Actually, I was jumping inbetween your conversation ^^ I think, the user didn't want to compare quality or fit - he argued, that the existence of some good to very good stats doesn't necessarily have dictate a general judgement about the players quality. Which I think we should be able to agree to. If you have a player, who is doing wonderful things but also does reckless things that put the team under pressure, how do you judge such a player? What do we value more - the positives or the negatives? What is better, somebody with low lows and high highs or somebody without those fluctuations.I wasn’t responding to your point, though. He wasn’t making a point about fit. He was making a point about quality. Bruno plays shit per 90 and creates chances, with some comparison to Ruud.
We all know, that it takes more to create a very successful and functioning team. Good players are essential, but sometimes, but not all good players fit every team. Bruno does fit us right now - but this status quo is something, that many fans expect to change at some point in time. And I think, it is a very fair question, if Bruno will be a accelerating or decelerating factor in that.