Tom Van Persie
No relation
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 27,473
I won't believe it until he officially signs with another club. It's just that nobody else (aside from maybe the Saudis) seems to be interested in him and the club is as usual dragging its feet in signing players this summer. I see the board dilly dallying the whole summer and offering ddg a last-minute contract in August (or even the extension of his current contract out of desperation) before the season starts.
If he really is leaving, why won't board secure another keeper before he's officially gone so that the other clubs don't fleece us even more? I wouldn't be surprised if the board is still leaving this "TBD" while they are tunnel visioned on Mount deal.
He's not very good in possession according to the tweet below. And so shouldn't be signed if the aim is to initiate attacks from deep.Surprised we are not interested in Vicario who is getting linke dwith SPurs now. £20m and a very promising keeper, much better than Hnderson who he replaces probably on a negative net spend both on transfer fee and wages, a quality second choice to provide viable competition to a ne number one.
Personally not totally convinced by Onana who seems heavily linked and popula ron here. Like his calmness on the ball, and he plays it our well AT the back, but his longer passing doesnt look great to me and I think he is a "good" keeper and a modern one, but not a great one. Think at £50m he is pretty expensive and dont have confidence in him being a great number one, prefer some of the cheaper options an dthink Spurs for all they hav edone wrong seem to be gettign good deals out of Serie A, Bentancaur is a very good player, Eomero I think is a top centre back who needs the right team and partner and Kulusevski though quiter this season and if they get Vicario, they have been good value signings with the exception of Romero maybe price wise.
Was always 50/50 on DeGea but the way he finished the season made my mind up. His career here had been under rated, especially in the elast few years with the modern keeper trend but he hasnt had a great season in a long time now, the good ones have still had error strewn spells. It is time to move on, but whatever the stats brigade say, as a personality, professional and experienced keeper, he isnt so easily replacable as people seem to say, it has been a huge burden being number one here for a lot of very good keepers
He's not very good in possession according to the tweet below. And so shouldn't be signed if the aim is to initiate attacks from deep.
He is good in possession, check out the stats in the responses to that tweet. Statistically he is better than Raya with passing. From what I can see all the fans in Italy rate him as good as or better than Donnarumma.
As long as he is better with his feet than Lloris (he is much better) I'll be happy.De Gea completes 68% of his passes, no one calls him as good on the ball.
Playing the ball doesn't mean just playing short passes, it's about not panicking and picking the right pass when pressed, ensuring team doesn't lose possession. This is something De Gea is poor at (including many other attributes), something that's Raya is good at. Not sure about the other Italian GK but the way stats are used is just wrong.
He does this every time his contract is up. He dithers until the very end and then eventually signs because he has no other options.I'd be pretty shocked if he stays now. The whole situation of him potentially staying didn't feel as convincing as it might have seemed despite the official line of the club. With 5 or 6 weeks of the season left the manager was hardly going to say "we don't want you anymore but try to help us get top 4 and win an FA cup final before you leave". I know a lot of people don't care but I wonder what De Gea's side of the story is.
As long as he is better with his feet than Lloris (he is much better) I'll be happy.
It's certainly an unusual situation playing out.
We've had reports the contract was all but agreed, reports De Gea was happy to take a pay cut, reports it was just awaiting United sign-off, reports that De Gea wouldn't be guaranteed #1, reports that it actually wasn't agreed, reports that De Gea didn't want to take a pay cut, reports that he was the one holding off, simultaneous reports that we were unsure we wanted to keep him, etc. All while the contract is running down.
Hard to tell to what extent it's a money issue, a squad status issue, hard bargaining, transfer priorities changing or the club trying to see De Gea to the exit door without it looking like he's been unceremoniously axed or deemed not up to the job. Maybe "we couldn't come to an agreement so the player leaves amicably at the end of his contract" is just the most polite way to manage the departure of a long-standing servant.
If reports are to be believed, I am very unhappy with how we have handled this. All the reports for months that Dave is happy to take a pay cut and terms have been agreed.
It seems the club has decided not to make a formal proposal at the last minute. That's not the way to treat a legend. If the club had doubts about him, they should have told him ages ago and allowed him to find a suitable club.
The club should have made this decision months ago.
If reports are to be believed, I am very unhappy with how we have handled this. All the reports for months that Dave is happy to take a pay cut and terms have been agreed.
It seems the club has decided not to make a formal proposal at the last minute. That's not the way to treat a legend. If the club had doubts about him, they should have told him ages ago and allowed him to find a suitable club.
The club should have made this decision months ago.
If reports are to be believed, I am very unhappy with how we have handled this. All the reports for months that Dave is happy to take a pay cut and terms have been agreed.
It seems the club has decided not to make a formal proposal at the last minute. That's not the way to treat a legend. If the club had doubts about him, they should have told him ages ago and allowed him to find a suitable club.
The club should have made this decision months ago.
Buffon on Vicario: "He might become even better than me, he's generational".Lloris has 77% pass completion as per fbref, that's better than Raya and other keeper.
Anyways I got the point, Lloris is shit, hard to get worse GK than him.
Buffon on Vicario: "He might become even better than me, he's generational".
However Buffon described Vicario as "extraordinary" and he said that he's "the future of the national team".
That's good enough for me!
Looks like the source for these quotes is Spurs fan facebook.
Stop trying to spoil my fun
In theory, yes.If reports are to be believed, I am very unhappy with how we have handled this. All the reports for months that Dave is happy to take a pay cut and terms have been agreed.
It seems the club has decided not to make a formal proposal at the last minute. That's not the way to treat a legend. If the club had doubts about him, they should have told him ages ago and allowed him to find a suitable club.
The club should have made this decision months ago.
If reports are to be believed, I am very unhappy with how we have handled this. All the reports for months that Dave is happy to take a pay cut and terms have been agreed.
It seems the club has decided not to make a formal proposal at the last minute. That's not the way to treat a legend. If the club had doubts about him, they should have told him ages ago and allowed him to find a suitable club.
The club should have made this decision months ago.
He hasn’t been offered any deal. At least, not formally.Once he rejected the first deal, he should have been told to find himself a new club.
That would've been risky though as it could have negatively impacted his performances during the latter stage of the season, especially as we didn't have a capable backup GK to keep him on his toes.He should just have been told many months ago that his services were no longer needed and we should have thanked him and given him a big send off.
This looks messy to me.
He hasn’t been offered any deal. At least, not formally.
He should just have been told many months ago that his services were no longer needed and we should have thanked him and given him a big send off.
This looks messy to me.
That would've been risky though as it could have negatively impacted his performances during the latter stage of the season, especially as we didn't have a capable backup GK to keep him on his toes.
Not that his performances were anything to write home about, but perhaps he would've dropped even more clangers if he had been told his services were no longer needed.
Not surprised, high wages and a lack of expectation are a sweet combo.
Agreed. I think the club is doing the right thing, he shouldn’t be our No1 and he can’t be a back up even on reduced wages.I see this as ddg making a last-ditch effort to publicly pressure the club using Romano.
If reports are to be believed, I am very unhappy with how we have handled this. All the reports for months that Dave is happy to take a pay cut and terms have been agreed.
It seems the club has decided not to make a formal proposal at the last minute. That's not the way to treat a legend. If the club had doubts about him, they should have told him ages ago and allowed him to find a suitable club.
The club should have made this decision months ago.
You're not convinced by Onana who has more experience playing at top level as well as experience in different leagues, major titles in Netherlands and Italy to his name, familiarity with Ten Hag's system and vast CL experience but you're more convinced by Vicario(turning 27 this year so not a youngster) who has never played outside Italy, never won a major title, never played in a European Competition and a virtually unknown entity in a position we need near on proven quality? I'm really struggling to see the reasoning hereSurprised we are not interested in Vicario who is getting linke dwith SPurs now. £20m and a very promising keeper, much better than Hnderson who he replaces probably on a negative net spend both on transfer fee and wages, a quality second choice to provide viable competition to a ne number one.
Personally not totally convinced by Onana who seems heavily linked and popula ron here. Like his calmness on the ball, and he plays it our well AT the back, but his longer passing doesnt look great to me and I think he is a "good" keeper and a modern one, but not a great one. Think at £50m he is pretty expensive and dont have confidence in him being a great number one, prefer some of the cheaper options an dthink Spurs for all they hav edone wrong seem to be gettign good deals out of Serie A, Bentancaur is a very good player, Eomero I think is a top centre back who needs the right team and partner and Kulusevski though quiter this season and if they get Vicario, they have been good value signings with the exception of Romero maybe price wise.
Was always 50/50 on DeGea but the way he finished the season made my mind up. His career here had been under rated, especially in the elast few years with the modern keeper trend but he hasnt had a great season in a long time now, the good ones have still had error strewn spells. It is time to move on, but whatever the stats brigade say, as a personality, professional and experienced keeper, he isnt so easily replacable as people seem to say, it has been a huge burden being number one here for a lot of very good keepers
You're not convinced by Onana who has more experience playing at top level as well as experience in different leagues, major titles in Netherlands and Italy to his name, familiarity with Ten Hag's system and vast CL experience but you're more convinced by Vicario(turning 27 this year so not a youngster) who has never played outside Italy, never won a major title, never played in a European Competition and a virtually unknown entity in a position we need near on proven quality? I'm really struggling to see the reasoning here
Plus Onana will cost £42m before add ons which is a good fee for a 27yr old top class GK in his prime. Vicario being cheaper isn't a guarantee he'll come good our last "cheap" signing from the Serie A(Darmian) flopped massively here
Vicario is a solid GK but he's a Tottenham level player. Pep himself before the CL final praised Onana for being so technically good that he singled out how hard it is to press against Inter because of the control Onana gives them at the back. That's a top level player