Judas
Open to offers
Isn't this less about City and more about the UAE wanting to be the top dogs? Hence why they're going to any lengths to achieve it? It's just a pissing contest.
You'd think HMRC would be crawling all over City's personnel.
This is a bigger issue though, because the reality is there is no way to ensure any owner isn't circumventing the rules, regardless of a salary cap. Nothing stopping an owner or shareholder offering a % of a fund they own or some random asset they own to a player via a string of companies that we couldn't trace.A wage cap means nothing to a state owner. They have banks and control an economy of their own. Circumventing a wage cap is the easiest form of cheating they can get away with.
All it would do is punish the non state owned clubs who are trying to compete with them.
Squad number limits are a smarter play than wage caps.
You are, the FA has nothing to do with any of thisI hope this happens, but unless I'm mistaken (very possible!), the FA don't decide what punishment City get for the 115 charges, they just decide if they're guilty.
Not if they've been told not to upset 'foreign relations'.You'd think HMRC would be crawling all over City's personnel.
City is UAE. Manchester City dont exist. They are just a physical form of the UAE's desperation to rule.Isn't this less about City and more about the UAE wanting to be the top dogs? Hence why they're going to any lengths to achieve it? It's just a pissing contest.
Likely they want to buy another club in the league, or indeed own the league.Something I don't get about the City project is why they have to continue to dominate football for the project to be seen by the owners as a success?
It would actually be far more in their favour for their arguments if they had won 2-3 fewer titles in recent years and taken the domestic cups a bit less seriously in the early rounds. They could still have been successful even without the alledged financial cheating, just by getting their structure and facilities sorted.
Their traditional clubs argument is also bizarre. united haven't won the league in 11 years. Liverpool have won 1 in 34 years, Arsenal only 1 in the last 20 years. Even worse, only two of those were won within the years since City first won the league.
Their goal for total dominance, rather than realistic but sustained success is hopefully going to be their undoing
Likely a bribe. £100m ffsMaybe there was some "extra" funding in the Grealish deal!
Isn't it the case that from early on if a journalist said anything bad about them they would get hounded by the City press office? I can't remember where I heard thatHave to laugh at the media suddenly getting all high and mighty.
You're the cnuts who brushed this aside and kissed their arse for a decade. Waxing lyrical about their style of football, gushing over Guardiola, saying they're the best PL side ever, praising City on their podcasts for having the best hospitality of any side. Greasy clowns got sportswashed for some gourmet sausage rolls but now the tide is finally turning and they're all hopping on the bandwagon to finger wag at them.
Isn't it the case that from early on if a journalist said anything bad about them they would get hounded by the City press office? I can't remember where I heard that
To rule what exactly?City is UAE. Manchester City dont exist. They are just a physical form of the UAE's desperation to rule.
I remember journalists (I forget specifically which ones) who were quite outspoken about how well City treated them and the amazing food in the press office and were using this as a stick to beat United with.
Yeah. I really want to start watching hurling live too, fantastic game but doesn’t transfer as well on tv.I’ve always got MLB and franchise cricket to watch too.
They’ll kill the goose that lays the golden eggs and this rate.
Jake Humphrey I believe
The sad and scary thing is it's probably all too little too late. The media, the government, the PL etc. have all fecked it.
I remember journalists (I forget specifically which ones) who were quite outspoken about how well City treated them and the amazing food in the press office and were using this as a stick to beat United with.
They should be made to bring a packed lunch with them. What's wrong with a few sandwiches and a yoghurt.It was a running joke on Sky's Sunday Supplement. Every week the hack morons would make some comment about how well city treated them compared to everyone else. It was thrown in along with praise for their youth set up and facilities etc. Nauseating
Shame it’s not a piss test.Isn't this less about City and more about the UAE wanting to be the top dogs? Hence why they're going to any lengths to achieve it? It's just a pissing contest.
This is a bigger issue though, because the reality is there is no way to ensure any owner isn't circumventing the rules, regardless of a salary cap. Nothing stopping an owner or shareholder offering a % of a fund they own or some random asset they own to a player via a string of companies that we couldn't trace.
What we should have is complete transparency of accounts, easier said than done, where as soon as you enter the PL you have to publicize all finances related to the club. Should just have a website like the Skateetaten one in Norway
Jesus
Maybe HMRC need to get involved looking into where money is going especially payments to avoid paying tax.
In a shocking twist of events, an authoritarian State does not like regulation telling them how they should act.https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-premier-league-is-to-become-less-competitive
Meanwhile in a parallel universe, plucky little City's chair claims that limiting the way that teams can receive sponsorship from companies controlled by their own owners will damage the chances of lesser teams being able to compete with the big boys.
Um...........
But how did they achieve that separate from the cheating and the injections of billions from their owners? The foundations of it all are rotten too!Something I don't get about the City project is why they have to continue to dominate football for the project to be seen by the owners as a success?
It would actually be far more in their favour for their arguments if they had won 2-3 fewer titles in recent years and taken the domestic cups a bit less seriously in the early rounds. They could still have been successful even without the alledged financial cheating, just by getting their structure and facilities sorted.
Their traditional clubs argument is also bizarre. united haven't won the league in 11 years. Liverpool have won 1 in 34 years, Arsenal only 1 in the last 20 years. Even worse, only two of those were won within the years since City first won the league.
Their goal for total dominance, rather than realistic but sustained success is hopefully going to be their undoing
Maybe this is why ex players are not talking about these off shore payments, a massive tax bill if HMRC ever gets involved plus whatever punishment for tax dodging. You would think something would of come out by now, but personal jeopardy is probably a good silencing technique.
The players must know whats happening, i can't think they are too stupid to realise they are getting 'free' money in a foreign bank account.
Against the usual 'assume stupidity over malice' i think what really is happening is well known by each individial man city player, current and ex players.
Cos of the above, punishing players (taking away medals etc) is fine by me
Fair enough, he really is. His name also sounds villainous.Why wouldn’t he? In many ways, he’s on another level to that.
And Ineos owned United, it makes perfect sense to inflate sponsorship deals to increase revenue so they can use Profits rather than Losses to pay of the historic debt?Villa are owned by the incredibly wealthy NSWE group.
Teams that are likely to back City are Newcastle, Villa and Chelsea.
None or very little?What access can HMRC expect to have to monies paid by an Abu Dhabi company into an Abu Dhabi bank account.
He follows many cliched villainous tropes too. And the games are only just beginning, now all this shit is out in the open. Threatening to cut funding to kids indeed.Fair enough, he really is. His name also sounds villainous.
Not true. They are limited companies. And you can not stop a limited company from making a capital increase. The EU court has ruled that sports clubs must comply with civil and commercial law.
You are, the FA has nothing to do with any of this
If City win this case it’s game over for the PL. I just hope if they do win there’s a huge backlash from the fans on an even bigger scale than the ESL protests. Get every game involving City called off. Something drastic needs to happen.