Erik ten Hag | 2022/23 & 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
Correct decision. You sense he has to hit the ground running though and I hope INEOS have been very specific in what they demand from him. A clear identity has to emerge, much more possession and control of games and Onana cannot continue to be peppered with 25 shots a game. Oh, and the medical department needs an overhaul - we have players missing entire seasons, not just odd games.
If you acknowledge the number of shots faced and lack of identity as a problem then how is keeping the manager whose insane tactics caused the number of shots faced the correct decision
 
Happy with that.

I fear, however, that too many ends have to meet to make next season a good one.
- We need to get 3-4 key signings right this time. We need serious reinforcement in both defence, midfield and attack. Hungry players with the right mindset.
- We need to sort out the amount of injuries we've had. Someone like Licha and Shaw are fundamental to us building a proper starting 11.
- We need to get rid of the bad seeds in the squad in order to create the right foundation for a better culture and coherence within the squad.

I have a hard time seeing all of these things play out the way we need them to. But I hope the new ownership and new people in the administration will help ETH

Having a good transfer market was always going to be more important than who the manager is, imo. If we don't move on the let downs and bring in good players in area we're weak in then it won't matter who the manager is.

Thing is, that might well take a few windows under the new structure INEOS are putting in place, so yes that is a worry for EtH. However, there's still a scenario where 3/4 good recruits this window would be a significant step in the right direction, especially if we don't have the same injury issues as last season.

It's a lot of ifs and buts. Going to feel like a long summer...
 
That looks like a 3v4. With 3 united players getting back before 1 liverpool player joins the attack. Its a freeze frame so impossible to actually tell but dont see the problem. Liverpool player has space 40+ yards from goal - oh no!

The problem was it was a scene that was repeated multiple times in virtually every game. There's compilations on YouTube and Twitter of the very problem.

We can only hope unlike last season it will be addressed next season.
 
That looks like a 3v4. With 3 united players getting back before 1 liverpool player joins the attack. Its a freeze frame so impossible to actually tell but dont see the problem. Liverpool player has space 40+ yards from goal - oh no!
:lol: what? Why do you think there's been constant chatter about how badly we've been set-up in midfield all season? And why do you think we've conceded so many goals and shots? Incredible that someone could not only watch football but also be active on a football forum, be a United fan that is tapped into the swirling discourse about the club, see that snap, and think that it's fine.

There's defending and finding excuses for the manager/set-up and then there's this.
 
So now we’re gonna give him a new contract and it will be much more expensive to sack him in November when the board finally accept what they already know. Genius.
 
So now we’re gonna give him a new contract and it will be much more expensive to sack him in November when the board finally accept what they already know. Genius.
They must have revised his severance package. No way he'll be getting a gargantuan payoff, surely.
 
2 and a half weeks is a lifetime for the tweet devouring generation. They've been through a roller coaster of emotions.

Think it’s quite possible some of them wanted him sacked straight after the cup final to maximise his humiliation. Gotta have some ritualistic drama. A sacrifice to the rage bait gods!

I mean even if they had sacked him, 2 and a half weeks grace from a huge win, wherein the only manager we missed out on was Vincent Kompany and pretty much every player is on international duty, wouldn’t have actually caused any issues at all either.
 
A lot of butt hurt "fans" in here today.
Why the quotation marks? If I believe the best thing for the club is to make a change (and frankly I have more evidence to back that up than you have), why does that make me any less of a fan? If anything you are the one placing a misguided sense of loyalty over the club’s best interests.
 
At least this saga has ended, rightly or wrongly for now .However without knowing the terms of ETH new contract conditions everyone will be expecting a massive improvement in tactics and coaching next season, obviously dependent of the quality of players we can lure to OT this summer.
A shaky first few months and he will be back on thin ice, thank god we are Southgate free!
 
Think it’s quite possible some of them wanted him sacked straight after the cup final to maximise his humiliation. Gotta have some ritualistic drama. A sacrifice to the rage bait gods!

I mean even if they had sacked him, 2 and a half weeks grace from a huge win, wherein the only manager we missed out on was Vincent Kompany and pretty much every player is on international duty, wouldn’t have actually caused any issues at all either.
They must have had an inkling prior to the final what the plan was, factoring in all possible outcomes for what might happen at Wembley. This suggests probably not though, which is why the chatter about injuries has come back to the fore. Feels a lot like they are punching in the dark at the moment.
 
Would like to have seen Tuchel appointed, however now off the table then willing to give him chance under the new structure. Now let's go out and negotiate but please Erik no BROBBEY or DUMFRIES.
Don’t think ERIK will read this.
 
Depends what our aims are. I’d say Top 4 is realistic without a dramatic window as long as we don’t lose our key players in defence again. In such an awful season we were only 8 points off Villa.

CB, DM and LB for me would be a good window if we decided to focus on those players as priority I.e. expensive signings then add a few younger players for depth on frees/loans.
This seems optimistic. We were fortunate to get the points we did and villas form may have tapered off partly because they didn't need to win every game at the back end of the season.

I wouldn't just be happy with top 4 personally if it didn't come with any indication that a better brand of football was being developed and I don't have any confidence ten hag can actually deliver that
 
Not great, not terrible. Could always have been so much worse, I suppose, like Southgate, Pochettino, Frank, or Potter. But it could have been better as well. The prospect of more of Ten Hag's miserable football is depressing.

Offering him a new contract however would be utterly stupid, but stupid is part and parcel around here, so not surprising. Maybe at least keep him away from recruitment then, please?

INEOS not exactly impressing so far...
 
I’m fairly indifferent on the decision, but happy to give him another seasons all things considered, but the idea it was some sort of organisational negligence and reflected badly on United that this wasn’t sorted immediately after the Cup final is some of the silliest cope I’ve seen on this forum. The season ended literally 2 and a half weeks ago and there’s a Euros on any second. It’’s caused absolutely no damage to anything or anyone, except I guess for those who were incredibly eager for him to be sacked who seemed to have driven themselves into a frenzy over these (again, absolutely trifflingly small) 2 and a half weeks by that looking less likely.

If anything giving it some considered thought and breathing space from the Cup Final so as to avoid an LVG situation but making sure it’s sorted before the Euros was pretty much the perfect balance here.

I wish I could be this optimistic about the way it's been handled

'considered thought' is a generous description of how this played out

to me it looks like we were all set to sack him, couldn't find a decent replacement and eventually bowed to fan sentiment after winning the cup

now we go into the new season with the managers position looking weak as piss
 
it is clear the club’s standards and vision no longer match my own, and they have forced me to consider my options. i will be conducting a thorough review of the past season to decide if the partnership between us can continue.
 
I'm aware of his criticism. I'd dismiss it as him being stuck on Benitez catenaccio, shit on a stick football. Dropping a midfielder back would cost us goals - the reasons why seem obvious. The trade off of having teams counter you sometimes isn't a problem in itself. We dont execute the tactic very well but having your back 4 on the edge of your box vs 3 attackers is probably a situation you'd expect them to manage

You say that like we score lots of goals. We were the lowest scorers in the top half of the table and the likes of Brighton, Bournemouth, Fulham, Luton and Brentford scored comparable amounts to us.
 
While it's not the decision I would have made, I was always going to back whatever decision INEOS made (bar maybe if it was Southgate). I'm going to trust them for a good few years until such time they prove they aren't competent.

My assumption at this point is that ETH showed enough behind the scenes (similar to Fergie and Arteta did) to indicate that what he was doing would provide long-term benefits. It's the side of things that we fans don't see, so if Wilcox and the others think he's doing good work there then so be it. I presume he'll be on a tighter leash in terms of what is happening on the field though, so hopefully we won't get the shit-show that we had this season. And unless he does the impossible and actually makes this season's tactics work in the future, the fact he threw away a season in stubbornness is something that will always be a negative against him even if he does make a different tactic work in the future.

If we do give him a contract extension, it better not be a long one though. One extra year until he proves he can actually turn things around on the field.

As some have speculated the contract extension might just be a means to change the terms of his contract and take away his control over transfers. And we'd have to hope he's been told that the wankyball we persisted with last season isn't going to fly next year. He's very lucky to still be in a job and I think the timing of the takeover saved him.
 
I'm fine with this. But obviously he won't survive another season like the one we've just had, mitigating circumstances or not.
 
I'm fine with this. But obviously he won't survive another season like the one we've just had, mitigating circumstances or not.

what happens if we’re 3-0 up in the first 10 minutes of the first game of the season, and then aliens abduct our players from the pitch, forcing him to play the under 12s for the rest of the season, and we only finish 15th?
 
Did you, and the rest of the people that desperately want him to stay, forget the absolute travesty of a season he just served up?

Like, did yous just blank out:
4 - 0 v Palace
1 - 1 v Burnley
3 (4) - 3 (2) v Coventry - after winning 3 - 0 at half time and not losing in the final minutes by the virtue of VAR.
2 - 2 v Bournemouth
4 - 3 v Chelsea (after winning in the 90th minute only to end up losing)
1 - 1 v Brentford (scoring in the 90+ minutes only to immediately concede)
1 - 2 v Fulham
0 - 3 v Bournemouth
0 - 1 v Crystal Palace
1 - 3 v Brighton

Or the absolute disastrous Champions League campaign.

Or being dumped out of the League Cup 0 - 3 at home to Newcastle.

Or struggling to beat Newport in the FA Cup.

These results alone should have seen him go months ago.

But wait there's more you must have blanked out:
9 games lost at Old Trafford.
14 PL games lost this season.
19 games lost in all competitions.
85 goals conceded in all competitions.
58 goals conceded in the PL.
57 goals scored in the PL.
Negative goal difference.
Lowest ever position finish in the PL.
Highest number of shots faced in a PL season.
Bottom of our CL group.

You can't chalk all of this up to "injuries". The buck stops with him. Do you think that's all going to suddenly change next season?

I feel like I'm in the bloody Twilight Zone.

Well you'd imagine/hope we can't have as many injuries next season. So if things are still going tits up by November then there'll be no excuse to hide behind next season.
 
The difference is Van Gaal's football during his last season was by far the dullest I've ever seen as a United fan. As season ticket holders, we received calls from the club asking if we were going to renew because almost everyone was fed up with the zombie football we were paying to see. As much as Ten Hag's kamikaze football has pissed off supporters, it has been a hell of a lot more tolerable than Van Gaal's 'philosophy'.

Also, in 2016, there was Mourinho waiting to be snapped up. Currently there is no available manager screaming out as an obvious upgrade on Ten Hag.

True but the shit served up last season wasn't far behind.
 
How many years did the scousers go without the title? 20 years? We're going to beat it.

For the last 10 years there's been shit seasons followed by new hope in different managers, new approaches etc. Yet it always fails. I hoped Ineos would be the end of it, but my overriding feeling right now is that we've turned a new chapter in disaster and this will simply be the Ineos era of ridiculous decision making and failure. I could have almost accepted Ten Hag staying on merit or for strong footballing reasons. But this talk of fan sentiment, or developing youngsters (they've been our best players since they stepped into the team, of course he's going to play them every week. The guy was dripping with desperation for anything to work for him), I just honestly give up. I just think we're doomed to failure, we're another has been like AC Milan who just can't get a damn thing right anymore or look like a well run outfit.

30 years.
 
Good news.

For me, it doesn’t make fiscal sense to fire someone in the final year of his contract, there is still a good chance we get a new manager next summer. There is also a chance he performs well this season.

Lets let INEOS put their money where their mouth is and see if they can implement a structure of success regardless of the manager, however him staying be seen as some sort of stability while get a shake up.

And to be honest, I think Erik was the best of all the other alternatives mentioned.

I doubt that was a consideration if as reported they are giving him a new contract.
 
Can someone explain to me why the hell
Would we be negotiating a contract extension at this point? We made this same mistake with Ole last time around, extending him when there was no one interested in him and just made our own sacking more expensive.

No one wants to take him from us, let the guy see out his contract and extend him if its all going well.

Ineos have undermined him with their rather public search for alternative managers. The only way to restore his authority is with a similarly public backing from the club, which was always likely to take the form of a contract extension.
 
That Palace 4-0 game was arguably the turning point strangely enough. As straight after that result ETH realised that he had to tighten things up and brought in Amrabat/packed the midfield from the Arsenal game onwards which has saved his job.

I don't really understand why it took until May for ETH to make this change - I think his biggest flaw is his stubbornness and sticking with a plan that clearly isn't working for too long.

But with that said - do I think he is a good coach? Yes. The tweak in system in the games leading up to the cup final is one example of that. I think it's actually quite refreshing that we are backing the manager.

Looking to next season, there's absolutely no chance the injury crisis is as bad as next season surely. Keeping Martinez and Shaw fit (and bringing in cover for them) will be key. Get another striker in to support Hojlund, Mount will improve, Rashford will want to prove people wrong etc - I think there's a lot to be positive about providing the new structure are more effective in the transfer window.
 
I doubt that was a consideration if as reported they are giving him a new contract.
Considering that they want to change the structure they might need to do that to take away responsibilities from him that are part of his current contract (I think it's likely that there exist some clauses especially about transfers as we know he wanted a lot of control over this - more than INEOS want a manager to have).
 
The difference is Van Gaal's football during his last season was by far the dullest I've ever seen as a United fan. As season ticket holders, we received calls from the club asking if we were going to renew because almost everyone was fed up with the zombie football we were paying to see. As much as Ten Hag's kamikaze football has pissed off supporters, it has been a hell of a lot more tolerable than Van Gaal's 'philosophy'.

True. Ill never forget one game at OT, think it was Swansea at home, and we were in that run where we just couldnt score a goal in the first half. I noticed this weird sound around me, and I turned and realised it was just everyone sat there chatting to each other. People weren't even facing towards the game because they knew nothing would happen, they were just having a chat and a beer and waiting til later in the game when it would eventually kick off. I've never seen anything like that before, not even under Moyes or Rangnick.
 
Proud to say I've been ETH in the whole time.

Vindicated.

This is the moment the club becomes Manchester United again.
 
Funny how the Scousers are delighted with this news. Do they need reminding that they failed to beat Ten Hag last season? And ruined their entire season? Odd bunch.
 
Considering that they want to change the structure they might need to do that to take away responsibilities from him that are part of his current contract (I think it's likely that there exist some clauses especially about transfers as we know he wanted a lot of control over this - more than INEOS want a manager to have).

Yep makes sense, I'm just saying I doubt they'd keep a manager on they don't want for an extra year just so they don't have to pay off the last year of his contract. Especially if they are making a financial committment to giving him a longer deal.
 
Ineos have undermined him with their rather public search for alternative managers. The only way to restore his authority is with a similarly public backing from the club, which was always likely to take the form of a contract extension.

The only way to restore his authority is by being good at his job. By having coherent Football and man-management decisions, if he focuses on that he will be fine. Things like public backing are useless outside of PR.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.