No one wants Southgate, he will be a disaster.Southgate is shit but ten hag has been so bad this year it would really be hard for him to be any worse
No one wants Southgate, he will be a disaster.Southgate is shit but ten hag has been so bad this year it would really be hard for him to be any worse
Ok, so what's going on? This is the exact same report as after McKenna. So either we had no intention of replacing Ten Hag and were just feeling out potential candidates or they have their eyes firmly set on one candidate. Southgate? Poch?
Why Fletcher?Erm Fletcher, Murtough, someone else - take your pick. I'd imagine someone up the hierarchy employs the head of department, who would then be responsible for hiring the department staff.
I think its obvious they have been poor, and from what I have read they are actively addressing it. Starting with the guy from Arsenal.
People are answering them though. What you are wanting is just unreasonable and unrealistic- just so you can blaim EtH. Embarrassed because no matter how many people highlight to you its a ridiculous suggestion, you still persist.
EtH is not going to ignore people who have medical degrees. Period. If they say the player is fit and the player says he is fit then EtH has no reason not to play the player, especially in left back this season.
I don't want him but personally I would consider finishing eight in the league and performing atrociously all season a disasterNo one wants Southgate, he will be a disaster.
What would have been the point of them meeting with him if they weren't interested in appointing him. It all seems a bit weird
Generally not impressed by the start ineos have made. Happy with berrada but it seemed important we had a good director of football in place for summer so the focus on ashworth (who was clearly going to be hard to obtain) feels like a mistake
100%De Zerbi and Frank have done nothing to deserve the Man United job. Both are inferior managers than ETH.
De Zerbi and Frank have done nothing to deserve the Man United job. Both are inferior managers than ETH.
I mean the point to meet is clear no? To see if the manager is aligned with the structure that the club will have in place, and whether their ideas fit the club's. It looks like Tuchel's wasn't - and seeing as they were initially unsure on him its fairly plausible that he wasn't able to turn around their opinions.What would have been the point of them meeting with him if they weren't interested in appointing him. It all seems a bit weird
Generally not impressed by the start ineos have made. Happy with berrada but it seemed important we had a good director of football in place for summer so the focus on ashworth (who was clearly going to be hard to obtain) feels like a mistake
De Zerbi with the right signings could work. Southgate seems more likely if we keep Ten Hag and sack him mid season, as there would be even fewer options then. He's the safe choice.Praying for De Zerbi, expecting Southgate
Debatable. His Brighton side played scintillating football last season and outscored us by 14 goals despite our amazing 3rd placed finish.De Zerbi and Frank have done nothing to deserve the Man United job. Both are inferior managers than ETH.
Surely tuchels style of management is well known enough not to require a meeting to determine that. Also, if they really are focusing on getting a manager that fits their plans for the club why are the names being linked so varied in terms of the style of football they prefer, management style and experience?I mean the point to meet is clear no? To see if the manager is aligned with the structure that the club will have in place, and whether their ideas fit the club's. It looks like Tuchel's wasn't - and seeing as they were initially unsure on him its fairly plausible that he wasn't able to turn around their opinions.
It's a bit like when you get tired of your girlfriend so you go and shag other birds but decide to keep your girlfriend anyway.
Or is it just me who does that?
I think INEOS’s position on Ten Hag is clear. When you’re having sit downs with potential replacements it hardly screams out you’ve got much faith in the current manager.
I'm sorry your sentence doesn't much make sense - are you suggesting managers who are known in management style from the outside shouldn't be interviewed or scoped out before being hired?Surely tuchels style of management is well known enough not to require a meeting to determine that. Also, if they really are focusing on getting a manager that fits their plans for the club why are the names being linked so varied in terms of the style of football they prefer, management style and experience?
I am not sure about de zerbi but claiming his style of football is boring is surely nonsense, does also have to be recognised they lost a number of key players this season they didn't adequately replaceDebatable. His Brighton side played scintillating football last season and outscored us by 14 goals despite our amazing 3rd placed finish.
Problem with De Zerbi is his defending. Also the rigidity of his system can be ridiculous at times and just seems high risk with little rewardDebatable. His Brighton side played scintillating football last season and outscored us by 14 goals despite our amazing 3rd placed finish.
Debatable. His Brighton side played scintillating football last season and outscored us by 14 goals despite our amazing 3rd placed finish.
Maybe we are just going to dither until Southgate becomes available
Praying for De Zerbi, expecting Southgate
100%
My whole time on redcafe, nothing confuses me more than the De Zerbi love-in. He’s literally done nothing. His football being attractive is a myth too. It’s diarrhoea on the eyes.
I am suggesting a competent club might have a better idea of the type of manager they are looking for than we seem toI'm sorry your sentence doesn't much make sense - are you suggesting managers who are known in management style from the outside shouldn't be interviewed or scoped out before being hired?
despite our amazing 3rd placed finish.
So you’re happy to wait for berrada but not for his pick of DoFWhat would have been the point of them meeting with him if they weren't interested in appointing him. It all seems a bit weird
Generally not impressed by the start ineos have made. Happy with berrada but it seemed important we had a good director of football in place for summer so the focus on ashworth (who was clearly going to be hard to obtain) feels like a mistake
Hope so.
Well that shortlist is down to Southgate (urgh please no) De Zerbi or someone not even mentioned
If i was ETH Id wait to the night before gameweek 1 and then resign, this has been an embarrassing shambles from INEOS
Thing is, you cannot expect to find a dynasty building manager in the current market when even the likes of Bayern are struggling. Names like Alonso and Nagelsmann are better but unavailable. If Ineos feels that ETH isn't taking us anywhere, then De Zerbi's style fits the type of football we'd like to play, brave attacking football. Even if he doesn't win any trophies for the next two years, as long as we're developing an attacking mentality and scoring freely again, we'd be in a much better position to move forward, bit like pool under BR then to Klopp, seamless transition.Scored fourteen more goals, took six points off us yet failed to finish above us or win a trophy.
de Zerbi cannot seriously be considered an upgrade. Rather, his would be a 'company' appointment. Sign some Ineos players. Play the Ineos way. Sacked after two middling, tophy-free seasons for god knows who. Poch, probably.
Change qua change. What's the point?
Some reports saying met and meeting went poorly/average.What would have been the point of them meeting with him if they weren't interested in appointing him. It all seems a bit weird
Generally not impressed by the start ineos have made. Happy with berrada but it seemed important we had a good director of football in place for summer so the focus on ashworth (who was clearly going to be hard to obtain) feels like a mistake