Hoof the ball
Full Member
Thanks for the reply!
Ah okay! I guess ill give it a bash and if im loving the game ill buy it.
DLSS 3.5 Raytracing overdrive will be a game changer for this game on PC.
Thanks for the reply!
Ah okay! I guess ill give it a bash and if im loving the game ill buy it.
Looks like CDPR delivered again. Very excited about it and just in time when I finish my 2nd BG3 playthrough
Yes which makes it a brilliant brilliant game regardless.If by delivered again you mean they finally gave us something close to the game we were initially promised almost 3 years later, then sure.
If by delivered again you mean they finally gave us something close to the game we were initially promised almost 3 years later, then sure.
What was promised?
A working game for one.
It worked fine on Next gen, but granted it was a shitty release.
But feature wise, specifically what was promised?
It worked fine on Next gen, but granted it was a shitty release.
But feature wise, specifically what was promised?
The article above is a good start, but even then, I specifically remember them saying that the opening segment would be very different depending on the background you pick for V. That wasn't the case at all, I think maybe the opening 30 minutes might have been slightly different and then it was the exact same. I played it through at launch and I can tell you that there's no way that's the game that CDPR, the studio that made The Witcher 3, wanted to release.It worked fine on Next gen, but granted it was a shitty release.
But feature wise, specifically what was promised?
If by delivered again you mean they finally gave us something close to the game we were initially promised almost 3 years later, then sure.
I don’t think it’s a gross exaggeration at all. CDPR basically promised us the biggest and best open world city ever in a game and what we got was a very, very, long way from that. Even now a lot of the reviews for Phantom Liberty say the city itself is still quite flatThat's a gross exaggeration, I played it a year in and at that point it was already in a great state. The fact it took a year is of course still shite.
I don’t think it’s a gross exaggeration at all. CDPR basically promised us the biggest and best open world city ever in a game and what we got was a very, very, long way from that. Even now a lot of the reviews for Phantom Liberty say the city itself is still quite flat
There's a difference between a broke game with huge functional gaps as was delivered day 1 and a game not living up to overhyped marketing bollocks. Plenty of top games still fail on the latter.
I get why those who played it at launch have a tainted view, it's probably hard to recover from that experience. Seems like for many though they waited and enjoyed a very good game.
The best trick CDPR played at launch was convincing everyone that it was only the bugs and the performance issues that were the problem. Even taking those away, the actual video game they released was nowhere near close to what they had promised. I don’t see how that can be argued. Almost 3 years later and they’re releasing a massive overhaul of the base game that actually delivers those things. 3 years!There's a difference between a broke game with huge functional gaps as was delivered day 1 and a game not living up to overhyped marketing bollocks. Plenty of top games still fail on the latter.
I get why those who played it at launch have a tainted view, it's probably hard to recover from that experience. Seems like for many though they waited and enjoyed a very good game.
I mean, this is basically the whole problem with the game. Imagine saying that about a GTA game And CDPR promised a city on par with GTA, if not better.And if you only focused on the quests and not free roaming, you didn't even notice most of the bugs.
From what I read about the update and Phantom Liberty, I still don't think its the game we thought it was going to be.The best trick CDPR played at launch was convincing everyone that it was only the bugs and the performance issues that were the problem. Even taking those away, the actual video game they released was nowhere near close to what they had promised. I don’t see how that can be argued. Almost 3 years later and they’re releasing a massive overhaul of the base game that actually delivers those things. 3 years!
plenty of video game companies deliver on the games they promise. It shouldn’t be acceptable to allow companies like CDPR to release cyberpunk in the state they did and not be tainted by it.
I mean, this is basically the whole problem with the game. Imagine saying that about a GTA game And CDPR promised a city on par with GTA, if not better.
I mean it’s actually better than GTA anyway (imo). Imagine saying GTA has characters or writing as good as this. Or that it’s an actual Rpg where you can role- play. The city is incredible - it just doesn’t have mindless filler ‘activities’.I mean, this is basically the whole problem with the game. Imagine saying that about a GTA game And CDPR promised a city on par with GTA, if not better.
I mean it’s actually better than GTA anyway (imo). Imagine saying GTA has characters or writing as good as this. Or that it’s an actual Rpg where you can role- play. The city is incredible - it just doesn’t have mindless filler ‘activities’.
We get it - you feel betrayed. But it’s a fantastic game now.
Am I not allowed to criticise it or something? Is that forbidden because you loved it?I mean it’s actually better than GTA anyway (imo). Imagine saying GTA has characters or writing as good as this. Or that it’s an actual Rpg where you can role- play. The city is incredible - it just doesn’t have mindless filler ‘activities’.
We get it - you feel betrayed. But it’s a fantastic game now.
but the post I quoted said CDPR “delivered again” which makes it sound like they’d already delivered on this game
I didn't read much of the marketing beforehand so it sounds like that department did a number on it, but CDPR releasing a GTA style game would be a big mistake for them and I would never have wanted or expected that. It wouldn't make the most of what they're good at which is focused engaging stories, RPG elements, good side missions and characters (exactly what W3 was fantastic at). I played Cyberpunk quite distanced from the marketing on day one and loved it for the aesthetics and story as it exactly what I want from that developer.
It helps that I was on PC judging by the bugs on consoles though so I'm sure there were a lot more issues for others.
I missed having a game as good as Gwent as a distraction mind.
Have to say it looks absolutely gorgeous in this video.
What do you mean?CDPR have delivered on this game as of about a year after release, imo. The launch was inexcusable of course, but it's been a great game for a long time now. Sounds like it's gotten even better.
I couldn't care less about GTA free roaming, but for those who do even that's there now. The GTA comparisons have always irked me - I don't want my immersive RPGs to devolve into "Press X to do thing" gameplay. I'd happily play launch CP2077 (on PC) over any GTA game.
What do you mean?