EtH
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2021
- Messages
- 2,712
What does ETH mean when he says we might have to be creative when signing a striker in January?
“Kane.”
What does ETH mean when he says we might have to be creative when signing a striker in January?
Meet our new striker, Harry Maguire.What does ETH mean when he says we might have to be creative when signing a striker in January?
Ole's first 23 games: 16 wins, 70%
(including wins vs Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea, PSG).
Meet our new striker, Harry Maguire.
“Kane.”
Meet our new striker, Harry Maguire.
What does internal disciplinary even mean? Stupid from rashford though when he’s in top form. Hope the players aren’t turning on ETH already.Interesting that Rashford dropped for “internal disciplinary issues”. Watch the British press turn on Ten Hag now.
“Kane.”
I don't mind that at all from Ten Hag.
If Rashford has actually done something along the lines of turning up late for team meetings or whatever these things usually are, it's good to see nobody is above the law even though he's arguably our best player on form.
I don't mind that at all from Ten Hag.
If Rashford has actually done something along the lines of turning up late for team meetings or whatever these things usually are, it's good to see nobody is above the law even though he's arguably our best player on form.
What does internal disciplinary even mean? Stupid from rashford though when he’s in top form. Hope the players aren’t turning on ETH already.
On the wind up. I’m actually a very positive person. Just seems out of character for rashford. Ten Hag is showing who’s boss though which is good.What?
First the Garnacho tattoo and suggesting he’s been corrupted now you are worried the players have turned on the manager?
Not sure if you’re on the wind up or if you just think the worst about everything in life?
Massive leaps to make
On the wind up. I’m actually a very positive person. Just seems out of character for rashford. Ten Hag is showing who’s boss though which is good.
He’ll be playing 90 every week and given the captaincy next given ETH’s previous flip-flopping.About time someone started laying down some rules in this club. None of this Billy Big Bollocks shit.
Rashford refused to eat the food cooked by our new Moroccan head chef, Omar Meziane and is being disciplined.
I'm only kidding..
Rashford refused to eat the food cooked by our new Moroccan head chef, Omar Meziane and is being disciplined.
I'm only kidding..
100%. Got to do what’s best for the club. We’ve missed discipline since fergie.Phew. You never know such is the incessant negativity.
The boss has got to be consistent ultimately.
There shouldn't be. Shaw did excellent last time out at CB and Rashford is being disciplined, both correct decisions 100%, no point in revisionism if we lose, would be bratty.If we drop points today there will be big inquests about Shaw and Rashford. Can see the knives being sharpened already, hopefully shut them up.
We have no clue about the details over RashfordThere shouldn't be. Shaw did excellent last time out at CB and Rashford is being disciplined, both correct decisions 100%, no point in revisionism if we lose, would be bratty.
You must be new hereThere shouldn't be. Shaw did excellent last time out at CB and Rashford is being disciplined, both correct decisions 100%, no point in revisionism if we lose, would be bratty.
Correct but I trust ETH to make the right decision. He doesn't strike me as someone who is unfair and unreasonable.We have no clue about the details over Rashford
I guess that's football fans in general.You must be new here
Spot on, this has clearly been the case with Ole for a long time and it's good to see that attitude has been done away with.In fact, it would show Garnacho that there is no favoritism. Since Garnacho was dropped from our pre-season games for a disciplinary issue.
Agreed, but you know what people are likeThere shouldn't be. Shaw did excellent last time out at CB and Rashford is being disciplined, both correct decisions 100%, no point in revisionism if we lose, would be bratty.
Terrible man management.
So it begins patheticTerrible man management.
He was asked why he wasn't starting. Internal disciplinary is fine I think? It's likely just a small issue where he's not starting one game but will be subbed on. Hardly a big deal.No issue for dropping Rashford for a disciplinary reason. Not so sure about mentioning it to the media though, unless if its become a pattern which I don’t see (hope) being the case in terms of Rashford.
How so?Terrible man management.