RedDevil@84
Full Member
Sounds like we can’t kick them out?
And if UEFA wait for a month, everyone will forget and adjust to the new reality.
Sounds like we can’t kick them out?
Someone better ask him about his intentions to help push through the Newcastle Saudi takeover.You would think that this would give Labour the fuel to call him out on his hypocrisy in future political exchanges, but they somehow manage to offer less than nothing.
Don’t necessarily agree with that as a fan of American sports.
They arent dropping out. Its a weird PR move that fans are latching on to as if there are levels to this cuntishness. If Bayern and PSG could say no, they could have as well.There's something highly laughable and revolting at the idea of City dropping out and being spoken about like saviours and true good guys.
No, you literally dodged the question. The system is already rigged and that was my point.
I voted neutral, wait to see more details. I agree tbh. There’s a lot with the proposal I don’t mind. But obviously a few things that most aren’t happy with.Hmmm....
I don't hate this as much as I thought I would.
This is good, and would make for a more competitive ESL.
- The competition winner would receive just 1.5 times more than the bottom side. By comparison, that ratio in Spain’s La Liga is closer to 3.5 times
This percentage needs to be smaller, imo.
- The 15 “founding clubs” of the Super League would share 32.5 per cent of these commercial revenues
And this one needs to be bigger.
- A further 32.5 per cent would be distributed between all 20 participating teams, including the five sides invited to play in the competition each year
I'd like to see an additional commitment to parachute payments/funding of national leagues in order to help grass roots football.
- The final 15 per cent would be shared based on broadcast audience size
Good.
- Super League clubs have committed to using only 55 per cent of their revenues on “sport spending”, such as player salaries, transfer and agent fees, according to people familiar with the terms
There's definitely room for improvement. But that's not the worst start. Assuming it is a start.
Sam Lee who is as reliable as it gets for city stated yesterday that these agreements are not legally binding.Perez wouldn’t have been as brash last night if he wasn’t on solid ground.
Oh they'll be in there somewhere, you can bet on it.Been thinking the same thing. To be honest I'm amazed they aren't supporting this, if it takes off the big 6 stand to make a monumental amount which would be even more lucrative for the UK economy.
Why would he do that when he wants a Saudi takeover at Newcastle.If Boris forces the Glazers out I’m voting Tory. Actually even saying that in jest makes me feel ill...
If Boris forces the Glazers out I’m voting Tory. Actually even saying that in jest makes me feel ill...
No, Arsenal was just a reference. Point is, if you are not state owned you are not guaranteed money at all. Means , the clubs who is responsible for.making the sport so popular thinks they deserve more because people are watching for them. For.e.g Real and Barca think they have more viewers and they should be compensated accordingly else they could end up like Arsenal tomorrow. They are sowing it but they fear the benefits will be reaped by someone else.Arsenal deserve what they earn, no more and no less. If their underperformance on the pitch impacts them financially while Leicester get a financial boost from overperforming then that's sport working as it should. Why on earth should Arsenal be ring-fenced from their own failures as if being good in the 00's means they're owed something 20 years later?
Well obviously someone is lying then.Sam Lee who is as reliable as it gets for city stated yesterday that these agreements are not legally binding.
I understand that but I think it’s not outlandish to treat competive sport differently to business. It’s a shame that the sport of football has turned into more of a business I suppose.
I don’t trust the government but I suppose protecting the premier league will also protect a lot of jobs and income more so than having the premier league fold and just have 6 rich clubs taking most of the money.
City embarrassed by Pep
Hmmm.... I don't hate this as much as I thought I would.
- The competition winner would receive just 1.5 times more than the bottom side. By comparison, that ratio in Spain’s La Liga is closer to 3.5 times
But Perez is literally the leader of this thing.Sam Lee who is as reliable as it gets for city stated yesterday that these agreements are not legally binding.
I never said they could close the gap. If you can't relate the question I asked and the discussion that was relevant, you are either dodging or you haven't been following the discussions. Feel free to go back and check the posts related to the discussions.No, you claimed that they could close the gap and then claimed that it was a similar situation than today, both of these statements are blatantly wrong. Finally you tried to muddy the water by asking a question about a point that I haven't made or defended.
That was last week. Last week’s Boris is very different to this week’s Boris.Why would he do that when he wants a Saudi takeover at Newcastle.
I wonder if UEFA would refuse to present the trophy at the CL final if this goes ahead, given all 4 teams are on the list.
It wasnt missed, this has been reported on for a few years. Was very loud last year too, everyone just denied itBut Perez is literally the leader of this thing.
Isnt he a bit more reliable that Sam Lee? Where was Sam etc before Sunday anyway? How the feck did everybody miss this?
We cant even scout Sancho without getting caught yet here we are, creating a new European league on the sly
If this stops any state funded clubs to invest unlimited money , then I am all for it. Let's see if PL has the balls to do it.Right but no one in here gives a single shit about UEFA, the PL, Sky, FIFA etc. The outrage on here, by all the other fans around the World is not for them, it is because this represents something much worse.
TrueThat was last week. Last week’s Boris is very different to this week’s Boris.
Realistically, there's no stopping the ESL. The best we can hope for is a softening of the initial ESL charter. In that regard, I'll support the protests. But I think everyone needs to be aware there's no 'winning' here. There's only 'losing less badly'.
I never said they could close the gap. If you can't relate the question I asked and the discussion that was relevant, you are either dodging or you haven't been following the discussions. Feel free to go back and check the posts related to the discussions.
So isn't that an opportunity for other teams to catch up then? West Ham and Leicester will get the top 4 ?
Realistically, there's no stopping the ESL. The best we can hope for is a softening of the initial ESL charter. In that regard, I'll support the protests. But I think everyone needs to be aware there's no 'winning' here. There's only 'losing less badly'.
I agree he was pretty arrogant too suggesting he knows that it can’t be stopped etc.But Perez is literally the leader of this thing.
Isnt he a bit more reliable that Sam Lee? Where was Sam etc before Sunday anyway? How the feck did everybody miss this?
We cant even scout Sancho without getting caught yet here we are, creating a new European league on the sly
To some degree. But it would hopefully be mitigated by this:Isn't this awful news? That means there's not even that much incentive to even bother bloody winning the damn super league! Even less chance of investment in the team, because why should they? Whats there really to gain? The Glazers have wanted success for money, if they don't need success for money, why would they bother improving the team? They wouldn't.
And this one needs to be bigger.
- A further 32.5 per cent would be distributed between all 20 participating teams, including the five sides invited to play in the competition each year
Hmmm.... I don't hate this as much as I thought I would.
I'll be beyond shocked if Ole speaks out about it to be honest, I hope I'm wrong though.