Seven Seas Sardines
Full Member
First season he was Vidic, second he was Phil Jones.
Agree with this. He seems to panic in one v one situations as if he has to win the ball back as quick as he can and goes diving in.His problems at the minute are all psychological! No idea what's happened but he seems all over the place and a shadow of the player two seasons ago!
To be "one of the best" you have to be consistently top class. If it was for a short period then you can call it a good patch of form. Average players can have great games, Anderson once bossed Gerrard at Anfield. As of right now, Bailly is an average injury prone defender, who has had good games you can count on one hand.Was one of the best defenders in the PL for a short period imo. Will be our best defender again soon enough
like his first 3 games for united where is was motm in all 3? come on mate, he has had far more than 2-5 good games.To be "one of the best" you have to be consistently top class. If it was for a short period then you can call it a good patch of form. Average players can have great games, Anderson once bossed Gerrard at Anfield. As of right now, Bailly is an average injury prone defender, who has had good games you can count on one hand.
Genuine question - Name all these great Eric Bailly performances? Someone, please. How is he our best defender? I hear that all the time & I just don't get it. What has he done to even be mentioned in the same breath as Smalling?
All I can remember are the first 2 games of 16/17 against Leicester & Bournemouth. I honestly can't remember any others.
Exaggeration? His style of defending is often described as not being aggressive enough, maybe you try and read the whole discussion between me and the other poster of what I meant about "doing nothing" before coming with a shit argument. Yes I disputed the claim that he supposedly has more awareness and even better positioning than Bailly, I also gave valid example of a situation where Lindelof's supposed superior awareness cost us. And yeah he needs a babysitter, it's been obvious how Fellaini especially has been instructed to help him out. A CB that can't win his own duels is pathetic, and that's unacceptable for a team like ours. Maybe try rewatching the last two games?Your exaggerations about Lindelöf sounds like a blind man: that his style is to do nothing, that he has no more awareness than Bailly, no better positioning than Bailly, that he needs a ‘babysitter’ rather than teammates with complementing skills.
I’ve studied some of his games out of curiosity, and while not finding him a player of top United quality yet, I see clear strengths and weaknesses, of which are mentioned by several people. You seem to see no strengths at all, where many looking closely find them easily.
Your response seems to be that people like me ‘invent’ abilities, ‘want to see’ them or delude ourselves. May be, but probably not.
Mourinho obviously are among us, buying him, selling Blind, dropping Jones, dropping Bailly before him proves not that he sees him as the final solution, but clearly that he has strengths Blind, Jones and Bailly lack (while they may have other strengths). I don’t know wether you reckon Mourinho is deluded or not, you must have an idea of what Mourinho sees that make him prefer Lindelöf to Bailly and Jones at times this season?
First game I though is Liverpool at Old Trafford last season, he was an absolute rock, and then went on and scored an own goal.I think he was good in his first few games and the impression that he was a great defender has stuck ever since for some!
Classic Bailly scoring own goals. Such a funny guy.First game I though is Liverpool at Old Trafford last season, he was an absolute rock, and then went on and scored an own goal.
Classic Bailly really.
He asked for a good performance, it was actually, with an unfortunate own goal, that happen in football.Classic Bailly scoring own goals. Such a funny guy.
It's gotten to the point where it's actually laughable to put Bailly's name next to Smalling nevermind saying Bailly is better. Bailly lacks the top two things you need from a CB - Composure and awareness. He's one of the worst CB's in the top six but hides behind spectacular tackles and a few four to five games. He instantly makes his partner look bad. The top defenders out there will be bemused playing next to him.Smalling and Bailly are the interchangeable pair, not Lindelof. He plays with them not instead of them. Of the two Bailly is a better player but Smalling can stay fit and is more reliable.
Not getting bullied is not the ultimate for a CB, is it?He asked for a good performance, it was actually, with an unfortunate own goal, that happen in football.
Maybe you enjoy Lindelof getting bullied around like a little bitch every other week?
Classic Bailly scoring own goals. Such a funny guy.
I'm sorry, but it's one of the bare minimums we should have at the back. A weak CB destabilizes the whole team. I mean it's ok when a quality striker like say Diego Costa comes over and has moments against you, but with Lindelof it happens against everybody. First it was Iheanacho, then Murray, then Kane, than whoever it was from Burnley, this week it was Grey.Not getting bullied is not the ultimate for a CB, is it?
Don't think Jose helps, he needs to stick to a partnership and back them. Surely he isn't basing his selections on single game performances? If he thinks Bailly and Lindelof are the future. Play them. They'll make mistakes have bad games etc just as vidic and Evra did. But perseverance wins out.
It's gotten to the point where it's actually laughable to put Bailly's name next to Smalling nevermind saying Bailly is better. Bailly lacks the top two things you need from a CB - Composure and awareness. He's one of the worst CB's in the top six but hides behind spectacular tackles and a few four to five games. He instantly makes his partner look bad. The top defenders out there will be bemused playing next to him.
Not that I disagree that Smalling is a better CB, but what happened to the actual defending part? Like tackling, marking, one on one defending, heading? Composure and awareness are important, but top two things you need from a CB?It's gotten to the point where it's actually laughable to put Bailly's name next to Smalling nevermind saying Bailly is better. Bailly lacks the top two things you need from a CB - Composure and awareness. He's one of the worst CB's in the top six but hides behind spectacular tackles and a few four to five games. He instantly makes his partner look bad. The top defenders out there will be bemused playing next to him.
When Bailly is at his best he is better than Smalling has ever been. There's little to argue there if you have ever watched either of them. His problem is not his top level, it's his erratic performances.
Thats a hyperbole if I ever saw one. Better than Mike has even been? Please..When Bailly is at his best he is better than Smalling has ever been. There's little to argue there if you have ever watched either of them. His problem is not his top level, it's his erratic performances.
Thats a hyperbole if I ever saw one. Better than Mike has even been? Please..
And if Baillys problem is his erratic performances he's not so good to begin with, at least for now, not to mention being better than Smalling or not. I simply don't know why Mike gets so much stick here. To the point of making such ridiculous claims.
Exaggeration? His style of defending is often described as not being aggressive enough, maybe you try and read the whole discussion between me and the other poster of what I meant about "doing nothing" before coming with a shit argument. Yes I disputed the claim that he supposedly has more awareness and even better positioning than Bailly, I also gave valid example of a situation where Lindelof's supposed superior awareness cost us. And yeah he needs a babysitter, it's been obvious how Fellaini especially has been instructed to help him out. A CB that can't win his own duels is pathetic, and that's unacceptable for a team like ours. Maybe try rewatching the last two games?
And since you've "studied" some of his games please enlighten me, what are his strengths?
Don't put Mourinho in this please, he dropped him after his horror show against Brighton, and is back into the team thanks to Jones being a sick note and injuring himself again. And even at the end of the day, Mourinho makes mistakes all the time, and you can disagree with him. For all his faults Bailly is twice the CB, Lindelof is, we are just shooting ourselves in the foot by persisting with the Swede.
How do you come to that conclusion, or have you been watching Bailly since he was a kid? A few games where he was good is not a good metric to guage his 'absolute best'. The truth is Smalling at his 'absolute best' was, and is one of the best defenders in the league.When Bailly is at his best he is better than Smalling has ever been. There's little to argue there if you have ever watched either of them. His problem is not his top level, it's his erratic performances.
When Bailly is at his best he is better than Smalling has ever been. There's little to argue there if you have ever watched either of them. His problem is not his top level, it's his erratic performances.
Those things you mentioned are extrinsic and depend heavily on the two intrinsic ones - composure and awareness. For example, in a one-one tackle, you need composure; to mark properly, you need awareness. 95% of the CBs out there can head, tackle, mark etc with ease.Not that I disagree that Smalling is a better CB, but what happened to the actual defending part? Like tackling, marking, one on one defending, heading? Composure and awareness are important, but top two things you need from a CB?
He also sometimes simultaneously lowers his head and raises his shoulders. It's like he jumps and then ducks while in the air. It can be hilarious if it wasn't so infuriating.And also that he's crap at heading the ball, which is essential for centre back.
Great leap, shit timing, and seems to close his eyes, ends up going over the ball and heading downwards. It's schoolboy technique. It needs to massively improve if he wants to be a starter.
Good post.Ah, so you did exaggerate.
Your Fellaini ‘babysitter theory’ is borderline conspiracy theory, and I’m curious as to what in the actual game confirms it to you. But what I’m most perplexed by is that you seem to think that Mourinho thinks Lindelöf is so bad in the air that he would have to base his tactics around babysitting him, instead of just starting with a player that is ‘twice the player’ and whom Lindelöf has no strengths at all in comparison to. One thing is that any manager can make mistakes, but you must think Mourinho is certifiably mad.
You didn’t answer the question: What strengths do you imagine Mourinho sees in Lindelöf for him to select him over Smalling and Jones vs Leicester and Brighton, and over Bailly vs Burnley and Watford?
I’ll answer your question regarding my opinion of his strengths: He reads the game and the players around him well, he is disciplined, he has good understanding of the tactics, he positions himself well to stay close to players and mark space at the same time, he is good at maintaing the offside line, he is a fighter, he doesn’t rush headlessly into things, he is good with the ball at his feet and strikes hard, fairly precise and sensible passes, he has a good eye for a pass. He is responsible, and seeks to organize his fellow defenders as well as himself. He normally makes less mistakes per game than other defenders. He has few glaring weaknesses.
He has weaknesses too, but this was about strengths. He is not the worlds best in any of these faculties yet, and he will make mistakes showing he is not perfect in them, so it’s no point in pointing out that he sometimes misreads a situation, makes a bad pass or positions himself wrong. I’ll maintain, though, that in all these regards I mentioned, he is at this point better than any of the other CB’s at the club.
Wether he is a better defender in total is another matter. Or wether he will improve significantly enough to be a regular first choice for us. On current form I’m inclined to say he is the second best after Smalling, and that these two is our best CB pairing as well. I’m one of those yearning for Bailly to sort his weaknesses out, as I love him when he’s at his best.
He also sometimes simultaneously lowers his head and raises his shoulders. It's like he jumps and then ducks while in the air. It can be hilarious if it wasn't so infuriating.
How do you come to that conclusion, or have you been watching Bailly since he was a kid? A few games where he was good is not a good metric to guage his 'absolute best'. The truth is Smalling at his 'absolute best' was, and is one of the best defenders in the league.
If you only started watching Bailly when he joined Man Utd, then I don't know how you can even point out his absolute best or even consider it better than Smallings'.
Spot on.Good post.
This new Caf narrative that Fellaini is playing as No6 to protect Lindelöfs ”weakness” is ridicilous IMO.
We had major problems defensively last year as well when it came to long balls, crosses and corners, especially against the ”lesser” teams that play a more direct game.
This despite us having the most physically imposing team in the top 6. Its stupid to put the blame for this on a CB that didnt even play that much last year. You can put equally or more blame at the feet of Matic, Lukaku and Pogba that should do much better due to their physicality. As well as De Gea who still has a lot to do in the area of commanding and dominating his penalty area.
Mourinho was always going to address this problem first and foremost this year. Its probably the area where we conceded the most unnecessary goals last season.
By playing Fellaini there Mourinho has managed to remedy a situation that was a major problem last year. So far. It has very little to do with Lindelöf, who has his plus and minuses as well as the others in what actually is a very even CB-squad. Best form will play as it should be (even if I dont see Mourinho dropping Smalling for the same reason as he is playing Fellaini).
Stop trying on this nonsense in every thread that can be subtly traced back to a discussion about Smalling. Nobody is buying it.When Bailly is at his best he is better than Smalling has ever been. There's little to argue there if you have ever watched either of them. His problem is not his top level, it's his erratic performances.
Conspiracy theory?Ah, so you did exaggerate.
Your Fellaini ‘babysitter theory’ is borderline conspiracy theory, and I’m curious as to what in the actual game confirms it to you. But what I’m most perplexed by is that you seem to think that Mourinho thinks Lindelöf is so bad in the air that he would have to base his tactics around babysitting him, instead of just starting with a player that is ‘twice the player’ and whom Lindelöf has no strengths at all in comparison to. One thing is that any manager can makte mistakes, but you must think Mourinho is certifiably mad.
You didn’t answer the question: What strengths do you imagine Mourinho sees in Lindelöf for him to select him over Smalling and Jones vs Leicester and Brighton, and over Bailly vs Burnley and Watford?
I’ll answer your question regarding my opinion of his strengths: He reads the game and the players around him well, he is disciplined, he has good understanding of the tactics, he positions himself well to stay close to players and mark space at the same time, he is good at maintaing the offside line, he is a fighter, he doesn’t rush headlessly into things, he is good with the ball at his feet and strikes hard, fairly precise and sensible passes, he has a good eye for a pass. He is responsible, and seeks to organize his fellow defenders as well as himself. He normally makes less mistakes per game than other defenders. He has few glaring weaknesses.
He has weaknesses too, but this was about strengths. He is not the worlds best in any of these faculties yet, and he will make mistakes showing he is not perfect in them, so it’s no point in pointing out that he sometimes misreads a situation, makes a bad pass or positions himself wrong. I’ll maintain, though, that in all these regards I mentioned, he is at this point better than any of the other CB’s at the club.
Wether he is a better defender in total is another matter. Or wether he will improve significantly enough to be a regular first choice for us. On current form I’m inclined to say he is the second best after Smalling, and that these two is our best CB pairing as well. I’m one of those yearning for Bailly to sort his weaknesses out, as I love him when he’s at his best.
Seems so. Apparently he knows what Mourinho is thinking.You're talking to one of the posters who dislike Smalling intensely, so expecting to hear rational arguments is to be expecting too much tbh.
No, he started this season because Smalling was unfit. There is a reason Smalling is our first choice CB and he's barely fourth choice.There is a reason he has started the last two seasons and Smalling has been on the bench. He has the most ability of any of our defenders. Mourinho knows ultimately Smalling needs to be upgraded but his consistency is valuable when the rest can't be trusted for various reasons.
Stop trying on this nonsense in every thread that can be subtly traced back to a discussion about Smalling. Nobody is buying it.
You made a ridiculous point about him and Smalling so deal with it.It's the Eric Bailly thread. I post about him. It's not my fault there is a group of Smalling fans patrolling all the threads for mention of him. Any thread about any of our defenders is the same.