ETH is the one constantly bringing up the term standards. Standards matter. The difference between me and you is that I'm not so sure last season happened simply as a result of constant injuries. I think the tactics employed were the root cause of the problems. In addition, I also believe that worse teams with worse squads have played better than what we served up last season. Wenger's teams always had a deluge of injuries, but were still able to serve decent football, despite not necessarily having the consistency or ability in big games to provide a proper challenge. I've seen good managers manage average teams. That is not what we looked like last season. We looked like a poorly coached team.
Another difference is that I actually think if given the chance, there are other managers that could do a far better job than what ETH did last season. The slight faith I have in ETH is that last season was a one-off due to a poor judgement call on the tactics employed, as that was not a feature of his first season. However, If performances and tactics employed follow the same pattern, then there are lots of managers that can do a much better job. As a club, we have standards regarding the type of players we have and who people expect the club to sign. As fans, when players don't live up to those standards, we want them sold as the players end up proving they are not up to par. Sancho looked like a world beater 2 years ago, he doesn't look like that to us now, and we want him sold and replaced. In turn, we are giving opportunities to members of our squad and players in the transfer market to replace him. Same thing goes for Antony. It's the same thing with managers. Hence, the same attitude is being taken when looking at Ten Haag. He, like Antony and Sancho, needs to prove to us through performances on the pitch, that he actually belongs here. If he doesn't do that in short order, then he should be sacked and the opportunity should be given to another manager.