David de Gea image 1

David de Gea Spain flag

2022-23 Performances


View full 2022-23 profile

6.2 Season Average Rating
Appearances
58
Clean sheets
25
Goals
0
Assists
0
Yellow cards
2
Status
Not open for further replies.
Come on guys, take a day off from melting down for once. It was inevitable, you all knew it. A compromise appears to have been found, lower wages, potentially reduced role.

Bigger things to sort out this summer on and off the pitch so this relatively minor issue being solved now is a positive. Who knows, you might even get your new keeper as well.
It isn't a positive. A positive would have been kicking him to the curb.
 
I think if you sell Deano off this summer, we’ll free up some wages there because we gave him like £110k a week unsurprisingly (no doubt thanks to two guys called Edward and Matthew). Those wages and DDG’s slashed wages will go towards the new guy, with DDG being the domestic cup keeper for the season and he leaves after that. I’d be content with that.
 
Last edited:
Assuming if this news comes to fruition , Murtough would be first one out of the door once the ownership changes and Ten Hag would duly follow him before the end of next season if he is stupid enough to rely on De Gea as No 1 next season.
 
Good man Dave, get yourself to the street and kick a ball against a wall in all of your spare time.
 
No he wasn’t. He’d been great from pretty much when he arrived up to the end of 2018; six years if you don’t count his first year acclimatising to the league. But that disastrous World Cup in 2018 seriously dented his confidence and he was pretty awful the entire season following.

It was at the end of that awful season that in true Woodward style we gave him the huge pay rise :wenger:


The reports that the club wants to move him on and it’s only ETH that wants to keep him have a number of possible explanations. How about:
  1. The press are talking out of their collective arse.
  2. It’s true and ETH genuinely rates him, or at least regards getting rid of others first as more important.
  3. The club and ETH are actually in agreement, but Arnold/Murtough have stepped forward to take the flak. Dave has plenty of ardent fanboys and ETH won’t be popular if he’s shipped out.

Im not disagreeing with you btw, im just saying thats what people were saying around the time he got his contract extension. It made no sense then,its even more baffling now if we sign him.
If hes a starter, were looking at the same issues of trying to dominate games (in that we will struggle, even with Varane, Martinez back, Shaw back to LB, a better striker etc)
It will mean going for top four rather than the title.

If were offering this to DDG, fair play to him, why should he turn it down? I cant wait to see what the wages are. Even if they are 100k, its mad to have a second choice keeper on that, if thats what happens (and it wont)

This feckin owner takeover is the biggest piss take. We have no clarity at all in terms of whats happening, when it will happen and its going to feck up our transfer window.
 
We continue to be a terribly run football club. Really thought ETH would make a difference, but he is sliding down the same hill as everyone else.
 
It isn't a positive. A positive would have been kicking him to the curb.

It is. The club can focus on bigger issues and our actual problems, like scoring goals.

Binning DDG off and receiving no fee would have meant potentially dipping into funds desperately needed elsewhere. Which would have been unacceptable.

We rank 10th for goals scored.
We rank 5th for goals conceded.
We rank first for clean sheets.

It's blatantly obvious where we are dropping most points. The hysterical reactions to anything DDG does when we can't hit a barn door are boring and until we start putting the ball on the net with far more consistency, it won't matter at all who the keeper is.

So yeh, it's a positive.
 
We're not going to be winning anything serious for a while. Seriously dissappointed with ETH on this one.
 
There was never going to be that much money to bring in a new GK. I think it’s positive, still allows the chance to either bring in someone to compete who is happy to rotate or shape a GK for the future eg Kovar.
 
This is massively deflating and feels like the write off of another season. The only hope is he’s our number 2.
 
PR stunt, very suspicious timing considering it clearly says only the framework of the deal has been agreed yet hasn't been signed of by the club. Which surely means it hasn't actually been agreed.

If we sign him up, it will by by far the stupidest decision the club has quite possibly ever taken. It's an easy decision to release on a free no hassle. Thanks for the service Dave and good luck should be the message. Not here's a bumper new deal for years of failure.
 
I am one of his biggest critics this season, but I don't mind him as backup goalkeeper. His value is at all time low probably, so there's a chance we have a good deal here.
 
If he doesn't make that "schoolboy error", we don't concede. Remind me again how you lose without conceding?
I could ask: how can we win without scoring?
 
i def get the disappointment, was hoping to get a new gk in here (and still may). At same time if you go back to the brighton/west ham games, if our attackers could simply hit the fecking target couldve and shouldve had 3-4 goals easily in the first halves of those games before we went to shit.
 
What's that got to do with the price of fish? He said that De Gea wasn't the reason we lost, not that he was the reason we didn't win.
Yeah but you can also argue that if we took the chances that we really should have scored from then DDG's howler wouldn't have mattered
 
Pretty obvious this would happen. We don't have the money to sign a top goalie.

We need a striker and midfielder first. We probably don't even have money for both of them.

Good to see he's getting appearance bonuses. That's usually a sign your position isn't a guarantee
 
I am one of his biggest critics this season, but I don't mind him as backup goalkeeper. His value is at all time low probably, so there's a chance we have a good deal here.
Although the first bolded part is true, I think you may be overly optimistic with the 2nd part. :lol:
 
What's with the tactic of Shaw usually taking a short goal kick to De Gea to get the play moving?

Is this something that ETH used to do at Ajax, or is this a tactic he's come up with to babysit De Gea in the hope he's less likely to shit the bed?
United did this last season long before ETH was here, personally I think it's stupid because pretty much every team puts 2 players on the 18 yard line and puts pressure on straightaway
 
Pretty obvious this would happen. We don't have the money to sign a top goalie.

We need a striker and midfielder first. We probably don't even have money for both of them.

Good to see he's getting appearance bonuses. That's usually a sign your position isn't a guarantee
Almost every player contract have that .
 
It is. The club can focus on bigger issues and our actual problems, like scoring goals.

Binning DDG off and receiving no fee would have meant potentially dipping into funds desperately needed elsewhere. Which would have been unacceptable.

We rank 10th for goals scored.
We rank 5th for goals conceded.
We rank first for clean sheets.

It's blatantly obvious where we are dropping most points. The hysterical reactions to anything DDG does when we can't hit a barn door are boring and until we start putting the ball on the net with far more consistency, it won't matter at all who the keeper is.

So yeh, it's a positive.
De Gea is a massive issue and problem. I have no idea how you or anyone else can't see it.
 
Although the first bolded part is true, I think you may be overly optimistic with the 2nd part. :lol:
His actual value is zero, he doesn't sign a new contract he's worth nothing to United
 


Surprise surprise. I'll wait for official confirmation but if true this further cements the believe that this club has zero ambition and our only hope is that a new owner will make a total overhaul of the club and its rotten structures. It would also confirm that feck all changed since Woodward.

Can't wait for the usual suspects to come out of the woodwork to justify a ridiculous decision like that
 
De Gea is a massive issue and problem. I have no idea how you or anyone else can't see it.
We do see it, we just don't see it as the main priority. Neither to the club seemingly. We are horrendous in front of goal and our midfield can't retain the ball.
 
A new number one and De Gea staying as number two on reduced wages would be perfect for me. He would be a quality backup keeper.

(But we all know we won't be getting a new keeper and he will still start next season.)
 
It doesn't matter how 'main' a priority it is. It is a priority. It needs to be addressed immediately.

Nah it's fine. For a club as successful in the last couple of years as ours it's totally ok to wait and fix the issue from 5 years ago. It's a process you have to remember.
 
It makes sense. He's out of contract in the summer, Hendo will likely be sold + have no reserve keeper. Keeping him for another year or 2 isn't the worst decision. What else are we going to do, roll into the new season without a recognized keeper?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.