- Joined
- Jul 8, 2023
- Messages
- 95
Low metric. He's still leaving in shots that Dave would save.Onana’s probably been our best player this season you weirdos, why are all talking as though it’s October 2023?
Low metric. He's still leaving in shots that Dave would save.Onana’s probably been our best player this season you weirdos, why are all talking as though it’s October 2023?
Low metric. He's still leaving in shots that Dave would save.
That’s how I feel too. Immensely happy for Dave. It just wasn’t working out for him with us anymore.Yeah, I’m convinced that this club is cursed.
Happy for him though. Genuinely.
As if Dave wasn't letting in howlers in his last 2/3 seasons. Revisionist history at its finest.Low metric. He's still leaving in shots that Dave would save.
We could have just kept him and saved lots of money, while going for someone like Restes.
There were very credible stories that De Gea was willing to sign a contract that United had drawn up on dramatically reduced wages, only for United to pull the plug last minute.We couldn’t “just keep him”. We had to make the best paid goalkeeper in the whole of the Premier League (with goalkeeping stats of a slightly below average PL keeper) even more better paid with a fat new contract. The exact opposite to what a club which was already paying far too much for mediocrity needed to so.
Even ignoring the footballing reasons to move him on it needed to be done as part of a long overdue overhaul of these stupid contracts we kept offering not very good footballers.
If the year out meant that Fiorentina got him on a reasonable salary then good for them. Let’s not pretend we had the same option.
EDIT: Think he might actually have been best paid goalkeeper in Europe?
What you should also mention though is that those rumoured dramatically reduced wages still would have put him at 7th or 8th best-paid keeper on the planet, down from #1 with a vast margin, but still a very questionable amount of money for someone whose form curve had been pointing down for years.There were very credible stories that De Gea was willing to sign a contract that United had drawn up on dramatically reduced wages, only for United to pull the plug last minute.
So what you're saying here isn't entirely truthful.
There were very credible stories that De Gea was willing to sign a contract that United had drawn up on dramatically reduced wages, only for United to pull the plug last minute.
So what you're saying here isn't entirely truthful.
The simple fact is United have moved on without De Gea and it's abundantly clear that the GK at United gets out under a lot of undue pressure leading to mistakes, De Gea was a brilliant keeper for United and would have continued to be one but Onana is proving his worth now after a very shaky start.
Not just that, he was the highest paid Spanish footballer of all time right up until Laporte moved to Saudi Arabia.We couldn’t “just keep him”. We had to make the best paid goalkeeper in the whole of the Premier League (with goalkeeping stats of a slightly below average PL keeper) even more better paid with a fat new contract. The exact opposite to what a club which was already paying far too much for mediocrity needed to so.
Even ignoring the footballing reasons to move him on it needed to be done as part of a long overdue overhaul of these stupid contracts we kept offering not very good footballers.
If the year out meant that Fiorentina got him on a reasonable salary then good for them. Let’s not pretend we had the same option.
EDIT: Think he might actually have been best paid goalkeeper in Europe?
You absolutely made that up. He was obviously on the decline and there were reports of him willing to accept lower wages.We couldn’t “just keep him”. We had to make the best paid goalkeeper in the whole of the Premier League (with goalkeeping stats of a slightly below average PL keeper) even more better paid with a fat new contract. The exact opposite to what a club which was already paying far too much for mediocrity needed to so.
Even ignoring the footballing reasons to move him on it needed to be done as part of a long overdue overhaul of these stupid contracts we kept offering not very good footballers.
If the year out meant that Fiorentina got him on a reasonable salary then good for them. Let’s not pretend we had the same option.
EDIT: Think he might actually have been best paid goalkeeper in Europe?
It's reported to be in the region of 150k/week, which still made him one of the best paid GK in the world, but a dramatic reduction from his previous contract nonetheless (and I don't for one second believe Fiorentina is paying him more than that). I think we are paying Onana about the same or slightly less (Italian media reported 7m Euro net, but would assume it includes all possible bonuses), but we also paid a 45m pound transfer fee on top of that, was it the right call the summer before last given how tight our PSR/FFP situation was? I'd argue not, not when we dont have the personnel in place to implement a possession game with the keeper heavily involved. Whatever blunders De Gea made during his last season, he kept 18 clean sheets in the league and we had 2 very good cup runs (and the not so good one could hardly be blamed on him, when we blew a two goal lead at home).I’m afraid I just don’t believe that. Footballers don’t sign their final contracts at their club on “dramatically reduced wages”. And exceptional claims like this require exceptional evidence.
You absolutely made that up. He was obviously on the decline and there were reports of him willing to accept lower wages.
Not just that, he was the highest paid Spanish footballer of all time right up until Laporte moved to Saudi Arabia.
It's reported to be in the region of 150k/week, which still made him one of the best paid GK in the world, but a dramatic reduction from his previous contract nonetheless (and I don't for one second believe Fiorentina is paying him more than that). I think we are paying Onana about the same or slightly less (Italian media reported 7m Euro net, but would assume it includes all possible bonuses), but we also paid a 45m pound transfer fee on top of that, was it the right call the summer before last given how tight our PSR/FFP situation was? I'd argue not, not when we dont have the personnel in place to implement a possession game with the keeper heavily involved. Whatever blunders De Gea made during his last season, he kept 18 clean sheets in the league and we had 2 very good cup runs (and the not so good one could hardly be blamed on him, when we blew a two goal lead at home).
Anyhow, that's all water under the bridge, we are where we are and it's good to see him enjoy his football.
It was more tongue and cheek based on him saving 2 penalties in a game while he struggled to save that many with us in 10 years.That’s how I feel too. Immensely happy for Dave. It just wasn’t working out for him with us anymore.
I don’t think we’re cursed. We just don’t have standards and a winning culture in the organisation. Huge lack of leadership too. And it starts at the top. I hope INEOS turns it around but must say that they’re going a bit slow for my tastes.
I still can't believe he took a year out. The short life of a footballer, 33 years old, he took a year out!
I just can't get my head around that. Whatever floats his boat and all that.
Another cryptic tweet. Celebrating EtH getting sacked?
ThisNah, I feel him. Sometimes you gotta revel in your enemies’ demise.
I like it when players show they’re human instead of super sanitised PR exercises