Danny Welbeck to Hull for £10m?

Playing in La Liga ffs. Also Benzema has only scored 20 goals ONCE for real madrid. He does not and is not a consistent goal scorer. Again, because he sacrifces it for Ronaldo.
He scored at least 20 goals a season every year since 2010. Including 23 goals in 4 seasons in the Champions League.
 
He scored at least 20 goals a season every year since 2010. Including 23 goals in 4 seasons in the Champions League.
I'm sorry when did this become about their goal records, I was asked if any club had a player that played welbecks role. I offered substantial proof, so you naysayers yet again change the subject to goals. What is it? Can't prove i'm wrong that big teams have a welbeck type player who won't score all the goals but will provide them.
 
I like Welbeck but he isn't going to get much of a sniff at CF this year injuries aside, & personally I'd rather see Wilson get the the number 3 slot if Hernandez goes, so what are the chances LvG could get him going properly as either a WB, or a winger? Seems to have all the attributes for it, or a bit more unlikely but as a box to box midfielder?

Just don't see him making it as a striker at United.
 
Playing in La Liga ffs. Also Benzema has only scored 20 goals ONCE for real madrid. He does not and is not a consistent goal scorer. Again, because he sacrifces it for Ronaldo.

10-11 = 26 in 48
11-12 = 32 in 52
12-13 = 20 in 50
13-14 = 24 in 52

Not bad for someone sacrificing everything so Ronaldo can score. Pretty damn consistent and he's a very good player. Certainly more consistent than Welbeck is in front of goal. One purple patch (and that's all it was) last year doesn't mean Danny is suddenly anything like a decent goalscorer.

Welbeck will do very well to get 20 in 50 once in his career, let alone consistently like that. I don't think he ever will.

People may very well reckon that £10m and Hull is a bit of an insult if they're fans of his, but ask yourselves, if he went for anything more, do you really reckon the Hull fans would be happy with him when he struggles so badly in front of goal?
 
I'm sorry when did this become about their goal records, I was asked if any club had a player that played welbecks role. I offered substantial proof, so you naysayers yet again change the subject to goals. What is it? Can't prove i'm wrong that big teams have a welbeck type player who won't score all the goals but will provide them.
What?

You said they don't score a lot of goals. They do. Benzema is a 20+ goal a season striker for Real Madrid. He's not as prolific as Cristiano Ronaldo, yes. You said he wasn't a consistent goalscorer. How is that not about his goal record?

He's not just kept for his hard work and sacrifice. He's also expected to score goals. And he does so, consistently. Which Welbeck needs to prove he can do.
 
That'd because they were at their peak years and had more experience and composure in their natural positions than Welbeck who is only 23 and has been shafted for other players.

Besides if you look at Welbeck's run when RVP and Rooney were both out, he scored every game leading up to the Sunderland COC game, you tell me if that's a sign he is anemic in front of goa?l? After that he was dropped and BARELY featured, a striker can also only score as many goals as the ball is given to him, considering the football we played that season he did well. Played better than RVP and Rooney in a lot of cases.

Aye, but I'm not the one comparing Welbeck to established strikers. I know you aren't but I'm being pedantic

He had an incredible run for 6 games... Only 6 games. It's a fool's errand extrapolating those to an entire season. I rate the lad highly, but he won't become a starter in our team unless he is given a deserved run of games for development. I'm willing to gamble on him, but I don't think the success starved fans and LvG will be that kind. For his own good he needs to leave for an upcoming team (Southampton?) and play week in and week out.
 
No way should we consider selling him. He is a very good fit for our new system and a good player already who is tactically flexible. And he has all the tools to take the next step and become very good pretty soon.

Some fans overrate him and some underrate him. Cannot judge him on numbers alone either.
 
No way should we consider selling him. He is a very good fit for our new system and a good player already who is tactically flexible. And he has all the tools to take the next step and become very good pretty soon.

Some fans overrate him and some underrate him. Cannot judge him on numbers alone either.

It's inexplicable that people rate him on goals, when he barely ever gets to play a full game up front, let alone a run. He's mostly out pissing about wide, or a sub.

if he played all season up front, it's unlikely he wouldn't get at least 15 goals.
 
Aye, but I'm not the one comparing Welbeck to established strikers. I know you aren't but I'm being pedantic

He had an incredible run for 6 games... Only 6 games. It's a fool's errand extrapolating those to an entire season. I rate the lad highly, but he won't become a starter in our team unless he is given a deserved run of games for development. I'm willing to gamble on him, but I don't think the success starved fans and LvG will be that kind. For his own good he needs to leave for an upcoming team (Southampton?) and play week in and week out.

He is our third striker in a new system that suits him and needs 2 strikers. And he offers something different to our first 2 strikers who have knacks of picking up injuries.

Not sure why would he leave the club he has been for so long at now. Plus he is the type of player that would do well surrounded by better players.
 
The Caf is hilarious. Benzema is way better than Welbeck. Welbeck is not a 20m footballer. Welbeck is not a 20-25 goal striker. He is not a late bloomer like Drogba. He has been playing for 5 years at United. Noone outside of our fanbase rates Welbeck highly.
 
Welbeck is overrated on the Caf and surprisingly continues to get the benefit of the doubt.

And rightly so. He is English, a manc who has come through the academy to start in some pretty big games, and he is still only 23. Many fans and more importantly the club, value the importance of a local lad coming through the academy/youth set up and becoming an important member of the squad or the team. The club will give him the time to reach his full potential and that's why Welbeck will get what you call the 'benefit of the doubt' from a lot of fans and most importantly the club.
 
The Caf is hilarious. Benzema is way better than Welbeck. Welbeck is not a 20m footballer. Welbeck is not a 20-25 goal striker. He is not a late bloomer like Drogba. He has been playing for 5 years at United. Noone outside of our fanbase rates Welbeck highly.

Obviously Roy Hodgson does.
 
Not sure what the point of this discussion is about. There is a group of people who will never rate Welbeck unless he explodes and becomes a world class striker scoring goals for fun. No amount of stats or comparisons will change their opinion. Just be happy they don't run the club.
 
I think that only in the caf Welbeck is rated higher than Eriksen...He makes our team better not because he is such a good player, but because he works hard for other players Btw better players dont make a better team, so you cant say that because with heam we are a better team, he is a hell of a player.

He doesn't make our team better because he works harder, he is involved as pretty much any other player when he is on the pitch, he is running with the ball, dribbling past players, makes good use of the ball, but you wouldn't understand that since you see him just as workhorse. IF you want to understand, just check at our preseason games with and without Welbeck and you'll see clear difference in our performances.

Right, here goes. Might as well, not that it'll do any good.


Erm, you said best player. Obviously the two are not comparable, but Lloris is a better goalkeeper by some distance than Welbeck is a striker. He's the French Captain, one of the best goalkeepers in the league and well known throughout Europe. Of course he's better than Welbeck.

"Vertonghen is an average defender" - Stop right there, please. Vertonghen was considered one of Ajax's biggest talents, came to Spurs and in his first season in the Premier League was the best defender in the league and made the team of the season. One poor season based on injuries and playing as left back and he's average? He's a very talented player who at his best is one of the best in the league. For some reason people rate him? He was bloody brilliant in his first season - both going forward and at the back. He probably wasn't far off Welbeck's best goalscoring season in the Prem whilst playing as a CB. He also wasn't "dropped" for Vermaelen for Belgium, he started against Argentina when they were knocked out and was pretty much regularly in the side. He played left back because they lack fullbacks, where he wasn't as effective.



Eriksen came in to this Spurs side at the worst side and was immediately our best player going forward, by an absolute mile, he did not just have a "good" first season, it was very good. Whilst Welbeck didn't always play - Eriksen also wasn't always in the side for a large portion of the season (He became one of the first names later on and suffered from injuries.) He was also played out of position often on the wing and was effective there

Eriksen had 7 goals and 9 assists. Welbeck had 9 goals and 2 assists. So no, they did not have "identical" stats. Eriksen had 2 less goals playing from an attacking midfielder position than Welbeck playing as a striker or at worst a left-winger. He's not meant to pump out goals though, that isn't his job. His job as a CAM is to create and he created 7 more goals than Welbeck, for a team severely lacking in firepower. In his first season in this league, playing in a less advanced position. My arse did he not have a better season than Welbeck.

To compare his stats to other players in his position, David Silva had 1 more assist in a far better side going forward, Ozil had the same assists as him and the likes of Hazard had 7 assists. These sorts of players aren't strikers so aren't expected to produce crazy statistics and the fact they have similar tallies isn't anything to crow about. It's actually pretty damn poor that Welbeck has only 2 more goals than an attacking midfielder new to the league.

Comparing him with Lloris is just ridiculous, I have no idea how to even compare keeper with outfield player, it's just stupid.

He is considered as one of Ajax's biggest talents and yet after all the talk no one from big clubs was even interested for him, even though lot of big teams bought lot of defenders at the time you bought him, meaning no one was really that impressed with him. Scott Parker was player of the year, it's quite obvious those lists are ridiculous. Steven Gerrard was there ahead of Yaya Toure, what's your point? The thing is that he is far from impressive as defender since he arrived in premierleague, only thing that is impressive about him is his ability with the ball and his physical abilities. He was actually very average in his first season, I remember he was making mistakes quite often yet no one was even mentioning that based on his form for about 5-10 games in first half of his first season in Spurs. He was dropped for Vermaelen immidiately after shit performance against Algeria, but Vermaelen being Vermaelen injured himself after 20 minutes and he was brought back to play because they had no options left.

Welbeck had 9 goals and 4(!) assists in 1461 minutes in premierleague last season(goal/assist every 112 minutes), and Eriksen had 9 goals and 7 assists in 1975 minutes(goal/assist every 123 minutes), so you are right, that's not identical, Welbeck was actually better looking at stats.
 
He doesn't make our team better because he works harder, he is involved as pretty much any other player when he is on the pitch, he is running with the ball, dribbling past players, makes good use of the ball, but you wouldn't understand that since you see him just as workhorse. IF you want to understand, just check at our preseason games with and without Welbeck and you'll see clear difference in our performances.



Comparing him with Lloris is just ridiculous, I have no idea how to even compare keeper with outfield player, it's just stupid.

He is considered as one of Ajax's biggest talents and yet after all the talk no one from big clubs was even interested for him, even though lot of big teams bought lot of defenders at the time you bought him, meaning no one was really that impressed with him. Scott Parker was player of the year, it's quite obvious those lists are ridiculous. Steven Gerrard was there ahead of Yaya Toure, what's your point? The thing is that he is far from impressive as defender since he arrived in premierleague, only thing that is impressive about him is his ability with the ball and his physical abilities. He was actually very average in his first season, I remember he was making mistakes quite often yet no one was even mentioning that based on his form for about 5-10 games in first half of his first season in Spurs. He was dropped for Vermaelen immidiately after shit performance against Algeria, but Vermaelen being Vermaelen injured himself after 20 minutes and he was brought back to play because they had no options left.

Welbeck had 9 goals and 4(!) assists in 1461 minutes in premierleague last season(goal/assist every 112 minutes), and Eriksen had 9 goals and 7 assists in 1975 minutes(goal/assist every 123 minutes), so you are right, that's not identical, Welbeck was actually better looking at stats.


Welbeck had 2 assists. No idea where you get your stats from.

The rest of what you said was absolute crap and your assessment of Vertonghen simply wrong on all levels.
 
Rafael, Rooney and Welbeck. My favorite players are either hated by our fans or constantly injured. What the feck has happened
 
Danny is still missing that factor that adds zeros on his number. He isn't a goalscorer. A poor finisher isn't exactly a hot topic for top clubs. It's also a trait that's very hard to take up. He's got pretty much most other things going for him besides finishing but imo that's a big piece missing.

He needs to get a move to progress. Better for his career, bad for us.
 
Yes he does because outside of Rooney and Sturridge there are no decent English strikers.

Says it all really. Should we consider Louis van Gaal's new 3-5-2 system as well as his habits, he will want players up front who are lethal and composed in the final third. With that regard, I would trust Wilson above Welbeck at the moment. For any striker who wants to have a successful career, especially for a top team, the thing he needs most as a bare minimum is instinct. Welbeck just doesn't have that, thus I also believe it's for the best for both parties that we cut all ties with him this time.
 
His chances to goals ratio isn't good enough.

I'd sell him and give Wilson a chance as 4th striker
 
Strange thread. Hull is making an offer as a main striker whereas at United he's a complimentary player who has a less than sparkling goal scoring rate. If he was such an interesting prospect then why hasn't Wolfsburg been heard on the matter? Why haven't we heard from other Champions League teams or Europa League teams making bids?

Hull was pretty good at times last year considering they were just promoted
 
Aye, but I'm not the one comparing Welbeck to established strikers. I know you aren't but I'm being pedantic

He had an incredible run for 6 games... Only 6 games. It's a fool's errand extrapolating those to an entire season. I rate the lad highly, but he won't become a starter in our team unless he is given a deserved run of games for development. I'm willing to gamble on him, but I don't think the success starved fans and LvG will be that kind. For his own good he needs to leave for an upcoming team (Southampton?) and play week in and week out.

With the number of games RvP and Rooney missed with injuries lasy season and a manager apparently intent on playing two specialist strikers in every game, this season looks like giving Danny more first team games in his preferred position than any season in his United career so far.

Would be an absolutely crazy time to leave.
 
This is never going to happen, but if it did I'd be raging. Selling Welbeck for 10 million is just ridiculous to even ponder.
 
Are they though? His level as it currently stands is probably a mid table team, so just above Hull's level. No top four side is going to make him their starting striker and the likes of Everton even have superior players like Lukaku.
Nonsense, absolute nonsense.
 
Well if Newcastle can get 35m for Andy Carroll from the Dippers maybe we can then get 50 for Welbeck and buy vidal straightaway;). I like the Little Pea but would prefer to keep Welbeck of the two.
 
From memory, Napoli and Real Madrid were interested according to sources no different from this one. If he was up for sale, more clubs will make an offer.

Nevertheless, I am not sure why I am entertaining this thread.


:rolleyes: