Yakuza_devils
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2016
- Messages
- 4,165
He survived again. How? Hope this is not our new standard under Ineos. It feels like Glazers were more ruthless.
Me might as well do it because I agree with the post you responded to.What's the point then? Let's just shut down the club in that case and never do anything.
Kept it to a 1-0 loss at home to Arse after crippling our whole squad. New contract incoming
Interestingly in 15/16 most agreed that LVG needed to go but that season we managed to get 66 points and were fighting for a CL spot until the last day.
Which Adam is that?I have had enough of this obnoxious prat,don't give his toxic channel the time of day. Was great hearing Adam who used to be on his channel sticking the boot in recently too.
These players are criminals. Just getting rid of deadwood, innit?Yes, most of us are baffled. He could literally pull out a gun and shoot a player and there would be a few in the Caf giving him a pass.
One could almost suspect fans supporting rivaling clubs to leave a vote or two….
It's going to be Potter or Southgate. They're going to go British and someone who's used to working under a setup like the one they're setting up currently. I doubt they're going to feck around and give someone time to learn on the job or get used to it.
But that cycle has to start again as if you get a new manager in, these same players will just throw him under the bus in another 2 years time.
I like your pressing maze term.I wouldn't attribute those issues to progressive intense modern styles. It's attributable to 1 man's style that tries to play in the manner you said. This doesn't happen to other sides that try to play a progressive intense modern style. Hence why I take issue with this vague description.
Progressive intense modern styles do bring to light a lot of deficiencies and issues, but I disagree with what you're getting at here. You think that with better players, it will make things click. You're passing off the responsibility onto the players only. I don't see how that's going to make his system work.
There is far too much space between the defensive line and the pressing players. This isn't the case for other progressive intense modern style sides. Compactness is valued for all styles. If you're Ole or Mourinho, you value it because it makes you more solid at the back when soaking up pressure. When you're pressing in an intense manner, you value it because it makes the "pressing maze" more difficult to navigate through. With the amount of space we give other sides, it's very easy for them to turn our press into a great transition for themselves.
I admire your resilience, and others like VP89. You all deserve medals
The whole thing is getting very childish, I’ve reached out to a few to ask if they can explain their position / assumption / assertion to me and guess what, no response.
It’s getting very tiring
Ole in retrospect was pretty OK for me. He trusted others better than him to coach and train us in areas he was weak and had us play a fun/efficient ballgame plus embodied some of our old siege mentality. The sum of his team were much greater than his parts until the odd Ronaldo signing pretty much ruined his dynamics I feel.The recency effect. But there are still those who will think that Ole was/is worse than ETH.
…and I don’t think appointing Southgate will be as bad as people make it out to be. Stranger manager-team combinations in football have clicked in recent history
It took 35 games, but he finally changed the defensive set up today. If he'd have done that earlier, we'd have a lot more points regardless of injuries.
I think he's stubborn beyond belief, but it seems like the penny has dropped. Let's see if that's enough to keep his job.
Which Adam is that?
Ole in retrospect was pretty OK for me. He trusted others better than him to coach and train us in areas he was weak and had us play a fun/efficient ballgame plus embodied some of our old siege mentality. The sum of his team were much greater than his parts until the odd Ronaldo signing pretty much ruined his dynamics I feel.
ETH somehow managed to replace most of the team and make us a LOT worse (!). ETH seem a stubborn fundamentalist with no wider sense of urgency or contingency plan, severely lacks charisma like other fundamentalist coaches to compensate. And the guy seem a tad sadistic in a dysfunctional way on different areas of player handling.
So far he has objectively failed on measurable metrics and set tons of negative records. He turned us into a nonfunctional tier 3 league Ajax but in the EPL... Heres hoping we as club don't double down, but seen as he has board room charisma at unprecedented Stockholm Symdrome levels with the out of touch board, can also see him get a renew. Still rather keep him over out of depth Southgate we're rumored to get....
He kind of admitted he wouldn't be able to win the league with the football we played with his second place finish season which was why he changed things things up. Ronaldo didn't help but it was part of the plan to take the club forward and it failed miserably. EtH has basically said the same thing recently that he could have got more points on the table had he been more conservative but it would be bad for the long term project. The last three managers have basically all had the same problem. How much you want to blame the managers or the fact that the recruitment and the player quality simply isn't good enough is up to the individual.
Depends what player it was...Yes, most of us are baffled. He could literally pull out a gun and shoot a player and there would be a few in the Caf giving him a pass.
100% and I don’t think anyone is confidently in. I wouldn’t even say I’m in. Hopefully my reply to crossy shows that I’m actually very much I don’t care who it is but let’s be clever about it.
Every single post targeted at me I respond to with care an attention unless I’m treated with disdain or disrespect and it’s not worth my time.
If this poster believes there is a ****, then they are far better off highlighting the reasons why by quoting the post and dealing with it directly or by attempting to highlight **** like posters so that we can all understand this imaginary ****.
I think it’s incredibly rich suggesting I don’t try to encourage the quality discussion given what I put up with in this thread and the depth and detail I put into my replies on the whole.
It’s consistently of a far higher standard than that of those suggesting there is a ****.
Do you not also see the irony in choosing this post to wuote and discuss rather than my one about what I’d like to see next year?
The issue is that the performances are somehow worse than the results.It’s strange but I remember arguments on here about ETH being too pragmatic. This season he’s been stubbornly avoiding pragmatism supposedly in pursuits of longer term benefits. Our fanbase demands a certain level of results to retain your job but what if we need to go through this kind of pain in order to make strides forward?
I’m not sure any manager has ever come back from such a low (at least not in modern times) but I am fascinated by what we’d try to do next season if we didn’t sack ETH. Just as an experiment I almost want to see it play out.
Totally agree. Let's hope we won't be lumped with waistcoat. Surely there are better options?
Tuchel as a short term solution unless by some miracle it becomes some match made in heaven. He seems to be able to extract as much as possible out of the players before blowing up.
But regardless, after ETH the bar is so low that anyone will be an improvement.
FFSSay hi from me.
…and I don’t think appointing Southgate will be as bad as people make it out to be. Stranger manager-team combinations in football have clicked in recent history
This one is a new, I haven’t seen this routine yet. It’s like nobody can come up with any reasons why ETH should go because it’s so irrational to think so.What exactly are you looking for? I mean the posters who want EtH out have made their position very clear.
He survived again. How? Hope this is not our new standard under Ineos. It feels like Glazers were more ruthless.
Scholes and Neville disagree.McLaren and Ten Hag are a unit: Ten Hag was his assistant and brought McLaren with him. It is a complete nonstarter.
This one is a new, I haven’t seen this routine yet. It’s like nobody can come up with any reasons why ETH should go because it’s so irrational to think so.
Nah, I think we're going to do fine under a guy like Tuchel. Ten Hag has had some shit luck with injuries and he didn't do himself any favors with his tactics / transfers. The transfers we're going to fix this summer. The tactics through better coaching. The injuries through (hopefully) better luck.
The issue is that the performances are somehow worse than the results.
If it’s Southgate, I think the non-English players will suss him out within weeks.But that cycle has to start again as if you get a new manager in, these same players will just throw him under the bus in another 2 years time.
He survived again. How? Hope this is not our new standard under Ineos. It feels like Glazers were more ruthless.