Dannn411
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
- Messages
- 3,218
Where the feck is this stuff on Southgate coming from? Surely the club cannot be that irresponsible.
Where the feck is this stuff on Southgate coming from? Surely the club cannot be that irresponsible.
A lot of noise at the moment that suggests he won't be the manager beyond May. I wanted him gone but if Southgate is the replacement then feck it, he can stay.
I’m still on the fence if I want to keep Hag or not.
On one hand; he did great last season with some great football (at least until Feb 2023), played some of the best football we have seen at Ajax, handled some bad situations (Ronaldo, Sancho) very well, bad luck with injuries, no great replacements (Southgate!!!).
On the other hand; can’t stop losing, struggling to score, has been battered several times, bad CL campaign this season, pretty crap football for the past 12 months.
If there was a replacement who was fantastic (say if we had a chance getting Alonso) then fair enough, let’s get him in. But there doesn’t seem to be one at the moment. Southgate, Potter, Di Zerbi, hardly inspiring.
The thought of rivals getting Alonso and De Zerbi (or Amorim or even Nagelsmann) in the next year while we keep ETH is sickening.
The thought of sacking ETH to then replace him with Southgate for the next 2+ seasons while all the above still happens makes you just want to uninstall football from existence, bulldoze Old Trafford and replace it with a giant crazy golf course.
What's there to understand not even a single credible source has mentioned him as candidate , atleast wait until that happens to question Ineos competence I don't believe he is even in the picture for United's job .I don't understand the Southgate talk, Ineos want the best of the bunch and surely they can see he is bang avg.
The thought of rivals getting Alonso and De Zerbi (or Amorim or even Nagelsmann) in the next year while we keep ETH is sickening.
The thought of sacking ETH to then replace him with Southgate for the next 2+ seasons while all the above still happens makes you just want to uninstall football from existence, bulldoze Old Trafford and replace it with a giant crazy golf course.
It's about playing well too - not just winning. I'm fine with him getting us the points but I want to see more than that. I want to see some good football where we do not look disjointed and lazy. The win against Liverpool gave some hope that he can do that (although it was still suicidal football at times) but we need to see it consistently in the league.We’ve had a strong start to 2024 results wise. If he keeps it going until the end of the season I think we’ll likely keep him. If we win the FA Cup and have a strong league finish he should stay anyway.
It's about playing well too - not just winning. I'm fine with him getting us the points but I want to see more than that. I want to see some good football where we do not look disjointed and lazy. The win against Liverpool gave some hope that he can do that (although it was still suicidal football at times) but we need to see it consistently in the league.
I don't understand the Southgate talk, Ineos want the best of the bunch and surely they can see he is bang avg.
But this is the entire point against.... we don't have the players to play the way ETH wants so we will do it anyway, the mind bogglesOfcourse it is. However; he is winning games whilst having all these injuries. Alot of ETH outers have said.. why does Ange still manage without his players. Well go have a look at his win % without Romero and Van der Ven starting. Go have a look at Liverpool's win % without VVD, Arsenal without Saliba.
We have been playing most season without Licha, who is for us, what those CB are for the clubs. Add to that we have no LB and CDM.
Its this poor narrative that all managers can manage without injuries apart from Ten Hag. Its nonsense. Not many other managers can win with a style when they are changing the back 4 every game.
Now, on top of that, we want to play a high line but we dont have the profile of CB's to do so, Varane, Maguire, Lindelof, Evans are all CB who want to defend the box, not be aggressive. We wanted Kim at the start of the season, an aggressive CB.
We need CB's who are happy to play the high line, play on the half way line and not drop, which is why we keep seeing this massive gap between our press and CB's.
that did cross my mindIneos are clever creating fear that Southgate might come in. Everyone will be happy then to just continue with ten Hag.
Imagine pointing to injured players and loan dumpster dives and claiming thats his squad as though it's a master design.
Caught out chatting shite, again.
Until he has 15 players he’s bought for at least 40 million, and at least 13 of them are injury-free, it’s not ETH’s squad and you can’t reasonably expect anything from him.I legitimately don't know what you're doing here. This is the first team squad according to our website -> https://www.manutd.com/en/players-and-staff/first-team
this is the composition of the squad:
Onana - ETH
Bayindir - ETH
Heaton
Martinez - ETH
Malacia - ETH
Evans - ETH
Kwambala - promoted by ETH
Varane
Lindelof
Maguire
Dalot
Shaw
Casemiro - ETH
Amrabat - ETH
Mount - ETH
Eriksen - ETH
Mainoo - promoted by ETH
Forson - promoted by ETH
Mctominay
B. Fernandes
Amad
Hojlund - ETH
Antony - ETH
Rashford
Martial
Garnacho
Shoretire
how is this not largely his squad?
you are caveating "free transfers", "loans", "availability" - as if the players suddenly stop being members of the first team squad. Madness
The Anthony signing should never have happened; that was a pure panic signing from the club who could not deliver Ten Hag his targets.Perhaps if we didn't spend 90M on Antony or 60M on Mount or 45M on Onana we'd have money for anything other than dumpster dive loans. These players are part of his plan.
Perhaps if Murtough can negotiate properly and not like a clown we wouldn't have to dumpster dive for loans.Perhaps if we didn't spend 90M on Antony or 60M on Mount or 45M on Onana we'd have money for anything other than dumpster dive loans. These players are part of his plan.
The Anthony signing should never have happened; that was a pure panic signing from the club who could not deliver Ten Hag his targets.
We need to see thoughtful pragmatic transfer business from now on. Last summer was a bit better, although it remains to be seen if the money spent on Mount was a good idea.
Note that Amrabat was signed on loan at the last minute; we were after other targets.
A hesitation that, according to the same report, was solely about him worrying about the optics of him only signing his former players. Do you genuinely not see how you’re constantly painting things in a way designed to absolve Ten Hag of blame?Perhaps if Murtough can negotiate properly and not like a clown we wouldn't have to dumpster dive for loans.
Antony fee ratification was made above Ten Hag (Antony was a unanimously agreed upon target, by the way, despite ten hag having initial hesitation. This is in Athletic).
Bollocks. Ten Hag wanted Antony, but it wasn‘t going to happen because Ajax did not want to sell more players.A hesitation that, according to the same report, was solely about him worrying about the optics of him only signing his former players. Do you genuinely not see how you’re constantly painting things in a way designed to absolve Ten Hag of blame?
What is bollocks?Bollocks. Ten Hag wanted Antony, but it wasn‘t going to happen because Ajax did not want to sell more players.
I‘m not blaming him for what we paid: that‘s on the club.
It's always good time to tell Southgate to feck offI love the positioning of this post in the thread. I was reading some interesting debates with lenghy-ish replies touching on academy players, midfielders, structure etc.. and then boom "Southgate can feck off"
Hesitation to buy Antony because he played for Ten Hag. There was none of that.What is bollocks?
In hindsight doesn‘t count. I would have supported buying Antony at 50 mill.What is bollocks?
And do you think Antony would have been a good signing at 50 million?
I’m literally just quoting the Athletic article VP89 referred to in his post. What a weird response.Hesitation to buy Antony because he played for Ten Hag. There was none of that.
I‘m not buying it. I was following the transfer as it unfolded. The hesitation had to do with the price, which was high because Ajax did not want to sell.I’m literally just quoting the Athletic article VP89 referred to in his post. What a weird response.
What were Ten Hag's targets?The Anthony signing should never have happened; that was a pure panic signing from the club who could not deliver Ten Hag his targets.
Feel free to share the articles that contextualise that.A hesitation that, according to the same report, was solely about him worrying about the optics of him only signing his former players. Do you genuinely not see how you’re constantly painting things in a way designed to absolve Ten Hag of blame?