Did I imply that you must not criticize? Otherwise, please feel free to quote where I write that.
I don't invent diagnoses, but you may be right that I should be more thorough when I write "depression". So instead, let's address it to what ETH called it in January: "Mental issues". But it doesn't change much. Sancho was out for a long period with, among other things, "mental issues". Here you can probably expect that it has not been an easy game for Sancho since he was away for so long. And therefore it may surprise me that ETH chooses to criticize exactly Sancho in public. This does not mean that Sancho cannot be criticized for poor efforts in training. But keep such criticisms internal with an employee who a short time ago was away with "mental issues".
My point is that ETH is not without blame in this situation and it is far too easy to point the finger at Sancho alone. The criticism is almost entirely aimed at Sancho.
Just checking, because you stated that it seems not to be allowed to criticise Ten Hag, but the only ‘punishment’ I can see for criticizing him is that people can criticize you for it. What else would make it ‘not allowed’?
I think people laying into Sancho is caused by too many people thinking they know what they don’t know, and it’s not helped by more people claiming unknowable things for fact in order to chose sides and make it a battle.
This is what I’ve found Ten Hag to say about Sancho’s mental aspect:
‘"Sometimes there are circumstances with fitness and mood. He was not in the right status or fitness state," Dec 2022
"It's physical, but physical is also the connection with mental. But I think he is now making good progress on the physical part and that will help him. I hope he can return quickly but I can't say a duration of how long it will be." Feb 2023
I don’t think Sancho or anyone else with knowledge has said anything about any mental theme regarding him. This can mean anything from ‘he’s got a niggle that won’t go away and it’s hard to focus in England’, to ‘he’s moody and badly trained, he needs a special training program but I‘m not gonna say he’s lazy to you public lot’ to ‘he’s mildly depressed and we thought he could do with a change of scenery’ to ‘he’s got delusions of grandure, is addicted to SoMe-ing about his grandness and this hs made him severely depressed’ to ‘he can’t handle tough love and I can’t stand for a weakling’ to ‘he lost his girlfriend to Ronaldo but he refuses to talk about it’ etc etc etc. We don’t know, and it certainly doesn’t help Jadon Sancho that the lot of us makes a big argument to decide it.
If he has serious mental health problems, it will not help to read social media or argue about your quality of training or attack your boss in public. If not, it’s also a bad idea. That much is pretty clear to me. Apart from that, it’s speculation.
What Ten Hag said after the Arsenal match, that mad Sancho accuse him (or ‘someone’) of speaking untrue and scapegoating him, was, as an answer to why Sancho wasn’t picked for the game: ‘on his performance in training we didn't select him’.
Unless you think Sancho has special rights to be in a Man Utd matchday squad, or you that is neither possible to call a lie, nor specially abusive. Wether Sancho thought himself the beat trainer that week and Ten Hag thought him the worst, or Sancho was clinically depressed and that impeded his performance’, it’s at best subjective and at worst harshly honest. It’s not a statement about his mentality though, in fact it’s the opposite. He could say he was mentally ill, or lazy, or was being difficult, or had done something wrong, but he didn’t, he simply said he had not warranted a place in the squad ahead of others. You and I can speculate on whatmust have happened that we don’t know that would explain this. Probably we ahould refrain. I think the whole thread title sucks, to be honest.
I don’t think anyone should be calling for Sancho’s head, nor claim he’s a victim, nor crticise Ten Hag based on projection or speculation. I do think it’s fair to say that Sancho’s public statements and non-statements are out of line for any scenario, and that if he can’t adress that, he has no human right to play in a particular professional football team ahead of others, so he will have to find another employer or accept that he’s not picked for squad’s or even collective training sessions. That’s just a fact about professional sports, not a moral issue. Apart from that, I think really we should all shut up and find something else to speculate about.