European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?


  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .
I am, but there's a lot of people on high horses in here who themselves would sell their granny for the money available in the SL. Football isn't dead, it's going to be fine.

You turn it into a popularity contest. This isn't a democracy but a competition. You don't give the membership to the team who earned it through football but who's best at advertising what they do. Why do we even play the games? We could just vote who should win it.
 
l
I haven't had chance! I'm getting about 15 replies a second at the moment. I'll read up on everything tomorrow when the dust settled. Don't really care right now as the sentiment around it is 95% negative so there's a total imbalance of rational thinking
No, the plan has been in the public domain for several months, people have had plenty of time to digest it
 
I’ve seen a few people make this point and I believe it reveals more about them, than it says about the clubs and players. I’m amazed by how many people are now openly admitted that the PL for them is in large part just an extended qualifying competition for Europe.

Give athletes and the sporting departments of football clubs a bit more credit. Most footballers and managers compete for the love of the game and proving themselves. League structures exist in all sports all around the world and are proven as a successful sporting format.

People are genuinely lamenting the death of a top four race, which I am amazed by. This has been the antithesis of what domestic football has been about for over a 100 years.

I think you're missing the point. The key thing is the primacy of the national leagues. That primacy has rested on several things. One is that it remains the main focus of most fans. Another is that they have been the only Leagues - the CL is just a tournament. SL is not a tournament - it is in effect a NA-style League with playoffs. A third is that even for clubs to whom the CL is more important than the national league, performing well in the national league is absolute necessity, because otherwise you don't get to the CL. The CL has never been seen by anyone as a threat to the primacy of national leagues, for that reason: It's a lucrative bonus tournament you get if you do well, and what defines "do well" is how you do in your own league.

In short - the national league is the baseline, for all clubs. This breaks that link, which really changes everything. It turns that level above into the main focus, leaving the national leagues as an afterthought which clubs can care or not care about as they choose - and which will mean less for the financial baseline than the SL does. Like the FA cup now.

That does not mean that people only care about the EPL because it decides who gets to the CL. On the contrary, it shows that people care about the national leagues remaining the primary focus.
 
They're being released from the requirement to try and win things. They're being told that the things they won historically are enough and what happens going forwards is no longer relevant. Everyone else is being told that it's too late to play their way to the top - they missed the cut-off.
Are they feck. You're telling me that there's no requirement to win a game moving forward? That's it? Ambition completely gone? Football now becomes a bunch of meaningless friendlies?

If that's the case then what's the point in playing now? Everyone still gets paid, why try and win any competition, especially the PL, I mean we're in it next year anyway.

The reality is, football does nothing but punish, it never rewards. Had a shit season? Relegated. Missed out on a couple of transfer targets? Relegated. Got a few injuries? Title gone.

I just hope that the players don't have the same attitude as some of you in here.
 
The only way this could be stopped is:

All other clubs in the Prem/La liga/Bundesliga/Italian/French leagues decide not to sell players to the Superleague clubs.

In 3 years the SL clubs would be fecked.

No Mbappes, no Bruno, etc.

They could have all the money in the world, yet, they couldn't spend it.
Sure, you could buy brazilians and other South Americans....
The SL clubs are the most decorated and iconic clubs in the world, the best players are going to want to join them. If non SL clubs really refuse to sell then it would backfire on them; said players will run down their contract and join for free meaning the 50m+ Sporting would have received by selling Bruno to United will be gone and surely that has bigger implications for a club in financial difficulties. Also players are likely to sign shorter contracts as a result so they have more power to move on their own terms.
 
The teams in it have huge followings and interest outside of the UK. They're being rewarded for winning things and having fans.
What was the last trophy Inter won? Why are they in it? Unless they're counting the winnings of ex-United players in their "history".
 
So far it hasn't been indicated that these 15 founding clubs can be replaced. They will automatically play in the Super League.
When the dust settles we'll have some requirement at some point. Like I said previously, if for some reason Southampton go on to become one of the most successful and most viewed PL teams over the next few years, you think they won't be extended an invitation?
 
Public opinion is all with UEFA on this. They can probably do a LOT of damage to the clubs in question and have the fans of the club's backing.

There are so many problems with this league:

No fear of relegation
5 teams qualify. Do they have to re-qualify the next year, even if they win the contest? What if they outpeform most teams? It renders the principle of fair competition null and void
No ethical governing body or impartial governing body. Perez is the chairman. What happens if Real Madrid has a complaint?
Will they get referees? They're all UEFA and FIFA licensed referees. Will the Super League simply hire them and have them ref 10-15 games a season each while getting excluded from reffing in domestic leagues?

I love this club so much. And I will absolutely support UEFA, and the Premier League if they choose to go nuclear on the club, strip us from all points and send us to the championship. There is legitimately no course of action that is too strong to stop this from happening.
This relegation point keeps getting brought up but it doesnt happen in todays CL? We went out in the group stages last year and we are sailing back into it next season.
 
Any word on what happens to the European competitions this season?
 
Still convinced this is a ploy by those teams to get UEFA to the negotiating table.
 
When the dust settles we'll have some requirement at some point. Like I said previously, if for some reason Southampton go on to become one of the most successful and most viewed PL teams over the next few years, you think they won't be extended an invitation?
They won't go on to become the most successful and viewed PL team because this plan is purposefully designed to ensure these 12 clubs get the wealth and opportunities and nobody else does.
 
If these clubs are getting massive automatic payments, in excess of what they'd get for winning the CL, then where is the incentive for actually... you know... competing? It's just a glorified exhibition where they turn up and collect their cash.

The more I think about it, the more I feel the people actually in favour of this are probably more those blinkered fans who don't give a sh*t about anything but what's new and shiny - the kind of people who fetishise transfers, and forget what made football so brilliant in the first place.
 
What you are saying would still be replicated in any super league. Except without the threat of relegation which would be new levels of boring.

When you have a gulf in resources between the best and the rest, you don’t pour petrol on it and systematically make it much bigger. When competition is the lifeblood of the sport you end up with a better product by spreading investment out, not funnelling it entirely into a handful of uber-rich clubs.

The difference is that while very few know that Burnley exist Inter and Milan has huge fan bases. Inter has 55m and Milan has 95m. A game between Manchester United and Milan would attract thousands of fans world wide something both clubs would benefit from. They won't be piggy banking on our popularity to attract the ££££ needed for their club to thrive/survive.

I understand and in many ways I share your concerns/anger. However I am also trying to see the other POV as well. When I started following United, the EPL was nowhere near as being the best league in the world. However it was certainly entertaining. Smaller sides would throw caution by the wind and play attractive football to keep football entertaining. By doing so they kept their side of the bargain. Can you say the same now? All these teams care about is that extra point needed to remain in the EPL or making it in the Europa league so that they can keep on piggy banking on the money the big guns generate. So if these clubs can be allowed to be greedy then what's so tragic in us doing the same?
 
Last edited:
How fecked is it that Leipzig are the other club that is going to join :lol: Such a blatant money grab. Disgusting.
They’re like 5 years old. What are Celtic thinking of this for instance. Pure joke. Absolutely no meritocracy.
 
All this talk about trophy cabinets and history as if performing now doesn't matter as much.

Would they have been OK with a Super League in 1995 including Blackburn? Or in 1980 with Forest after their back-to-back European Cups?
 
Unless the clubs name is Manchester United, who have barely qualified for the competition over the last 8 years, even with all the advantages of having a billionaire owner?

If the Super Leagues happens the likes of Arsenal, Spurs and United won’t get any better. The money will flow in and the only people who will benefit are the owners, players and agents. No doubt fans will be expected to pay a premium to go to games and there will be yet another separate payment service to watch games on TV.

Not sure who you're arguing with here. I think the same as you. I was responding to someone who didn't see the problem with it.
 
Trouble is, if we are kicked out of other competitions then it will be all we have. It will be 12 Harlem Globetrotters playing each other.

It's 20 teams. People have seemingly missed that part but it's essentially a normal league with playoffs.
 
Btw people saying that the PL should throw away the big six are surely looking at the smaller picture. The other 14 clubs will be financially destroyed if the big six are out of the league. The TV revenue will be reduced by 70-80% imo.
The big six will be out of the league because competing for four spots for UCL football is no longer needed. They can finish 13th and it makes no difference.
 

Ferguson, in his first intervention in a live issue since retirement, have commented this time around too:

“Talk of a Super League is a move away from 70 years of European club football. Both as a player for a provincial team Dunfermline in the 60s and as a manager at Aberdeen winning the European Cup Winners’ Cup, for a small provincial club in Scotland it was like climbing Mount Everest,” he told Reuters.

“Everton are spending £500 million to build a new stadium with the ambition to play in Champions League. Fans all over love the competition as it is,” he said.

“In my time at United, we played in four Champions League finals and they were always the most special of nights.

“I’m not sure Manchester United are involved in this, as I am not part of the decision making process,” he added.
[source]

(Reuters calling the club 'Soccer-United' in their headline though. :wenger:)
 
The NFL merged with the AFL and it didn't ruin American football. The NBA merged with the ABA and it didn't ruin basketball. The National League and American League started playing interleague games and it didn't ruin baseball.

It seems absurd that some of the best players in the world might go their entire careers without facing each other. I get why traveling fans would be dismayed because it's ruining a culture built up for a century... but just in terms of the football it seems silly that the best aren't always playing the best.
Spoken like true glazer supporter.

Your examples dont work in this case because ALOT of clubs are excluded.
 
Tottenham a founder of the European Super League, the same Tottenham who were knocked out of the Europa League by Dinamo Zagreb....
 
Those young Mbappes/Brunos don't go to these clubs in the first place or go with specific contract clauses. In football, the power is with the top players and big clubs. The latter are exercising it and they will distribute part of the pie to the top players to keep them happy.

Yeah, but the talents? You can't possibly imagine ALL the top talents in the world to play only in the 20 clubs of the world.
That's just ridiculous.

Mbappe came from Monaco.
Haaland came from Molde and RB Salzburg.
Bruno came from Sporting.

If the top 20 can't buy from Monaco or Molde or Salzburg.....in 5 years when they're done trading Neymar between themselves, they're fecked.

They will sign a ton of free agents on stupid money though.

They could. It's their league, their rules.

Just out of curiosity, how many free agents are there today that the top clubs would buy?
Most of the top players are contract bound.

Also, most players, young ones especially, they want to play football. Not sit on a 3 mile long bench at PSG waiting their turn to play.
 
This entire thing is disgusting. Anyone who agrees with this super league is a disgrace as well.

It’s literally all money based. Like that’s it. Nothing to do with quality of football. You can say football is money based these days but this is like...another level of greed.