croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 38,768
I do not agree with this assessment:
Yeah he shouldn't see Rashford as a 9 like Martial & Hojlund but for some reason he does
I do not agree with this assessment:
This is madness. Antony is no Greenwood replacement that's for sure.
I do not agree with this assessment:
What he has to play with is a load of dross. Martial can't be accounted for. Antony brings little in terms of goals. Rashford is no centre forward. We are desperately short.Not madness, united a pretty much out of cash, and he has to talk up what he has to play with in the hope the sale goes through and he gets some upgrades in January.
People are too reluctant to criticise because, for many, he's the last hope. After countless managers failing, we finally hired one that was considered a modern, progressive coach, and, if he fails, what then?
It's understandable. Especially when he's shown promising signs. The stuff he's being criticised for is warranted, though. The worrying part is that pretty much all of it is his own doing.
Ralf could of been a big help.Appreciate it has been brought up before,however still amazed he never gave Ralf the time of day. You only need to look at those players he suggested we should sign to see he clearly knows a player. Yeah he wasn't a good manager but when it came to spotting talent he was elite.
He needs a proper DoF
United is playing shit football with zero cohesion and strategy behind. We're signing awful players that we have no clue how to use.
It's exclusive to RedCafe and Twitter. Our fanbase are pretty reasonable away from them two platforms. (I agree with you 100%)Seriously, how did y'all become this toxic in the span of two games? I swear the toxicity levels were rock bottom end of the summer, through the summer. It was all sunshine and rainbows here.
Ten Hag is a good manager but you can't say he's infallible and we have to trust him no matter what, he is rightly being questioned for some of the choices he is making and that's just the life at a massive football club. Blindly following a manager is how we keep getting ourselves into situations that take years to unwind. Saying you don't need to look for positives because you 'trust' the manager is a dangerous mindset.
I do not agree with this assessment:
Doubt it’s what he wants. There are financial constraints.
I do not agree with this assessment:
I do not agree with this assessment:
Who did he suggest?Appreciate it has been brought up before,however still amazed he never gave Ralf the time of day. You only need to look at those players he suggested we should sign to see he clearly knows a player. Yeah he wasn't a good manager but when it came to spotting talent he was elite.
Hopefully dropped today.Thank god he’s called out the forwards. Mainly Rashford, his work rate was a disgrace at Spurs.
I do not agree with this assessment:
"Attack" seems a bit strong. It's not exactly Mourinhoesque.
More like decisions have consequences and who knew? The margin for error, in the transfer market and under the Glazers within the FFP context, is slim and he looks like he has made two big ones. The £140m wasted on Antony and Mount could and should have brought in cheaper but more effective players leaving us with enough to buy him his Casemiro insurance policy.He’s making some questionable decisions tactically, but I really feel for him. It’s blatantly obvious what we need squad wise before the window closes and yet it’s very unlikely that it’s going to happen.
Without the squad additions I can see him being sacked by Christmas. Then we start the whole fecking process all over again.
Probably a lack of drive to be successful, they've already won at life.The question is why are they ignoring instructions? Too thick to remember them? Rebelling against the manager? Seems like a pretty serious issue to keep ignoring your boss and I'd expect to see players being dropped for it
Then why is there people in here who cannot take people rightfully asking questions about what's going on? The poster I was replying to said that he didn't need to see any positives because he had total faith in Ten Hag to win the league. Surely you understand how dangerous that line of thinking is? We all obviously want that to happen but when we're yet again looking to sign players from the Dutch league or we're playing shite football, people are rightly going to ask what the feck is going on.This "blindly following the manager" is nonsense. Your evidence is what, that we haven't bought players the manager specifically doesn't want? Who else should be directing these decisions, DoF advised by the scouts? Because the scouts are so great? The idea that we'd be better off handing the reins to these people is ludicrous.
Anyone with eyes could see that we had to replace most of the first team to change the playing style. Further evidence was provided last season when EtH had to modified Ole-ball because most of the squad wasn't up to the switch. Changing the style requires bringing in players who 1) have experience playing the style and/or 2) have the right skills to perform in the new style. Who else would we bring in if that's our goal?
You're all upset about two transfers in particular, Antony and Mount. The Mount hate is based on nothing but transfer muppetry, idiot fans not only incorrectly assuming the squad needs another holding midfielder, but zeroing in on by far the most expensive option in Caicedo. Antony has had a poor first season creating goals but is decent at retaining possession and very good off the ball. So what? Lots of players take until their mid-20's before they become adept at goal creation. Chelsea had a few players like that who Mourinho fecked off, and they happened to become the two best players in the league for our two biggest rivals. Even Antony doesn't become a huge goal threat, it's not even a major indictment of United's transfer strategy. Most big clubs have spaffed a bunch of money on at least one left footed right winger who ended up being disappointing. Barca had Dembele and Raphinha, City had Sane, Arsenal has Pepe, Real had Bale.
People just need to calm the feck down and stop expecting everything to look perfect immediately. Arsenal and Liverpool both took more than 2 seasons to start looking like contenders for the league title. Arsenal could have fired Arteta and brought in some double DM wanker for a manager and everyone would have thought it was a great idea, but they'd have been back to square 1 with their rebuild and off the top 4 last year.
For Martial? It's more likely he's going to get moved out on the left. Garnacho and Antony probably need dropping more than Rashford.Hopefully dropped today.
Disharmony in the squad? It's usually a case of "He's not running when he's supposed to so what's the point in me doing it?"The question is why are they ignoring instructions? Too thick to remember them? Rebelling against the manager? Seems like a pretty serious issue to keep ignoring your boss and I'd expect to see players being dropped for it
I don't think it's really fair to judge him based on what he can do with a midfield that will mostly consist of McTomminay this season. I'd like to see another £500m spent and see if he can push for a title challenge, then we'll know if he's good enough. However, with the caveat that he isn't actually allowed to spend it and we outsource the money to Brighton's scouting department to make the signings for us.If no one else comes in, we're really going to see what he's made of and how good he is. It's going to be interesting, to put it kindly, to see if we can match last seasons achievements, hard to think about doing better right now.
Rashford's attitude in the first 2 games has been appalling. Martial is a far better CF and Sancho deserves a start.For Martial? It's more likely he's going to get moved out on the left. Garnacho and Antony probably need dropping more than Rashford.
I do not agree with this assessment:
Definitely, his "I can't be arsed running" hands in the air stuff is not good enough. I can't see Martial playing the whole 90 minutes though. Maybe it's time to try a false 9 formation with no striker?Rashford's attitude in the first 2 games has been appalling. Martial is a far better CF and Sancho deserves a start.
He is going to have to do something really drastic but I fear he doesn't have it in him to do an LVG and pull a diamond from the dust. The team is unbalanced and lacks cover in crucial areas but it's not all lost, especially if he makes a drastic decision and chooses not to ever revert to the McTominays and the Maguires, just go with the you to supplement a talented but unbalanced first team.If no one else comes in, we're really going to see what he's made of and how good he is. It's going to be interesting, to put it kindly, to see if we can match last seasons achievements, hard to think about doing better right now.
Maybe. No point playing Sancho there pre season if he won't even try it in a home game vs Forest.Definitely, his "I can't be arsed running" hands in the air stuff is not good enough. I can't see Martial playing the whole 90 minutes though. Maybe it's time to try a false 9 formation with no striker?
Yeah I don't get the Sancho thing to be honest. Played him as a false 9 all preseason, looked decent by Sancho standards, played a bunch of minutes and then gets dropped for Antony and Garnacho. If he doesn't start today he should really force a move away if he has any ambition.Maybe. No point playing Sancho there pre season if he won't even try it in a home game vs Forest.