Robbie Boy
Full Member
Why have the votes increased for him to stay after that performance
Amorrim manages Sporting, how is he less realistic?
Why have the votes increased for him to stay after that performance
So if we beat City in the final that would mean nothing to you?It'd be as meaningless as the time Di Matteo won the champions league, or when Avram Grant was a penalty kick away from winning it
@hobbers they’re the best in the world. They are cheaters, but they are the best.Best team in the world but in a neck and neck 3 way title fight, and just lost in the CL semis.
Literally only reason he's saying that because he thinks it'll make Erik Ten Hag, man, myth,baldfraud, legend, look less incompetent when he loses. Again.
Why have the votes increased for him to stay after that performance
Rival fans, halfwits...
Why have the votes increased for him to stay after that performance
So what gives us the best chance of winning the final?
1. No disruption, let Ten Hag manage until the final then sack him after it.
2. Sack him now and hope for a new manager bounce, if the new manager is available (lets presume its Potter)
3. Sack him, and let Steve McLaren be interim until after the final.
4. Sack him and ask Ole to do us a favour for the final games/final.
I do but I'm just playing your tedious accusation game mate.
It is true though, Ten Hag has control over targets and veto over signings. No one has been signed that he didn't identify or accept as an alternative. This is his squad for the most part, he's spent £450m ffs.
I'm happy to end the discussion here mate, because ironically I don't believe you are discussing in good faith. If you are fair enough, but I don't feel like continuing.
Good night, no hard feelings.
However, when I called them cultists, I offended their sensitivities .Don't try to make sense of people's faith in Ten Hag mate.
No, it just exposes past it managers and frauds. We've genuinely not had a good manager since Fergie.I just don’t see how Alonso would even consider the United job when he’s already turned down the liverpool job. Yes, so far so good from INEOS but it’s uncertain whether the new structure will be successful, there will inevitably be bumps along the way. Liverpool are far more stable from a structure standpoint ant the moment and likely would’ve backed Alonso with a huge transfer budget yet he still turned it down. He’ll be patient and doesn’t need to rush his next job, and certainly not to United when Madrid maybe looking to replace Ancelotti in a few years.
Zidane has already stated he has no interest in managing in England and I think that position doesn’t change despite whatever efforts INEOS make.
The United job is very much a poisoned chalice at the moment. It destroys and tears down good managers. The footballing structure may change that perception but I suspect many managers will give second thought to managing United until they see a commitment to keeping the new structure and whether it delivers success in the transfer market.
Yeah I think that's our lowest percentage chance of success unfortunatelyWe're not sacking him in late April.
Our best bet is sheer luck on the day.
He’s on the buzz, just let him bee.Trying to bee sarcastic is embarrasing.
Any half intelligent person knows that we are mourning about how we play and the totality of this fraud's tenure
The United job is very much a poisoned chalice at the moment. It destroys and tears down good managers.
"Best team in the World"
No Utd manager should ever be saying that about City.
"Best team in the World"
No Utd manager should ever be saying that about City.
203 votes is wild. I'm guessing there's nowhere near that amount of active rivals fans on the site.
Hi Eric.ETH has been given an impossible job. I’m not sure there are many managers out there that would succeed with the platform United have given them.
If Ten Hag had inherited the current city team and its structure, he would have been successful.
I'm not looking to gloat. To be honest I hate nothing more than United fans being divided as it has been for the last 10 years. But I do firmly believe somebody could get us looking well coached within half a season. Not saying it would be successful instantly, but the signs would be there. I honestly do think there's just been an accumulation of different issues over the years, and most of our managers just weren't up to it for different reasons. They have been hampered by players, Woodward etc but I don't think we're just so unlucky that the 100s of players we've had over 10 years are just simply not coachable. And I think this group is one of our best in the last 10 years because some of the past signings that we've not accumulated are solid, and we've got a good crop of youngsters that have come through and look like they could be top level if handled correctly.
If Ten Hag had inherited the current city team and its structure, he would have been successful.
Sorry Manchester United only achieved what 3 times?
Yeah I think that's our lowest percentage chance of success unfortunately
Rival fans was one category, and halfwits was the second.
Plenty to go around in that second one.
So would I.
But give Hag six months coaching his "principles" and "system", rapidly accumulating injuries and baffling everyone with his game management, and see how long that success lasts.
Ralph spent nothing and hands were tiedYeah it's insane that he has any backers tbh. This season is right up there with the Ole/Ralf disasterclass.
Ralph's job was as a caretaker and to get results improved, which he failed to do.Ralph spent nothing and hands were tied
Ralph spent nothing and hands were tied
The players gave him 30 minutes ofthe first game, and then checked outRalph's job was as a caretaker and to get results improved, which he failed to do.
I was the only one of us debating in good faith, you started off barely doing so and snowballed to full on strawmanning.
But agreed, no hard feelings, I think we're all miserable after today's performance.
Yes as its exactly the same, bar the 400m spent and 2 years of trainingAnd? I'm comparing the seasons comparatively. They were both fecking shit-shows.
They didn't just instantly check out, that's nonsense. Ralph was a tool of the highest order and as soon as things went bad, he started throwing the players under the bus. They gave up because he gave up and didn't give a shit.The players gave him 30 minutes ofthe first game, and then checked out