gajender
Full Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2016
- Messages
- 4,170
And that's a problem in itself with no disrespect to Rashford and Bruno .Bruno and Rashford are our best players.
And that's a problem in itself with no disrespect to Rashford and Bruno .Bruno and Rashford are our best players.
Went right over my head. Thanks!Think it’s a Roy Keane gag FYI
It's never good when the description of an ideal partner basically translates to a player that's basically better than you. If one even exists the team might as well even just build around the new player. Like if we get a unicorn of a CM that can control games we won't need Bruno limiting their effectiveness every other possession.Quality footballer. Just wish we had a Scholes like player next to him to dominate games while he produces moments to affect the score line. That way his weaknesses would be less glaring.
It's never good when the description of an ideal partner basically translates to a player that's basically better than you. If one even exists the team might as well even just build around the new player. Like if we get a unicorn of a CM that can control games we won't need Bruno limiting their effectiveness every other possession.
That holds true for many great players. Casmeiro in part had such an amazing career and performance levels because he had Modric and Kroos who suited his qualities well. It’s a team sport and there’s nothing wrong with building a cohesive unit that elevates it’s respective or parts.It's never good when the description of an ideal partner basically translates to a player that's basically better than you. If one even exists the team might as well even just build around the new player. Like if we get a unicorn of a CM that can control games we won't need Bruno limiting their effectiveness every other possession.
I don't agree, you need a Carrick type who can sit deep and then someone like Essien who will be the B2B and link everything whilst Bruo has that drifting 10 role. They don't need to be as good as Carrick/Essien mind you, it's more the player characteristics. I honestly think you would get a good balance with the Hojlund transfer + McT + Bruno but then you really call into question the player quality.I think he's right there in the middle of our issues on the ball. Building a possession comfy midfield around him is a nightmare. He's pretty much press-phobic so we need 2 unicorn midfielder partners that are not just competent on the ball but skillful enough to outplay 3 man midfields. That rules out even good midfielders like Casemiro. It's not that we won't ever win a midfield battle, it's more that we will never be consistent at it, not against the tougher midfields.
His caf average rating is awesome.
7
6.4
5.2
6.1
5.3
His caf average rating is awesome.
7
6.4
5.2
6.1
5.3
saturdays game was just a weird one, and hard to take a lot out of for looking at performances. With forest going up 2 so early, they went into an absolute shell for most of the rest first half. So stat wise our players just started to absolutely dominate because of that ball possession. Even 2nd half forest were sitting deep for the most part and just trying to hit a long break generally i thought (could be misremembering this part). Once we finally got the red card and eventually lead though seeing out the game was a joke from our players, way too many chances given to a 10- man squad. Overall i applaud their comeback to at least get the 3 points but i dont really look at the stats much from that gameBy all accounts he had a good game on Saturday. As is typical that has not been disputed, it’s largely the consensus and this is typically the case week in week out. The consensus of his performance is rarely polarised. Good or bad.
His caf average rating is awesome.
7
6.4
5.2
6.1
5.3
Bruno for my money is easily one of the best footballers we’ve ever had at the club. Wouldn’t look out of place in any of our great teams.It's never good when the description of an ideal partner basically translates to a player that's basically better than you. If one even exists the team might as well even just build around the new player. Like if we get a unicorn of a CM that can control games we won't need Bruno limiting their effectiveness every other possession.
It's never good when the description of an ideal partner basically translates to a player that's basically better than you. If one even exists the team might as well even just build around the new player. Like if we get a unicorn of a CM that can control games we won't need Bruno limiting their effectiveness every other possession.
Best, Law, Charlton, Edwards, Stiles, Crerand, Robson, Whiteside, Hughes, Pallister, Schmeichel, Bruce, Irwin, Ince, Keane, Giggs, Cantona, Beckham, Scholes, Neville, Stam, Yorke, Cole, Ole, Rio, Vidic, Evra, Ruud, Ronaldo, Rooney, RVP, DDG, VDS.Bruno for my money is easily one of the best footballers we’ve ever had at the club. Wouldn’t look out of place in any of our great teams.
Saying Scholes or Carrick etc are miles better is just not true. Bruno has consistently performed near their regular standards basically since he joined.
He’s been a United great but sadly played for us in the down time so gets more dirt thrown at his skillset.
Try playing Scholes next to McTomminay for a season…
Would expose Scholes weakness badly playing a pivot with someone who doesn’t shield a defence well.
It’s all about your teammates end of the day not just talent.
Best, Law, Charlton, Edwards, Stiles, Crerand, Robson, Whiteside, Hughes, Pallister, Schmeichel, Bruce, Irwin, Ince, Keane, Giggs, Cantona, Beckham, Scholes, Neville, Stam, Yorke, Cole, Ole, Rio, Vidic, Evra, Ruud, Ronaldo, Rooney, RVP, DDG, VDS.
Off the top of my head working through, these would be in the argument for the greatest team.
As good as Scholes? Just no. Scholes was unbelievable.
8 goals 8 assistsThis obsession with Bruno not being the type of player some people think a #10 has to be is just tunnell vision in my view, missing the bigger picture. The man has been creating big chances more than any other player in the PL, and he's been doing it consistently for more than 4 seasons. For most of that period he's also been putting up goals and assists like a good striker. Clearly a player who can do that isn't holding this team back.
Hahahahahahahahahanahahah sorry but hahahahahhahaSo is Bruno. They're just different kinds of player. Also, he's flat out better than several names on that list. Beckham, for example.
So is Bruno. They're just different kinds of player. Also, he's flat out better than several names on that list. Beckham, for example.
Beckham? Is there some other Beckham who has played for us?So is Bruno. They're just different kinds of player. Also, he's flat out better than several names on that list. Beckham, for example.
8 goals 8 assists
10 goals 6 assists
Last two seasons.
These are not the stats of a good striker?
Hahahahahahahahahanahahah sorry but hahahahahhaha
Beckham? Is there some other Beckham who has played for us?
So is Bruno. They're just different kinds of player. Also, he's flat out better than several names on that list. Beckham, for example.
You really want to have a discussion over that fundamental point?
Since arriving, he's got 45 PL goals and 34 assists in 124 games. You're not going to find a large number of players with better output than that.
Context, you know? Those numbers are incredibly inflated due to penalties.
Tell me how many of those goals are penalties. Context, you know? Those numbers are incredibly inflated due to penalties.
That goes for a lot of other good attackers too. 16 PL goals were penalties.