SATA
Full Member
Looking forward to the day he signs for us and hopefully very soon. Brilliant player, a top established name and he’s a vocal leader at the back
He sounds more than willing to leave to be fair.For Bayern to accept anything under 50m Eur would be extremely weird given 1) he's been quite good since he signed 2) he doesn't even want to leave and 3) he still has plenty of time on his contract
This will be one of the strangest transfers of the season if it goes through and a massive coup for us.
I knowETH did not sign Donny.
Bayern paid Juve £56 million plus add ons, paid in 5 yearly instalments. This was two years ago, and so they have £33 million left to pay Juve, his stock is lower than it was leaving Juve, and so I don’t really know why they would think they could demand any profit from the sale.
Would also be interesting to know how the wages factor into this. We’re always told the transfer fees we receive are smaller than other clubs because of high wages. I’m assuming Ineos won’t be wanting to pay him £250k a week.
They bought him for €67m and gave him a 5 year contract (I am not aware of any add-ons). Therefore, he still has a value of €40.2m in Bayern's books.They bought him for €67m + 10m, and are demanding €50m + ?. They're not getting a profit.
https://www.capology.com/club/bayern-munich/salaries/For Bayern to accept anything under 50m Eur would be extremely weird given 1) he's been quite good since he signed 2) he doesn't even want to leave and 3) he still has plenty of time on his contract
This will be one of the strangest transfers of the season if it goes through and a massive coup for us.
They bought him for €67m and gave him a 5 year contract (I am not aware of any add-ons). Therefore, he still has a value of €40.2m in Bayern's books.
Well, yes (I work in finance. I am aware of this. ).Yes, because the rest is already registered as a loss. Any sale over 40 is a profit in a bookkeeping sense, it doesn't mean they made a profit on the deal itself. It you sell something for less than you bought it for you're not profiting.
Say they bought for 67, sell for 50, and he has a book value of 40. That's a loss of 17, but since they've already registered a loss of 27 they adjust upward by 10.
I think 50m eur happens but it will need to be compromised on structureFor Bayern to accept anything under 50m Eur would be extremely weird given 1) he's been quite good since he signed 2) he doesn't even want to leave and 3) he still has plenty of time on his contract
This will be one of the strangest transfers of the season if it goes through and a massive coup for us.
Yeah not sure how much stock we can put on it but I’m sure there were links provided in this thread saying MDL only wants to join us and he’d be willing to take a lower salary (£220k pw being the figure I seem to recall). But yeah, I think the £35-£40m price already factors in a big discount for someone of his quality. IMO anyway.Bayern paid Juve £56 million plus add ons, paid in 5 yearly instalments. This was two years ago, and so they have £33 million left to pay Juve, his stock is lower than it was leaving Juve, and so I don’t really know why they would think they could demand any profit from the sale.
Would also be interesting to know how the wages factor into this. We’re always told the transfer fees we receive are smaller than other clubs because of high wages. I’m assuming Ineos won’t be wanting to pay him £250k a week.
I had heard the wages have been agreed already at £170k per week. He is taking quite a big salary drop to come here!Bayern paid Juve £56 million plus add ons, paid in 5 yearly instalments. This was two years ago, and so they have £33 million left to pay Juve, his stock is lower than it was leaving Juve, and so I don’t really know why they would think they could demand any profit from the sale.
Would also be interesting to know how the wages factor into this. We’re always told the transfer fees we receive are smaller than other clubs because of high wages. I’m assuming Ineos won’t be wanting to pay him £250k a week.
Salary. It's the same problem we'll have with selling Sancho and/or Rashford were a deal ever to happen.For Bayern to accept anything under 50m Eur would be extremely weird given 1) he's been quite good since he signed 2) he doesn't even want to leave and 3) he still has plenty of time on his contract
This will be one of the strangest transfers of the season if it goes through and a massive coup for us.
I’m walking off.when are we getting this digga in?
De Ligt is a starter and yes, his salary is one reason why Bayern is entertaining offers.https://www.capology.com/club/bayern-munich/salaries/
Their salary is so high..maybe it is a reason to get rid a non starter with high salary
"Wann kaufen wir den endlich, digga?!"when are we getting this digga in?
Ah read that wrong initially you sounded very excited.I’m walking off.
They bought him for €67m + 10m, and are demanding €50m + ?. They're not getting a profit.
@NotThatSoph From what I’ve seen, the fee was spread out in five instalments, and so they would have already paid two of them, leaving about €40 million.They bought him for €67m and gave him a 5 year contract (I am not aware of any add-ons). Therefore, he still has a value of €40.2m in Bayern's books.
I would be surprised if he just agrees to drops £80k per week to play for a non champions league club. Maybe we’ll pay £170k this season with a promise of it going up by 25% next season if we qualify again, like the other player contracts.I had heard the wages have been agreed already at £170k per week. He is taking quite a big salary drop to come here!
@NotThatSoph From what I’ve seen, the fee was spread out in five instalments, and so they would have already paid two of them, leaving about €40 million.
United have offered around €37 million by the sounds of it. Given his injury record, I’d say just about recouping the money is about all Bayern can ask for. It’s good negotiating by United.
Wrong thread. Pokemon go talk is in a different one.when are we getting this digga in?
"Wann kaufen wir den endlich, digga?!"
They want to get rid. That's how sales works.We're still lowballing Bayern for this one .
One thing I don't understand about this transfer is who would be starter at RCB? I bet we promised Yoro that status, and De Ligt would want it as well.
They really want Tah.For Bayern to accept anything under 50m Eur would be extremely weird given 1) he's been quite good since he signed 2) he doesn't even want to leave and 3) he still has plenty of time on his contract
This will be one of the strangest transfers of the season if it goes through and a massive coup for us.
Has anyone cried because we haven’t just paid what they are asking yet because £30m is a silly offer?
We offered 29M pounds, they want 42. Hopefully it gets done for 35 + possible add-ons.
I actually love the fact we're trying to lowball.
Seems like we're trying to undo our reputation as mugs who allow ourselves to be fleeced. Hopefully the days are over where clubs see us desperate pushovers in the transfer market who cave in to their inflated demands.
Hoping we're taking the same approach with our outgoings. No more silly transfer fees or subsidised loans for our players either.
You just need to be patient, and you'll get him for 30m easily.I reckon we end up paying what they want. Like the Yoro fee, I predict the number going up and up. Bayern are not selling for £30m.
Unwanted players on high wages. United knows about this issue. Bayern simply joined them in their strugles.We're still lowballing Bayern for this one .
One thing I don't understand about this transfer is who would be starter at RCB? I bet we promised Yoro that status, and De Ligt would want it as well.
I’m not claiming they’ve made a profit on the original transfer fee. It’s a profit in the way that financial fair play is currently being regulated by UEFA. Because he’s been at Bayern for two years, his value in accounting terms is no longer €56 million.I tried finding info on that, but couldn't. However, the payment plan is irrelevant, any outstanding payments is just debt.
If you sell your car for less than you bought it for, but more than you owe on your car loan, you haven't made a profit.
It's quite rightly a book-keeping profit of 10M given you have amortised 17 for the benefit of using the asset over two years and then someone comes along offering more than your remaining valuation of the asset.Yes, because the rest is already registered as a loss. Any sale over 40 is a profit in a bookkeeping sense, it doesn't mean they made a profit on the deal itself. It you sell something for less than you bought it for you're not profiting.
Say they bought for 67, sell for 50, and he has a book value of 40. That's a loss of 17, but since they've already registered a loss of 27 they adjust upward by 10.