European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?

  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .
crossy1686 said:
Your team just built a new stadium so more fans could watch them play and therefore increase their revenue. That's okay but playing in a competition is 'sickening'? That's some moral dilemma you've got there
Click to expand...

Non sequitur of the decade.
 
holdsteady said:
Acquiescence to the almighty dollar is not what a football club is about.
Click to expand...
Then I guess we should stop all advertising and sponsorships, cancel streaming services, stop with the replica shirts, stop building bigger stadiums and not enter competitions that include prize money from now on. If we're going to be purists we might as well go all in instead of choosing which parts we like and which parts we don't
 
crossy1686 said:
Your team just built a new stadium so more fans could watch them play and therefore increase their revenue. That's okay but playing in a competition is 'sickening'? That's some moral dilemma you've got there
Click to expand...

It's not a competition because it's not based on merit. How can you not see that this is the reason people object to it, and why all the comparisons you want to make to the money in football elsewhere are irrelevant. Yes football may already be a corrupt cash cow but you have to win games to earn a place in the CL and if you don't win games you can be relegated from the PL.
 
JPRouve said:
That's not how it works, the players that wants to leave would simply not extend or resigned. One of the reasons players don't resign is because FIFA wouldn't register the player with his new club but in this case the competition they are joining is out of FIFA's jurisdiction.
Click to expand...

True that.

You would still have to wait for 5 years till the contract expires.

You have 3 billions, but i still won't sell you my new shinning toy for you to play with.

A childish game, but hell, you fight fire with fire.

Zehner said:
I'm not even sure that this would be possible. The authorities behind player licenses etc. are the UEFA/FIFA and the domestic leagues. If they build a parallel competition it is possible that players would legally be allowed to be contracted for two clubs simultaneously. It would be treated like a differet sport. Just like a membership in a football club doesn't prevent you from joining a basketball team. I'm sure there'll be working laws to be considered, too, but I doubt this new constellation would have absolutely zero influence on the fees paid at all.
Click to expand...

A contract is the law. You put in the contract that you can't play for anybody else during your time in the club.
Not all good players could play for the SL 20 clubs.
Young players....rising stars. Haalands, Mbappes, etc. We all know where they started.
 
Kostov said:
The FA is no better than Uefa so no simpathy, and I don't think the fans have to be affected by this, the FA through the likes of Sky and other media outlets are trying to make like they care for the fans when in reality they are only worried for themselves, therefor they can ban the clubs from domestic competitions and harm the fans.
Click to expand...
This will ruin the Premier League which will affect the Championship, League 1 and 2. You talk about the FA and ignore all the teams in those Leagues. This will squeeze many of the clubs in those Leagues out of existence. It is to establish 12 teams as the only thing that matter in football for now and always. This is terrible for the fans.
 
Chris Williams: In UEFA there is a genuine want for the 12 to be dismissed and for Real, Barcelona, AC Milan and Liverpool to be stripped of all titles
 
crossy1686 said:
Then I guess we should stop all advertising and sponsorships, cancel streaming services, stop with the replica shirts, stop building bigger stadiums and not enter competitions that include prize money from now on. If we're going to be purists we might as well go all in instead of choosing which parts we like and which parts we don't
Click to expand...

Man, you're not getting the point at all.
 
Kita said:
I have been reading a lot of about this Super League today and watching a lot of reactions. Some background about where my views are coming from here: I was born in Poland but grew up in America. I followed the World Cup and Euros but that was essentially it. My cousin visited me in the States and began to show me United matches and got me into the club. This was late 2000s. I haven't missed a Champ League or Premier League match since. I fell in love. The passion, the history, the structure, everything. It all meant something. I missed the majority of United's glory years but went back to watch a lot of it. It was incredible.

I was a massive NFL and NBA fan growing up. Once I got into (proper) football, it all seemed pointless. Teams in those two leagues get rewarded for being bad. You get rewarded for losing. Think about that concept. The NBA regular season is largely irrelevant. The NFL season? The best teams do not win. The New England Patriots were 18-0 going into the Super Bowl and lost. The playoffs are one and done. They were by far the best team that season and lost one game and were not champions.

Meanwhile in football, you get the best teams that win the league each season. There are no massive flukes because you cannot luck your way into a title. Even Leicester deserved on merit the season they won because they were the best team that season (maybe not most talented but irrelevant). Even the Champions League you have group stages and two matches for elimination prior to the final.

This Super League is an absolute joke for many reasons I have seen mentioned and someone that rarely get mentioned. The Champions League is something you look forward to during a work day here. I love working from home because I can pull up midweek games and watch them. In the office, I can stream them on my phone and still enjoy. It is an amazing competition and has incredible moments. Sure, the big teams win this. However, you still have great storylines. Giant slayers happen all the time. For a lot of these clubs, those are moments they remember. Scoring against United, beating City at home, going to Real Madrid and playing there. For a lot of teams (Belgian, Swiss, Polish, Ukrainian, etc.) these are the moments they do not forget. Those are now gone. Real Madrid should be absolutely ashamed for doing this. The Champion's League is a competition they are kings in. They are so admired in this competition and they will piss it all away. Disgraceful.

Domestically, what is the point? The second you are out of the title race, why even try? Liverpool would be resting players by New Years this season. Why compete in the EPL when you are still playing so many games in the super league? Getting 2nd, 3rd, 4th in the EPL is irrelevant. So once City or Liverpool or United get a comfortable lead then why keep trying? All 6 English teams will not remain competitive in the EPL so I would guess at least 3 will be resting players by New Years to focus on Super League placement (if they even care about that). It destroys the competition in domestic leagues. What about teams like Leicester, West Ham, Aston Villa? These teams can overtake Spurs easily (or already have) as the consistent top finishers. Now they do it for nothing. What is the point of the season once a team has a somewhat comfortable lead.

There is no risk for the big teams. No reason to push for the league. No reason to compete. The money will constantly come in and it will be mostly the same every season. You will push to win the Super League but once that is out of the realm of possibility, what is the competition? Spurs will be walking through the motions in the Super League within a month. They will not be punished for not being competitive because their owner is on the board. It is a complete joke of a league where teams will not get punished. I hope the Leagues, UEFA and FIFA come down on this. It will ruin mid table clubs and make winning the league even more impossible.
Click to expand...

Good post.
 
There will be a compromise somewhere. I finally read the statement on the app.
Firstly, from a totally objective point of view - it makes sense business wise. Otherwise, they will need to address certain issues which isn't covered by their current plans (but they acknowledge this). (This is just looking at it dispassionately)

However, I felt throughout like it was another European competition - only this time instead of UEFA calling the shots, it is these elite clubs (mostly elite clubs). I dunno. What's the difference between these people? Nothing.
And UEFA has shown in the past that they will punish a non-elite club over FFP issues, yet give a pass to other more 'visible' clubs. So I don't get the outrage - neither party has the moral high ground here.

But like I said, something will be worked out.
 
crossy1686 said:
People are upset their clubs are increasing their revenue and yet build huge stadiums to increase their revenue. A lot of ivory tower in here
Click to expand...

No, you are dead wrong! People are upset because the clubs are trying to increase their revenue at the expense of fair competition. That's the key bit. I am all for getting an official tractor sponsor if it means more money for transfers, wages, etc. But this is a blatant cash grab that damages the integrity of the sport.
 
crossy1686 said:
People are upset their clubs are increasing their revenue and yet build huge stadiums to increase their revenue. A lot of ivory tower in here
Click to expand...
I have literally no club what comparison you're making here. There are lots of ways a club can increase their revenue, it doesn''t mean they're all as right or wrong as each other. Allowing more fans into the stadium to watch the games is not the same as joining some plastic competition where teams can't be relegated.
 
youmeletsfly said:
Money and quality wise, the ESL is a much better proposition than the fifa/uefa model.

However, the beauty of any competition is having the little teams surprise the big ones.

If they find a way to also invite other teams, like the UCL now does, the current competitions are in trouble.

Other than that, I don't see anything wrong with it. It's not like uefa and fifa haven't been corrupt as feck in the last 30 years.
Click to expand...

What's wrong with it is that you don't qualify on merit. The one positive about having billionaire owners is that they actually have to invest huge sums maintaining very good football teams, because otherwise there's an acute risk of missing out on CL qualification. No more. You've got a free ride.
 
Brightonian said:
It's not a competition because it's not based on merit. How can you not see that this is the reason people object to it, and why all the comparisons you want to make to the money in football elsewhere are irrelevant. Yes football may already be a corrupt cash cow but you have to win games to earn a place in the CL and if you don't win games you can be relegated from the PL.
Click to expand...
Of course it's based on merit, but it's based on a merit that no one likes. It's based on viewing metrics and popularity of a club, that's what gets you in the SL, something which successful clubs like United have worked hard on for decades. If we all get kicked out of the PL and lets say Southampton go on to win it multiple times, will they grow a bigger following? Will they get access to the SL? Of course they will.

Top 4 isn't a trophy, United aim to win all competitions they play in, that won't change. And the fear of relegation isn't something that's been spurring us on for decades.
 
It would also go straight to CAS and I imagine the club's affected have taken robust advice on this.
 
crossy1686 said:
Your team just built a new stadium so more fans could watch them play and therefore increase their revenue. That's okay but playing in a competition is 'sickening'? That's some moral dilemma you've got there
Click to expand...

What are you blabbering on about now? You don't have talk some tripe. Is that the best you have? Spurs built a new stadium so thats just as 'bad' as them gutting the Premier League and Champions League? What planet are you on mate?
 
Brightonian said:
All these false comparisons with the problems with UEFA, FIFA, the CL, clubs funded by oil magnates and nation states and all the other things that are problematic about modern football are missing the point.

You do not get into this 'competition' on merit.

There's no way past that, for me. Leicester's league win would not have earned them a chance to play in it. If West Ham get fourth this season, that will not earn them a chance to play in it. Football may have structurally undermined its own meritocracy in a number of ways already but the principle remains that you can play your way to the top. The ESL would end that principle.
Click to expand...
Finally someone acknowledging this. It amazes me how many people ignore this.
 
GifLord said:
That amazing manager got them nowhere in UCL 2 season's in a row - GS elimination. This season they're only winning the Serie A because of that potato of a manager Juve has
Click to expand...

Conte is an excellent manager and he's got a quite an excellent team to work with.
 
Surprised that PSG aren't in already.

The three open slots seem clearly designed for bayern, dortmund and PSG to enter as founders.
 
justsomebloke said:
What's wrong with it is that you don't qualify on merit. The one positive about having billionaire owners is that they actually have to invest huge sums maintaining very good football teams, because otherwise there's an acute risk of missing out on CL qualification. No more. You've got a free ride.
Click to expand...
The teams in it have huge followings and interest outside of the UK. They're being rewarded for winning things and having fans.
 
Kita said:
Domestically, what is the point? The second you are out of the title race, why even try? Liverpool would be resting players by New Years this season. Why compete in the EPL when you are still playing so many games in the super league? Getting 2nd, 3rd, 4th in the EPL is irrelevant. So once City or Liverpool or United get a comfortable lead then why keep trying? All 6 English teams will not remain competitive in the EPL so I would guess at least 3 will be resting players by New Years to focus on Super League placement (if they even care about that). It destroys the competition in domestic leagues. What about teams like Leicester, West Ham, Aston Villa? These teams can overtake Spurs easily (or already have) as the consistent top finishers. Now they do it for nothing. What is the point of the season once a team has a somewhat comfortable lead.
Click to expand...
I’ve seen a few people make this point and I believe it reveals more about them, than it says about the clubs and players. I’m amazed by how many people are now openly admitted that the PL for them is in large part just an extended qualifying competition for Europe.

Give athletes and the sporting departments of football clubs a bit more credit. Most footballers and managers compete for the love of the game and proving themselves. League structures exist in all sports all around the world and are proven as a successful sporting format.

People are genuinely lamenting the death of a top four race, which I am amazed by. This has been the antithesis of what domestic football has been about for over a 100 years.
 
Classical Mechanic said:
This isn't going to help though. UEFA is full of greedy insecure babies.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, I think you're right. If they throw the clubs out of national competitions and, worse still, ban players from playing for national teams, that just destroys what remains of their own competitions, and turn the SL into even more of a threat. Which the SL clubs have no doubt anticipated.
 
Can't believe how many are in either in favour or apathetic about this. It reeks of entitlement from elements of our fan base.

And the idea about the entertainment on offer from the 'best playing the 'best' every week ? Those snorefests we had against Chelsea, Liverpool and arsenal at home this season have been washed out from peoples minds.
 
I've seen a couple of tweets suggesting that Chelsea and Man City didn't want this and were backed into a corner to "join up or be left out".

Stinks of a club leak to try and paint themselves as victims and only makes them look weak in my opinion. If it's true, Roman and the Man City people should've said "we don't need the money, feck off".
 
crossy1686 said:
Of course it's based on merit, but it's based on a merit that no one likes. It's based on viewing metrics and popularity of a club, that's what gets you in the SL, something which successful clubs like United have worked hard on for decades. If we all get kicked out of the PL and lets say Southampton go on to win it multiple times, will they grow a bigger following? Will they get access to the SL? Of course they will.

Top 4 isn't a trophy, United aim to win all competitions they play in, that won't change. And the fear of relegation isn't something that's been spurring us on for decades.
Click to expand...

I'm so sorry, let me clarify. By 'merit', I meant winning football matches. Not winning on social media.
 
A lot of over the top outrage with this.

It'll soon become the norm and we'll then wonder how we ever managed without it.

The only thing wrong with it is that Spurs are in it. How can a team that has won just a single trophy in 13 years (and that being the Carabao Cup) be included?
 
Last edited:
I'm ashamed that Spurs are part of this but having said that as all this new league is about money surely people can understand that Spurs who are now in the top 10 most valuable clubs in the world should be in the 12 clubs. This just emphasises what a joke the thing is - your clubs value is based on money not history.
 
duffer said:
I've seen a couple of tweets suggesting that Chelsea and Man City didn't want this and were backed into a corner to "join up or be left out".

Stinks of a club leak to try and paint themselves as victims and only makes them look weak in my opinion. If it's true, Roman and the Man City people should've said "we don't need the money, feck off".
Click to expand...
It does make you think whether the Americans pushed this through.
(Kroenke, Glazers and FSG)
 
crossy1686 said:
Yep, the mighty Midtjylland and Lincoln Red Imps battling it out in a Champions League final any day now, what a time to be alive.

If you've got to play two qualification rounds to get into a tournament, you've got no business being there.
Click to expand...
That is a mindset of someone insanely privileged and spoiled. How many clubs should then realistically exist? 10? What's the point of having millions of professional footballers if only 200 of the best can do the trick? Disgusting attitude.
 
crossy1686 said:
It's actually the elites saying "we want a fair share of what we actually bring to the table for once" and there's nothing wrong with that.

I know it's trendy at the moment to be all doom and gloom and see this as the death of football but none of that is going to happen. Look around at other sports and tell me where an influx of money has ruined the game? People said exactly the same thing as this when the CL came along, guess the game was ruined and owners made quick bucks a long time ago then?
Click to expand...

The self declared elites you mean?

They weren’t the elites until TV arrived, they took the revenue and the fan base grew, the revenue attracted wealthy owners who fancied a slice of the cake and now they fancy an even bigger share of the TV cake. And putting that aside what iselite about Arsenal or Tottenham?

It’s got nothing to do with the best v the best, that should not even be a thing.The pyramid gets steeper every year. Football was far better when the resources were spread evenly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.