with everything tells me they just no nothing can stop them. They wouldn’t have been so brash or arrogant about it.
The only way it will be stopped is by collective action from players.
If the players, not individuals, but as a group, say no, its done.
Without players, all the owners have is an an acre and a half of grass with some seats around it.
Juventus was in serie b less than 15 years ago.
- The 15 “founding clubs” of the Super League would share 32.5 per cent of these commercial revenues
- A further 32.5 per cent would be distributed between all 20 participating teams, including the five sides invited to play in the competition each year
- Twenty per cent of revenues would be allocated on “merit” or be dependent on performance in the competition
- The final 15 per cent would be shared based on broadcast audience size
- The competition winner would receive just 1.5 times more than the bottom side. By comparison, that ratio in Spain’s La Liga is closer to 3.5 times
- Clubs will be also allowed to retain all revenues from gate receipts and club sponsorship deals
- Super League clubs have committed to using only 55 per cent of their revenues on “sport spending”, such as player salaries, transfer and agent fees, according to people familiar with the terms
- Super League clubs have also signed up to a “tax equalisation” clause so that “income tax on salaries shall be normalised and calculated at a rate of 45 per cent”, according to people with direct knowledge of the contracts
That is the only problem imo. It is these shitty clubs as well as UEFA/FIFA being the "good" guys now. But I guess we take whatever we can!a team who literally spent 400m + on 2 players talks about Fairness. God - hypocrisy just suicides.
They were relegated as punishment. Something that can easily happen again.Yes but they were banished for corruption , not because they were a crap team who couldn't buy their way out of trouble which is why I included the proviso 'not banned'
45% income tax is why the Government won't fully block the move, they'll be raking it in with 45% tax.
Yeah agreedThe only way it will be stopped is by collective action from players.
If the players, not individuals, but as a group, say no, its done.
Without players, all the owners have is an an acre and a half of grass with some seats around it.
How so? They were literally running their mouth on TV last nightThey are literally in hiding.
Even if the SL was the best idea in the world, the fact that players, managers and fans had no say or even acknowledged when making the decision is what ultimately everyone is rightly against. It's not a defence of UEFA really.